4500$ sights for the pigs...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think when there is an attack of small outpost the problem is with surveillance and securing an perimeter. Concrete measures must be taken because in such a terrain the rats are moving under the noses of our soldiers. Its unacceptable when you know its a static position. Securing a perimeter and then proper patrol/guard is deciding you live or die.I saw a sad video of the recent incident in the south east, 1 martyr. Our army has made huge strides but we need to remain on guard and professional at all times!
I think when there is an attack of small outpost the problem is with surveillance and securing an perimeter. Concrete measures must be taken because in such a terrain the rats are moving under the noses of our soldiers. Its unacceptable when you know its a static position. Securing a perimeter and then proper patrol/guard is deciding you live or die.
When you have such a terrain you have to consider the weight and effect of your equipment so you have make the balance. I wouldn't call the flamethrower a light or easy to carry equipment. Imagine that you have to carry a vest, personal weapon and you also have to carry a backpack in which you will have to put your other tools, ammo, food. A flamethrower would be a big burden in the most scenarios. Taking into account the effect of smoke and flame of the flamethrower I think you can achieve close effect with a more lighter and compact tools like smoke and tear gas grenades with high concentration. The terrorist will pass out or get out. Both variants are deadly.A lot of these PKK rats hide in caves. I suggest the use of flamethrowers and roast those pkk rats to make kebab.
When you have such a terrain you have to consider the weight and effect of your equipment so you have make the balance. I wouldn't call the flamethrower a light or easy to carry equipment. Imagine that you have to carry a vest, personal weapon and you also have to carry a backpack in which you will have to put your other tools, ammo, food. A flamethrower would be a big burden in the most scenarios. Taking into account the effect of smoke and flame of the flamethrower I think you can achieve close effect with a more lighter and compact tools like smoke and tear gas grenades with high concentration. The terrorist will pass out or get out. Both variants are deadly.
If that is making you feel better soon the rats will face thermobaric weapons including the thermobaric NEB and those things are no joke. It will be difficult to distinguish flesh from coalTrue to be honest by all accounts flamethrowers are actually obsolete. I have been playing BF1 a lot and the Ottoman flametrooper is just kick *** im like imagine if the Turkish army had modern day flametroopers with modern flamethrowers. Those pkk rats would shit themselves.
If that is making you feel better soon the rats will face thermobaric weapons including the thermobaric NEB and those things are no joke. It will be difficult to distinguish flesh from coal