The Mysoreans who won Battle of Haifa,paved way for creation of Israel.

[user1]

I am just amazed that how Indians have contribution in almost every aspect of past and present that defies belief; especially in religion they sometimes come with the most paradoxical idiosyncracies.

I was only recovering of the shock of inclusion of Jesus Christ in Hindu pantheon that I got dumbstruck by Husseini Brahmins.

 

[UKBengali]

But then again some people want to deny the existence of Israel as a state now,which is absurd.Because they are here to stay and have the powerful militaries in that region.

That is what the Crusaders thought just before they got wiped out.

 

[wolfschanzze]

I am just amazed that how Indians have contribution in almost every aspect of past and present that defies belief; especially in religion they sometimes come with the most paradoxical idiosyncracies.

I was only recovering of the shock of inclusion of Jesus Christ in Hindu pantheon that I got dumbstruck by Husseini Brahmins.

'
Jesus christ as hindu is the construct of evangelicals from west who want to dupe innocent tribals into thinking jesus was a hindu and therefore conversion to christianity is the same as hinduism.

India is a big nation of course it has contribution in many things, the discovery of Americas was due to India.
When Europeans tried to chart a route to India.

That is what the Crusaders thought just before they got wiped out.

Israel is strong and it took on 5 nations in war and won.That itself should tell you how strong as a military power they are.Not to mention the nukes they have.

If sun is shinning bright, and a blind man insists there is no sun.

What would you do?


Israel is here to stay for a long long time - InshaAllah




,,,,

The palestinians should settle for a peaceful dialogue, if you can't beat them join them, fighting against them is abdsurd when 5 nations combined lost in a war against them."If you cab't beat them join them".
Or become a Secular country like Turkey.

 

[FaujHistorian]

'
The palestinians should settle for a peaceful dialogue, if you can't beat them join them, fighting against them is abdsurd when 5 nations combined lost in a war against them."If you cab't beat them join them".
Or become a Secular country like Turkey.

Even though it is nice approach. What you say is uniquely Indian way of thinking. It evolved in India under specific circumstances. Therefore not applicable to ME that is Middle East.

 

[JonAsad]

Whatever it our soldiers not yours.
Our soldiers are being honored for paving way to formation of Israel from ottoman rule of 400 years.
Were glad we helped our bit .

I am glad you claim all the traitors for yourself as a indian- the traitors back home were killing hindustanis and freedom fighters on behest of the British -
I am glad you want to associate yourself with the sellouts-
I dont want any part of their inglorious history of boot licking and slavery- I curse them sold out souls ready to fight for and die at their imperial gora masters will- Have them all-

 

[wolfschanzze]

I am glad you claim all the traitors for yourself as a indian- the traitors back home were killing hindustanis and freedom fighters on behest of the British -
I am glad you want to associate yourself with the sellouts-
I dont want any part of their inglorious history of boot licking and slavery- I curse them sold out souls ready to fight for and die at their imperial gora masters will- Have them all-

You already separated yourself from India, what more do you want?looks like you anger dwells from the fact that these soldiers were instrumental in breaking the caliphate and paving way for formation of israel.
History is history.

 

[FaujHistorian]

You already separated yourself from India, what more do you want?looks like you anger dwells from the fact that these soldiers were instrumental in breaking the caliphate and paving way for formation of israel.
History is history.

Actually Gandhi Ji was honorary Lt in British Indian army and thus tried his best to recruit more young men for the army.

But he also supported Khilafat movement.

Such are the strange behaviors of politicians.

 

[JonAsad]

You already separated yourself from India, what more do you want?looks like you anger dwells from the fact that these soldiers were instrumental in breaking the caliphate and paving way for formation of israel.
History is history.

Lol that caliphate was soon going to be history one way or another- you should really feel proud to be used as as sweepers to do some one elses dirty work- glorify it as much as you want- the facts wont change-

 

[jamahir]

these same "mysoreans" were involved in an earlier crime... invasion of the fort of tipu sultan in 1799. it took five militaries to overcome the might of the tiger... what say you, @wolfschanzze ??

"mysoreans"... puppets of the britishers then, puppets of the britishers now.

'fighting against them is absurd when 5 nations combined lost in a war against them."If you cab't beat them join them".

western bloc invasion of north korea, 1950 == invaders were the usa, south korea and their allies in the united nations of america. how many invading militaries?? and yet, north korea survived and became stronger.

western bloc invasion of iraq, 1990 == invaders were 34 militaries. iraq survived.

western bloc invasion of iraq, 2003 == invaders were militaries of nato. iraq socialist government overthrown. but baath movement resistance continues.

western bloc invasion of libyan socialist jamahiriya, 2011 == invaders were 35+ militaries of nato and allies, plus al qaeda, taliban, al-qaeda, taliban, jemah islamiya, ikhwaan ul muslimoon, hamas, hezbollah, al shabaab. jamahiriya government overthrow. but jamahiri resistance continues.

western bloc invasion of syria, 2011 == invaders were special forces of nato and allies, and al qaeda, taliban, jemah islamiya, ikhwaan ul muslimoon, hamas. but the syrian arab army fights on.

'Or become a Secular country like Turkey.

i don't want secular countries. i want a socialist world.

 

[FaujHistorian]

I am glad you claim all the traitors for yourself as a indian- the traitors back home were killing hindustanis and freedom fighters on behest of the British -
I am glad you want to associate yourself with the sellouts-
I dont want any part of their inglorious history of boot licking and slavery- I curse them sold out souls ready to fight for and die at their imperial gora masters will- Have them all-

Please checkout the following piece on history to see who were the real big name "traitors".


Muslim and Hindu leaders who were loyalists of British Empire

 

[JonAsad]

Please checkout the following piece on history to see who were the real big name "traitors".


Muslim and Hindu leaders who were loyalists of British Empire

I disown them all- I think I have already cleared that bit fauji-

Plus Molanas are the most confused lot on the planet earth- deen or duniya both-

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You already separated yourself from India, what more do you want?looks like you anger dwells from the fact that these soldiers were instrumental in breaking the caliphate and paving way for formation of israel.
History is history.

Didnt the Indians in British Army helped British win the mutiny of 1856-1857? Mutiny of 1856-57 was also called War of Indian Freedom What could be worse than Indians helping British to keep India OCCUPIED BY BRITISH

If Indians can help British to OCCUPY INDIA OFFICIALLY, then Indians can do anything

 

[wolfschanzze]

these same "mysoreans" were involved in an earlier crime... invasion of the fort of tipu sultan in 1799. it took five militaries to overcome the might of the tiger... what say you, @wolfschanzze ??

"mysoreans"... puppets of the britishers then, puppets of the britishers now.



western bloc invasion of north korea, 1950 == invaders were the usa, south korea and their allies in the united nations of america. how many invading militaries?? and yet, north korea survived and became stronger.

western bloc invasion of iraq, 1990 == invaders were 34 militaries. iraq survived.

western bloc invasion of iraq, 2003 == invaders were militaries of nato. iraq socialist government overthrown. but baath movement resistance continues.

western bloc invasion of libyan socialist jamahiriya, 2011 == invaders were 35+ militaries of nato and allies, plus al qaeda, taliban, al-qaeda, taliban, jemah islamiya, ikhwaan ul muslimoon, hamas, hezbollah, al shabaab. jamahiriya government overthrow. but jamahiri resistance continues.

western bloc invasion of syria, 2011 == invaders were special forces of nato and allies, and al qaeda, taliban, jemah islamiya, ikhwaan ul muslimoon, hamas. but the syrian arab army fights on.


i don't want secular countries. i want a socialist world.

Didn't Tipu bite the dust or not?
Mysoreans puppets of british" NOW" ?

That earlier conflicts you stated were in cold war eta, where they had backing of Soviet Union so they survived the onslaught.

Iraq war was a one way street,Iraqi army left thier tanks and ran when Nato was bombing them,You cannot fight a enemy you cannot see,Thet met their objectives in war and left.

Dragging on a war is pointless if your objectives are met.Where is Iraq today?

Nato came to Afghanisthan ousted taliban, killed its main leaders and established democracy that is a win.its job is done so its leaving, it will leave behind a small contingent of soldiers 2000-3000 special ops in permanent bases in afghanisthan.
You wont be getting any socialist world, it is dead, Even the chinese have turned away from socialist ideas.The future of world is Capitalist.

Didnt the Indians in British Army helped British win the mutiny of 1856-1857? Mutiny of 1856-57 was also called War of Indian Freedom What could be worse than Indians helping British to keep India OCCUPIED BY BRITISH

This is about what Indian soldiers did in WW1 not about revolt of 1857.

 

[FaujHistorian]

Didnt the Indians in British Army helped British win the mutiny of 1856-1857? Mutiny of 1856-57 was also called War of Indian Freedom What could be worse than Indians helping British to keep India OCCUPIED BY BRITISH

valid point.

but just imagine if the mutineers would have won.

They were shooting people just on the rumors of pig fat and beef fat.

Briish India would have turned into a large Afghanistan.

So sometimes we have to be careful in asking for something. But if we get it, it could have been pretty bad.


Anyways that is just :if then: history game that never gets to anything.


hope you understand.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

This is about what Indian soldiers did in WW1 not about revolt of 1857.

If they can make wrong decisions in 1857 and get their own country occupied by British then they can certainly do other blunders too

BTW you called war of 1857 "REVOLT of 1857" and not "INDIAN FREEDOM WAR". Just goes to show how you think about your own FREEDOM WAR