Major vikram batra
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2011
- Messages
- 125
- Reaction score
- 0
I think that is ignorant. JF 17 is a very potent fighter for its price and fits perfectly into PAF's intended role. It is the most foolish idea to underestimate JF 17. As far as oakistani contribution to the JF17 project, read the JF 17 information pool. PAF got this aircraft designed according to thier needs from chengdu. hence PAF's contribution is immense...
Russian engine? RD33 is one of the best engines with exceptional track record...
Chinese avionics?? If avionics are fake ..then what about ours? we have lesse experience in avionics when compared to china...
and dont bring in PLAAF in this, JF 17 is something they thought would not suit their needs with J10 already developed as an agile dog fighter with longer range than JF 17.
I replied him about what he said about tejas engine and avionics
Originally Posted by mafiya:
Dont compare Apple with peanuts. Talk is
about JF-17 vis a vis LCA and how LCA is
still not being inducted after fitting
American engine and Western Avionics in
it.
Seriously(not offensive). Whats your contribution