What's new

Tamil actor in trouble Over 'Derogatory' Remark on Hindus' Mahabharatha

Tell us in which Hindu scriptures its stated that disrobing a women is adharma and a crime ?

Huh...Take any Hindu scripture and it will talk about Golden Rule, you know, the one your kind conveniently forgets.
Shathapatha details every crime and punishment you need..Check it out.

And stop confusing yourself and others with your half knowledge.
 
.
None have called IVC people as genetically similar to Tamils, all they said is that they spoke a proto-Dravidian language. Dravidian is a linguistic group, just like Indo-European. Doesnt mean all Indo-Europeans or Dravidians are related.



How are Brahuis racially and culturally diluted? This makes no sense. They still live in the Indus Valley, around the area of Mehrgarh while these Tamilo-Madrasies live far away in the jungles of South India. Who is culturally diluted? People of IVC were not Australoid or with significant Onge and Andamanese genes like Tamils are. Sorry, but genetics are very clear on this.



If you are going to continue on harking about Sumerians and Elamites, tell me who do you think is genetically, phenotypically and culturally more similar to Iranians (Elamites) and Sumerians (Levantines)?
Brahuis or Tamils? Get real.


This is only based on linguistics. By the same logic one can show a Sri Lankan Sinhalese and Norwegian connection because they both are Indo-European or 'Aryan'. Your Adivasi and Andamanese kin to this day live without civilization btw.

If you make a proposition please provide the relevant academic or papers of historical researchers to support your case. If not your rambling will not b taken seriously but just a nasty albino retort.

As far as Brahuis or Present Pakistanis are concern they have no relevance to IVC (unless you can prove me wrong) and when you lump and confuse Dravidians with Munda adivasis (and Andamanese) it just shows the level of an intellect I am dealing with.

Huh...Take any Hindu scripture and it will talk about Golden Rule, you know, the one your kind conveniently forgets.
Shathapatha details every crime and punishment you need..Check it out.

And stop confusing yourself and others with your half knowledge.

It will be helpful if you can provide me the verse etc , thank you
 
Last edited:
.
It will be helpful if you can provide me the verse etc , thank you

Nope. Do the work yourself. You know the veda that is dealing with this. So, go for it, research it.
It even talks of different kinds of hells & punishment in detail for diff kinds of crimes.
 
.
Nope. Do the work yourself. You know the veda that is dealing with this. So, go for it, research it.
It even talks of different kinds of hells & punishment in detail for diff kinds of crimes.

if you are unable to provide the vedic reference that I have to call your bluff, just like how you tried to pass off MB as historic and not a religious work

A sexual predator stealing young maidens' clothes to see them nude isn't "crime against society and social sensibilities" ?
 
Last edited:
.
If you make a proposition please provide the relevant academic or papers of historical researchers to support your case. If not your rambling will not b taken seriously but just a nasty albino retort.

As far as Brahuis or Present Pakistanis are concern they have no relevance to IVC (unless you can prove me wrong) and when you lump and confuse Dravidians with Munda adivasis (and Andamanese) it just shows the level of an intellect I am dealing with.

The academic papers you have quoted only talk about a linguistic link. Dravidian is a linguistic group just like Indo-European. It's Tamilo-Madrasies who haven't got any relevance to IVC. Albino? Lolwut. Connections with Adivasis and Mundas is genetic not linguistic. Check out Harappa DNA.
 
.
The academic papers you have quoted only talk about a linguistic link. Dravidian is a linguistic group just like Indo-European. It's Tamilo-Madrasies who haven't got any relevance to IVC. Albino? Lolwut. Connections with Adivasis and Mundas is genetic not linguistic. Check out Harappa DNA.

plz go through my post again , I have carefully avoided using linguistic links as support, repost some of the links posted earlier

Map land /sea route taken by Tamils source : Who Brought The Mayans To Mexico?
turkey21.jpg

The ancient Tamils were international traders and colonizers. Wherever they went in the world, they left an unmistakable imprint of their presence, such as place names, foods, games, and temple buildings. Their temple buildings were usually zikharis (tiered or pyramidical temple platforms).

https://southturkistan.wordpress.com/2010/05/16/who-brought-the-mayans-to-mexico/

The face-type of the average Indian today is no doubt much the same as that of the Dravidian race ancestors thousands of years ago...And it is to this Dravidian ethnic type of India that the ancient Sumerian bears most resemblance, so far as we can judge from his monuments
Hall is of the opinion that Dravidian people must have migrated to Mesopotamia from India,((( whereas others think Dravidians came from Mediterranean regions, which was their earlier home. KP Padmanabha Menon writes about their close relationship: “Orientalists, many of them, are prepared to concede that the Sumerians, the Mediterranean race, are branches of the early Dravidians.†)))))
http://www.israel-a-history-of.com/dravidians-indians-and-sumerians.html

Thus it becomes unquestionably clear that these so-called DRAVIDIANS (TAMIL, MALAYALAM, KANARESE, AND TELUGU) are the descendants of the most ancient Turs of India. This fact may also help to understand the claim that the ancient INDUS culture was also TUR culture. In view of all these findings, it is no wonder that the Turanian Turkic languages and Dravidian (TUR-EVIDI-LER) languages are related to the Sumerian language. Because, all of these peoples were the most ancient TUR peoples of the ancient world before the so called Aryans were around.

http://members.storm.ca/~cm-tntr/tur1.html

and to easy your australoid obsession
1-2b6fc1fd3d.jpg

http://www.academia.edu/8740634/The_Austroid_Origins_of_Ancient_Sumer
 
.
Kamal Haasan In Soup Over 'Derogatory' Remark on Mahabharatha, Public Interest Litigation Filed Against Him

Indiatimes
March 21, 2017

In an interview with a Tamil television channel, Hassan had said, "In Mahabharata, Panchali was used as a pawn while the men gambled. She was used as a collateral and India is a country that respects and honours a book that revolves around men using a woman to gamble away as if she was a mere object, " reports ANI

Rama Ravikumar the state secretary of HMK told The Financial Express, "“He does not have the guts to talk about any other religion. He is an anti-Hindu person, so we complained against him. We have been suffering for long but haven’t been saying anything.”

The actor also sparked a raging debate after his comment on Jallikattu ban where he said, "“If you want a ban on jallikattu, let’s also ban biryani… I’m a big fan of jallikattu.”

What is HMK and who is Rama Ravikumar?
 
. . .
I can understand your desperation to defend an act that triggered the disrobing and subsequent war, as the blame will be on the god Krishna/his queens and the Pandava gang and not Duryodhana.

Your foolish attempt to sound condescending does not impress anyone.

if you do not even know which hindu scriptures spell out dharama and adharam,then on what basis are you debating you fool. :lol:

LOL at your suggestion that it was the disrobing that triggered the war. The war was triggered when they refused to return the kingdom after serving out the terms of exile.
 
Last edited:
.
Your foolish attempt to sound condescending does not fool anyone.

if you do not even know which hindu scriptures spell out dharama and adharam,then on what basis are you debating you fool. :lol:

LOL at your suggestion that it was the disrobing that triggered the war. The war was triggered when they refused to return the kingdom after serving out the terms of exile.

discarding the first born out of wedlock must be Vedic Aryan dharma !

they wouldn't have lost the kingdom if they had not gambled
the war was instigated by 'god incarnate' Krishna (Arjuna didn't want to fight) to quench a woman's blood thirst
 
Last edited:
.
I can understand your desperation to defend an act that triggered the disrobing and subsequent war, as the blame will be on the god Krishna/his queens and the Pandava gang and not Duryodhana.

Tell us in which Hindu scriptures its stated that disrobing a women is adharma and a crime ?

No matter how much Dushashan pulled, he was still not able to disrobe Draupadi.

BG 7.16: O best amongst the Bharatas, four kinds of pious people engage in my devotion—the distressed, the seekers after knowledge, the seekers of worldly possessions, and those who are situated in knowledge.

discarding the first born out of wedlock must be Vedic Aryan dharma !

they wouldn't have lost the kingdom if they had not gambled
the war was instigated by 'god incarnate' Krishna (Arjuna didn't want to fight) to quench a woman's blood thirst

Karna- The eldest son of Kunti who was born when she was still a virgin, by chanting a divine mantra and praying to Sun god. Born with kavacha and kundala ( armour and earrings),he was let into the river in a small casket by his mother fearing she will be accused.Unwilling to face the world as an unwed mother, Kunti abandoned Karna, setting him afloat in a box in a river. The child was picked up by King Dhrtarastra's charioteer, Adhiratha. Karna was raised by him and his wife Radha.
 
.
While there is really no comparison between knowledge works such as the Vedas and Upanishads with mere religious texts such as Bible and Quran all great works atleast try to teach some morals. And they usually do that by showing evil events and how the perpetrators of such evil get punished and reformed.

Kamalhasan has obviously lost his marbles if he forgot this and made such a stupid comment. I thought he was smarter than that but I guess his brilliance stops at being a terrific cinema guy.

Buffoons such zakir naik make such comments due to upbringing and lack of knowledge but a smart guy such as Kamalhasan should know better.
 
.
While there is really no comparison between knowledge works such as the Vedas and Upanishads with mere religious texts such as Bible and Quran all great works atleast try to teach some morals. And they usually do that by showing evil events and how the perpetrators of such evil get punished and reformed.

Kamalhasan has obviously lost his marbles if he forgot this and made such a stupid comment. I thought he was smarter than that but I guess his brilliance stops at being a terrific cinema guy.

Buffoons such zakir naik make such comments due to upbringing and lack of knowledge but a smart guy such as Kamalhasan should know better.

Vedas are the first divine revelations from Supreme Creator and then later Avestan, Zabur, Taurat, Injeel and Quran were sent by the Supreme Creator.

All these divine books not only explain about the humankind, Creation etc and are even helpful in space programme.

Religion is even now the base for the science and technology.
 
.
No matter how much Dushashan pulled, he was still not able to disrobe Draupadi.

BG 7.16: O best amongst the Bharatas, four kinds of pious people engage in my devotion—the distressed, the seekers after knowledge, the seekers of worldly possessions, and those who are situated in knowledge.

that's why this whole episode of disrobing is a religious fraud

Karna- The eldest son of Kunti who was born when she was still a virgin, by chanting a divine mantra and praying to Sun god. Born with kavacha and kundala ( armour and earrings),he was let into the river in a small casket by his mother fearing she will be accused.Unwilling to face the world as an unwed mother, Kunti abandoned Karna, setting him afloat in a box in a river. The child was picked up by King Dhrtarastra's charioteer, Adhiratha. Karna was raised by him and his wife Radha.

Aryan Vedic dharma - impotent Aryan kings have their wives impregnated by their male servants ( e.g Pandu, Dasaratha) and later have them killed or banished to create a religious sham that the child was conceived through divine intervention of gods or mantras. In the case of Kunti it was premarital sex
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom