T-LORAMIDS Tender | Updates & Discussion

[Bismarck]

I red it was a meeting. Was this the only decision/topic?

 

[flamer84]

Greece do the same.

That was a complicate affair,it was win win as the S 300 didn't end up in Cyprus and as far as i know that system isn't fully integrated with NATO.I think that the chinese based turkish system will be stand alone,NATO officials repeatedly said that if they go this way it won't be data linked with NATO.

Or,it could be a win for NATO as they get their hands on a important piece of chinese technology and that was the plan all along.

 

[Hafizzz]

^^^^

China most likely have better tech in store.

Well every country holds back a brick !

 

[Bismarck]

That was a complicate affair,it was win win as the S 300 didn't end up in Cyprus and as far as i know that system isn't fully integrated with NATO.I think that the chinese based turkish system will be stand alone,NATO officials repeatedly said that if they go this way it won't be data linked with NATO.

Understand. Mayby Turkey find a way to switch both (China/Nato) systems, or, they get the technology base for its own (Nato compatible) system. Who knows? China do the same with Russian S-300!

 

[Neptune]

What are the basis of your suspicions?

NATO, defence&political ties with US. And China won't give important parts of ToT that will be signed. Everybody knows why.

 

[hacksquat]

Understand. Mayby Turkey find a way to switch both (China/Nato) systems, or, they get the technology base for its own (Nato compatible) system. Who knows? China do the same with Russian S-300!

I believe tech transfer is the key here. As long as we have access to the complete source codes including the command and control, I am confident we can find a way to interface them together.

That was a complicate affair,it was win win as the S 300 didn't end up in Cyprus and as far as i know that system isn't fully integrated with NATO.I think that the chinese based turkish system will be stand alone,NATO officials repeatedly said that if they go this way it won't be data linked with NATO.

Greece had no way of integration since Russians never shared the tech with them. They would have been required to submit NATO specs to Russians which would abviously be unacceptible whereas we can do the integration ourselves within Turkey.

 

[Kompromat]

@Neptune

If Greece can have S-300, why cant Turkey have HQ-9s ?

 

[ELTurco]

NATO, defence&political ties with US. And China won't give important parts of ToT that will be signed. Everybody knows why.

Well, i guess you simply dont know, ofcourse we will get ToT..

@Neptune

If Greece can have S-300, why cant Turkey have HQ-9s ?

Bro, nobody told Turkey anything about HQ-9

it is just some fairly tails spread by some fanboys.

 

[Mitro]

No doubt about it

Yet better than anything India has !

 

[Mitro]

I Think Pakistan played a big role in bringing china and turkey together and now we will see TOT Flying From turkey to china to pakistan

 

[flamer84]

I believe tech transfer is the key here. As long as we have access to the complete source codes including the command and control, I am confident we can find a way to interface them together.



Greece had no way of integration since Russians never shared the tech with them. They would have been required to submit NATO specs to Russians which would abviously be unacceptible whereas we can do the integration ourselves within Turkey.

I can't remember exactly but i think it was some NATO official that said you won't be allowed to data link the system with the NATO radars in Turkey,that's why you could use it as a stand alone system within the protective umbrella you're building.

Do you think that some specifics will be released ? Was this just a financial decision? I don't like the Patriots very much but i think Aster is a powerful platform and i think that the french would have provided ToT also.

 

[Anubis]

Communists have penetrated NATO.

 

[T-123456]

I wish we would had chose either Aster-30 or S-300/400. . . . .

Explain why?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

^^^^

China most likely have better tech in store.

HQ-19 = THAAD & HQ-26 = SM-3

DN-2 is China's unique GEO ASAT and midcourse interception system, China will have these techs in store.

HQ-9 is a mature and reliable tech, but it is far from China's most advanced tech for now.

 

[Neptune]

@Neptune

If Greece can have S-300, why cant Turkey have HQ-9s ?

man...it'd be good but, i'm sure that the hellenic s-300s are not the same as Iran's and other nations s-300s. My 2cent brotha