The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

[TaiShang]

It's good that the American can always live in delusion that everything of China is behind them. I just hope that their awaken will not give them a rude shock

Sun Tzu, always leave the Americans think they are the strongest and we still have 200 nukes

Military is the only viable asset of US foreign policy. That's why they tend to show it off at every instance. That's in fact a serious abdication of reason. No wonder thay are incapable of producing good leadership ever since Bush Sr.

I guess China will continue to encourage the US to further get involved in a Cold War thinking and to bring in more military assets and thereby rationalizing the militarist mindset of the regime.

What China must not allow the US is to adopt is a developmentalist mindset. Thus, the more US patrolling in SCS, the better.

 

[Beast]

Military is the only viable asset of US foreign policy. That's why they tend to show it off at every instance. That's in fact a serious abdication of reason. No wonder thay are incapable of producing good leadership ever since Bush Sr.

I guess China will continue to encourage the US to further get involved in a Cold War thinking by continously encouraging it to bring in more military assets and thereby rationalizing the militarist mindset of the regime.

What China must not allow the US to adopt is a developmentalist mindset. Thus, the more US patrolling in SCS, the better.

Precisely, US economic is declining and it's in that area that they are incompete and that's why they used the military provocation.

The AIIB which even pulls major US allies like UK, France and Australia clearly show the crack of US greenback.

 

[TaiShang]

Precisely, US economic is declining and it's in that area that they are incompete and that's why they used the military provocation.

The AIIB which even pulls major US allies like UK, France and Australia clearly show the crack of US greenback.

We can even make a parallel between US' historic defeat at AIIB and the sudden increase in the China threat propaganda orhestrated by the US regime media. Somewhere along the line, China must have touched a very sensitive nerve of the US regime elites.

That's an incredibly good sign of China's being on the right track.

Just encourage the US regime to further militarize its diplomacy to the extent that they are completely incapacitated from critical thinking.

 

[terranMarine]

We can even make a parallel between US' historic defeat at AIIB and the sudden increase in the China threat propaganda orhestrated by the US regime media. Somewhere along the line, China must have touched a very sensitive nerve of the US regime elites.

That's an incredibly good sign of China's being on the right track.

Just encourage the US regime to further militarize its diplomacy to the extent that they are completely incapacitated from critical thinking.

USSR got dissolved for the well known reason, and whatever the US do let them continue. Their crazy defense budget will hurt them eventually.

 

[Jlaw]

First of of all, there is no likelihood of a cold war with China without Russia in it. The blocs are being formed and the US is not without allies, either.

Second, I thought that China was about to collapse. What happened?

Your source must have been Vietnamese, that's what happened

 

[TaiShang]

Your source must have been Vietnamese, that's what happened

In fact, a bulk of the China collapse theory comes from the US.

Interestingly, a bulk of the US collapse theory used to come from much less developed countries.

 

[Economic superpower]

Military is the only viable asset of US foreign policy. That's why they tend to show it off at every instance. That's in fact a serious abdication of reason. No wonder thay are incapable of producing good leadership ever since Bush Sr.

I guess China will continue to encourage the US to further get involved in a Cold War thinking and to bring in more military assets and thereby rationalizing the militarist mindset of the regime.

What China must not allow the US is to adopt is a developmentalist mindset. Thus, the more US patrolling in SCS, the better.

The US military diplomacy cannot compete with China's economic diplomacy. This is why China is winning.

 

[Kyle Sun]

US is still at least 25 years ahead of China militarily and Americans need an adversary in order to justify defense budget which is more than the total of next ten countries in the list combined.

make it 30～40 years

 

[AndrewJin]

In fact, a bulk of the China collapse theory comes from the US.

Interestingly, a bulk of the US collapse theory used to come from much less developed countries.

We need send or make more dear Gordon Chang sort of agents, just love him.

 

[xunzi]

We are not the one seeking to have a cold war. I can guarantee you that. This is what the USA wants, an unstable world so they get to keep their force abroad and maintain hegemony.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

BEIJING: China will be the largest shareholder in the newly floated Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) with a 30.85 per cent stake followed by India and Russia, Chinese officials have said.

"Based on the AIIB members' GDP weight in the world economy, China will become the bank's largest shareholder, followed by India and Russia," Chen Fengying, a research fellow at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told state-run Global Times.

China is likely to have a 30.85 per cent share in the bank, followed by India with 10.4 per cent, the daily quoted media reports as saying.

"Whether measured by nominal GDP or the purchasing power parity-adjusted GDP, it makes sense for China to be the biggest capital contributor and the most influential decision maker among all the Asian members," Ma Tieying, an economist with Singapore-based DBS Bank, told the Global Times.

Based on the GDP and Purchasing Power Parity, ( PPP) China was expected to get the post of President followed by India as one of the Vice Presidents.

German Ambassador to China Michael Clauss said Germany will have a director on the board of the AIIB.

Clauss said that Germany was in favour of a board of directors that represented the regions joining the Beijing-led bank and had the power to approve projects.

He said China would be an influential player in the bank, as was the United States in the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund, but he added that the bank would be operated in accordance with international procedures, including the requirement of a super qualified majority for voting to approve critical projects.

"For us, it is important that the standards do not differ too much from those adopted by the IMF, World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. Our feeling is that Beijing does respect that it has to adhere to international standards and procedures," he was quoted as saying by the Hong Kong based South China Morning Post.

Founding members of the bank will initially pay up to one-fifth of its USD 50 billion authorised capital, which will be raised to USD 100 billion.

A total of 57 countries have joined AIIB as founding members, including 37 from Asia, which is set to mainly finance major infrastructure projects in Asia, Shi Yaobin, China's vice finance minister has said earlier.

An agreement on the structure of the bank will be signed before the end of June, he said.

Meanwhile, the chief negotiators of the 57 prospective founding members held their fifth meeting in Singapore to finalise the Bank's structure.

Read more at:
China, India, Russia to be top 3 shareholders of AIIB: Report - The Economic Times

 

[TaiShang]

The US military diplomacy cannot compete with China's economic diplomacy. This is why China is winning.

China's needs to encourage the US to delve into more militarist stance. Hence their growing assertiveness in the SCS is to be welcomed. Apart from the practical benefit of experience building for the future more serious contingencies and also gauging enemy's reactions and thinking patterns, it offers China the window of opportunity to engage its partners in development-related activity.

Besides, it is China's home turf, and what China has to do is simply go ahead with its regular build-up work. The US on the other, has to burn real money on inconclusive harassments.

 

[Raphael]

Soros: US on the Brink of World War III With China / Sputnik International

Military spending is on the rise in China, where there is an effort to transition to a domestic-demand-led economy from exports, Soros said at the Bretton Woods conference at the World Bank.

If that move falters, he said, there is a "likelihood" that China’s leaders would promote an external conflict – possibly with a US ally – to keep the country together and hold on to power.

"If there is conflict between China and a military ally of the United States, like Japan, then it is not an exaggeration to say that we are on the threshold of a third world war," Soros was quoted as saying by MarketWatch.

He called on the United States to make a "major concession" and allow China's currency to join the International Monetary Fund's basket of currencies. This would make the yuan a potential rival to the dollar as a global reserve currency.

In return, China would have to make similar major concessions to reform its economy, such as accepting the rule of law, Soros said.

Allowing China's yuan to be a market currency would create "a binding connection" between the two systems, he argued. Such an agreement will be difficult to broker, Soros acknowledged, but the alternative could be global catastrophe.

"Without it, there is a real danger that China will align itself with Russia politically and militarily, and then the threat of third world war becomes real, so it is worth trying."


Read more: Soros: US on the Brink of World War III With China / Sputnik International

 

[Jlaw]

Soros, one of the great illuminati member. Rothschild's right hand man.

 

[faisal6309]

Where will Pakistan and India stand?