The delusion of identity

[A Town]

The Indian sites are all small compared to Pakistani cites and have only been excavated by Indian archaeologists who obviously have an agenda considering they are uh Indian. Indians of today say these sites are from the Indus valley civilization but somehow the inhabitants of said civilization forgot how to build anything as they moved east right? LOL

They may be small but there still significant, the largest IVC burial site is in Rohtak, Haryana. Earliest pre Harrapan site is in Fatehbad, Haryana. Details of Food habits where in Kutch, Gujarat.

Yes Rajputs failed badly, remember Mughals? The idea of rajputs defending hindu country is hilarious, they couldnt even defend their backyard properly let alone rest of hindus. And when did i say punjabi rajputs are the only one?

Our downfall was too Mughals yes, however before that who was kicking Arabs for 500 years? Lmao

 

[good_boy]

They may be small but there still significant, the largest IVC burial site is in Rohtak, Haryana. Earliest pre Harrapan site is in Fatehbad, Haryana. Details of Food habits where in Kutch, Gujarat.

Not earliest but latter phase sites are in North Western India bordering Pakistan.

 

[ranjeet]

Ok now its understandable.



Yes Rajputs failed badly, remember Mughals? The idea of rajputs defending hindu country is hilarious, they couldnt even defend their backyard properly let alone rest of hindus. And when did i say punjabi rajputs are the only one?

what is understandable ?? It's not my fault if you don't know the history.

 

[good_boy]

what is understandable ?? It's not my fault if you don't know the history.

Ok

 

[A Town]

Not earliest but latter phase sites are in North Western India bordering Pakistan.

Haryana doesn't border Pakistan.

 

[Dem!god]

Indians say the same people were a part of their sites, but their sites do not show the level of sophistication that is shown on Pakistani sites. The only ones that come close are extremely close to Pakistani border and so may have historically been a part of the boundary of IVC. You answer me if the same people were in your sites how did they forget to build anything? Pakistani cities shows city planning, drains, etc while Indians do not even let foreigners check their ruins but claim it is the same civilization!

hahaha..
again denial and no answer......
and what make you think it had no town planing....show me proof.....
look at this pics and it shows all.. the red dots are major center....

 

[KingMamba]

They may be small but there still significant, the largest IVC burial site is in Rohtak, Haryana. Earliest pre Harrapan site is in Fatehbad, Haryana. Details of Food habits where in Kutch, Gujarat.

Yeah and Haryana was historically a part of Punjab no? Where are the boundaries of Sutlej all the way up to Himachel Pradesh right?

 

[INDIC]

All came after Darius how about you get your dates right?

Darius never coined the name India.

 

[KingMamba]

hahaha..
again denial and no answer......
and what make you think it had no town planing....show me proof.....
look at this pics and it shows all.. the red dots are major center....

Gimme source also don't just post the map. You understand all ancient civilizations were centered mainly around a river right?

Darius never coined the name India.

Like I said go look up what he stated. You don't do research and come here with bakwas lol. The greeks got the word directly from him and up until 300 BC it meant IVC inhabitants.

 

[A Town]

Yeah and Haryana was historically a part of Punjab no? Where are the boundaries of Sutlej all the way up to Himachel Pradesh right?

Why does that matter? It's still Indian, and there was no Haryana/Punjab back then.

 

[good_boy]

Haryana doesn't border Pakistan.

Its close enough to Pakistan then South India i guess? And vast majority of India for that matter. The sites found in Hryana are latter phase, centuries later. Not sophisticated enough compared to actual sites in Pakistan.

 

[Dem!god]

Gimme source also don't just post the map. You understand all ancient civilizations were centered mainly around a river right?



Like I said go look up what he stated. The greeks got the word directly from him and up until 300 BC it meant IVC inhabitants.

so, now you can't even get the map right....
lol...
and you have no proof to prove your point......
Michel Danino - The Indus-Sarasvati Civilization and its Bearing on the Aryan Question

 

[good_boy]

Why does that matter? It's still Indian, and there was no Haryana/Punjab back then.

India is recent but punjabis are ancient people.

 

[KingMamba]

Pakistani cites are excavated by foreigners who have nothing to gain meanwhile supposed Indian cites are only allowed by the GOI to be excavated by Archaeological survey of India which falls under the ministry of culture. Why India don't let neutral people check those distant supposed sites?

 

[good_boy]

so, now you can't even get the map right....
lol...
and you have no proof to prove your point......

No proper historian call it Indus-Sarasvati civilization, your link have lower value then gutter trash.