What's new

Taliban blow up boys school in NW Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Metallic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
1,645
Reaction score
0
Taliban blow up boys school in NW Pakistan
PAKISTAN - 13 FEBRUARY 2010

PESHAWAR, Pakistan – Taliban militants blew up a boys high school in a tribal district of northwest Pakistan along the Afghan border on Saturday, an official said.

There were no casualties as the school in the village of Qamardin at Safi area of the Mohmand tribal district, 92 kilometres (57 miles) in northwest of Peshawar, was closed.

"The school was almost completely destroyed. Taliban planted explosives at five places and blew up most of the rooms," Maqsood Khan, a senior administrative official in the area told AFP by telephone.

Islamist militants opposed to co-education have destroyed hundreds of schools, mostly for girls, in the northwest of the country in recent years as they wage a fierce insurgency to enforce sharia law.

"This was an act of the Taliban," Khan added. "This is a reaction to the operation we have launched in the area."

Pakistan's military is engaged in offensives against Islamist fighters across much of the northwest including tribal areas bordering Afghanistan, a region branded by Washington the most dangerous place on Earth.

About 30,000 Pakistani troops poured into South Waziristan in mid-October to try and dismantle strongholds of the Taliban leadership, enraging militants who have responded with a surge of bomb blasts and attacks.


Source: AFP
 
.
Boys school? Why would they blow up a boys school?? They claim to be opposed to educating girls
 
.
Must have ran out of girl's schools to blow up.

Besides, its only when they blow up schools and deny the populace education that they get their next batch of uneducated grunts to do their dirty work.
 
. .
Boys school? Why would they blow up a boys school?? They claim to be opposed to educating girls

Because they are anti education in general. Do you know what they have done in schools in Afghanistan? they have beheaded the teacher in front of the horrified school kids.
 
.
Boys school? Why would they blow up a boys school?? They claim to be opposed to educating girls

They are no more nicer to boys than girls. Them being anti-women - and not being anti-men at the same time - is a myth. It is a myth because if they do something against women, it gets a lot of attention, whereas it doesn't if they do it against men. They are generally against any progress and advancement and boys education is no more different.
 
. . .
Now they proved themselves as true retards .... Pakistan as a nation should stand up to these irhabists . They are the true enemy which dosent even deserve to be left alive ..!
I pray that one day the PA might be successful in liberating Pakistan from such assholes ..!
 
.
Being uneducated themselves, it is no surprise that they see little value in education.
 
.
Not to come off as a supporter or apologist, the primary reason for targeting schools (at least the boys one) I believe is to prevent the military from using it as temporary bases in war time. That would explain the penchant for blowing up schools.:frown:
However, this reason doesn't come off as dastardly as them being anti education idiots (which they are I think). Hence the media spin.
 
Last edited:
.
Not to come off as a supporter or apologist, the primary reason for targeting schools (at least the boys one) I believe is to prevent the military from using it as temporary bases in war time. That would explain the penchant for blowing up schools.
Civilian structures like hospitals, schools and places of worships are prohibited from being targeted or used by the military. Same for misuse of the Red Cross and Red Crescent symbols.

Emblems of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The symbols described below have two distinctively different meanings. On one hand, the visual symbols of the Red Cross, the Red Crescent, the Red Lion with Sun and the Red Crystal serve as protection markings in armed conflicts, a denotation which is derived from and defined in the Geneva Conventions. This is called the protective use of the symbols.
Hospitals, schools and places of worships are structures and unless they are used by any party in an armed conflict in a manner inconsistent with their primary intent, they are forbidden, or protected structures. Ambulances marked with either the Red Cross or Red Crescent symbols are also protected provided the vehicles are used to transport ONLY wounded and/or medical supplies.

However, if any party in an armed conflict violated this understanding, then said school, hospital or place of worship lost its protected status and become legitimate target. Same for the vehicle marked with the Red Cross or Red Crescent symbol but was transporting arms or armed soldiers.
 
.
Very shameful act. Its time they pay for this. I hope they all get cancer. :partay:
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom