Saif al-Arab
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 8,873
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
When you read my few line , you will realize , what i am talking about.
I am better at cryptology where numbers are involved rather than letters. Especially as your posts are very vague.
Just argue your case and explain what you mean. I explained in detail what is what and what is up and what is down. You can argue against my points if you disagree.
No. You want al-ahwaz/khuzistan like saddam (pan-arabs)?
The Arab world is almost the size of Russia. Almost 10 times larger than Iran as well. Why would any Arabs be interested in incorporating small Al-Ahwaz/Khuzestan? In this case Iraq. KSA for instance has more resources than any country on the planet other than 6.5 times larger Russia and 4 times larger Canada.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_resource#Natural_Resources_by_country
Having significant Arab minorities in Israel, Turkey, Iran etc. (entire region basically) is a good thing for Arab countries politically, economically and other areas. Those are great cards to play.
Al-Ahwaz as it is now would be a burden for Iraq or KSA as things stand now. There are no such aspirations. Those are the invention of the Iranian Mullah regime.
If the Iranian terror Mullah regime wants to prevent local discontent, not only in Al-Ahwaz but in Baluchistan and Sistan, Kurdish provinces and elsewhere, they should be doing everything in their power to provide basic services to locals, not oppress them politically, allow their languages to be used freely (they already use them in private or when together in public) and give them greater representation. Once that happens, they will have no need to detach themselves from the country.
Why do you think that most of the Iranian Arabs (first line of defense) back in 1979 did what they did? It was because, although they had certain grievances, lived overall stable and good lives under the Shah, unlike what followed later under a supposed Arabized and Islamist Mullah regime.
KSA learnt that ages ago in regards to certain regions of the country. To prevent discontent the state invested large sums of money on those cities, provinces etc. and gave local communities the freedom to deal with their own private dealings such as Shias doing their thing, as shown in this thread already, and them not being neglected.
Iranian leaders/politicians/regime have failed to do the above in an impressively bad fashion and that is why you have a hugely polarized society that is about to erupt. It's just a question of time if the Mullah terror regime does not wise up but they are reliant on chaos and misery so they can pursue the "us against them" rhetoric and brainwash locals.
This attack is a great example. KSA involvement is non-existent (by all accounts) but the mere mention of that has already removed the focus of Iranian intelligence incompetence once again, just like last year when the parliament and Khomeinis grave was attacked in broad daylight by some Iranian Kurds armed with AK47's.
Last edited: