well,,,,all those killed were kafirs according to them.
Indian Muslims are 'Kafirs'......
For God's sake, not this 'Kafir' BS again.
From an Islamic perspective, we can't even call most Non-Muslims Kafir, never mind other Muslims. Only God can decide who is Kafir, so unless anyone here considers himself to be God, stop wasting time with this Kafir nonsense. I have been repeating this for a while now, on many threads (like
here and
here) This (my) argument is solid from a theological viewpoint, so no questioning the Islamic-ness of this :
Kafir does not mean non-Muslim. Kafir can not be used to refer to non-practicing or misguided Muslims. Kafir is not the answer to disagreements. (This is addressed to both misguided Muslims and misguided non-Muslims)
Sir,
There's nothing to refute, even a prominent leader of the erstwhile ruling Alliance - UPA had time and again exposed the role of RSS and it's subsidiary fringe elements in 26/11.
RSS & 26/11: Digvijaya flags it off again, this time in Mumbai - Indian Express
The book '26/11 RSS ki saazish' is a must read. Due to strong reactions from hindutvavadis and to appease the hardliner Hindu population en masse the hands of rss in the dastardly events that took place on 26/11 was never proved. If half the energy wasted on blaming Pakistan and so called mastermind of all attacks on Indian soil - 'hafeex sayeed' was spent on raiding the offices of rss and baning the organization, India would've been a much better and safer place to live in.
So you agree with (at least some of) the points? Good to see a voice from the inside and some 'national introspection' but I'm still waiting for the inevitable counter arguments.
One - how does modi come in the picture when it was the first term of the congress that was in power.
Why did Pakistan accept that kasab was from Pakistan?- to support rsd plot? -Genious
Why was kasabs village faridkot totally off limits for journalists immediately after one of the journalist apparently found kasabs father in the village before kasabs family was bundeled away by the isi? Mind you the journalist who went to the village was Pakistani.
The terrorist s booked into the taj hotel before going on a killing spree...so if i was a guy sending some terrorist to another country where they have to mingle with local populace would i not train them in the local language to a point that they are convincing? Would i not make them wear the local attire( including a red thread that makes them look like a local?)
If the rss was targetting karkarey, they should be really good with predicting that karkarey would come to the spot himself at the correct time to engage the terrorist directly. ( rss has a Nostradamus - mind you if they do have one like you suggest - it is all over for Pak)
Mobile camera? Kasab was caught on cctv. The vedio clip was released because he was the one caught
And he did not walk to any railway station but went in a jeep that was intercepted by the policr where our men died in the process of capturing him( the brave soul- omble who held on to kasabs gun even when it was directed at him and was pumping bullets into him.)
So then why did Pakistan arrest lakhvi?
Why did china not defend hafeez sayeed in the UN like it did earlier?
Samjahuta express- if India wanted to blame Pakistan which we did - why would we go back on this and arrest our own people?
So if you still want to live in delusion go ahead...
How about you answer the points instead of bringing up your own? Respond to the argument, don't dodge it. None of this addresses the points. We have our faults, we admit it and work to solve it. It's about time you do the same.
Why was kasabs village faridkot totally off limits for journalists immediately after one of the journalist apparently found kasabs father in the village before kasabs family was bundeled away by the isi? Mind you the journalist who went to the village was Pakistani.
It wasn't 'off limits' if people from the FBI could go in there and have a look themselves. Your own media reported it.
FBI sleuths visit Kasab’s village - Economic Times
The Pakistani journalists had enough access to come to many conclusions, including this one:
Pakistani journalist reveals how 26/11 butcher Qasab was sold to terror group LeT by his parents for Rs 1.5 lakh | Daily Mail Online
How could they do that if the village was so 'off limits'?
Obviously, it was under scrutiny and all because of how important the area had become. Nothing wrong in that, except the occasional mistreatment of journalists which everyone unequivocally condemned.
The terrorist s booked into the taj hotel before going on a killing spree...so if i was a guy sending some terrorist to another country where they have to mingle with local populace would i not train them in the local language to a point that they are convincing? Would i not make them wear the local attire( including a red thread that makes them look like a local?)
What are you even trying to say here - that they 'mingled' with the local populace enough or not?
If the rss was targetting karkarey, they should be really good with predicting that karkarey would come to the spot himself at the correct time to engage the terrorist directly. ( rss has a Nostradamus - mind you if they do have one like you suggest - it is all over for Pak)
Or they could simply know it through surveillance, informants or simple 'word on the street' and plan their attack accordingly. All the webs you spun here are irrelevant.
Mobile camera? Kasab was caught on cctv. The vedio clip was released because he was the one caught
And he did not walk to any railway station but went in a jeep that was intercepted by the policr where our men died in the process of capturing him( the brave soul- omble who held on to kasabs gun even when it was directed at him and was pumping bullets into him.)
Read the point again:
21 Conveniently the same terrorist caught on tape was the one who was captured. Not only that but conveniently this same terrorist seems to be walking casually at the train station with an Ak47 in his hands and does not notice someone with a mobile camera taking pictures of him in what seems to be an empty place.
It doesn't matter whether he was caught on CCTV or mobile camera. The point he made here is that it was very convenient. Nothing else. He was walking at or around the train station. Doesn't matter where he went or what jeep he took after that, the point still stands.
So then why did Pakistan arrest lakhvi?
Because he was known to be involved in illegal activities and was accused by India itself - investigating the accusations doesn't mean admitting fault.
Why did china not defend hafeez sayeed in the UN like it did earlier?
When did China ever defend Hafeez Saeed 'earlier'? Anyways, It's their perfectly rational and understandable choice if they want to stay out of it.
Samjahuta express- if India wanted to blame Pakistan which we did - why would we go back on this and arrest our own people?
What? Your choice, that's why. Your politics. Perhaps to mask involvement or to silence people. India did it (arresting own people) - India is supposed to explain it, not us.
If you're going to make such weak arguments you're better off staying quiet instead.