What's new

The incredibly bloody Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam

Status
Not open for further replies.
Scythians / Sacae


"Scythians" (Greek Σκύθης) and "Sacae" (Old Persian Sakâ): two renderings of Skudat ("archers"?), the name of the nomads of the Central Asian plains.


Scythian archer on an Athenian dish
The Central-Asian steppe has been the home of nomad tribes for centuries. Being nomads, they roamed across the plains, incidentally attacking the urbanized countries to the south, east and west.

The first to describe the life style of these tribes was a Greek researcher, Herodotus, who lived in the fifth century BCE. Although he concentrates on the tribes living in modern Ukraine, which he calls "Scythians" (Σκύθης), we may extrapolate his description to people in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and possibly Mongolia, even though Herodotus usually calls these eastern nomads "Sacae". In fact, just as the Scythians and the Sacae shared the same life style, they had the same name: in their own language, which belonged to the Indo-Iranian family, they called themselves Skudat , which probably means "archers". The Persians rendered this name as Sakâ and the Greeks as Skythes or Skythai. The Chinese called them, at a later stage in history, Sai.

Tribes are, almost by definition, very loose organizations. Every now and then, new tribal coalitions came into being, and sometimes, new languages became prominent among the nomads from the Central-Asian steppe.


Scythian arrowheads
The oldest group we know of is usually called Indo-Iranian. (The old name "Aryan" is no longer used.) There are no contemporary reports about their migration, which can only be reconstructed from later languages. It is reasonably certain that at the beginning of the second millennium BCE, the speakers of the Proto-Indo-Iranian language moved from Ukraine to the southeast. From an archaeological point of view, their migration is attested in the change from the Yamnaya culture into the Andronovo culture.

They invaded the country that was later called Afghanistan, where they separated into an Iranian and an Indian branch. The first group settled in Aria (a name that lives on in our word "Iran"), where they settled after 1000 BCE; the second group reached the Punjab c.1500 BCE. From the second millennium on, three groups of languages can be discerned: the Indian group (Vedic, Sanskrit...), the Scythian group (in the homeland on the steppe), and the Iranian group (Gathic, Persian...). Even when, in the sixth century, the Achaemenid empire was at its most powerful and the Persians lived in comfortable towns, they still remembered their earlier, nomadic life style, as Herodotus points out:

The Persian nation contains a number of tribes, and the ones which Cyrus assembled and persuaded to revolt were the Pasargadae, Maraphii, and Maspii, upon which all the other tribes are dependent. Of these, the Pasargadae are the most distinguished; they contain the clan of the Achaemenids from which spring the Perseid kings. Other tribes are the Panthialaei, Derusiaei, Germanii, all of which are attached to the soil, the remainder -the Dahae, Mardi, Dropici, Sagarti, being nomadic.note

A second group of nomads known to have gone south may be the tribe of the Cimmerians. Their name Gimirru, which was given to them by the Assyrians, may mean "people traveling back and forth". The Cimmerians destroyed the kingdoms of Urartu (an old name for Armenia) and Phrygia (in Turkey) in the last quarter of the eighth century BCE. A group that Herodotus identifies as Scythians even reached Ascalon in Palestine. According to Herodotus, they ruled the northwest of Iran (which Herodotus calls Media) for twenty-eight years.


Map of the world of the Scythians
In the sixth, fifth and fourth centuries BCE, the Persians discerned several nomadic tribes on the Central-Asian steppe. As we have seem, they called them Sakâ. We know the names of these tribes from Persian royal inscriptions and can add information from Herodotus and other Greek authors.

  • The Sakâ haumavargâ ("haoma-drinking Sacae") were subjected by Cyrus the Great. Herodotus calls them Amyrgian Scythians. Haoma was a trance inducing drink, made from fly agaric. Because his mushroom does not occur south of the river Amudar'ya (Oxus), we must assume that these nomads lived in Uzbekistan. Herodotus informs us that they were archers and wore trousers and pointed caps. He also mentions their use of the battle ax (which they called sagaris).

  • The Sakan leader Skunkha (right) on the Behistun relief
    The Sakâ tigrakhaudâ ("Sacae with pointed hats") were defeated in 520/519 BCE by the Persian king Darius I the Great, who gave this tribe a new leader. One of the earlier leaders was killed, the other, named Skunkha, was taken captive and is visible on the relief at Behistun. (It is possible that Darius created a new tribe from several earlier tribes.) Herodotus calls the Sakâ tigrakhaudâ the Orthocorybantians ("pointed hat men"), and informs us that they lived in the same tax district as the Medes. This suggests that the Sakâ tigrakhaudâ lived on the banks of the ancient lower reaches of the Amudar'ya, which used to have a mouth in the Caspian Sea south of Krasnovodsk. The pointed hat is a kind of turban.
  • The Apâ Sakâ ("Water Sacae") are also known as the Pausikoi, as Herodotus prefers to call them. Later authors, like Arrian of Nicomedia (in his Anabasis) and Ammianus Marcellinus seem to known them as the Abian Scythians.note Still later, we encounter them as the Apasiaki, first east and later southwest of Lake Aral. They must be situated along the ancient lower reaches of the Amudar'ya.
  • The tribe that Herodotus calls "Massagetes" must have been called something like Mâh-Sakâin Persian, which means "Moon Sacae". This is a bit confusing, because it is known that the Massagetes venerated only one god, the Sun. The Massagetes were responsible for the death of the Persian king Cyrus the Great (in December 530). From Herodotus' description, it is clear that they lived along the Syrdar'ya (Jaxartes).

  • A mounted archer
    The nomad tribe known as Dahâ, which means "robbers", is mentioned for the first time in the Daiva inscription of Xerxes; he must have subjected them. In the quotation above, Herodotus calls the Dai a Persian subtribe, but they can not have lived in Persia proper, because they are mentioned in the Anabasis of Arrian as living along the lower reaches of the Syrdar'ya. In the days of the Macedonian king Alexander the Great, they were famous for their mounted archers. It is possible that this tribe desintegrated after the fall of the Achaemenid Empire; one of the tribes that came into being was that of the Parni, who went south in the third century BCE and founded the Parthian empire.
  • The Sakâ paradrayâ ("Sacae across the sea") were living in Ukraine. These are the nomads that the Greeks called Scythians. In (514 or) 513 BCE, king Darius launched a disastrous campaign against the Sakâ paradrayâ. Herodotus gives a long description of their way of life and discerns many tribes in the neighborhood.
    • The Royal Scythians lived in the southern part of Ukraine, immediately north of the Greek towns.
    • The Scythian-Farmers seem to be identical with the archaeological culture known as Chernoles, which has been identified with the Iron Age Slavs.

    • An eagle attacking a sturgeon (copy of a piece from the Witaszkowo Treasure)
      Perhaps, we may identify the Neuri with the Milograd culture, the archaeological remains of which have been found on the confluence of the rivers Dnepr and Pripyat, north of modern Kiev. It has been suggested that they were the ancestors of the Balts.
    • Herodotus' story about the Man-eaters received some confirmation with the excavation of human remains that were gnawed at by human jaws; these excavations were along the river Sula, to the southeast of Kiev.
    • The Argippaeans are sometimes identified with the ancestors of the Calmucs.
    • The Issedones may be identical to the Wu-sun who (according to Chinese texts) lived on the shore of Lake Balchash.
  • Sarmatian coalition consisted of four tribes:
    • The Iazyges, which had once lived on the shores of the Sea of Azov, were now living on the northern bank of the Danube. They were to move to what is now eastern Hungary, where they settled in c.50 CE. They were defeated by the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius (in 175).
    • The Urgi lived on the banks of the Dnepr, south of Kiev.
    • The Royal Scythians were still living in the south of Ukraine and had become the most important Sarmatian tribe. They and the Urgi became known as the Sarmati. The Romans seem to have accepted their settlement in eastern Hungary, but the situation was sometimes tense. The Sarmati were, for example, responsible for the destruction of the Twenty-first Legion Rapax in 92.
    • The Roxolani initially lived between the Don and the Dnepr but settled on the lower reaches of the Danube, where the Iazyges had been living before they migrated to Hungary.

A Scythian shield emblem in the shape of a stag


A Scythian shield emblem in the shape of a stag


Eagle-shaped scythian brooche


A gilded disk from the Astrakhan area


Sakâ tigrakhaudâ. Relief from the eastern stairs of the Apadana at Persepolis.
The steppe nomads frequently attacked the urbanized regions to the east, south or west. Usually, this created great havoc, although after some time, they went back to their homeland. It was necessary for the attacked states to defend themselves. The Indians thought that they did not need walls because they were protected by the Himalayas but still, in c.110 BCE, the valley of the Indus was run over. The Chinese built the "Wall of ten thousand miles" to protect themselves. The rulers of the Achaemenid empire, from Cyrus the Great to Alexander the Great, may have built walls as well. One of these is mentioned in the eighteenth sura of the Quran and in medieval legend, and may be identified with known archaeological remains in Golestan (Iran). Both Cyrus and Alexander built garrison towns along the river Syrdar'ya or Jaxartes; our sources call them Cyreschata and Alexandria Eschatê.

tatar.jpg

A Tatar khan with a pointed cap
Nomadism continued to exist into the first and second millennium CE. Several tribes may be mentioned. The Alani (whose language lives on in modern Ossetian) are known from the first century CE; they lived in modern Kazakhstan. Later, they moved to the west, being pushed forward by the Huns, which are known from Chinese texts as the Xiung-nu. Later tribal formations were the Avars, the Chasars, the Bulgars, the Turks, the Magyars, the Cumans, the Tatars, the Mongols and the Cossacks.
 
.
Sad thing for these "turk'' nationalists is that a large part of their history is doubted nowadays. They have build their whole nationalism around theories which became outdated and discretided, but they stayed in the past while the specialists, academics came with new facts, theories, evidences.

1. Gokturks might have had an Iranian/Indo-Iranian ruling elite (Ashina).
2. The myth of the wolf is probably from the Indo-european Wusun, who are considered as an Iranian or Tocharian speaking people.
3. The Xiongnu were also possibly Iranian, or mongolian and lesser chance being Turkic. Most weight is given to the Iranian theory. Either way their overlords were the Indo-european Iranian speaking Yuezi people.
4. The ural-altaic hypothesis is rejected and outdated.
5. Even the Altaic hypothesis is also outdated nowadays. "While 'Altaic' is repeated in encyclopedias and handbooks most specialists in these languages no longer believe that the three traditional supposed Altaic groups, Turkic, Mongolian and Tungusic, are related."
6. Safavids having Iranian ancestors from fathers side.
 
.
They raped you a way worse than Iranians because Iranians were their fellow Muslims whom they had learned Islam from... Seljuks were turk slave soldiers of Samanids but when they conquered anatoli they raped your forefathers as bad kafirs. That's why today 15- 20% of your people are Turk which very ironically you're proud of...

Your invaders whom you are proud of their blood became Muslims and Persianized by Iranians. 90% of culture that today you Anatolis are holding are invented/borrowed from Iranian. Even many of your Islamic words are Persian origin Not Arabic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samanid_Empire


Sad thing for these "turk'' nationalists is that a large part of their history is doubted nowadays. They have build their whole nationalism around theories which became outdated and discretided, but they stayed in the past while the specialists, academics came with new facts, theories, evidences.

1. Gokturks might have had an Iranian/Indo-Iranian ruling elite (Ashina).
2. The myth of the wolf is probably from the Indo-european Wusun, who are considered as an Iranian or Tocharian speaking people.
3. The Xiongnu were also possibly Iranian, or mongolian and lesser chance being Turkic. Most weight is given to the Iranian theory. Either way their overlords were the Indo-european Iranian speaking Yuezi people.
4. The ural-altaic hypothesis is rejected and outdated.
5. Even the Altaic hypothesis is also outdated nowadays. "While 'Altaic' is repeated in encyclopedias and handbooks most specialists in these languages no longer believe that the three traditional supposed Altaic groups, Turkic, Mongolian and Tungusic, are related."
6. Safavids having Iranian ancestors from fathers side.


when i was a child really i have some respect for iranians but when i meet with iranians daily life of in virtual life
then i understand this people really have a psychological and mentality problems .
1- persians were most mixed people in the region because if you look etnich persians Y dna they are seperate from other iranic people such as pasthuns, kurds or tajiks .
2-actually there is no genetic connections with kurds and pashtuns or tajiks but nobodys says to one tajik of persians you are not iranic.. only you can see fairy tales from eu centrism to iranic people .. as they are saying saka people iranic or wusuns . but these are only thoery but these thoeries are only ballon one days all of them is gonna be destroyed

3-Ashina clan or wusuns has nothing with iranic people. Turkic scholars are saying ashina clan orginaly came from wusun yes that is right but turkic scholars or turkologs also they are saying wusuns were historicaly turkic people ..

4- yes we turks have learned many things from persians greeks or arabs. but persians greeks and arabs have learned many things from ancient middle east people such as sumerians akads ..etc actually it is about we came early in middle east
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2010/08/post-2.html

5- ashina clan carried Y dna r1a z93 -94 this is common with turks .. akkoyunlu turks rulers ottoman rulers also carried same Y dna r1a z93 -94 also dulo clan is that caming from family of attila founder of hunnic empire carried r1a z93 -94
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulo_clan#Origin

6- saka people were ancestors of turks and they have nothing with your persians people. And im sayhing again saka people were not iranic one day you will learn it
http://eurogenes.blogspot.fr/2017/03/genetic-origins-and-legacy-of-scythians.html

http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/24Alans/IranianEtymologyEn.htm

http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/27_Scythians/OssetianLanguageAbaev.htm

7- 2 years ago I also checked to wiki and I looked wusun and ashina clan then wiki said they are turkic people but now some people changed it and wrote iranic lol people can change the article but truth always will come and cover up the lies

8- I seeing some mankurts saying we azeris have nothings with turks :D azeri word faked up 80 years ago by pan iranist azerbaijani turks people occurered by

Bayat
 
Last edited:
.
when i was a child really i have some respect for iranians but when i meet with iranians daily life of in virtual life
then i understand this people really have a psychological and mentality problems .
1- persians were most mixed people in the region because if you look etnich persians Y dna they are seperate from other iranic people such as pasthuns, kurds of tajiks .
2-actually there is no genetic connections with kurds and pashtuns of tajiks but nobodys says to one tajik of persians you are not iranic.. only you can see fairy tales from eu centrism to iranic people .. as they are saying saka people iranic or wusuns . but these are only thoery but these thoeries are only ballon one days all of them is gonna be destroyed

3-Ashina clan or wusuns has nothing with iranic people. Turkic scholars are saying ashina clan orginaly came from wusun yes that is right but turkic scholars or turkologs also they are saying wusuns were historicaly turkic people ..

4- yes we turks have learned many things from persians greeks or arabs. but persians greeks and arabs have learned many things from ancient middle east people such as sumerians akads ..etc actually it is about we came early in middle east
htt

5- ashina clan carried Y dna r1a z93 -94 this is common with turks .. akkoyunlu turks rules ottoman rules also carried same Y dna r1a z93 -94 also dulo clan is that caming from family of attila founder of hunnic empire carried r1a z93 -94


7- 2 years ago I also checked to wiki and I looked wusun and ashina clan then wiki said they are turkic people but now some people changed it and wrote iranic lol people can change the article but truth always will come and cover the lies

8- I seeing some mankurts saying we azeris have nothings with turks :D azeri word faked up 80 years ago by pan iranist azerbaijani turks people occurered by

Bayat
  • Shahsevan
  • Qarapapaqs
  • Qajar
  • Ayrums
  • Karadaghis
  • Bichaghchi
  • Terkeme
  • Padars
  • Tribes of Karadagh
  • Tokhmaqlu, Beghdillu, Illyaskhanlu, Bayburdlu, Qaradaghlu

r1a -z93 is the main lineage of Brahmins(upmost caste) who according to Anthropologists purest Indo-Aryan people in South Asia as their r1a-z93 is from 60% to 80% on average.
2fa739160d49273e6279b278d8fa6711.png

other people who carry r1a in south asia have different r1a from brahmins.
 
.
when i was a child really i have some respect for iranians but when i meet with iranians daily life of in virtual life
then i understand this people really have a psychological and mentality problems .
1- persians were most mixed people in the region because if you look etnich persians Y dna they are seperate from other iranic people such as pasthuns, kurds of tajiks .
2-actually there is no genetic connections with kurds and pashtuns of tajiks but nobodys says to one tajik of persians you are not iranic.. only you can see fairy tales from eu centrism to iranic people .. as they are saying saka people iranic or wusuns . but these are only thoery but these thoeries are only ballon one days all of them is gonna be destroyed

3-Ashina clan or wusuns has nothing with iranic people. Turkic scholars are saying ashina clan orginaly came from wusun yes that is right but turkic scholars or turkologs also they are saying wusuns were historicaly turkic people ..

4- yes we turks have learned many things from persians greeks or arabs. but persians greeks and arabs have learned many things from ancient middle east people such as sumerians akads ..etc actually it is about we came early in middle east
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2010/08/post-2.html

5- ashina clan carried Y dna r1a z93 -94 this is common with turks .. akkoyunlu turks rules ottoman rules also carried same Y dna r1a z93 -94 also dulo clan is that caming from family of attila founder of hunnic empire carried r1a z93 -94
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulo_clan#Origin

6- saka people were ancestors of turks and they have nothing with your persians people. And im sayhing again saka people were not iranic one day you will learn it
http://eurogenes.blogspot.fr/2017/03/genetic-origins-and-legacy-of-scythians.html

http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/24Alans/IranianEtymologyEn.htm

http://s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/27_Scythians/OssetianLanguageAbaev.htm

7- 2 years ago I also checked to wiki and I looked wusun and ashina clan then wiki said they are turkic people but now some people changed it and wrote iranic lol people can change the article but truth always will come and cover the lies

8- I seeing some mankurts saying we azeris have nothings with turks :D azeri word faked up 80 years ago by pan iranist azerbaijani turks people occurered by

Bayat
I wish you turkish posters would stop claiming to be Turkic or Turk ancestry, that purely belongs to biological Turk's who are pretty much just another people of Iranian Plato. not the neo age Turkish people. So please.
 
.
I wish you turkish posters would stop claiming to be Turkic or Turk ancestry, that purely belongs to biological Turk's who are pretty much just another people of Iranian Plato. not the neo age Turkish people. So please.

You should stop claiming bulshits with your mullah directed informations!
 
. .
Pan turanian speak about bullshit that's weird since you believe that you are descendent from wolves:rofl:

We just don't care whatever bulshits you persians say about! LOL
 
. .
I was told a thousand times by multiple moderate pakistanis in sincere tone that there is NO SUCH THING AS FORCED RELIGIOUS CONVERSION!!!!!
Huh?

Islam on the sub-continent was always Sunni, this is Shia Islam
 
. .
Even more weird is the fact that the story of Turan is an Iranian story

And the Persians on the top world! LOL
You're just a nothing in fact. No one cares of you!
 
Last edited:
. .
We just don't care whatever bulshits you persians say about! LOL

I once meet a Turkish dude who said the the moon is also Turkish, So Turkish Flag has the Moon. Since then I have never trusted what you people said, and when I came to internet, you went blatantly lying. Turkish is NOT Necessarily TURKIC. Just like Israeli not really native semites, You might have 10% turk blood 500 years ago, today, I dont know.
 
.
I once meet a Turkish dude who said the the moon is also Turkish, So Turkish Flag has the Moon. Since then I have never trusted what you people said, and when I came to internet, you went blatantly lying. Turkish is NOT Necessarily TURKIC. Just like Israeli not really native semites, You might have 10% turk blood 500 years ago, today, I dont know.

Are you so stupid that you really think they're 100% of anything??

 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom