Tejas Needs to Cross 6 Milestones in 15 Months

[he-man]

I think he means nautical miles (80 NM).

http://www.iai.co.il/sip_storage/FILES/0/38030.pdf

80 * 1.875 = 150KM

50 * 1.875 = 93

Radar has been tested to 120 KM.

80 nm is not possible

even bars of mki has range of 140-160 km only

 

[spectribution]

My mistake it is 80 - 90 km tracking range for a 5m2 target.
Max radar range is 150km.
See APG - 68.

80 nm is not possible

even bars of mki has range of 140-160 km only

Here we mean tracking range. For a fighter sized target must 90 km same as APG 68.

 

[he-man]

My mistake it is 80 - 90 km tracking range for a 5m2 target.
Max radar range is 150km.
See APG - 68.


Here we mean tracking range. For a fighter sized target must 90 km same as APG 68.

there is no source available for apg-68 v9 which pakistan have
none,zero,nyet.shunya

i have been looking for months now but none.

rdy-2 of mirage 2000(upgraded) has 120 km
even zhuk-m of mig-29 k ans kub is also 120 km

both for 5 m2 target

 

[spectribution]

there is no source available for apg-68 v9 which pakistan have
none,zero,nyet.shunya

i have been looking for months now but none.

rdy-2 of mirage 2000(upgraded) has 120 km
even zhuk-m of mig-29 k ans kub is also 120 km

both for 5 m2 target

N011M has a search range of 400 km and a tracking range of 200 km, with 60 km in the rear in the air to air mode. Detection range fighter type MIG-29 in area of review of over 300 sq. deg: - on towards course - up to 140 km; - in pursuit of - up to 60 km.

N011M has a search range of 400 km and a tracking range of 200 km, with 60 km in the rear in the air to air mode. Detection range fighter type MIG-29 in area of review of over 300 sq. deg: - on towards course - up to 140 km; - in pursuit of - up to 60 km.

Tracking range is 105KM of KLJ 7.

there is no source available for apg-68 v9 which pakistan have
none,zero,nyet.shunya

i have been looking for months now but none.

rdy-2 of mirage 2000(upgraded) has 120 km
even zhuk-m of mig-29 k ans kub is also 120 km

both for 5 m2 target

Mig 29 RCS is 1m2 - 1.5m2. All 200km, 105km, 150km figures are for 5m2.

Tension mat lo, HAL isn't stupid. A K Antony is.

there is no source available for apg-68 v9 which pakistan have
none,zero,nyet.shunya

i have been looking for months now but none.

rdy-2 of mirage 2000(upgraded) has 120 km
even zhuk-m of mig-29 k ans kub is also 120 km

both for 5 m2 target

For 1m2, Zhuk-ME detection range is 80km

 

[he-man]

N011M has a search range of 400 km and a tracking range of 200 km, with 60 km in the rear in the air to air mode. Detection range fighter type MIG-29 in area of review of over 300 sq. deg: - on towards course - up to 140 km; - in pursuit of - up to 60 km.

Tracking range is 105KM of KLJ 7.



Mig 29 RCS is 1m2 - 1.5m2. All 200km, 105km, 150km figures are for 5m2.

Tension mat lo, HAL isn't stupid. A K Antony is.



For 1m2, Zhuk-ME detection range is 80km

zhuk gives only value for 5m2 and thats 120 km
i challenge u to post a source for 1 m2

but anyways even 120 km is a lowly range and 140 km for mki is very bad too

compare this to irbis e of su-35 which as 400 km range for 3 m2!!!
damn

 

[Gessler]

80 nm is not possible

even bars of mki has range of 140-160 km only

MKI BARS has a detection range of 140-160km (I don't know exactly for what RCS,
could be 1m2 or 3m2.). It's search range is some 400km.

EL/M-2032 maximum range is 150km, it could be the detection range of certain
RCS targets (again, could be either 1m2 or 3m2) which is 80km.

 

[he-man]

MKI BARS has a detection range of 140-160km (I don't know exactly for what RCS,
could be 1m2 or 3m2.). It's search range is some 400km.

EL/M-2032 maximum range is 150km, it could be the detection range of certain
RCS targets (again, could be either 1m2 or 3m2) which is 80km.

its for 3 m2 for mki

once again i have tried everything but no proper link exists for 2032
in any case i highly doubt it would have 150 km range considering its size

 

[Srinivas]

once again i will state the radar range is just very bad

even 80 km is low and we need more clarifications

Tejas is an interceptor and is aided by AWACS and Ground radar networks. But Radar Range needs to be increased though.

 

[he-man]

Tejas is an interceptor and is aided by AWACS and Ground radar networks.

thats a weak argument

same pakistanis use for jf-17

i am sorry

 

[Srinivas]

thats a weak argument

same pakistanis use for jf-17

i am sorry

How is it a weak argument??

Tejas is not a multi role platform, it is a defender not employed in Deep strike role, Tejas can also be aided by Su 30 MKI or MMRCA in future during dogfights.

 

[he-man]

How is it a weak argument??

Tejas is not a multi role platform, it is a defender not employed in Deep strike role, Tejas can also be aided by Su 30 MKI or MMRCA in future during dogfights.

the point is why not get a good radar or better radome and increase the range??
u are thinking in the wrong direction,,we must get the best value out of any platform

AWACS are no substitute for the main radar,no

 

[Srinivas]

the point is why not get a good radar or better radome and increase the range??
u are thinking in the wrong direction,,we must get the best value out of any platform

AWACS are no substitute for the main radar,no

I also wrote the point in my first point and you quoted it even before I edited it.

Secondly HAL is developing AESA and It will be completed soon, I think they are planning to install it for LCA Mark 2.

 

[he-man]

I also wrote the point in my first point and you quoted it even before I edited it.

Secondly HAL is developing AESA and It will be completed soon, I think they are planning to install it for LCA Mark 2.

don't make me laugh mate

HAL has filed to develop a simple pulse doppler radar miserably and u expect aesa??

i am sure they are gonna install el/m 2052 from israel again.
its not an easy job,to develop a fighter jet aesa.


i have seen the pictures of the prototype but i am not sure it will be built

Tejas is an interceptor and is aided by AWACS and Ground radar networks. But Radar Range needs to be increased though.

sorry,didn't read ur full sentence

 

[Srinivas]

don't make me laugh mate

HAL has filed to develop a simple pulse doppler radar miserably and u expect aesa??

i am sure they are gonna install el/m 2052 from israel again.
its not an easy job,to develop a fighter jet aesa.


i have seen the pictures of the prototype but i am not sure it will be built

Simple mate Go to Russia, France or EU just like chinese do and Buy critical technologies, if possible get some of the developers from there and build the prototype here in India.

Once the prototype is successful do some research and build the next version of it.

HAL has realized it and doing it now. I am confident of good Aerospace Industry in this decade in India.

Disadvantage is The Nations which are aiding the development will have Kill switches, Once we know how to deal with them, the product is a success!!!

 

[he-man]

Simple mate Go to Russia, France or EU just like chinese do and Buy critical technologies, if possible get some of the developers from there and build the prototype here in India.

Once the prototype is successful do some research and build the next version of it.

HAL has realized it and doing it now. I am confident of good Aerospace Industry in this decade in India.

Disadvantage is The Nations which are aiding the development will have Kill switches, Once we know how to deal with them, the product is a success!!!

pretty much what i would say,drdo cannot make it on its own at this stage.

whatever its better to have an aesa with 40-50% indigenous content than buying fully offshelf