I don't know if you are addressing me or someone else. But let me deal with your post anyway. Your colleague wrote, the Indian court wouldn't admit confession under medical sedation. Please tell me, would your court admit confession under duress and brutality? Is confession taken by using violence and torture admissible in Indian Court?
Neither is admissiable in an Indian court... But I am confused at your changing points... What is it that you want to point at?
1. Is 26/11 stage managed...? I had used a reference in Khaleej times which states that some rogue elements were indeed involved and thus, it can not be stage managed... That is why the whole world is asking Pakistan and even for the heck of it, Pakistan authorities had to call Hafiz Saeed for investogations.. So it can not be a fluke mate.... Plus, if there was any indian hand in it and that had been the case, it would have reflected somewhere in Indian or american Investigations... if we can arrest a major on charges of Samjahuta, then in 26/11 kind of an incident no one would have been spared - state or non-state...
2. What Kasab is saying is Gospel truth? Arguably not and Indian courts will not accept what he said under duress or any other influence... he will have to accept or state his statements in his full aware/awaken self and only is it admissible... Only circumstantial evidence can be used to counter him, if he changes his statements... But none can be forced...
3. Is Kasab not Pakistani? I don't think anyone needs to prove it... It has been accepted at so many forums, news channels (and Pakistani channels only) have shown his home etc... if you want to defend the undefendable, I am sure you will have to come with some solid support grounds to your conspiracy theory...
4. Indian police is Brutal... That is a fact ! But, is beyond the purview of this argument as courts will not accept anything that police gets out of somebody using stick... and btw, these videos (after they have been reported) have led to suspension/termination of culprits... Indian press is overactive (and at times borders on being provocative), but they do help invoke public hue n cry in such instances and lead to swift action
The larger point is, that the courts have found him guilty based on grounds definitely other than the recording that you see... and has been clearly addressed as a pakistani who has asked for access to and help from Pakistani consulate (btw, the truth tests are done in hospitals under medical supervision only, police can not administer them and thus the cleaner surrounding) and pakistan has also aknowledged the involvement of non-state actors in it...
what i am not clear is what is your point or what are you trying to get at... I am happy to debate (although I am not qualified enough ), but not on your subjective rants like pakistanis speak better language, or a terrorist should have done better under interrogation etc etc...
My friend, it is very easy to point fingers and said you did that and not us... look at so many incidents in pakistan and all i see (for majority and with exception of some right thinking fellows) is blame Raw, CIA and everybody else... but not even a look or concern for the rut within... We lost 166 civilians on that fateful day and for no fault of theirs... For you to even suggest that it is stage managed looks like a disrespect to the dead and those who lost their dear ones... Calling it a drame is not fair... to say the least!
I don't believe that any pakistani agency can kill its own people and in a similar way, I don't believe (and have seen no reasons) that an indian agency can be involved in such a barbarous attack on its own people... It has been proven so many times that the attack originated from Pakistani soil, so why do you want to open that wound and rub the salt by arguing for something which is zero defence at all...