What's new

The most expensive and least expansive fighter aircrafts

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
List prices of some fighter jets
Prices are approximate and can be reduced or raised depending on the buying country, the number of aircrafts and the package of additions and modifications required..
The list below gives an idea of prices and is almost close to reality and sometimes touches it..


F-22 Raptor $150 million

1024px-Lockheed_Martin_F-22A_Raptor_JSOH.jpg


Typhoon Tranch-3 $120 million


c548a8e107c3a4a03588c3520dfb40f9.jpg


F35 C
$115 million, F35 B $100 million, F35 A $97 million


1200px-F-35C_landing_on_USS_Nimitz_%28CVN-68%29_in_November_2014_%2801%29.JPG


USS_America%27s_Test_F-35_Flight_Operations.jpg


800px-F-35A_-_Inauguration_Towing.jpg


F15 K
$95 million


maxresdefault.jpg


Rafale
$84 million


maxresdefault.jpg


Sukhoi 35 S
$63 million, Su-30 MKA $52 million, Sukhoi 30 MKM $51 million


Russian-Sukhoi-SU-35S-new-Fighter-enters-service-1.jpg


e95045af4679accc2495c23606a2a4f3.png


1024px-Royal_Malaysian_Air_Force_Sukhoi_Su-30MKM_over_the_South_China_Sea_in_May_2015.JPG


F18
$55 million


how-to-fly-your-f18.jpg


F-16 Block 70
$50 million


1497554263613.jpg


Gripen-39
$47 million


Gripen_05.jpg


MIG 35
$36 million, MIG 29K $30 million

1024px-Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-35_MAKS%272007_Pichugin.jpg


%D0%9C%D0%90%D0%9A%D0%A1-2007-%D0%97%D0%92%D0%93-017.jpg


JF-17 Block 3 $29
million, JF-17 Block -2 $25 million


PAF-JF17Thunder-PakistanAirForce-induction-multirole-jetfighter-jet_6-16-2015_188217_l.jpg


110514023898e48729ab729edc_jpg_thumb-740x357.jpg


J-10A
$26 million


1024px-Chengdu_10.jpg


T-50 $25 million

1024px-T-50_Golden_Eagle_Lining_up.jpg
 
. . . . .
Because, India is willing to pay such price.
India is not buying Typhoons.
Why Typhoons are so expensive???
Because the design of typhoons are such that it's aerodynamically unstable, and requires a lot of sensors and controllers to stabilize making them very expensive, and maneuverable.
 
. .
These are wrong prices India bought 1 Rafael for $120 million

these are the base price... which we got was well customized ones.

And MKIs are also comes areound 100mil a plane
 
.
India is not buying Typhoons.

Because the design of typhoons are such that it's aerodynamically unstable, and requires a lot of sensors and controllers to stabilize making them very expensive, and maneuverable.
Every modern platforms have dynamically unstable airframes including LCA Tejas... Jf17 is an exception... it has stable configuration... Unstable platforms are more maneuverable and must need FBW in all axis...
 
.
Sir my bad, it was Rafael.
No probs.. The price mentioned is unit cost.

Every modern platforms have dynamically unstable airframes including LCA Tejas... Jf17 is an exception... it has stable configuration... Unstable platforms are more maneuverable and must need FBW in all axis...
You are right, but compared to Rafaels, Typhoons have can maneuver better at Supersonic speeds. While Rafaels are long endurance strike fighters, with better weapons carrying capacity. And faring one of the best engines, compared to the Rafael.
 
.
Every modern platforms have dynamically unstable airframes including LCA Tejas... Jf17 is an exception... it has stable configuration... Unstable platforms are more maneuverable and must need FBW in all axis...
How can you come to the result that JF-17 is a stable design, it too has a FBW, 2 axis in block 2 and has been upgraded to a 3 axis FBW in JF-17 B. The design is heavily based on the F-7 and the F-16, both of which are highly maneuverable fighters in their own right. The JF-17 has exhibited decent maneuverability in all airshows.
 
.
How can you come to the result that JF-17 is a stable design, it too has a FBW, 2 axis in block 2 and has been upgraded to a 3 axis FBW in JF-17 B. The design is heavily based on the F-7 and the F-16, both of which are highly maneuverable fighters in their own right. The JF-17 has exhibited decent maneuverability in all airshows.
The answer lies in your comment... An unstable airframe must need FBW in all axis... Even a very skilled pilot can't control an unstable airframe without the help of flight control computers...
 
.
The answer lies in your comment... An unstable airframe must need FBW in all axis... Even a very skilled pilot can't control an unstable airframe without the help of flight control computers...
So the block 1 and block 2 are comparatively stable when compared to the JF-17 B (which also makes use of swept back stabiliser instead of vertical one).

https://defence.pk/pdf/attachments/thunder-ac-jpeg.456777/
Really hope that the block 3 design is based on this. It does look to be more unstable design.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom