What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

No, numbers from ur MS Paint pic are not mentioned there.


Here a proof that kim jong un is sexiest man alive:

v3-kim1.jpg


14620910183.jpg
Once again posting as usual nonsense crap third class propooganda which has nothing to do withSyrian conflict now check real reality
download.jpg
Now close ur eyes and refuse to accept.reality
images


West HELPED Assad.

Meanwhile Assad created a Volksstum:

C65_G0-WwAERZPp.jpg


volkssturm-units-marching-towards-the-brandenburg-gate-berlin-after-picture-id545735009
IMG_20170315_142542.jpg
oh really
 
.
Once again posting as usual nonsense crap third class propooganda which has nothing to do withSyrian conflict now check real realityView attachment 384060 Now close ur eyes and refuse to accept.reality
images


View attachment 384062 oh really
Reality is simple. People of Syria have just 3 choices:

1) Submit to Assad dictatorship.
2) Daily barrel bombs and starvation.
3) Exile in tents.

Majority of Syrian Sunnis chose #2 and #3 (even if I use ur numbers). So u can imaginable the amount of hate to Assad regime if they chose barrel bombs and tents in winter over his regime. And those who chose #1 that does not mean they like Assad either. Not everyone is ready to submit his family to tens and barrel bombs.

And despite that majority of Syrian people hate Assad you still try to enforce him. You keep murdering and expelling hundreds of people every day just to keep Assad. I simply dont understand the amount of sadism.
 
. .
http://www.businessinsider.com/pentagon-more-troops-inside-syria-2017-3
The Pentagon is considering sending an additional 1,000 conventional troops over the next few weeks into Syria, ahead of an upcoming offensive against the ISIS capital of Raqqa.

The troops would likely come from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit — currently on its way to the region — and the Army's 82nd Airborne Division, which recently made its way to Kuwait, according to a report in The Washington Post by TM Gibbons-Neff.

The proposed increase in conventional forces would follow similar deployments in recent weeks that have supplemented special operations forces, of which roughly 500 have been on the ground for some time.

A convoy of US Army Rangers riding in armored Stryker combat vehicles was seen crossing the border into Syria last week to support Kurdish military forces in Manbij. The convoy, identified by SOFREP as being from 3rd Ranger Battalion of the 75th Ranger Regiment, was the most overt use of US troops in the region thus far.

The Ranger deployment was followed soon after by a contingent of US Marines from the 1st Battalion, 4th Marine regiment, which left their ships to establish a combat outpost inside Syria that is apparently within striking distance of Raqqa.

"For the base in Syria to be useful, it must be within about 20 miles of the operations US-backed forces are carrying out," the Post wrote.

Col. John Dorrian, a spokesman for OIR, told Business Insider previously that the moves into Syria were to pre-position US forces so they can provide logistical and fire support to "Syrian partnered forces" who will eventually assault Raqqa.

The Marines and Rangers will provide the "commander greater agility to expedite the destruction of ISIS in Raqqah. The exact numbers and locations of these forces are sensitive in order to protect our forces, but there will be approximately an additional 400 enabling forces deployed for a temporary period to enable our Syrian partnered forces to defeat ISIS," Dorrian told Business Insider.

He added: "The deployment of these additional key enabling capabilities allows the Coalition to provide flexible all weather fire support, training and protection from IEDs, and additional air support to our Syrian partners."

Meanwhile, US special operations forces, who are said to be taking a training and advisory role with Iraqi and Kurdish forces, were quietly given more latitude to call in precision airstrikes and artillery. As the AP reported in February, advisors are now able to call in airstrikes without seeking approval from an operations center in Baghdad.

Additionally, advisors were embedded at lower echelons of Iraqi security forces at the brigade and battalion level, rather than division — meaning that US forces are increasingly getting closer to direct combat.

The presence of additional US ground troops inside Syria — even miles from the frontline — would bring with it considerable risk. Combat outposts often draw rocket and mortar fire, in addition to small arms. Last March, a Marine outpost established to support the operation to retake Mosul, Iraq came under rocket attack by ISIS militants, killing Staff Sgt. Louis Cardin.

A total of nine American service members have been killed in OIR combat operations, while 33 have been wounded, according to Pentagon statistics.

There is also additional risk from the US' partnership with Syrian Kurdish fighters known as the YPG, or People's Protection Units. Though the Pentagon seems to believe the YPG would be the most effective force in the Raqqa fight, the unit is considered a terrorist group by Turkey.

Turkey has so far refused to compromise, insisting the US use a different Syrian rebel group, Reuters reported.

"Our soldiers will not be fighting together with people who shot us and killed our soldiers and are trying to kill us," one senior Turkish security official, briefed on recent meetings between Turkish and U.S. strategists, told Reuters.
 
. .
Someone bombed a mosque in Aleppo province yesterday. 50 dead. Russians or Americans. I guess Assad becomes more and more popular by letting foreign forces destroy mosques?
 
.
Someone bombed a mosque in Aleppo province yesterday. 50 dead. Russians or Americans. I guess Assad becomes more and more popular by letting foreign forces destroy mosques?

Where in Aleppo? Aleppo city is controlled by Assad. It cannot be a strike on Aleppo city.
 
. .
US Missile Remains Reportedly Recovered from Site of Aleppo Mosque Bombing
March 16, 2017

By Christiaan Triebert


Updates:
  • The geolocation has been confirmed to a site southwest of Al-Jīnah, based on video footage of the aftermath and satellite imagery.
What happened?
In the evening of March 16, 2017, reports came in that a mosque in a Syrian village in the western part of the Aleppo governorate was targeted by an airstrike, killing over 50 attendees of the evening prayer. Most posts on social media blamed either the Russian or the Syrian Air Force for the attack. Some reports, however, accused the United States (US) and the Coalition (CJTF-OIR) it leads, or said that the planes could not be identified. In this investigation, Bellingcat aims to see what we can establish using open source information.

The lowest casualty estimates are by the Syrian Network for Human Rights (29) and the Syrian Civil Defence (35; better known as the White Helmets). Other sources have claimed much higher casualty figures.

Untitled.jpg

Where did it happen?
Based on the textual information available, the location of the airstrike is said to be at a mosque in or around Al-Jīnah, an opposition-held village located in the western part of the Aleppo governorate. Some reports call the mosque the ‘Umar ibn Al-Khaṭṭāb mosque.

There are three mosques detectable on satellite imagery in Al-Jīnah itself, however, local activists told Bellingcat that the targeted mosque was relatively newly built just southwest of the village: 36.107721, 36.787080 (Wikimapia). According to reports, the evening prayer was mainly attended by civilian but used for religious teaching.

C7E0LdWXwAAjYBs-1200x715.jpg

Based on a video uploaded to YouTube showing the aftermath, it is possible to confirm that the two locations match.

Geolocation of mosque bombed by the US is CONFIRMED: southeast of Al-Jīnah, w-Aleppo, #Syria. https://t.co/BLjjLH93or pic.twitter.com/j0gKDk7Kzf

— Christiaan Triebert (@trbrtc) March 17, 2017

When did it happen?
The alleged airstrike took place on March 16, 2017. In several videos of the event, people are saying that the airstrikes took place during the Isha prayer, meaning that the specific time of the airstrike must have been somewhere between 19:00 and 19:30 local time.

Who is responsible?
Both the Russian Air Force as well as the United States(-led Coalition) have been accused of targeting the mosque in Al-Jīnah.

However, a photo showing an alleged weapon remnant found in the rubble of the mosque may reveal more about the perpetrator of the attack.

C7EfNjCW4AM3bzw-1200x900.jpg

The photo was published on Twitter by Sakir Khader, a Dutch journalist, who said he received the photo from local activists on the ground. No results show up in a reverse image search, suggesting the photo has not been indexed by Google and may thus be authentic. The location and authenticity of the photo could not be independently referenced, and we are currently awaiting more photos and videos from the targeted site.

A text in Latin is visible on the alleged weapon remnant: “WT: 52.0 kg”. ‘WT’ is an abbreviation for ‘weight’, possibly referring to the weight of the missile.

Interestingly, the specific font and abbreviation are used on US missiles, as can be seen in hundreds of reference pictures of AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-surface missiles, as shown below. This fact, combined with the striking similarity of rivets, paint, et cetera, strongly suggests the photographed object is a remnant of a US AGM-variant.

C7Ef005XQAAEzhk.jpg

Perhaps even more noteworthy is that the exact same label on a weapon remnant was found at the site of an alleged drone strike on a high value target (HVT) in Syria’s Idlib province in October 2016. At the day that those photos were published by pro-opposition Step News Agency, the US admitted targeting a target with a drone.

C7Ei7PIXwAIjwPc.jpg

If the photo of Mr. Khader thus indeed was taken at the mosque site, it is highly likely that the US is the perpetrator of this attack. It is, however, also worth mentioning that the damage shown in the October 16, 2016, footage of Idlib is considerably smaller than the March 16, 2017, strike, as was noted by Twitter-uster @sasmojo.

Why did it happen?
On social media, many were fast to see that the mosque was attended by “young men of fighting age”, and that rebel fighters were attending the evening prayer. None of this can be confirmed.

However, it is possible that the US was aiming to kill one or more high value targets (HVTs) of the various groups in Syria that are designated as a terrorist organisation by the US. It is important to note that the US airstrikes targeting HTS, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (formerly known as Jabhat al-Nusra) have been separate from US-led CJTF-OIR.

CENTCOM did confirm they conducted airstrikes in the Idlib province, as they told Samuel Oakford, an American journalist. Al-Jīnah is 5 kilometres from the governorate border with Idlib.

NEW: CENTCOM says the US conducted a strike in Idlib during the past 6 hours. It is looking into Aleppo mosque strike, which is near border.

— Samuel Oakford (@samueloakford) March 16, 2017

Bellingcat will contact the US Central Command to comment on the above information, and this article will be updated accordingly.
 
.
I hope Erdogan will close Incirlik airbase for Americans after today's terror strike. If he does not do it then he is pathetic coward.
 
.
I hope Erdogan will close Incirlik airbase for Americans after today's terror strike. If he does not do it then he is pathetic coward.

Then Turkey loses. Assad will let the US use its Hama air base.
 
. .
C7Mta64WwAET_Wj.jpg

C7MSva4WwAAl1nQ.jpg

Khameai thugs continue murdering and displacing Muslim kids out of their homes so athetist corrupt dictator could sit for another couple years on his throne.

Assad.jpg
 
. .
I hope Erdogan will close Incirlik airbase for Americans after today's terror strike. If he does not do it then he is pathetic coward.

He protest at most he did before against you.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom