The delusion of identity

[A Town]

Its close enough to Pakistan then South India i guess? And vast majority of India for that matter. The sites found in Hryana are latter phase, centuries later. Not sophisticated enough compared to actual sites in Pakistan.

No they where Pre harrapan, how is that latter phase?

 

[good_boy]

Pakistani cites are excavated by foreigners who have nothing to gain meanwhile supposed Indian cites are only allowed by the GOI to be excavated by Archaeological survey of India which falls under the ministry of culture. Why India don't let neutral people check those distant supposed sites?

No doubt, a lot of history rewritten by Indians. Thats why their claims seem hilarious to international historians.

 

[A Town]

India is recent but punjabis are ancient people.

Haryanvis are different people, hence the split.

 

[INDIC]

Yeah because Jinnah knew the real history of region unlike troll on PDF. By naming your self India, their people history don't suddenly change to something else. There are many countries named after River Indus by British.

Go to school and learn that Greeks named this country as India and Megasthanes wrote full description of the entire India he saw in his book 'Indica'

 

[KingMamba]

so, now you can't even get the map right....
lol...
and you have no proof to prove your point......
Michel Danino - The Indus-Sarasvati Civilization and its Bearing on the Aryan Question

LOLOL look at your source it says Saravati civilization and it even has this gem on the same site.

Michel Danino - The Deciphered Indus Script - Methodology, Readings, Interpretations
The Deciphered Indus Script (never been deciphered all claims have been considered null by scholars)
By N. Jha & N. S. Rajaram(Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, 2000

Nice try

 

[A Town]

No doubt, a lot of history rewritten by Indians. Thats why their claims seem hilarious to international historians.

Are you an international historian?

 

[KingMamba]

Go to school and learn that Greeks named this country as India and Megasthanes wrote full description of the entire India he saw in his book 'Indica'

Again with your garbage it only proves that you know how to repeat yourself, all that happened long after the first mentions of Indian people.

 

[ranjeet]

Haryanvis are different people, hence the split.

Go to school and learn that Greeks named this country as India and Megasthanes wrote full description of the entire India he saw in his book 'Indica'

Why do you think the author wrote the article in the first place? You can't convince people who are in denial mode.

 

[Dem!god]

No proper historian call it Indus-Sarasvati civilization, your link have lower value then gutter trash.

I know genius ...you are the most gifted historian of world....
no don't quote me further....if you nothing proper to answer.....
do you even know/read the source and what it said.......get up before it's too late...

 

[KingMamba]

I know genius ...you are the most gifted historian of world....
no don't quote me further....if you nothing proper to answer.....
do you even know/read the source and what it said.......get up before it's too late...

Umm your source is BS and the owner of the site is just quoting Indians.

 

[good_boy]

No they where Pre harrapan, how is that latter phase?

Pre harappa is Mehrrgarh site which is about 9000 years old in Pakistan. Early Harappa was Pakistan exclusive, only centuries later harappans expanded to North West India. And even then most of sites no matter how small are near Pak border.

 

[farhan_9909]

Indus valley civilization had indian connection or not since this all is BS

Anything that fall unde the ancient Land of Indus valley civilzation is True Pakistani Geography.

Pakistan infact is a successor state of Indus valley civilization.

Indus valley people were monotheist like modern day Pakistanis.

 

[good_boy]

I know genius ...you are the most gifted historian of world....
no don't quote me further....if you nothing proper to answer.....
do you even know/read the source and what it said.......get up before it's too late...

Don't worry i won't quote you further, someone who call the civilization after mythical river which is not identified even to this day unlike rest of the rivers is indeed real historian.

 

[Dem!god]

LOLOL look at your source it says Saravati civilization and it even has this gem on the same site.

Michel Danino - The Deciphered Indus Script - Methodology, Readings, Interpretations
The Deciphered Indus Script (never been deciphered all claims have been considered null by scholars)
By N. Jha & N. S. Rajaram(Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, 2000

Nice try

Ok..you show your proof....and let me check......

Umm your source is BS and the owner of the site is just quoting Indians.

now you are talking like a school kid.....
I say your source is BS..
show me another....

 

[A Town]

Indus valley civilization had indian connection or not since this all is BS

Anything that fall unde the ancient Land of Indus valley civilzation is True Pakistani Geography.

Pakistan infact is a successor state of Indus valley civilization.

Indus valley people were monotheist like modern day Pakistanis.

Proof they where monotheist?

Pre harappa is Mehrrgarh site which is about 9000 years old in Pakistan. Early Harappa was Pakistan exclusive, only centuries later harappans expanded to North West India. And even then most of sites no matter how small are near Pak border.

Where's your source that it was Pakistani exclusive?