Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
So Abu Rayhan Biruni and Avicenna must be hallucinating when they were Criticizing Al-razi for his religious Beliefs .
Al-Razi's religious and philosophical views were later criticized by Persian Islamic philosophers such as Abu Rayhan Biruni and Avicenna in the early 11th century. Biruni in particular wrote a short Risala treatise dealing with al-Razi, criticizing him for his sympathy with Manichaeism, his Hermetical writings, his religious and philosophical views,for refusing to mathematize physics, and his active opposition to mathematics. Avicenna, who was himself a physician and philosopher, also criticized al-Razi. During a debate with Biruni, Avicenna stated:
Or from Muhammad ibn Zakariyyab al-Razi, who meddles in metaphysics and exceeds his competence. He should have remained confined to surgery and to urine and stool testing—indeed he exposed himself and showed his ignorance in these matters.
Scholars criticize each other to ignite debates even after those writers are dead, it has been part of the scholarly culture for centuries. If you know anything about PhDs these days, too they go by "peer review" process which is a fancy name for finding flaws and criticism in someone else's work. Iqbal was also criticized and even fatwas were issued against him after he wrote Shikwa'h Allama Iqbal Poetry
Then he wrote "Jawab-e-Shikwa'h" Allama Iqbal Poetry and everyone was shut but there were still people, criticizing him.
In Islamic jurisprudence, no one has the right to tag other Muslims as Non Muslims until they renounce the basic tenants of Islam, which never was the case with these men even with all of the propaganda around done by Ismael right wing goons and others.