What's new

Temple demolition increases insecurity, fear among Pakistan's Hindus

Status
Not open for further replies.

karim.chota

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
As Pakistani authorities are all set to raze a 79-year-old temple in Rawalpindi, anger and disappointment prevail among the country's Hindu minority that is seeking protection and freedom to practise their religion in an Islamic state.
Representational image. AgenciesRepresentational image. Agencies
Hindus have been living in Rawalpindi for over a century and the 1935-built Maharishi Valmik Swamiji Mandir in the Gracy Lines area of the Chaklala cantonment holds major significance as it enables them to worship and conduct religious festivities. Its entrance is decorated with Pakistani flags, a sign of the Hindu minorities' patriotism and love for the country where they were born and grew up.
When notice to demolish such an old temple was issued July 18, a sense of anger, fear, and panic gripped not just the over 20,000 Hindus of Rawalpindi and neighbouring Islamabad but also the two million Hindus - a dwindling community - living across Pakistan, a nation of 180 million people.

The temple is to be razed to make way for an educational and housing complex. Officials have assured the Hindus they would build a new temple wherever the residents were relocated, "even if it costs Rs.2 million, a Dawn report said recently.
Fearing that they might lose the temple as well as their homes, the area's Hindus filed a petition with the civil court and were granted a stay order till August 21. But the order provides them temporary relief as they can live in the area only until Sep 13.
"The mandir is considered to be the home of the lord. Every human has an emotional attachment to his religious places. Valuing such feelings, it shouldn't be demolished," a Hindu college student in Rawalpindi, who did not wish to be identified for fear of retaliation, told IANS in an e-mail communication.

A Lahore-based Hindu intellectual, requesting similar anonymity, contended the Valmik temple is the Hindus' sacred place and used for religious practices. "The temple should be respected like any other religious community's sacred place is. Everyone should be free to perform their religious practices in their sacred places."

As many Hindus expressed inability to speak to the media for security concerns, some Muslim intellectuals spoke up on their behalf.
Lahore-based journalist Raza Wazir felt the demolition of the temple symbolises "a trend in Pakistan where the space for religious plurality and tolerance of different beliefs is fast shrinking".
It is indicative of a change in the attitude of the authorities as well as the active members of society who "no longer consider it their duty to care for faiths other than Islam", Wazir told IANS in an email, adding, "This is surely a bad sign for the progress of Pakistan's democratic culture."

"Unless and until Pakistan treats its minorities at par with its Muslim citizens it cannot hope to be at peace with itself and its neighbours," Wazir said.
At the time of partition of the Indian subcontinent in 1947, many of Rawalpindi's Hindus had opted to put up at their roots due to emotional bonding instead of migrating to India.

"They are today concerned as, despite their loyalty shown to the country, they are not being accepted like other citizens. Hindus are worried about the existing state of affairs as they feel unsafe despite being granted citizens' rights under the Pakistani constitution like others," Muhammad Akbar Notezai, a Pakistan-based journalist, told IANS in an e-mail interview.

The temple has been providing a shelter to homeless Hindus and is a "symbol of unity" of Hindus living there. Demolishing it means "bringing an end to their unity as well and compounding the woes of the already persecuted homeless Hindus," Notezai said.
He said the Hindus already face insecurity, kidnapping for ransom and forced conversions of their daughters in Pakistan. If they were relocated, their woes would compound since non-Hindus were already the least tolerant towards them.

"We must not forget the temple in Rawalpindi has been providing a shelter to homeless Hindus and has been a sign of unity for Hindus living here...demolishing it means ending their unity as well and compounding the woes of the already persecuted homeless Hindus."
Article 25 (1) of the Pakistani constitution says all citizens are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law. "Like Muslims, Hindus are also equal citizens of Pakistan, and their lives, sacred places and property must also be protected," Notezai added.
 
.
Concerted effort of getting them back to India should exist.

What did they expect in the very first place that they stayed there in 1947 ? You can delay it (coming back to india) but not avoid it if you want to remain a hindu in a land filled with hatred towards hindus, a country like Pakistan.
 
.
Concerted effort of getting them back to India should exist.

What did they expect in the very first place that they stayed there in 1947 ? You can delay it (coming back to india) but not avoid it if you want to remain a hindu in a land filled with hatred towards hindus, a country like Pakistan.
they are not indians .
 
. .
they are not indians

hindus they are. in the world of brotherhood, who will look for the hindu, boss ? except other hindus ?

you know germany, frace, italy uk, they all are targeting IS because they killed and converted christians in Middle East. in ME.

There isn't a knight in shining armor for us. except ourselves.
 
.
hindus they are. in the world of brotherhood, who will look for the hindu, boss ? except other hindus ?

you know germany, frace, italy uk, they all are targeting IS because they killed and converted christians in Middle East. in ME.

There isn't a knight in shining armor for us. except ourselves.
I dont want these pakistanis in my country
 
.
Stop giving it a religious rung.

The fate would've been same if it was a mosque.

The land belong to government and development of the land was essential.

Calm down everyone.

We aren't india which demolishes mosques, discriminates against Muslims, and try to convert them to Hinduism (India's ruling party opening calling for every Muslim to convert to Islam or else.....)

hindus they are. in the world of brotherhood, who will look for the hindu, boss ? except other hindus ?

you know germany, frace, italy uk, they all are targeting IS because they killed and converted christians in Middle East. in ME.

There isn't a knight in shining armor for us. except ourselves.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

They don't give a sh!t about M.E christians...

Western world is a post-christian society and christianity is a dead religion worldwide (except few exceptions) and noboy practices the faith anyways...specially Europeans.

Stop being an idiot
 
. .
They don't give a sh!t about M.E christians...
Western world is a post-christian society and christianity is a dead religion worldwide (except few exceptions) and noboy practices the faith anyways...specially Europeans.
Stop being an idiot


Posting smileys doesn't make credible news vanish away. I suggest you go to a new tab and type in google dot com in it and search for german assitance to anti IS factions, how France and UK are mulling ground attack in ME. Why ? Cause they targeted the christians. Who cares when these scum are killing other muslims ?

Just because people are not blowing themselves up doesn't mean they do don't follow their faith.

I'll stop being an idiot ? OK...you stop demolishing temples. I will stop too.
 
.
they are not indians .
If Muslims in India, are considered to be Indians. Then no harm in calling those Hindus "Indians".

I dont want these pakistanis in my country
Are they considered Pakistanis? No. On other hand we have many Pakistan lovers in our country who live off welfare.
 
. .
Its an illegal property.
I didnot see that mentioned anywhere in the article and IF it really was an illegal property then officials would not have assured to build a new temple.
And what happens to the sentimental value ppl attach to this temple.Would a 2million be enough??
 
.
Devotion should never come in the way of development as long as the subject of faith concerned does not hold very high value of antiquity and architectural importance. There is no reason to challenge unnecessarily the intention of the authority either as a new place for temple has already been promised.
 
.
Land is owned by the Army. As long as they get relocated properly, i have no issues. We demolish Mosques all the time when they become unsafe, no one complains.
 
.
Land is owned by the Army.
Whats the proof??
As I said it is not mentioned anywhere in the article.
Please give a link to prove your point.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom