TEJAS FACTS

[21 Dec 2012]

2m^2 target

I must be blind

Even LCA clock 200 hrs annually then it would cross 6000 hrs.

Even LCA clock 1000 hrs annually then it would cross 30000 hrs....................NOT

 

[kṣamā]

I don't get this hypocrisy by these Pakistanis. they say a Radar made by DRDO with Israeli assistance as Israeli radar, aircraft design with french inputs as french design, fly by wire with limited help with USA (which was again taken back) as USA fly by wire technology. But when they will be the first to say their assembled fighter as their own with 50% input !! That too when they cannot design and produce a simple passenger car in-house. And then ask us to believe them !!

 

[Sri]

Radar range he clearly stated 100 km for 2m^2 target compared to Jf 17 thunder 130 km for 5 m^2 target.


Even LCA clock 200 hrs annually then it would cross 6000 hrs.

Only thing disappointing is FOC one mre time extended till March 2016

It doesn't matter as the FOC date has no impact on delivery schedule to IAF as they'll be receiving 20 IOC MK1 first, so ADA/HAL have all the time like 2 years to take care of refinements, e.g. the weight of the fighter and drag can be further reduced.

 

[SRP]

They deleted my question, " Is it possible to add Multiple Ejector Rack (MER) in Tejas ?" but they were busy answering stupid questions if LCA is better than JF-17, F-16 and blah blah blah.

 

[Ankit Kumar 001]

Hey @Amit kumar 001
i have a question what is the progress on K9 and K10 engine programme

Hi
Sir am no expert.
But one more reply was given to some query.
It read as " Along with the dry thrust Kaveri now in development, there are progressive work being done on engines for future Drones."
Nothing more that this I can say.
The dry thrust engine of Kaveri is in development.
And the know how which we got while developing it will always be helpful.

Cheers
Thanks

 

[Manindra]

I must be blind

For sure

●Radar Range of mk1 is 100 km for targets of size 2m^2.

Even LCA clock 1000 hrs annually then it would cross 30000 hrs....................NOT

Don't comment like expert where you doest not have IOTA as prove above for your target size for radar range comment.

 

[21 Dec 2012]

For sure


Don't comment like expert where you doest not have IOTA as prove above for your target size for radar range comment.

And you Mr. are an idiot. Yes, an IDIOT.

 

[Manindra]

And you Mr. are an idiot. Yes, an IDIOT.

View attachment 233837

If you have functioning brain then you realize that we quote our range for standard RCS against 2m2 because their main adversary PAF use small single engine fighter, against world standard 5m2

View attachment 233838

So common sense is so uncommon ?
LCA MKI F-404 engine life is 6000 hrs & each IAF pilot clocks 200 to 250 hrs annually .
So, a fighter would fly barely 16 minute a day
Man , you are so technically nood despite you are arguing with me so much confidence
@sancho @MilSpec @Oscar can you help him , I am done.

 

[21 Dec 2012]

If you have functioning brain then you realize that we quote our range for standard RCS against 2m2 because their main adversary PAF use small single engine fighter, against world standard 5m2

One should generally not call someone an idiot, but you certainly deserve it, IDIOT.
First you claim that 'he clearly stated' your fictional number, and when challenged, bring the OP's line which was clearly mis-representing the official quote. And now when I show you the real quote thus completely demolishing your point, you jump again like the monkey to 'world standard' bullshit. BTW There is no 'World Standard'. APG-77 is quoted for 1m2, IRBIS-E for 3m2. But then why would one expect Mr. Twiddle Dum, to know such simple facts.

So common sense is so uncommon ?
LCA MKI F-404 engine life is 6000 hrs & each IAF pilot clocks 200 to 250 hrs annually .
So, a fighter would fly barely 16 minute a day
Man , you are so technically nood despite you are arguing with me so much confidence
@sancho @MilSpec @Oscar can you help him , I am done.

Oh you are most certainly done. Here we have the Tejas program Chief expressly stating a service life of 3000 hrs for the Tejas system (airframe), and now this monkey contends that the Chief is wrong as the engine has more life. Please go and at yourself.

 

[Manindra]

One should generally not call someone an idiot, but you certainly deserve it, IDIOT.
First you claim that 'he clearly stated' your fictional number, and when challenged, bring the OP's line which was clearly mis-representing the official quote. And now when I show you the real quote thus completely demolishing your point, you jump again like the monkey to 'world standard' bullshit. BTW There is no 'World Standard'. APG-77 is quoted for 1m2, IRBIS-E for 3m2. But then why would one expect Mr. Twiddle Dum, to know such simple facts.

Oh you are most certainly done. Here we have the Tejas program Chief expressly stating a service life of 3000 hrs for the Tejas system (airframe), and now this monkey contends that the Chief is wrong as the engine has more life. Please go and at yourself.

Only one word for you brain defaulter

 

[21 Dec 2012]

Only one word for you brain defaulter

Expected reply of a thoroughly bitch-slapped man.

 

[nair]

Come on guys..... Let us not get personal.....

 

[Manindra]

Expected reply of a thoroughly bitch-slapped man.

Still you are bitching & moaning

Come on guys..... Let us not get personal.....

Can we conduct a screening test before member participating in technical thread

 

[nair]

Still you are bitching & moaning


Can we conduct a screening test before member participating in technical thread

I leave it that to moderators and forum management...... But my point was by responding to some on in the same tone wont make the other guy wise...

 

[HariPrasad]

Compared to Gripen's 3200, its rather piss poor.

It is with fuel tank Tejas has that figure of 300 KM as well.

He didn't say anything about target size.

Than what is 2m^2 size if not target?

Bloody 28* AOA is awesome.

putting AESA, a good EW suite and a BVR missile on the craft makes it as good as any 4th or 4th+ gen aircraft if not better thats not an answer dude thats dodging the question

No unless it fly at atleast Mach 1.8 and hit str 18* It shall be a sub standard plane according to me. It need to carry 4+ TON also.