The Coming American Civil War -- Igor Panarin

[Hello_10]

Jesus as a person was cool but christianity as a religious system is BS(like all montheistic organized religion)

because his mother wasn't sure, who was his father, a psycho who wanted to prove that he was Son of God, even if Jews hanged him?????? ask Jews regarding it, why US/West always serve Jews as their father, anyway ........


Is the World at New Threat of Westernization?

about a month before, I openly challenged the politicians of US that US can go against Jesus but not against the people who feed them, mainly Indian Hindus who helped them have high technologies, run their industries/medicines and businesses by the use of Indian business professionals etc. as, they simply can't go against the people who feed them, as Jesus him selves can't feed these Americans/British

if Britain could get success during 19th and 20th centuries then it was because of those Indians who were given better opportunities in US/UK, after making a 'Rule' on India. and US also knows that if it could get high technologies from Britain in 19th century and also in early 20th century then it was again somewhere the migrant professionals who helped them. (its no secret that US/West awarded many scientific awards to their own people during last two centuries for the works done by the migrant professionals.) and yesterday's statement of Mr B.Obama is very offensive for rest of world. in his offensive statement, he again showed his intention that there is a possibility of WW2 type things which may again bring the US at its best, similar to how US enjoyed its best in 50s after winning WW2. he knows that he can't attract the best people of rest of world until he may establish a Rule in world, and for that he has to win more wars. and his clear intentions to organize a WW3 type things in this world, to again bring US at its best like in 20th century, is a clear challenge for this whole world.

Barack Obama says: 'Best is yet to come'

BBC News - Barack Obama says: 'Best is yet to come'

 

[Hello_10]

=> Helping Wrong Background Western People

yesterday I was talking about that certain time when I had to believe that I would make a distance from these Western War Champions, no matter how much I have to abuse them to make them understand that they would talk to only Indian diplomats, politicians about the geo political issues, as its not my duty, its not my job. and as criterion of getting success in life is not education for these people, then obviously only committing different crimes may help them success. and I found they have only wars to discuss, which involves social/political/economical including direct military wars organized by them every year. I found these people have no work other than doing different wars of all types and only that type of person they want who may help them in these wars some way. and they noticed that they always get to know few interesting things about India from me..............

yesterday I remembered that I used to have much respect for Mr Sarkozy, that time french president, as I was given information that he was made concerned about me since 2008. and I finally found that friendship with french who were coming to me, was simply means for supporting them in their every war. whether its recent Libya war, any critical geo-political issue like Climate Change talk etc, they always tried to make me supporting French for all the types of wars, including social/political/economical/ direct military etc. having friendship with any of the diplomat of a Western nation simply means for helping them in their wars, they are involved with US including in Afghan. when I came to India this time, few were sent to me, approached me to make me go to Saudi Arabia and with my experience I could clearly understand that regardless my respect sent to Saudi rulers in past, going there for a high paid job would simply bring the same type of circumstances I have been facing till now. that is, support Saudi Arabia against Syria in their war.

and my experiences in Australia have clearly advised me that if you dont support Australia in their war then you are against them this way. as when a war is organized, all those who dont support them are called traitors, a simple concept they had put and then to involve me in different types of war politics of all levels..............

in beginning I was careless as we generally talk like normal people but the way they involved front line politicians with the meetings they organize around me in australia, and the time I saw that this Mr Manmohan Singh is always made to do anything I say, which I generally used to say 'good' to show me 'good' in front of Westerns, I then had to believe that I can't just say anything in favor of Western nations for my personal benefits which may harm the nation India in either way. I do remember that when I backed to australia in 2010 in tough circumstances, after just a week visit to India and no one received me in India, I openly supported Super Hornet for M-MRCA deal in australia that time. heavy lobbying was going on by the US's diplomats to get this deal, almost every month they used to put efforts to get this deal, and when I got involved in this talk then it was the first time when I changed my favor from Rafale to Super Hornet. but I got surprised that Mr M.Singh made a statement within a week that his favorite is also Super Hornet for MRCA???? I got wondered that how a PM would decide which aircraft is good for the military and how soon I get response from a top indian politician for any statement I make in australia??????? i was given information since 2008 that I was being listened by the top indian politicians which made me in the position to keep saying good for India, but how did he respond so quickly while there were lobbying by the US's diplomacy for this M-MRCA deal almost every month since 2009?????

I then again changed my support for Rafale since then. as Rafale was a western product, and little expansive but not bad option, with keeping me on the safe side. i was involved in talks about Libya war of 2010-11 for giving my 'social' support for France again. (and whenever they used to organize something around me then it used to involve the whole political system of Australia, with PM and leader of opposition of party also, with putting many indian origins to support or oppose also, the dramas I saw for a long.....) but I was never willing to support french stand on their wars so there was always a question, "why always supporting Russia but France for only outer friendship?" and I responded few times, "when Russians go for war, do they come to me to ask for help? then why you come to me for discussing any type of war, including this MRCA war of US's diplomats??? few times few russians gave me their business cards also to contact them if things go bad but none from Russia ever expected my support for them in their any war. so why Western Nations first organize different wars and try to involve indian rulers through few people like me?????" I even told them few times that, "whoever comes from Russia is very clear with anything he/she stand for, regarding any political issue. while now French have learned from British techniques, that, before involving me in their wars, now they also send French girls first." i found, british/australian friendship do downgrade French mindset also

its the less about life style but its the more about the things British/Australians organized around me, which made me understand that "this society is finished. there is just no hope for these people and they want only those who may help these people in different wars, social/economical/political/ with direct military organized every year." sending group of 50-60 on the road to keep making horns/shouting etc, while most of these I found hardly class 6th/7th passed and many of them takes drugs also, and except fuuckin women, these aussie can only be part of discussing different war politics only. working for few days and spend on weekends on these free to fcuk women, and then they are sent in behalf of their government to discuss different war politics with me....... and even if i get impressed with few french girls, fcuking any of them simply means for supporting Mr Sarkozy in his wars,.........."

the wrong background Western people is more meant to say that if Im brought in this position then its more because these b@stards are 'only' concerned with organizing wars, political/economical/direct military. if Im sitting for few months then its simply means for a loss on career side while these people who were usually sent to me dont even know what the 'career' means for. i came to australia to study from a very high ranked university while these people dont even know what the ranking of institutes means, as they generally take so many breaks even on schooling level that they simply dont know either about education or career type things and these people were sent in behalf of John Howard/Kevin Rudd/Julia Gillard to make noise on the streets and also to discuss politics while using every resource of australia with having a direct involvement from the political people of US/UK/Australia/Canada ............

its neither mean to abuse Western Society nor insulting any certain person but it would always be cleared to the rules of US/UK/Australia, including of Canada/France, that no politics can be discussed if they first send a woman to me. and there can't a reason why my pay scale would vary with my political statements, and these techniques can't make these nations proud in either sense. I was in the position to apply for australian citizenship in early 2008 but I wasn't willing to do that as my permanent visa was always enough for me to work in australia and I clearly passed my message to that time FS of US, Ms C.Rice, that a person like me can't be citizen of any country. I must not be involved in geo-political issues after being 'trapped' to apply for australian citizenship in late 2008. and with this condition, how will I make any statement if a woman is first sent with a clear words from my boss that my promotion/increase in salary will mainly depend on the 'political' statement I make on any place organized by their government??????

i came to India this time with a decision that Im using my australian passport for the last time, or the second last time. with full communication with the government agencies here that either take me in a Proper Legal Process, or, help me go with russian officials. a month before, including the recent visit of Julia Gillard to India, I first brought an Australian Flag and pissed on it in Open, and then i threw that flag near my toilet to give her a clear message to Ms Gillard that things are gone now . .............. there can't be any talk anymore until Im taken on a proper legal system, and I dont trust CBI also until it is being controlled by MMS, the CBI which always created condition for me in India that I would finally beg for help from the Western rulers. there can't be any personal approach/personal contact by any politician of any country, until Im taken on a proper legal process, or, just let me go to russia. I can't be put on the condition that if I come out of my home then Im always on watch by the government agencies of different nations. and its less about security but more about a threat that if any of them offend with me then it will then be hard to find out who really did that. when I gave my letter on the hands of Russian Ambassador in Sydney, my letter for Mr Putin, I clearly stated that, "if these democratic countries can't take me on a proper legal process then its simply means that they will have to finally kill me one day........"

(with that I have demanded the State of Western Australia as my fair claim for the things happened with me for so long. things happened with me can't bring claim for a certain person, Indian government itself has given billions of dollars to different countries. but as I was migrated under STNI category of western australia and was then bound to live in Perth for at least 2 years which created so many problems for the State of India, and as India has been proved a good country by all aspects, hence the 'Western Australia' would now be handed over to India in front of that world which discussed so many things about India for so long. my fair claims for the things happaned for so long can't be measured in monetory terms and as they did whatever they could out of mine against India, hence, they did whatever they could do with me in that state and finally I got the Land/State of Western Australia. I want that state under control of India, in the same way as China control Hong Kong, I have cleared to Gillard Ministry while her recent visit to India....... )


How to define a wrong person/society?

I told may times while living in Australia that the people who give wrong information, discuss the facts based on lies, bargain personal life/career to solve purpose of wars, bring any person on gun point to bargain him on political issues this way, can be said to be the wrong people/society in either sense. and Western background People do qualify on this criterion with reference of every certain incident occurred during last 6 years around me......


=> Helping Wrong Background Western People

there was a time when there were too many attacks on the International students in Australia in 2009 to 2010, and few where sent to me to discuss, how those under high school passed people were superior to the International students doing master level engineering/ medicines/ business studies this way. and I simply passed my message as below:

"Bluff of Superiority, based on publicity of greatness, without any credibility or proper educational background."

yesterday I discussed that one daye we had an official meeting by Toshiba Motor suppliers and few were sent in behalf of Mr T.Blair and involved me in the talks which were not related to our profession. I always tried to ignore these talks but as he was looking like a senior of team Blair, I told him as below:

"Nothing came from sky and nothing will ever come from sky, and whatever is new today will be old tomorrow and you need those people who may develop new technologies or improve the existing ones. you can't run your industries by the labors you make in your society. YOU ARE MAKING LABORS." (the last line I told him in a very clear way.)

and I made few very bad posts about Britain recently as I wanted to tell them clearly that you want someone from India who may help you get your work done in India, engage India in your different wars in behalf of your White/Christian/Western belief, and then you do need that certain who may help protect your falling country/economy.......

few times I said in a little rude way but very clearly as below:
"your men are labors and women prostitutes and your economy is falling this way. but even if not education but at least your women are trained in group sex/prostitutions/Escorts etc since schooling and better keep sending your women to India to earn by prostitution and help British economy this way. and when one of these women get pregnant, make that kid, the Indian Origin future British Prime Minister."
(what message I passed for prince Charles yesterday, even if your young generation taking drugs from beginning, they may hardly be suitable for labor works, the only credibility I saw in your society that your women can well work as pretty good sex workers. the only skill I saw in your society and Im not sure how much will help your falling economy this way.........)

look, things are simple, that Nothing will ever come from sky and you yourself can't run your different industries/medicines/businesses by your own people. and winning wars is also not easy as US is a hollow power and UK is almost nothing. and only a wrong Background person would help you keep your wrong social structure, to maintain life style of wrong background Western People in either way.........


=> Western Pig Class:

I got a very special experience of this certain class of Britain, Australia, US, including of those who were coming from Canada. this certain class work for few days and spend on weekends, no career and no future, working for hardly around $15 to $22/hour jobs, but they are involved in discussing different 'war politics' in behalf of their rulers. (just go to backpakers of Sydney and you will find their 6 bed rooms to be filled with europeans, mainly British, almost all of them have Steel Cap Boot for construction works, which is little higher paid at around $20 to $22/hour, as compare to the european/british girls working in Cafe's for hardly $16 to $18/hour jobs.) and I find this Western Pig Class having a ratio of around at least 70% in Australia, 80% in Britain and I guess around 70% in US too. this "Pig Class" earn 'only' as much that they may feed themselves, work few days and spending on weekends, living for no career/future progress and are struggling hard to maintain their "Superiority" based on their White/Christian/Western belief, as guided by their media, inspired by wrong publicity of developing nations

(and as handled by their government, this certain Western Pig Class is involved in discussing different 'War Politics' in terms of racial war/religious war/political war/economic war/social war/culture war etc, including the direct military operations continuing by Western Forces in different parts of world right now.....)

one day I said, there might be a time of 90s when professionals were 'happy' while having an unskilled job in western nations but now they may have a better life in India, China, ASEAN, South America etc on the basis of their degrees, they earned from Western nations, which may help them get good professional jobs in their home countries, due to high growth in these countries since 2002, as in case of India. you certainly can't have a better life in Australia while working in KFC, Mc Donalds, 7-11, local factories etc, at hardly $36k to $45k, as compare to doing a professional job in India for 20lacs+ ($40,000+), the normal starting pay for a Master level foreign degree holder person, with a promising future after getting more work experience. while its really hard to get a permanent general labor job in Sydney I saw, a big ratio of people there are on hourly payment only

a labor is 'only' a labor, the certain "Hand to Mouth class", whether its India or Australia/US/UK. but its true that a labor may have a 'decent' life in UK, Australia, US, Canada etc, if he may manage to get 'any' job somehow, while labor class of India isn't in the same position. while now professionals, including small shop honors also, may have a decent life in India with better career progress with more experience

=> for example of major BRIC/E7 economic, India, even if unemployment of India is maintained at 10% for last 20 years, things have been considerably changed while I can't see any real change in Sydney, Perth etc during last 10 years of my stay . Indian companies have bought many big brands and have considerable improved their production lines to the standard of western nations, since then. for example, the most advanced manufactured products we see in cities are vehicles, and have a look on the modals of Tata, Mahindra etc, they are now fit in comparison to Western competitors. and the same type of things are seen in other sectors while Indian IT industries have even exceeded performance of western competitors now. that time has gone when these Asian companies were copying technologies, now we would see new technologies coming from Asian tigers.........

Tata Motors : Home

New Mahindra Scorpio 2012 | 4 Wheel Drive Vehicle | Best SUV in India

 

[Hello_10]

U.S. is nearing its debt ceiling again, Treasury Department warns

The federal government will probably hit its $16.4-trillion borrowing limit by the end of the year, adding more urgency to efforts to avoid the fiscal cliff.

October 31, 2012

WASHINGTON — The nation's debt ceiling once again looms as the spark to congressional brinkmanship that could threaten the slowly recovering economy.

The Treasury Department said Wednesday that the U.S. probably will hit its $16.4-trillion borrowing limit by the end of the year, at the same time that Congress will be grappling with the automatic tax hikes and large government spending cuts scheduled to kick in Jan. 1.

"It adds to the caldron of the dark brew," Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said of the fast-approaching debt limit. "That makes the disaster more disastrous." :usa:

The Congressional Budget Office and most economists predict another recession in 2013 if the confluence of tax increases and spending reductions known as the fiscal cliff takes place.

And straying too close to the debt limit — not to mention hitting it — probably would lead to a second downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. In mid-2011, a bitter standoff over the issue led to the first credit revision. :facepalm:

The Treasury said Wednesday it could take "extraordinary measures" to juggle the nation's finances to give Congress and the White House more time to work on a debt-limit increase. But even those steps — essentially a series of accounting maneuvers — would buy only into early 2013 before the government faced a possible default.

As of Tuesday, the U.S. debt was $16.165 trillion. (at tuesday at 30/10/2012)

"I think that, as we saw last summer [2011], it's important that the debt limit is raised in a timely manner, but really that's in Congress' hands," said Matthew Rutherford, assistant Treasury secretary for financial markets.

It was the agreement then to boost the limit that created the $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts that are part of the fiscal cliff. The other part is the expiration of the George W. Bush-era tax cuts.

Lawmakers and President Obama will try to deal with the fiscal cliff after next week's elections. The debt limit will probably be addressed then as well, although it has not yet been the focus of Democrats or Republicans.

House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said in May that he had a simple principle for raising the debt limit — any increase must be offset "by spending cuts and reforms that exceed the amount of the debt limit increase."

"No decisions have been made on timing, but the speaker's principle — that spending cuts and reforms must exceed any debt hike — will have to be met," Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith said Wednesday.

A White House spokeswoman declined to comment.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, have warned about the negative ramifications for the U.S. and world economies if the debt limit is not raised.

U.S. is nearing its debt ceiling again, Treasury Department warns - Los Angeles Times

its already around $16.3trillion+ by 24/11/2012, as below:

U.S. National Debt Clock

 

[Hello_10]

U.S. most armed country with 90 guns per 100 people

(Reuters) - The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, a report released on Tuesday said.

U.S. citizens own 270 million of the world's 875 million known firearms, according to the Small Arms Survey 2007 by the Geneva-based Graduate Institute of International Studies.

About 4.5 million of the 8 million new guns manufactured worldwide each year are purchased in the United States, it said.

"There is roughly one firearm for every seven people worldwide. Without the United States, though, this drops to about one firearm per 10 people," it said.

India had the world's second-largest civilian gun arsenal, with an estimated 46 million firearms outside law enforcement and the military, though this represented just four guns per 100 people there. China, ranked third with 40 million privately held guns, had 3 firearms per 100 people.

Germany, France, Pakistan, Mexico, Brazil and Russia were next in the ranking of country's overall civilian gun arsenals.

On a per-capita basis, Yemen had the second most heavily armed citizenry behind the United States, with 61 guns per 100 people, followed by Finland with 56, Switzerland with 46, Iraq with 39 and Serbia with 38.

France, Canada, Sweden, Austria and Germany were next, each with about 30 guns per 100 people, while many poorer countries often associated with violence ranked much lower. Nigeria, for instance, had just one gun per 100 people.

"Firearms are very unevenly distributed around the world. The image we have of certain regions such as Africa or Latin America being awash with weapons -- these images are certainly misleading," Small Arms Survey director Keith Krause said.

"Weapons ownership may be correlated with rising levels of wealth, and that means we need to think about future demand in parts of the world where economic growth is giving people larger disposable income," he told a Geneva news conference.

The report, which relied on government data, surveys and media reports to estimate the size of world arsenals, estimated there were 650 million civilian firearms worldwide, and 225 million held by law enforcement and military forces.

Five years ago, the Small Arms Survey had estimated there were a total of just 640 million firearms globally.

"Civilian holdings of weapons worldwide are much larger than we previously believed," Krause said, attributing the increase largely to better research and more data on weapon distribution networks.

Only about 12 percent of civilian weapons are thought to be registered with authorities.

U.S. most armed country with 90 guns per 100 people | Reuters

 

[Hello_10]

Hate groups, citizen militias surge in U.S. as race and economy fuel tensions
Reuters Mar 9, 2012

WINSTON-SALEM, North Carolina — The number of hate and anti-government groups in the United States continued to rise last year, fueled by racial tensions, conspiracy theories and anger over economic inequality, according to a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The most explosive growth came from the so-called Patriot movement, whose adherents view the federal government as their enemy.

The Patriot movement reached a peak in 1996, a year after right-wing extremist Timothy McVeigh set off a truck bomb outside the Oklahoma City federal building, killing 168 people. McVeigh and a co-conspirator were convicted, and McVeigh was executed.

The number of Patriot groups, a largely rural phenomenon sometimes referred to as the militia movement, increased to 1,274 groups in 2011 from 824 in 2010, the report released on Thursday said.

The number of those organizations has swelled in recent years since the economy slumped into recession and Democratic President Barack Obama, the country’s first black president, was elected in 2008, said the law center, which has tracked extremist groups for three decades.

A backlash against federal bail outs of the bank and auto industries, and discredited allegations that Obama was not born in the United States and therefore disqualified to be president, provided believers with the rationale to join such groups, according to the report.

Heated political rhetoric from this year’s presidential campaign could attract more adherents, said Mark Potok, senior fellow at the center and editor of the report.

“The campaign season has simply added fuel to the fire,” Potok said. These groups vehemently oppose Obama and abhor the possibility that he could be re-elected to a second term in November. “To them, that’s a horror show,” Potok said. The center counted 1,018 hate groups in the United States last year, up from 1,002 in 2010. The number of groups have been increasing since 2000, when the center counted 602.

Potok said it was hard to gauge how many Americans are members of hate groups, but estimated the number was between 200,000 and 300,000 people.


The U.S. election campaign season has simply added fuel to the fire


The center also estimated that some 300,000 Americans were part of the so-called “sovereign citizens” movement who flout most laws, do not pay federal taxes and even refuse to obtain driver’s licenses.

The report’s findings echoed comments last month in Washington by the FBI about a growing threat of violence by members of these “sovereign citizen” groups.

Stuart McArthur, deputy assistant director in the FBI’s counterterrorism division, told a news conference that routine encounters with police can turn violent “at the drop of a hat.” He cited shootings of police officers after routine traffic stops in Arkansas and Texas the past two years.

Convictions of such extremists, mostly for white-collar crimes such as fraud, increased to 18 each in 2010 and 2011 from 10 in 2009, the FBI said.

Most members of hate groups and anti-government organizations have not committed crimes, Potok said. But the center’s report highlighted recent examples where authorities accused militia members of plotting violence.

In one case, authorities accused four Georgia members of a militia group of plotting to obtain explosives and produce the deadly toxin ricin, with which they intended to attack government officials.

In Michigan, seven members of a Midwestern militia group called the Hutaree are standing trial on charges that they plotted to kill police to spark a wider insurrection.

The law center also found the number of groups specifically targeting gays and lesbians rose to 27 in 2011 from 17 in 2010, and the number of anti-Muslim groups jumped to 30 from 10.

But the number of so-called “nativist extremist” groups who harass people they suspect of being illegal immigrants appeared to be in decline. The number of those groups dropped to 184 in 2011 from 319 the year before.

The center attributed the decline in part to the push in some states for laws aimed at cracking down on illegal immigrants, the report said. “Nativist groups have lost the wind in their sails as their issue has been co-opted by politicians,” Potok said.

The Southern Poverty Law Center was formed in the early 1970s to defend the legal rights of African Americans following the civil rights reforms of the 1960s. It was instrumental in some convictions of members of white supremacist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan for civil rights abuses against blacks. It has broadened to other issues in recent years.

Hate groups, citizen militias surge in U.S. as race and economy fuel tensions | News | National Post

 

[Hello_10]

United States incarceration rate

The incarceration rate in the United States of America is the highest in the world. As of 2009, the incarceration rate was 743 per 100,000 of national population (0.743%). In comparison, Canada was 123rd in the world as 117 per 100,000, and China had 120 per 100,000. While Americans only represent about 5 percent of the world's population, nearly one-quarter of the entire world's inmates have been incarcerated in the United States in recent years . Imprisonment of America's 2.3 million prisoners, costing $24,000 yearly, and $5.1 billion in new prison construction, consumes $60 billion in budget expenditures.

United States incarceration rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

,
the main thing in this news is as below. that is, 1 in 32 Americans there is either in jail or about to visit there

File:Correctional Populations in the United States 1980-2008.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[faithfulguy]

This Hello_10 guy is hoping for a pie in the sky, the demise of USA.

 

[Hello_10]

Americans Renouncing Citizenship at Record Levels to Protect Wealth
June 25, 2012

NEW YORK -- – America's rich are renouncing their citizenship at record levels -- just to get richer.

Startling new data from Uncle Sam show that defections by Americans are expected to double this year, largely to avoid any stiff tax bills resulting from the proposed 55 percent hike on the rich, as well as the likely Dec. 31 expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts.

As many as 8,000 US citizens are projected by immigration officials to renounce in 2012, or about 154 a week, versus 3,805 in 2011, or about 73 per week.

"High-net-worth individuals are making decisions that having a US passport just isn't worth the cost anymore," according to Jim Duggan, a lawyer at Duggan Bertsch, which specializes in protecting assets of the wealthy. "They're able to do what they do from any place in the world, and they're choosing to do it from places with much lower tax rates."

Duggan added, "Some are philosophically disgusted at the course our country is taking, in all kinds of ways. They're making a strong protest of 'enough is enough.' But largely, it's an economic decision."

There is a catch to reaching tax nirvana. To renounce citizenship, and thus escape any future US taxes forever, a citizen must buy that freedom with a one-time exit tax of 15 percent on the fair-market value of all assets -- including real estate, securities, businesses and personal belongings -- less their basis price.

Duggan said that dozens of tax-haven nations and island regimes around the world eagerly welcome disenchanted rich Americans with quick citizenship, business deals and protections from the US Justice Department and the IRS. Among the popular spots: Australia, Norway, Singapore, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Guernsey and Antigua.

And there is one way to have your cake and eat it, too, he added.

The US possessions in the Caribbean -- St. Thomas, St. John and St. Croix -- give a 90 percent tax credit to US citizens living there at least 183 days a year, resulting in an effective tax rate of just 3.5 percent, he said.

Americans Renouncing Citizenship at Record Levels to Protect Wealth | Fox News Latino

December 5, 2012

WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama told about 105 chief executives of big companies Wednesday that higher-income Americans—including those in the audience—should face higher tax rates. A few blocks away, Republicans huddled with small-business owners to promote the argument that a rate increase would stifle the economy.

The dueling events perfectly illustrated how the two parties are courting different allies in the private sector as each aims to deploy public pressure in the stalled "fiscal cliff" budget talks.

Obama, GOP Each Pitch to Business - WSJ.com

 

[Hasbara Buster]

The sooner, the better.

 

[Hello_10]

U.S. is nearing its debt ceiling again, Treasury Department warns

The federal government will probably hit its $16.4-trillion borrowing limit by the end of the year, adding more urgency to efforts to avoid the fiscal cliff.

October 31, 2012

WASHINGTON — The nation's debt ceiling once again looms as the spark to congressional brinkmanship that could threaten the slowly recovering economy.

The Treasury Department said Wednesday that the U.S. probably will hit its $16.4-trillion borrowing limit by the end of the year, at the same time that Congress will be grappling with the automatic tax hikes and large government spending cuts scheduled to kick in Jan. 1.

"It adds to the caldron of the dark brew," Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said of the fast-approaching debt limit. "That makes the disaster more disastrous." :usa:

The Congressional Budget Office and most economists predict another recession in 2013 if the confluence of tax increases and spending reductions known as the fiscal cliff takes place.

And straying too close to the debt limit — not to mention hitting it — probably would lead to a second downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. In mid-2011, a bitter standoff over the issue led to the first credit revision. :facepalm:

The Treasury said Wednesday it could take "extraordinary measures" to juggle the nation's finances to give Congress and the White House more time to work on a debt-limit increase. But even those steps — essentially a series of accounting maneuvers — would buy only into early 2013 before the government faced a possible default.

As of Tuesday, the U.S. debt was $16.165 trillion. (at tuesday at 30/10/2012)

"I think that, as we saw last summer [2011], it's important that the debt limit is raised in a timely manner, but really that's in Congress' hands," said Matthew Rutherford, assistant Treasury secretary for financial markets.

It was the agreement then to boost the limit that created the $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts that are part of the fiscal cliff. The other part is the expiration of the George W. Bush-era tax cuts.

Lawmakers and President Obama will try to deal with the fiscal cliff after next week's elections. The debt limit will probably be addressed then as well, although it has not yet been the focus of Democrats or Republicans.

House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said in May that he had a simple principle for raising the debt limit — any increase must be offset "by spending cuts and reforms that exceed the amount of the debt limit increase."

"No decisions have been made on timing, but the speaker's principle — that spending cuts and reforms must exceed any debt hike — will have to be met," Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith said Wednesday.

A White House spokeswoman declined to comment.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, have warned about the negative ramifications for the U.S. and world economies if the debt limit is not raised.

U.S. is nearing its debt ceiling again, Treasury Department warns - Los Angeles Times

U.S. National Debt Clock

 

[danger007]

chinese influence territory??? .... Americans will bring down those who ever eying on their territory

 

[Mike_Brando]

1. You are confident of 'smoking' (whatever/whoever) even without knowing the capabilities of the other side.
2. Muhammad Yunus did win a Nobel prize in Peace, and A K Sen (born in BD) won an award in Economics. Nobel Prize being a Western award always favours Westerners, so the Soviet Union collectively won as many awards as insignificant tiny countries like, maybe Belgium or Netherlands.

Also, Bangladesh being much poorer than the wealthier countries can not afford to spend much on scientific research and development, by default.

3. Can you show me "world media" reports of Bangladesh being flooded any time in the last five years for a prolonged period of time? I picked the duration of five years, at random, but that figure could be changed, if needed. The idea is that Bangladesh has not been 'flooded' recently, which reinforces my point that USA citizens mostly know whatever tripe is fed to them by their Jewish controlled media.



Russia is no Soviet Union.
Russia did not save Saddam Hussein or Muammar Qaddafi.
If USA is gone, it would mean Al Saud, GCC, Jordan, Morocco and other countries' joker rulers would also be gone, most probably. That would be good for the world as a whole.

lets not lie about Dr.Amartya Sen please!he is as much Indian as Rabindranath Tagore!he was born in Shantiniketan,W.B.,India and have been educated from the University of Calcutta!he is not by any mean a Bangladeshi other than the fact that his ancestral home is in Bangladesh!you should be rather happy with Mohd. Younus!