What's new

Taking Back Azad Kashmir Is Next Step Towards Akhand Bharat: Bjp General Secretary Ram Madhav

We nearly did (and then let it go) 49 years ago when were a bankrupt LDC country.

It was always the threat of your massa what forced India to retreat in 1965 even after capturing Pak, give western territories back in 71 or not to cross LoC in Kargil.

https://swarajyamag.com/politics/india-could-have-split-west-pakistan-in-1971/

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/reveal-names-of-cia-moles-of-1971-war-cic-393131

Ever asked why Abhi was released within 2 days with no demands at all?

This 7 times bigger country doesn't spin its foreign policy around Pakistan unlike negated vice versa. India doesn't even try to weaponize its size. It only uses exiting cap and even that ends up doing wonders.

Your leaders and intellectuals and leaders are more aptly aware about power differential and keep running for umbrella eventually, more than enough to defy delusions.
You could be anything but you aren't a defence defense enthusiast on a defense forum if you don't agree with me. Because everyone of them knows the power differential between India & Pak.

Seriously, who is desperately running away and hiding behind third parties? India or Pakistan?
World needs to dissuade India from its war-mongering after Pulwama, Qureshi tells UNSC chief

Pak blinks, offers ‘moratorium’ on artillery firing to ease LoC tensions

World has responsibility to stop Indian aggression: PM

Pakistan asks UN to 'act decisively' to prevent a 'disastrous war' with India

PM Imran reiterates need for UN to intervene in Kashmir

Regional unrest won't serve anyone's interests, says foreign minister

Difficult equation

More

As India rises, what does it have to lose if it goes to war?
National Security to Dictate Pakistan's Future



The India problem

Media Watch: So, you think you’re a tough guy?

Modi’s war

'India’s pursuit of hegemonic policies creating instability in region'

Pakistan neither wants, nor engaged in arms race in S. Asia: envoy

Can the next Pakistani army chief get rid of the anti India lot?
One, two, three


Tension at LoC by Indian forces threat to regional peace: PM

Strategic Weapons in Wrong Hands
Indian 'belligerence' can lead to strategic miscalculation: Pakistan


Will Qamar Javed Bajwa be as hostile as Raheel Sharif to India?

A key ingredient of Modi's policy with Pakistan: Impermanence
The missing Buddhist trick


How National Security Will Dictate Pakistan's Future

The establishment’s dilemma

Invite Trump to Gaddafi Stadium

A united national front

Spies underwater [Factual errors, specially about UNCLOS]

The developing ‘strategic depth’ and ‘full spectrum deterrence’ [This is a funny article.]

The Indian ‘no’

Old challenge, new approach

Modi’s challenge


Pakistan will continue to try for peace in region: Janjua

Arms Race Against India May Completely Disintegrate Pakistan Like USSR – Experts

Why Bangladesh overtook Pakistan

Attempts to isolate

Pakistan downed an Indian jet — but the economy is the real battleground

Going forward

Lok Sabha Election 2019: Implications for Pakistan

Senate panel for clear-cut policy to counter Modi’s ‘fascism’

No brakes on Modi

Pakistan to take India's move to annex occupied Kashmir to UN Security Council: Qureshi

The wages of isolation


Divide and bleed

Pakistan strongly condemns India's remarks about 'having control' of AJK one day

The BJP’s designs

India, Kashmir & deterrence

Indian navy & Gulf

Most of what I posted is from Pakistani authors and intellectuals. The list includes extremely anti-India articles as well. But none of them is able to deviate from consensus that India can eclipse existence of Pakistan while vice versa isn't true.

Your news channels discuss Pakistan more then India. And there is no diplomatic threats which keep India on hold, when you have the power you do it. Just like Russia did with Crimea, or India did in 71.
 
.
We nearly did (and then let it go) 49 years ago when were a bankrupt LDC country.

It was always the threat of your massa what forced India to retreat in 1965 even after capturing Pak, give western territories back in 71 or not to cross LoC in Kargil.

https://swarajyamag.com/politics/india-could-have-split-west-pakistan-in-1971/

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/reveal-names-of-cia-moles-of-1971-war-cic-393131

Ever asked why Abhi was released within 2 days with no demands at all?

This 7 times bigger country doesn't spin its foreign policy around Pakistan unlike negated vice versa. India doesn't even try to weaponize its size. It only uses exiting cap and even that ends up doing wonders.

Your leaders and intellectuals and leaders are more aptly aware about power differential and keep running for umbrella eventually, more than enough to defy delusions.
You could be anything but you aren't a defence defense enthusiast on a defense forum if you don't agree with me. Because everyone of them knows the power differential between India & Pak.

Seriously, who is desperately running away and hiding behind third parties? India or Pakistan?
World needs to dissuade India from its war-mongering after Pulwama, Qureshi tells UNSC chief

Pak blinks, offers ‘moratorium’ on artillery firing to ease LoC tensions

World has responsibility to stop Indian aggression: PM

Pakistan asks UN to 'act decisively' to prevent a 'disastrous war' with India

PM Imran reiterates need for UN to intervene in Kashmir

Regional unrest won't serve anyone's interests, says foreign minister

Difficult equation

More

As India rises, what does it have to lose if it goes to war?
National Security to Dictate Pakistan's Future



The India problem

Media Watch: So, you think you’re a tough guy?

Modi’s war

'India’s pursuit of hegemonic policies creating instability in region'

Pakistan neither wants, nor engaged in arms race in S. Asia: envoy

Can the next Pakistani army chief get rid of the anti India lot?
One, two, three


Tension at LoC by Indian forces threat to regional peace: PM

Strategic Weapons in Wrong Hands
Indian 'belligerence' can lead to strategic miscalculation: Pakistan


Will Qamar Javed Bajwa be as hostile as Raheel Sharif to India?

A key ingredient of Modi's policy with Pakistan: Impermanence
The missing Buddhist trick


How National Security Will Dictate Pakistan's Future

The establishment’s dilemma

Invite Trump to Gaddafi Stadium

A united national front

Spies underwater [Factual errors, specially about UNCLOS]

The developing ‘strategic depth’ and ‘full spectrum deterrence’ [This is a funny article.]

The Indian ‘no’

Old challenge, new approach

Modi’s challenge


Pakistan will continue to try for peace in region: Janjua

Arms Race Against India May Completely Disintegrate Pakistan Like USSR – Experts

Why Bangladesh overtook Pakistan

Attempts to isolate

Pakistan downed an Indian jet — but the economy is the real battleground

Going forward

Lok Sabha Election 2019: Implications for Pakistan

Senate panel for clear-cut policy to counter Modi’s ‘fascism’

No brakes on Modi

Pakistan to take India's move to annex occupied Kashmir to UN Security Council: Qureshi

The wages of isolation


Divide and bleed

Pakistan strongly condemns India's remarks about 'having control' of AJK one day

The BJP’s designs

India, Kashmir & deterrence

Indian navy & Gulf

Most of what I posted is from Pakistani authors and intellectuals. The list includes extremely anti-India articles as well. But none of them is able to deviate from consensus that India can eclipse existence of Pakistan while vice versa isn't true.

You can post all the BS you want, truth is if you could do it you would have done it decades ago. In the presence of Nuclear threat, I don't think Indians are that stupid to try that. But still, you can try your luck at any given time. Moreover, yes you can eclipse our existence and you have done wonders on 27th Feb when every nation in the world witnessed your humiliation. So keep bragging and thinking what you want but the ground realities aren't going to change.
 
.
Your news channels discuss Pakistan more then India
They don't. Except a couple of stupid special shows, Pakistan isn't even main focus of news.
And there is no diplomatic threats which keep India on hold, when you have the power you do it.
They are very much. US runs a balance of power structure to keep all regional powers in check.

Pakistan is again a major non-NATO ally and shares borders with Afghanistan, China, India and Iran (and even USSR) in past.

Till CINC of India is enough to shoo away any third party intervention, no expedition will happen.
Just like Russia did with Crimea, or India did in 71.
Let's agree you aren't as weak as Crimea was.

In 1971, we used USSR to keep third parties away to do our job.
You can post all the BS you want, truth is if you could do it you would have done it decades ago.
Our firepower was similar to you decades ago. Significant edge we started gaining was after 2000s.

Moreover, unlike 1971, we won't need Soviet Union to block third parties in sea.
In the presence of Nuclear threat, I don't think Indians are that stupid to try that.
In presence of ready to use a d deployed nuclear triad, Pakistan will be stupid to even try to use nukes.

Nukes or no nukes, gap in firepower is enough to let India win any war. Why India restrains is just the threat of damage it would incur. With time, gap will grow larger and threat will only minimize.
Moreover, yes you can eclipse our existence and you have done wonders on 27th Feb when every nation in the world witnessed your humiliation. So keep bragging and thinking what you want but the ground realities aren't going to change.
Only Pakistani fanboys are smart enough to make a joke of themselves citing 27th Feb. Seriously, a dogfight between 1 and a quarter squadron? And this LoC engagement was against a deep air strike.

And who started shying away from war after that? It wasn't India most certainly.
 
. .
Seriously, what exactly happened on 27th Feb?:lol: Who kept running away from war like cowards in entire episode?

Matching someone on a damned border skirmish is probably the best thing Pakistani military has done till date.
 
.
:lol:
can't handle unarmed kashmiris in iok and the sanghi bitches are dreaming about taking on a heavily militarized AJK where nearly every citizen owns an assault rifle! no such thing as an "akhand bharat"..never was, never will be. whining too much will only result in the Pakistani flag flying over new delhi so mind your words carefully if you wish to keep whatever little is left of bharat mata!
:lol:
 
.
The Akhand Bharat him and the Indian Hindu majority is trying to achieve will be a radioactive wasteland with most of those who are wishing for Akhand Bharat either vaporized, rotting away as radioactive corpses, becoming radioactive corpses or dying of cancer and starvation.
 
.
The Akhand Bharat him and the Indian Hindu majority is trying to achieve will be a radioactive wasteland with most of those who are wishing for Akhand Bharat either vaporized, rotting away as radioactive corpses, becoming radioactive corpses or dying of cancer and starvation.
but but but...what if they get reincarnated as roaches & rats and then infest our sewers! :lol:
 
.
India does. It even captured it in both 65 and 71 and still sits because of diplomatic reasons. Honestly, no one wants jihadi population of Pakistan. If government was a plan to cleanse or purge them, only then should be thinking about land.
Yes same as last year feb 27?
Repeated propaganda makes you belive what your govt teach you......
 
. . . .
but but but...what if they get reincarnated as roaches & rats and then infest our sewers! :lol:
Not our problem. We will be gone as well. Infact, the suffering on our side will be in lower numbers(as if that is a solace) because there are 6 of them for 1 of us.
Our weapons numbers and targets are picked to ensure that even with bmds and whatnot, all 6 of them suffer like the one of us.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom