The China Navy Third Fleet Carrier Battle Group Named PLANS FUJIAN 福建舰 (CVBG-18) Officially Launched !

[S10]

Quite strange, that they don't have this in straight line. I found it before, wanted to get better image to see if it's true.
any idea why its like that? Design not properly copied?View attachment 854794View attachment 854795

It's called angled landing deck dimwit. Put down the cow urine. It's giving you brain damage.

USS Gerald Ford

 

[Daniel808]

Quite strange, that they don't have this in straight line. I found it before, wanted to get better image to see if it's true.
any idea why its like that? Design not properly copied?View attachment 854794View attachment 854795

Damn, looks like Chinese Engineer need to learn math from indian supah powah

This is the proportional Aircraft carrier design according to india
definetly straight line in the stern

 

[avenuepark57]

Laughable Indians as always

Learn what integrated electric propulsion is first. Actually, find a working toilet first, before you dump your shit on the internet.

Unlike the U.S. Navy’s supercarriers, the Type 003 uses conventional rather than nuclear propulsion and features three catapults instead of four

China Launches The Fujian, Its Most Capable Aircraft Carrier Yet (Updated)

Previously known just as the Type 003, the new carrier features catapults and is expected to host advanced aircraft and drones.

www.thedrive.com

 

[Beast]

Unlike the U.S. Navy’s supercarriers, the Type 003 uses conventional rather than nuclear propulsion and features three catapults instead of four

China Launches The Fujian, Its Most Capable Aircraft Carrier Yet (Updated)

Previously known just as the Type 003, the new carrier features catapults and is expected to host advanced aircraft and drones.

www.thedrive.com

It is using IEP , as sophisticated as Queen Elizabeth class carrier propulsion unlike India aircraft carrier using ill efficient oldies system.

3 catapult do not hamper any ops as all deck operation max used 3 catapult for launching..

And finally, the Chinese EMAL are far more superior, reliable and capable than US Gerald Ford crappy EMAL.

 

[S10]

Unlike the U.S. Navy’s supercarriers, the Type 003 uses conventional rather than nuclear propulsion and features three catapults instead of four

China Launches The Fujian, Its Most Capable Aircraft Carrier Yet (Updated)

Previously known just as the Type 003, the new carrier features catapults and is expected to host advanced aircraft and drones.

www.thedrive.com

No wonder you're such a retard.

They're both integrated electric propulsion. China powers the electric generators with boilers, while Americans use nuclear reactors. The generators in turn power the onboard systems. You still have no idea how this works do you? How much cow piss did you drink today?

 

[MH.Yang]

Honestly, China targeting to more than 10 Fleet Carriers for long term (2035-2040). Because, Chinese interests is growing in all over the world. And they need to keep that Sea Lanes secure from threats (Conventional & Unconventional).


But Fleet Carriers (Like CVG-16, CVBG-17, CVBG-18, and so on.....) only move to the hot spot location if needed.
For Patrolling and maintaining presence purpose, they will use Type 076 Medium Carrier & Type 075 LHD that more cost efficent to operate.

8 aircraft carriers are enough.

We only need to control the route from East Asia to East Africa, and we should not enter the Atlantic and Mediterranean.

Once our naval force exceeds that of the USA, the hegemony of the USA is likely to collapse, and Europe is bound to rise and seize the sea power of the Atlantic.
If we don't go to the Atlantic, we can wait for the conflict of interest between the USA and Europe to break out, we can wait patiently for the losers to come to us for help. If we go into the Atlantic, they will unite against us.



If the USA is not willing to give up its sea power and engage in a naval arms race with us. We can use the naval arms race to substantially increase US military spending and bring down the US economy.

BTW: China's shipbuilding capacity is 30 times that of the USA(per year 12 million tons:0.4 million tons)
The cost of shipbuilding in China is less than half that in the USA
055's cost is $0.9 billion.
Burke's cost $2.58 billion.
How does the USA respond to this situation?
Relinquish control of the sea？Or double the military spending? 10% GDP,like the Soviet Union?

 

[Beast]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1537681855222370304

Might be the world first AESA CIWS going into operation.

 

[kuge]

This is a good example of how copying someone's homework doesn't mean you understand the material. The US carriers that use EM catapults are nuclear powered, meaning there is almost an unlimited amount of electrical power available and makes sense.Nuclear-powered Ford and Nimitz-class ships have much more free storage capacity so they can store more jet fuel, weapons, and so on. While the Chinese carrier is fossil fueled so it normally would have an excess amount of steam and therefore should use steam catapults instead. The EM cats require vast amounts of electricity, meaning you'll be stressing the boilers to drive generators for electricity (losing efficiency) to use the cats. This will limit the sortie rates and cause more frequent fuel replenishment (thus limiting range or station time). This carrier is far from being operational anytime soon. The Chinese do have experience with carrier operations they have been for the past 10 years. But going from a ramp style to a catapult launch system is a very large step and one they are not familiar with.
US navy has been using catapult launch for decades and are the best in the world in carrier operations. Not just in ship board operations but also in aviation operations. China's propulsion technology is still several generations behind. Still using steam turbines when a lot of newer ships are going IEP and older generations of ships using gas turbines

summary:.................you dont know what you are muttering about!!

 

[S10]

For navies, the real pay-off in network-centric operations is foreshortening conflict by causing the adversary to concede long before his means to challenge have been exhausted, or long before additional friendly forces could be expected to reach in the crisis area. This efficacy revolves around the proficiency of network-centric forces to carry out precise effects-based operations, that is, result-oriented, activity focused on rival behaviour. The purpose of these campaigns is psychological rather than physical. Therefore, they are concentrated on the enemy’s decision-making procedure and aptitude to take decisive action in some coherent manner—particularly getting inside the enemy’s OODA loop and prompting exploiting chaos. The know-how, precision, speed, and swiftness brought by network-centric operations constitute the price of admission into this realm.

Quit copy and pasting irrelevant passages from elsewhere. We know you're retarded from the dumb shit you posted earlier. There is no recovering from it. This is becoming sad, like an Indian attempting to find a working toilet.

 

[MH.Yang]

Quite strange, that they don't have this in straight line. I found it before, wanted to get better image to see if it's true.
any idea why its like that? Design not properly copied?View attachment 854794View attachment 854795

A typical Indian.

I suggest you send this picture to WION or FOX. You can tell them that you have found a big defect in the Chinese aircraft carrier.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Looks good but not in the league of our INS Vikrant.

Lol its way way better than your trash vikrant

Taiwan's days are numbered. By 2030s China will have 10 carrier strike groups operational.

No China has no global ambitions like USN but regional ambitions ( indo pacific) 6-7 carriers are more than enough for China. And 10 carriers in 2030 will impossible for China

This is a good example of how copying someone's homework doesn't mean you understand the material. The US carriers that use EM catapults are nuclear powered, meaning there is almost an unlimited amount of electrical power available and makes sense.Nuclear-powered Ford and Nimitz-class ships have much more free storage capacity so they can store more jet fuel, weapons, and so on. While the Chinese carrier is fossil fueled so it normally would have an excess amount of steam and therefore should use steam catapults instead. The EM cats require vast amounts of electricity, meaning you'll be stressing the boilers to drive generators for electricity (losing efficiency) to use the cats. This will limit the sortie rates and cause more frequent fuel replenishment (thus limiting range or station time). This carrier is far from being operational anytime soon. The Chinese do have experience with carrier operations they have been for the past 10 years. But going from a ramp style to a catapult launch system is a very large step and one they are not familiar with.
US navy has been using catapult launch for decades and are the best in the world in carrier operations. Not just in ship board operations but also in aviation operations. China's propulsion technology is still several generations behind. Still using steam turbines when a lot of newer ships are going IEP and older generations of ships using gas turbines

Copy is old thing for China they are designing their all military equipment from scratch now

Quite strange, that they don't have this in straight line. I found it before, wanted to get better image to see if it's true.
any idea why its like that? Design not properly copied?View attachment 854794View attachment 854795

Are you Naval engineer?

Unlike the U.S. Navy’s supercarriers, the Type 003 uses conventional rather than nuclear propulsion and features three catapults instead of four

China Launches The Fujian, Its Most Capable Aircraft Carrier Yet (Updated)

Previously known just as the Type 003, the new carrier features catapults and is expected to host advanced aircraft and drones.

www.thedrive.com

Its China's first Super carrier so they did very good job to design and develop and China has no global ambitions like USA their carriers normally will sail through Indian and pacific oceans, and their very next class of carriers will have nuclear propulsion and it doesn't matter it has 3 catapult and Ford have 4

 

[avenuepark57]

Lol its way way better than your trash vikrant

INS Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

INS Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM

Not made in India. 003 is 100% made in China. Sanction proof.

 

[Han Patriot]

sour grape.

That's a closet Indian.

INS Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM

See....

 

[White and Green with M/S]

INS Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM

So??? Based on old Soviet era design and practice and this Chinese carrier is modern design so it has no need to carry LRSAM when TYPE-52E/ TYPE 55 destroyers and cruisers equipped with long range HQ-9C SAMs

INS Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM

Do you ever heard CARRIER BATTLE GROUPS??