What's new

Tejas : Story of a pie in the sky.

Getting foreign design is nothing when most of your core component are still import. If US or French Israel are going to embargo India today. Can LCA or LCH still form a force? No. But WZ-10 and J-10 can still goes on.


Doesnt matter, we're not out here claiming anything is perfect. Or that India's defence industry is perfect. Every Indian user here will already tell you this.

If Sweden with a more developed defence industry can do it, it takes nothing away from India. But dont come here talking about India's lying, or not telling the truth, or other non sense, when your respective countries arent as open about as it.

It's hilarious you cant accept CAG report, but accept misquoted sources that are Indian too.
 
Last edited:
.
Getting foreign design is nothing when most of your core component are still import. If US or French Israel are going to embargo India today. Can LCA or LCH still form a force? No. But WZ-10 and J-10 can still goes on.
Copying then making the same thing with 3 D printers not going to WIN wars, WHY in the world you placed an order for SU 35, after all you make SU copies (with Imported Engines)
 
.
Not even the French whole sale gave India LCA's design, they consulted on several designs already developed by ADA.

Guess who acted as design consultants for FC 1 aka JF 17

1995 | 1842 | Flight Archive

If US or French Israel are going to embargo India today. Can LCA or LCH still form a force? No. But WZ-10 and J-10 can still goes on.

Have french transferred technology for making the core of WZ 16 in China yet ?Just curious.
 
. .
SAAB-JA39-Gripen.jpg
Come on Sir, you need to update yourself, its a old news and Picture. Things have changed now.
 
. . . .
When Indian's do it - Seek consultancy or speak out the truth,its blasphemy here.

When any one else do it,its perfectly fine.


The hilarious part is when they cant take in a Indian source like CAG. :rofl:

When all this time they've been using Indian traced sources this whole time. :rofl:
 
.
it is beyond a joke when it combined with these deluded Indian defending LCA is X/Y/Z% 'indigenous' :lol:
 
.
I am not an aviation expert nor claim to be one. But 30 years of development seems to be too long. The Indian Tejas should be a 5th Generation Fighter by now. I don't think the Pakistani Thunder took that long. But then again I might be wrong.

@gambit sir, You are the resident aviation expert, what's your take on this one?
 
.
Why Tejas aircraft failed and some Indian members claims 35 years research and development produce great knowledge and tech.
Aircraft itself doomed the first and the only before induction many believes it becomes obsolete.
Engine Kaveri failed.
Indigenous Radar still not available.
Locally designed landing gears too heavy for a small aircraft and often develops snags.
Serious changes requires in aerodynamics.
Now Indian members ask sources Just google it.
Nothing achieved in 35 years development and research even not a single notable achievement.

What else required to declare it a failure.
 
. .
Why Tejas aircraft failed and some Indian members claims 35 years research and development produce great knowledge and tech.
Aircraft itself doomed the first and the only before induction many believes it becomes obsolete.
Engine Kaveri failed.
Indigenous Radar still not available.
Locally designed landing gears too heavy for a small aircraft and often develops snags.
Serious changes requires in aerodynamics.
Now Indian members ask sources Just google it.
Nothing achieved in 35 years development and research even not a single notable achievement.

What else required to declare it a failure.

79dda10fcac2f5a38521b657f824173f08a68bb11d800021990bab390b8f35a0.jpg
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom