What's new

TF-X Turkish Fighter & Trainer Aircraft Projects

What a beauty !
5299497A-C887-47A8-B657-20E1B26AE42C.jpeg
 
. .
July 31 dead line for tfx engine is near.any news
 
. . . .
The number of hard points are pretty good, 2 air to air missile can be put on the end of the wings, and 4 guided bombs could be put under the wings, also one more hardpoint to put aselpod under the body. So:

2 anti air missiles
4 guided bombs
1 aselpod

is a nice CAS configuration.
 
.
The number of hard points are pretty good, 2 air to air missile can be put on the end of the wings, and 4 guided bombs could be put under the wings, also one more hardpoint to put aselpod under the body. So:

2 anti air missiles
4 guided bombs
1 aselpod

is a nice CAS configuration.
This message also gives important clues about the choice of engine.

Aselpod 240 kg
2x HGK-82 600 kg
2x KGK-82 600 kg
2x Aim9x 160 kg
 
. .
http://www.kokpit.aero/hurjet-tek-cift-motor

this guy is engine master only turkish


Friends,

I had a bit of free time. On the link, i translated it into English so that it would be an education for the average forum user.
Although I am not much familiar with aviation technical terms, I try to use the correct terms as much as possible. If I have been mistaken, my apologies and any corrections are welcome.




What are the engine options at Hürjet?

Supersonic training aircrafts are necessary to train pilots in military aviation and are an integral part of the air force. They have a very important role in completing the trainings required for pilots' high-speed flights and sighting tactics. For this purpose, Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI), on 14 August 2017 in accordance with the needs of the Turkish Air Force and to take the place of the currently used T-38 fleet, is aiming to develop jet training and light aircraft, and therefore "Training Jet and Light attack aircraft (Hürjet) Project "has been started.

Although we don't have much information about the project because it is at the consept phase at the moment, we had the opportunity to see Hürjet's mock-up in the live broadcast of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's at the Kahramankazan facility of TAI on Monday, June 19th. It was remarkable that the model aircraft was single-engine one. Hürjet came out as a twin-engine training plane in the pictures published on TAI's website and the plane that we had the opportunity to see for the first time on the evening of 19th June was a single engine model.

WHAT ARE THE ENGINE PREFERENCES?

In this short article we will examine some of the engine preferences of some supersonic training aircrafts and carry out ideas about the Hürjet engine. It is useful to be aware that we are looking for an answer to a rather complex question, and that the answer needs to be searched in the light of various factors.

Some questions are not easy to answer and this is one of them!

Jet Training Aircraft and Engine Preferences

It would be useful to review some of the jet training aircrafts before interpreting single or dual engine options for Hürjet. We can start by reviewing the turbofan engines used in the T-50 / -50A, Hawk T2 (Hawk 128) Hongdu L-15 and Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master training aircrafts. The engines used in the airplanes are given comparatively on the table.


Yeni Resim.png


While T-50 / -50A and Hawk T2 training aircrafts are single-engine, the L-15 Falcon training aircraft used by the Chinese Air Force and the Italian M-346 are dual-engine.


Yeni Resim (1).png

Jet training aircrafts



Yeni Resim (2).png

Turbofan engines used in jet training aircrafts


If we go back to the main topic of our writing, is the selection of single / dual engine selection; being a single or dual engine is a question that needs to be answered for every platform rather than just a question asked for training aircraft. For example, by examining F-22 and F-35:

A dual motor was needed to get the F-22 to work in accordance with the design goals / requirements and to achieve the necessary propulsion for the platform. The F-35 is designed with a single engine and can provide the necessary thrust. Although both aircraft were designed by Lockheed Martin and the engines by Pratt & Whitney, the F-22 is a dual-engine, while the F-35 is a single-engine. The choice of a single / dual engine should be at the center of the decision making of the platform to be fitted.

Single-engine airplanes can not achieve as high an altitude or cruising speed as dual-engine versions, and must operate safely with a single engine for a long period of time. If we look at the progress of security in an example:

The F135 engines used in the F-35 were built based on the F119 engine which is used in the F-22 and were never wrecked during the 50,000-hour flight. It takes into account the fact that several decades have provided significant improvements in reliability. Especially, with dual engine, air combat ability of aircraft is more effective. Besides, dual-engine designs are heavier, more expensive, but offer a clear advantage in terms of safety and sometimes performance.


Summarizing our single / dual engine comparison:

1) Advantages of single engine:

A lighter aircraft

Higher thrust / weight ratio and higher performance

Lower running cost

Less spare parts and maintenance cost


2) Advantages of dual engine:

Safety (the fact that the second engine is available, but the reliability issue needs to be credited with significant improvements over the last few decades) is often better with the dual-engine and platform air combat capability

The biggest disadvantage of single engine arises when the total thrust provided by the dual engine is required from only one - existing- engine is required. The engine may require warmer operation, or a larger engine may be needed. As a result, mechanical difficulties in design will increase. When single / dual engine selection is made, the platform should be tailored around the engine in accordance with design-performance criteria and existing engine technology. I will briefly mention what these criteria are:

Design - Performance Measures: Expected task parameters, service ceiling (altitude), acceleration time / climb rate, range, useful load capacity and maximum take-off weight etc. Performance criteria are largely limited to existing engine technology.

Let's go back to the single / twin engine spec for Hürjet. In the 62nd issue of C4Defence defense magazine, an interwiev with Dr. Mahmut F. Akşit, General Manager of TAI Motor Sanayii A.Ş. (TEI), contains very important clues about Hürjet's engine. Based on this interwiev, I will go out of the details and start guessing what kind of engine is being considered for Hürjet. I want to convey the details that I see as important from the interview of Mr. Mahmut Akşit Bey:

"Hürjet's engine, half of the National Combat Aircraft engine, and twice the size of the National Helicopter motor. They consider the ready purchase in the first place; because we will be busy with both the national helicopter engine and the national combat aircraft engine. So we do not have the capacity to take the time right now. In Hürjet, it is likely that the first engine will be purchased as ready to use parts; However, as TEI, we'll be producing more than 150 of these engines in Turkey. That's our goal. We want Hürjet's engines to come out with the TEI serial numbers. Licensed production is also spoken in this framework. In licensed production, we produce 50-60 percent of the engine here, but we use what we do not get into our mass production, such as pipes, cables, from the OEM supply chain. After all, it is our production. "

A Power Pack around 60 kN of thrust is considered to be produced under licence in Turkey. If we take into account the desired thrust value, there are 2 different alternatives:

In the case of using an engine with thrust of 30 kN, similar to Rolls-Royce / Turbomeca Adour, Honeywell / ITEC F124-GA-200 or Ivchenko AI-222-25F, a twin engine version would be available,

In the case of a General Electric F404 or similar engine providing 60 kN thrust, it will be a single-engine aircraft.

During this selection, the most decisive detail will be the under license production permission in Turkey. Under similar conditions, we can give the T50 training plane as an example of licensed production. T-50 is powered by F404-GE-102 engine which is manufactured by Samsung Techwin under license. The General Purpose Helicopter project, in which TEI is working as a subcontractor responsible for licensed engine production, is also ongoing. Within the scope of this project; more than 50% of 236 pieces of T-700-TEI 701D turboshaft engines, including Engine Installation and Tests (AIT) processes, is manufacturing with TEI serial umbers in Turkey. It is contemplated that a similar business model will be applied for Hürjet's engine.

The selection of the engine, which will be procured from a ready to use supplier in the first stage and which is thought to be produced under the license will be very important. As a matter of fact, the platform will be shaped according to the engine and we have a goal to develop it with a motor of our own design. If an engine choice that is relatively easier to design is made, it will be shorter to develop the engine that will take its place. The point I want to emphasize is that if our current technology is to develop a 30 kN thrust engine, we would have to choose a 30 kN thrust twin engine design for Hürjet if it would be less risky with our human power. The opposite is also true. If our ultimate goal is to develop a domestic engine of the 60 kN class, the engine we produce under license for Hürjet must be in the 60 kN thrust class. We can list the decisive factors in motor selection as follows:

Which engines can be produced in Turkey under licence.

According to our technological competence, in which propulsion class we can develop the engine,

According to the roadmap of the engine design, which propulsion class of the engines improvement would be more suitable,

The cost, the financial strength and operational service lifetime,

Platform and accordingly, engine selection considering the potential market.

Wishing this article i prepared would be helpful, with the hope of finding an answer to a question that is not easy to answer.
 
Last edited:
. . .
UK unveils new next generation fighter jet called Tempest
By
George Allison
-
July 16, 2018

Tempest is expected to complement the F-35 and eventually replace Typhoon.

It is understood that £2 billion in initial funding will be set out to oversee the design and build of the aircraft, which will be operational in 2035. The project is a joint venture between BAE Systems, Rolls Royce, MBDA UK Ltd and Leonardo.

Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson said as he also launched the UK’s new Combat Air Strategy:

“We have been a world leader in the combat air sector for a century, with an enviable array of skills and technology, and this Strategy makes clear that we are determined to make sure it stays that way. It shows our allies that we are open to working together to protect the skies in an increasingly threatening future – and this concept model is just a glimpse into what the future could look like.

British defence industry is a huge contributor to UK prosperity, creating thousands of jobs in a thriving advanced manufacturing sector, and generating a UK sovereign capability that is the best in the world.

Today’s news leaves industry, our military, the country, and our allies in no doubt that the UK will be flying high in the combat air sector as we move into the next generation.”



The aircraft will no doubt put many of you in mind of Replica, a design study for an envisioned military aircraft with stealth capabilities, developed by BAE Systems. It was ultimately not pursued after the 90’s as the British government chose to proceed with involvement in the Joint Strike Fighter program instead, which ultimately led to the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II. Experience and data acquired through the programme was later rolled into the Joint Strike Fighter.

As part of the study, a full size model of the aircraft was constructed and was subjected to a rigorous test regime to determine its radar cross section. The model is shown below.

BAE_replica_1.jpg


According to reports, the Replica project is known to have been worked on from 1994 to 1999. It was also widely believed that Replica could have been intended to inform work on new generation aircraft and that looks to have been somewhat accurate, even based on how similar the design looks to Tempest.



The concept aircraft has been put together by British firms including BAE Systems, Leonardo, MBDA and Rolls-Royce, which have joined together with the RAF Rapid Capabilities Office to form ‘Team Tempest’ to pursue the opportunity.


An official computer generated image of Tempest from the Combat Air Strategy.
Team Tempest brings together the UK’s world leading industry and sovereign capabilities across future combat air’s four key technology areas: advanced combat air systems and integration (BAE Systems); advanced power and propulsion systems (Rolls-Royce); advanced sensors, electronics and avionics (Leonardo) and advanced weapon systems (MBDA).

The MiD will now set up a dedicated team to deliver the combat air acquisition programme. They will deliver a business case by the end of the year, and have initial conclusions on international partners by next summer – with engagement with potential partners beginning immediately.

Early decisions around how to acquire the capability will be confirmed by the end of 2020, before final investment decisions are made by 2025. The aim is then for a next generation platform to have operational capability by 2035.

The Government say that F-35 Lightning II and the Typhoon are two complementary multi-role combat aircraft that will make up the RAF’s combat air fleet, “placing the UK at the forefront of combat air technology” – with the Typhoon expected to remain in UK service until at least 2040.

Chief of the Air Staff Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier, said:

“The Combat Air Strategy will bring together the best of our people, industry and international partners to support the RAF lift-off into the next century of air power. Team Tempest demonstrates our commitment in ensuring that we continue to build our capabilities, draw upon our experience and history to bring forward a compelling vision for the next generation fighter jet. In last 100 years, the RAF has led the way and today’s announcement is a clear demonstration of what lies ahead.”

Charles Woodburn, Chief Executive of BAE Systems, said:

“The UK’s combat air capability, built by generations of committed and highly skilled people through a century long partnership between the RAF and industry, is admired the world over. The UK Government’s Combat Air Strategy is a powerful statement of intent to invest in next generation combat air systems. We’re proud to play a key role in this important programme, with our world leading technology, capability and skills, which will contribute to the UK’s defence and prosperity for decades to come.”

Warren East, Chief Executive Officer of Rolls-Royce, said:

“As the UK’s long-term power and propulsion partner, we warmly welcome the Government’s announcement of a Combat Air Strategy. The UK’s capability in combat air power and propulsion is at a critical point and this long-term commitment from Government will allow us to protect the expertise and key skills that are vital to retaining sovereign capability. It ensures that we are able to develop and deliver the advanced technologies that will be required in future combat air systems to help ensure our national security.”

Norman Bone, Chairman and Managing Director of Leonardo in the UK, said:

“As Britain’s national champion for advanced defence electronics, we are proud to be a part of Team Tempest. Work we have conducted under research and development programmes such as FOAS and FCAS has significantly advanced our thinking with regards to the complex electronics required for future air combat scenarios and we stand ready to support the future needs of the Royal Air Force. We are excited about the work that’s already been done, and the work still to do, on the FCAS TI programme and are all set for these activities to feed into the Typhoon successor programme.”

Chris Allam, Managing Director of MBDA UK, said:

“MBDA is proud to be providing its complex weapons expertise to the Team Tempest partnership. Delivering effects is central to next generation combat air systems, and we will continue to invest in developing our world leading complex weapons and novel technologies to ensure the UK retains sovereign operational advantage and freedom of action in Combat Air. The strong partnership (through the Portfolio Management Agreement) between MBDA and the MoD has already changed the paradigm for complex weapons developments in the UK, delivered world leading capabilities to the UK Armed Forces and provided savings in terms of both time and money. The Team Tempest partnership has the potential to do the same for Combat Air.”

 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom