BleedingBOI AKA JOHN LOW AKA FILIPINO MONKEY! LOL
Living in Cebu City
HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE A WHITE MAN? LOOOOOL
Here is Bleeding Boi Youtube comment page. He is obsessed with Chinese ******. (He is also obsessed with pretending he is a patriotic American and/or White person).
It is quit clear bleeding Filiturd has a huge inferiority complex and lacks the self-confidence needed to call himself a Filipino!
Filipinos have an obscene obsession with wanting to be White. I think this guy actually convinced himself he is White. He was caught earlier but was trying to pass off the baboon in his pic as his "assistant".
Isn't it interesting that his "assistant" has a YouTube comment page focusing solely on anti-China and pro-Filipino comments and videos? LOL!
Isn't it interesting that this Fili-maid has a profile on a Fili site, and that he uses his dirty Fili language to comment on it?
So mister Fili wanna-be White man, where to next?
- Details for User bleedingboi[/url]
Re-iterating from my previous post, I really don't care on how you guys bash me or my assistant out for using this user ID and email address to start this forum account. And if it's really gut-wrenching looking at false flaggers, people assuming identities , then I will not use this account anymore. No big thingy. I can create my own.
Although I don't owe you guys any explanation about everything. John Bradley Lowe is a good friend of mine, and yes he's Filipino. I do admit he has hate issues, but it's not him posting all these comments here, it's me. So you can hit the bloody bat on me, I'll bite the bullet. You can stop dragging him to this thread.
But I do owe everyone an apology if I have used the "C" word against the Chinese. Any racial slurs, discrimination, and bashing comments, it won't happen again. I'm sorry. If you all look at my previous posts on different threads, it's not really about "China-Hating". I hate the regime but I don't hate the people.
The reason I joined this site is that, I'm a fan of the newer Pakistani Al-Khalid Battle Tanks. That's all.
Asian women in general, but Southeast asian women in particular and especially are viewed as cheap sex objects by western men. Thats why southeasti asia has a reputation for western sexual tourism. In reality, this is unfair to the majority of Thai women who are very conservative and don't sleep with perverted, middle aged overweight men from the west who can't get women back home. (This is not a personal insult to you, but to sexual tourists)
Prostitution is illegal on most ASEAN countries. Governments have a stiff rule against human trafficking and public indecency, but I can't describe the same to the Thai government, they're being too laxed. Here's why:
1. During the Vietnam War, Western soldiers and other personnel would take R&R in Thailand - this, obviously, increased demand for prostitutes in Thailand.
2. In an effort to industrialise (and at the recommendation of the World Bank & IMF), the Thai government started to push Thailand as an exotic destination for Western tourism. However, little/nothing was done to change the image Thailand inherited from the Vietnam war as being an anything-goes sex and drugs haven .
3. Thailand is surrounded by poorer neighbours - Burmese, Lao, Cambodian and Yunnan Chinese women may all come to Thailand seeking greater opportunity.
4. Prosecuting those who buy and sell sex would significantly impact on the Thai economy. Therefore, the Thai government chooses to turn a blind eye, making sex-tourism relatively risk-free for Westerners in terms of potential legal repercussions.
5. Thailand has long been a hub for drugs- and arms-trafficking - these two industries are closely correlated to human (sex) trafficking .
it's amazing why some Filipinos defy the findings of their own NBI. PCG had no right to shoot! That's the END! what more do you guys want? Your own investigators said that PCG was WRONG! all that diplomatic jousting was just delaying the inevitable, and what everyone knew (including the 14 U.S. Congressmen who condemned the shooting). Let it be a forgone conclusion that it was a wrongful act to shoot a fisherman, trespassing or not. now the question is whether it was intentional -- another forgone conclusion by any means.
If the NBI came with evidence where the PCG personnel lacked restraint on these shooting and needs to be brought to curt, then it must be the rule.