What's new

The Indian Mindset

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Pakistan is already trying some 6 ppl in connection with the attacks, but unfortunately in lahore high court - the best friend of terrorists outside of rawalpindi.

If Pakistan wasn't taking action against the perpetrators of 26/11 Mumbai attacks, then why is it trying 6 people in connection to the attack? Why are you contradicting yourself?

The men that are being tried have been accused of acting out of their individual capacity. To implicate the JuD in the attacks, you were asked to provide evidence against Hafiz Saeed (the head of the organization) implicating him, but you failed to do that.

The terrorist org is based in pakistan, trains in pakistan, raises funds in pakistan (even before the so called lift of ban as you claimed), plans attacks in pakistan, launches them from pakistani soil, coordinates from pakistani soil, the perpetrators are pakistani.

The Pakistani authorities have clamped on the LeT network & taken significant action against them. Your nation was asked to prove the evidence linking the LeT & JuD, but you failed to do that.
 
.
Bahi Sahib.....why do you assume that these are my words.??? ..... please read the article again to understand that it's an Indian author's disclosure about his experience on the Indian way of thinking. Adaab.

if im not wrong hes the same idiot who in an interview with moeed pirzada was saying that if he gets his way he will break the gate (dont know which gate he was talking about) between the two nations & will take its iron to his house !!!!! wow & who posted that dickheads fanatsies on this thread ????????? windy bhai these JNU type, good for nothing idiots write anything to get some audiance because nobody gives them a second look so to be different & sensational they spew such s*** , we have also likes of arundati something also , wake up dude unlike you beloved nation we dont make heros out of jockers like zion hameed .....adaab.
 
.
Of all the Indian members here, I'd have to say you are probably the most consistently hateful I've encountered.

Thank you! Coming from the best friend of CD, that really really means a lot. *sniff*

If Pakistan wasn't taking action against the perpetrators of 26/11 Mumbai attacks, then why is it trying 6 people in connection to the attack. Why are you contradicting yourself?

The men that are being tried have been accused of acting out of their individual capacity. To implicate the JuD in the attacks, you were asked to provide evidence against Hafiz Saeed (the head of the organization) implicating him, but you failed to do that.



The Pakistani authorities have clamped on the LeT network & taken significant action against them. Your nation was asked to prove the evidence linking the LeT & JuD, but you failed to do that.


BS excuse, as pointed out even when JUD was banned, they were raising funds in newspapers. Rest of the typical plausible deniability national routine is as discredited as your fight against terrorism.
 
. .
if im not wrong hes the same idiot who in an interview with moeed pirzada was saying that if he gets his way he will break the gate (dont know which gate he was talking about) between the two nations & will take its iron to his house !!!!! wow & who posted that dickheads fanatsies on this thread ????????? windy bhai these JNU type, good for nothing idiots write anything to get some audiance because nobody gives them a second look so to be different & sensational they spew such s*** , we have also likes of arundati something also , wake up dude unlike you beloved nation we dont make heros out of jockers like zion hameed .....adaab.

Tall talk and cheap banter doesn't cost a dime......however it's a different case when you have the likes of Ball Thakrey dictating your foreign policy.
 
. .
BS excuse, as pointed out even when JUD was banned, they were raising funds in newspapers. Rest of the typical plausible deniability national routine is as discredited as your fight against terrorism.

You're confused, the JuD is not the same as the LeT, & India has not provided any evidence that links the two. Yes, the JuD was banned in Dec. 2008 in alleged links with the LeT, but you failed to provide any evidence to support your allegations. The LeT has been banned from raising funds in Pakistan.
 
.
You're confused, the JuD is not the same as the LeT, & India has not provided any evidence that links the two. Yes, the JuD was banned in Dec. 2008 in alleged links with the LeT, but you failed to provide any evidence to support your allegations. The LeT has been banned from raising funds in Pakistan.

Isnt JuD and its Hafeez Sayeed declared as terror organization and a terrorist respectively by UNSC? Why would you ask proof from India for that..??
 
. . .
Yes, mostly Indian & articles from the US.

---------- Post added at 02:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:45 PM ----------



Again, who told you Zaid Hamid is a Pakistani hero? There are plenty of belligerent figures sitting in India as well. Generalizing a whole nation on one personality isn't right.

As usual you are in the denial mode
 
.
You're confused, the JuD is not the same as the LeT, & India has not provided any evidence that links the two. Yes, the JuD was banned in Dec. 2008 in alleged links with the LeT, but you failed to provide any evidence to support your allegations. The LeT has been banned from raising funds in Pakistan.

Are you that thick??..How does one be declared a terrorist organisation and then get banned by UN, just based on allegations?
Both LeT and JuD(an alias LeT adopted after it was banned by UN) were declared terrorist organisations based on evidence provided to it.
 
.
Tall talk and cheap banter doesn't cost a dime......however it's a different case when you have the likes of Ball Thakrey dictating your foreign policy.

you are right about talk being cheap . but do remember it goes both ways.

as for bal thakery dictating policy , the guy cant even stand up without help now a days and he dictates policy?:lol:
 
.
Are you that thick??..How does one be declared a terrorist organisation and then get banned by UN, just based on allegations?
Both LeT and JuD(an alias LeT adopted after it was banned by UN) were declared terrorist organisations based on evidence provided to it.

Pakistan has a different stance from the UN on JuD (not on the LeT), just like India has a different stance from the UN on Kashmir being disputed territory. Pakistan has asked India for evidence that links JuD to the LeT, but they have failed to do so.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom