Taliban blow up boys school in NW Pakistan

[Rank]

Total crap BS news " Taliban Blow up boys school". I think from last 4 years i am continously listening this BS i am also confuzed about i think more thn 5000 skools in SWAT and S.W. Everyday i listen such kind of news Talibans blow up boys skools girls skool lol totally BS. I think in NWFP skools colleges are more thn whole pakistan.

BS!

 

[SMC]

Utter nonsense.. There is no acknowledgement of proof being received by any state..

US has acknowledged but denied. It's not in their interests to do so. Every respective government has been provided proof. Moreover, they will only acknowledge if it's in their interests.

Musharraf is accused of being a criminal in your country. His words carry zero credibility

That's irrelevent. His criminal proceedings are in no way related to indian support for terrorism. Indians had great trust in him not too long ago. He wouldn't say something in public he knew to be false. His words carry zero credibility when you want them to be so.

here we go again on inside govt and army.. See my post on inside sources in RAW

And I replied to that. You're using a pathetic argument (sarcasm) to deal with my argument. It's a strawman argument. What I am saying is true, while you're clearly using sarcasm.

Say what you want to.. but back it up with something more than imaginary sources in Army and ISI

Imaginary? Nice argument. Everyone in the army and ISI knows about heavy indian involvement in terrorism.

 

[karan.1970]

US has acknowledged but denied. It's not in their interests to do so. Every respective government has been provided proof. Moreover, they will only acknowledge if it's in their interests.

Good excuse for the so called proofs being thrown out

That's irrelevent. His criminal proceedings are in no way related to indian support for terrorism.

Goes to the credibility of the source. Criminals have a much lower credibility than non criminals..

And I replied to that. You're using a pathetic argument (sarcasm) to deal with my argument. It's a strawman argument. What I am saying is true, while you're clearly using sarcasm.

Not really.. It doesnt become true because you are saying so..

Imaginary? Nice argument. Everyone in the army and ISI knows about heavy indian involvement in terrorism.

Yeah! Every one in Indian Army and RAW knows that ISI?LeT is doing blasts in Pakistan to implicate India..

Lashkar-e-Taiba - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[DaRk WaVe]

Its just amazing the way you people divert the topic

 

[DaRk WaVe]

Total crap BS news " Taliban Blow up boys school". I think from last 4 years i am continously listening this BS i am also confuzed about i think more thn 5000 skools in SWAT and S.W. Everyday i listen such kind of news Talibans blow up boys skools girls skool lol totally BS. I think in NWFP skools colleges are more thn whole pakistan.

BS!

are you trying to say that story of Taliban blowing up schools is BS
The people who daily report about blowing of schools are not mad, that word BS is 'uncalled for'
I don't know about Swat & NW but in Mardan & Villages around Mardan on every corner there is a School & i don't think it will be different in Swat because almost all refugees coming from Swat could read & write & all children i talked to were going to school but their schools were blown up

 

[SMC]

Good excuse for the so called proofs being thrown out

It's the truth. You're using diversion for the obvious. It's not in US interests to stop indian terrorism. If you can't see the obvious then it's not my problem.

Goes to the credibility of the source. Criminals have a much lower credibility than non criminals..

Besides his crimes being questionable and being political (not murdering anyone or anything), and him NOT BEING CONVICTED, it's still irrelevent because it has nothing to do with india, and moreover he has always been honest about what he has done in the past. You're using a desperate argument here. Strawman argument, i.e.

Not really.. It doesnt become true because you are saying so..

Several other people have said similar things too. And again, I couldn't care less whether you believe it or not. The truth will be exposed sooner or later anyhow. We know that india is heavily involved in supporting terrorism and killing number of innocent people.

Yeah! Every one in Indian Army and RAW knows that ISI?LeT is doing blasts in Pakistan to implicate India..

Lashkar-e-Taiba - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Again, sarcasm does not negate the argument. It merely offers a childish, naive diversion.

 

[karan.1970]

It's the truth. You're using diversion for the obvious. It's not in US interests to stop indian terrorism. If you can't see the obvious then it's not my problem.

Besides his crimes being questionable and being political (not murdering anyone or anything), and him NOT BEING CONVICTED, it's still irrelevent because it has nothing to do with india, and moreover he has always been honest about what he has done in the past. You're using a desperate argument here. Strawman argument, i.e.

Several other people have said similar things too. And again, I couldn't care less whether you believe it or not. The truth will be exposed sooner or later anyhow. We know that india is heavily involved in supporting terrorism and killing number of innocent people.



Again, sarcasm does not negate the argument. It merely offers a childish, naive diversion.

Since you have not given any further arguements over and above the WE KNOW BS, your post does not deserve any rebuttle

 

[SMC]

That was expected from you. You're using childish, strawman, sarcastic arguments as rebuttal. In other words, no real arguments. Several people, besides me, have stated that army and ISi know of indian involvement in supporting terrorism. If you don't believe me, don't, I couldn't care less like I said - and I have always maintained that about bhangees.