1 Pakistan and Bangladesh based militants with the support of ISI have been blamed for almost every attack in India. Can it really be true that no attack takes place without Pakistan being blamed even though India makes 1/5th of the World Population and is known for religious violence?
As opposed to Pakistan, which is known as the citadel of religious harmony and tolerance?
2 The terrorists were talking in Hindi their speaking style their interviews with the media proved they were from Hyderabad as was stated by them. Many Hyderabadis themselves confirmed that they really were from the region of Hyderabad seeing their speaking style and interview.
Right, it's not like they could imitate an accent. That would be so difficult. Besides, he even said "Bhagvaan". What more proof does one require?
3 Hemant Karkare had implicated Colonel Prasad Purohit and a number of Indian Hindu terrorists for the attacks and stated that some BJP leaders could be responsible for the attacks. He was killed within the first 10 minutes of the attack. Several BJP leaders have said that "he got what he deserved" and some fanatic hindu websites stated he was a "slave of muslims"
Him being the head of the Anti terror squad of Mumbai could not have anything to do with him being present there, could it? He should have learned from Pakistan, where elite forces disappeared into thin air when terrorists attacked the cricketeers they were supposedly protecting. Instead, this idiot rushed headlong into the thick of the action - stupid Indians. BTW if he was killed within ten minutes of the commencement of the attacks, I wonder how he appeared on television news channels, putting on his helmet and BPJs in preparation for going to confront the terrorists. Must have been his ghost or deceptive twin, who was seen preparing several hours after the attacks took place.
And I wonder how Colonel Purohit, who was already in jail and still is, feels about Karkare being killed to get him out, since apparently they forgot to release him, the beneficiary of the conspiracy. How did it help him?
4 It is speculated that Hemant Karkares widow did not take Modi’s compensation for this very reason and she knew he was trying to capitalize on the anger left after the attacks as a basis to demonize Muslims and blame Pakistan. Several people suggested she might have thought or known he was responsible for the attacks as well. Why did Karkares wife deny the compensation if she did not know that there was definitely something fishy surrounding the murder of here husband?
Let's believe what those unknown "several people" instead of Mrs Karkare herself, shall we? She said she declined another state govt' rewardd because that seems like political point scoring, and she did not want to be involved in that. But hey, why believe her? Let's believe those who say that her real reason for turning down the reward was because she suspected that the BJP assassinated her husband. Why believe an emotional woman, instead of believing our unmentioned informers, aka "several people"?
5 Hemant Karkare received death threats from Hindu fanatics a day before he was killed and he had exposed a group named Abhinav Bharat and had said it was involved in previous attacks against Muslims. Could this have been the cause of his death and the members of this shadowy outfit the perpetuators?
Of course, they "could have been". Anybody "could have been", except Pakistanis and lashkars. I mean, lashkars would never hurt a fly, would they? The very word "Lashkar" means charity workers.
6 Indian forces inability to stop only 10 terrorists who caused so much damage casts major doubts about the Indian government description of the events. Several people are wondering how just 10 terrorists could cause such a massive scale of carnage killing over 170 civilians without being stopped.
Three or four gunmen attacking one spot in Paris, were killed only a day later. But in a much more congested and thickly populated and thinly policed city like Mumbai, terrorists attacking five different spots and being mobile and having hostages, are expected to be shot down faster, right? Because as we know, Mumbai police is better trained and armed that the gendarmaries, and Mumbai is so much more easier to navigate than Paris.
7 The timing of the attacks could not be any better. Elections were just a few days ahead and this attack was set to give BJP a Right Wing Hindu Nationalist Party a major boost in the elections
And what was the result of those elections? BJP did even worse than the previous one, and a victorious congress party swept into office. What an idiotic miscalculation by the BJP. They orchestrated such a huge drama and fooled the entire world, but failed to fool the smart Indian electorate who saw right through their tricks, and refused to vote them in. Damn, if only Indian voters were as dumb as the rest of the world (minus Pakistanis, of course), the trick would have worked.
8 Jamaat Ud Dawa is a charity and all of Pakistan rallies in its support and surprisingly even the Hindus and Christians in Pakistan rallied for it claiming it was in no way a terrorist organization as it provided them with education and healthcare. JuD have over 180 schools, 40000 students and thousands who live on their aid and medical supplies daily. Is this really a terrorist organization or a victim of the same blame its neighbours that India has been doing for years. Shweta Mayur has specifically raised this point.
Right. Lashkar-e-toiba doesn't even exist - Mr Hafiz Saeed himself said so. Only the charity wing exists. Names like "lashkar-e-toiba" were invented by conniving Indian baniyas to defame the angels of mercy like Hafiz Saeed and Lakhvi and David Coleman Headley.
9 Why was Mr Qasab wearing a band that only Hindus can wear? This is the greatest blow and reveals the truth about the attacks and the attackers. The band he was wearing is a band that is worn by Hindu terrorists of the RSS.
You nailed it, bro! The hindu terrorists of the RSS trained ten members to stage an elaborate drama of blood and tears that fooled the whole world - billions of people fell for their masterful deception - but oh noes, they forgot to take off their arm band before doing it. Damn it!
11 The list of 20 people India gave to Pakistan include names of dead people, people not in Pakistan and people who have been in jail for years. Is this list a joke?
Yes, Pakistan said so. So it has to be true. Pakistanis never lie.
12 There is no family by the name of Qasab back in Faridkot Pakistan. Many Indian story tellers tried their level best to somehow change that and made fools out of themselves trying to find a Pakistani link. Some even went as far to say they found the family and Qasabs parents had accepted he was their son after seeing his picture. However no record of Qasab exists in Pakistani Records.
Right, and Pakistani security forces cordoned off that village only to prevent evil mediapersons visiting the place to spread filth and kuffar. And oh, Pakistan officially admitting that Kasab is a Pakistani? That was a remarkable counter false flag by Pakistan to sow confusion in the ranks and file of the RSS. Pakistanis
never sometimes lie, but only as part of psy-ops.
14 Several Shiv Seniks had been talking about such an attack to "awaken hindus" across India and make them aware of the Islamic plot against them. RSS chief said such an attack was needed to make Hindus fight against the demon (Islam according to them)
I won't ask for a source or quote, because since the Sultan has said it, it must be true. Once again, he has his "several" people to rely upon.
15 A strange group of Islamic terrorists would go to a bar and have several drinks and start their rampage from there. Intellectuals have been wondering what kind of Islamic terrorists come in T-shirts and jeans completely clean shaven and would start their rampage from a bar.
Exactly. The would have come in full islamic regalia, with beards, skullcaps, shalwars, and a zulfiqar sword on their waist. That's how the 9/11 hijackers dressed, that's how any muslim trying to unobtrusively sneak in would be attired.
16 The terrorist that killed Hemant Karkare spoke Marathi according to Maharashtra Times itself. Marathi is only spoken within India. Is he really a Pakistani or a victim of the blame game.
Wait, now I'm confused. Is he a poor victim of the blame game, or is he a cunning agent of the RSS? Sultan sir, please do not confuse us.
18 It is claimed by the media that the attackers came from Karachi by sea. What was the coastguard doing all this time? And over 200 miles were crossed without the Indian coastguard noticing at all.
Right again. The Indian Coast Guard was world renowned for being an impenetrable nautical shield, whom no smuggler or small boat could ever evade. The US coast guard was begging the ICG to train them to detect every single narco boat that plies between US and Latin America every day.
19 No one except Mr Modi the Chief Minister of Gujarat, the same person who is said to be responsible for the massacre of over 3000 muslim civilians in cold blood even thought about compensating the victims. What is this proving? That Hindus should follow terrorists like Modi instead of more secular Hindu parliamentarians because he is the only one who cares about terrorism?
Umm...never mind the fact that both the state and central govts had given compensations to the victims' families - Rs 5 lack from the state govt and Rs 2 lakh from the Prime minister's funds. If Sultan Sahib says it did not happen, it did not happen. Shame on the media for blatantly lying:
The attack claimed 164 lives, while 250 were injured. All their families, barring one which could not be traced, received Rs. 5 lakh each from the state government, and Rs. 2 lakh each from the Prime Minister's fund.
Chief Secretary Jayant Banthia said, "Compensation packages worth Rs. 5 lakh and Rs. 2 lakh have been distributed to 163 families. We haven't been able to identify the one remaining family yet. The remaining amount of Rs. 3 lakh has been given to 76 families, whereas distribution is still under process for the other 88 families.
Oh no, only Modi who personally hacked 3000 muslims to death offered compensation, because he had pangs of guilt. No scratch that - Modi was offering rewarding them for being willing participants in the drama he orchestrated.
20 The events were changed several times and several conflicting statements were made by different sources. First Mauritius ID cards were found with the terrorists, then they were not. The contradictory statements by different government officials and investigators cast a shadowy image to this situation.
Yep. Crystal clarity is expected in such chaotic situations. Otherwise, it's a false flag drama.
21 Conveniently the same terrorist caught on tape was the one who was captured. Not only that but conveniently this same terrorist seems to be walking casually at the train station with an Ak47 in his hands and does not notice someone with a mobile camera taking pictures of him in what seems to be an empty place.
Umm...many of the other terrorists were also caught on cam in the two hotels, and are widely available on the internet, and were constantly shown on TV news channels for days. But let's disregard every inconvenient fact that doesn't fit our narrative.
23 The terrorists definitely knew the city inside out. They were well aware of the locations to strike and were so well acquainted with the city that they knew every corner. Even many Indians themselves did not know about the Jewish community center. Several sources have claimed that they had been living in Mumbai for at least a year to know the city so well. Were they Indian or Pakistani?
Right, because terrorists can't do planning and reconnaisance. Headley was arrested for indecent exposure, not for doing recons of targets.
24 Why would the terrorists call their alleged leader Hafiz Mohammed Saeed through VOIP in the middle of the fight when Indian commandos were pounding at the hotel? Did the terrorists really want themselves to be traced back to where they actually came from and came with all preparation passports and documents to prove they were Pakistani?
Except that they didn't have Pakistani passports on them. There are no immigration officials posted on the coastline to check visas and passports. Oh wait - if they didn't have Pakistani passports, then they were not Pakistanis, they were Indians! Another point for your checklist!
25 Several Indian media circles even went as far as to claim that the attack was the handiwork of ISI. Now what kind of intelligence agency would launch an attack that could actually be traced right back to itself? It seems that “Pakistan’s Powerful Spy Agency” is more often than not a victim of the failures of others.
Of course, nobody can ever accuse ISI of incompetence. Pakistan is a citadel of peace because of their competence.
Talk about jurisdiction......
