Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

[Madali]

Only genuine revolution in human history was Iran Khomeini revolution 1979. All other are fake Illuminati Zionst, Free mason NATO conspiracies. All who support them are nothing but terrorist rats and should be crushed like bugs, tortured expelled, gased to death and barrel bombed with no mercy.

The Egyptian revolution was real.

 

[Tsilihin]

Assad's days are counted. Hopefully the new leadership of Syria in the future will be an Arabic one supported by the Arab world and Turkey. Contrary to your dreams, Syria consists of 80% Sunni arabs, after removing extreme elements, the newly formed government will most likely be hugely Turkey backed. Since Turkey took care of Syrians the most, this is a long term strategy that guys like you are oblivious to.
Assad proved his illegitimacy. Shitty media like Press TV and RT News nonsense propaganda cannot change facts on the ground in an age of information.

You live on reality or in Alice in Wonderland ??
The wars are not for ideology, money and power are key factor.
Your comparison is same like we say that in Mexico real believers are guys in narco cartels ..
ISIS or other organizations goes in wars just for profit ,they are scumbags,criminals and nothing more than that.

 

[Timur]

it was home grown

from france maybe, where the ayatollah came from?

 

[Ceri]

You live on reality or in Alice in Wonderland ??
The wars are not for ideology, money and power are key factor.
Your comparison is same like we say that in Mexico real believers are guys in narco cartels ..
ISIS or other organizations goes in wars just for profit ,they are scumbags,criminals and nothing more than that.

ISIS is an excuse used by every country. You should ask yourself that question, i'm not the one ignoring 5 million syrian refugees, or the simple fact that almost every Syrian Arab in that country despises Assad and Iranian/Russian bombardment of their country. If you have the slightest conviction that the government in the future that will replace dictator Assad will be pro- Iran and Russia you are extremely myopic minded.
Or perhaps you think Assad will remain on power indefinately, thanks to Russian presence in Syria forever?

 

[Madali]

from france maybe, where the ayatollah came from?

Oh, did French civilians join the revolution to start a Parisian Caliphate? Maybe, maybe. You know more.

 

[libertycall]

Oh, did French civilians join the revolution to start a Parisian Caliphate? Maybe, maybe. You know more.

Alternatively Khomeini's French godfathers returned him to Iran in a VIP jet just in time to prevent the secular left-wing Iranian parties and their supporters from taking power during the Cold War.

 

[Madali]

Alternatively Khomeini's French godfathers returned him to Iran in a VIP jet just in time to prevent the secular left-wing Iranian parties and their supporters from taking power during the Cold War.

So lets say Khomeini was a french agent, how about the actual day to day Revolutionary battles by the people? What percentage of them were French? Would you say 50,000 to be an accurate number, with French weapons smuggled in to help them fight the Shah?

 

[libertycall]

So lets say Khomeini was a french agent, how about the actual day to day Revolutionary battles by the people? What percentage of them were French? Would you say 50,000 to be an accurate number, with French weapons smuggled in to help them fight the Shah?

Who says he was a French agent? He was a useful idiot. He killed hundreds of thousands of Iranian students. Destroyed its economy. Forced Iran's best and brightest to leave. Created enmity between Iran and every Muslim country in the world by sponsoring Shiite terrorism. Engaged in a fruitless war which he lost according to his own words.

And now his gang who once complained about theft of national resources by the Shah are stealing resources from Iran and depositing them in assets abroad. All the Ayatolloids are at it. Millionaire Mullahs - Forbes

You should read some Ahmad Kasravi.

 

[Madali]

Who says he was a French agent? He was a useful idiot. He killed hundreds of thousands of Iranian students. Destroyed its economy. Forced Iran's best and brightest to leave. Created enmity between Iran and every Muslim country in the world by sponsoring Shiite terrorism. Engaged in a fruitless war which he lost according to his own words.

And now his gang who once complained about theft of national resources by the Shah are stealing resources from Iran and depositing them in assets abroad. All the Ayatolloids are at it. Millionaire Mullahs - Forbes

You should read some Ahmad Kasravi.

Okay, so what has that got to do with me saying the revolution was homegrown?

 

[B@KH]

Alternatively Khomeini's French godfathers returned him to Iran in a VIP jet just in time to prevent the secular left-wing Iranian parties and their supporters from taking power during the Cold War.

you are mistaken. French is not the god father.

God Father is HOLY NAJAF-E-ASHRAF - IRAQ.

Turkey : Nov 1964 - Oct 1965 11 months
IRAQ : Oct 1965 - Oct 1978 13 years
Kuwait : Oct 1978 - Kuwait refused Entry
France : Oct 1978 - Jan 1979 4 months

IMAM KHOMEINI R.A. LANDED IN IRAN ON 01 FEB 1979.

EMBRACED BY HIS NATION IN A HISTORIC WELCOME.

 

[Aslan]

The Iranian revolutionaries would have stupid if they expected the Shah wouldn't react. He did. The reason it succeeded was because it was home grown. Chechens and Saudis and etc did not join.

U are an ignorant of special kind by repeating the same bs of ur masters about Chechen and outsiders bs. WhIle the whole world saw the Syrian masses protesting on the streets peacefully while getting shot at by the regime thugs. We saw huge defections from the SAA of those who couldnt kill their own. And yet u claim it otherwise. Have u seen the latest videos of sctarian shia malitias the Iraqis the afghans the pakistanis the lebanese and what else the hell not, driving through Aleppo shouting labaik this that khonenis and what ever dead or alive they could call on.

And u are whining about a handful of Chechens. U deserve the kind of repressive gov that sits in tehran. And really u deserved what the basigi did to u guys the last time u tried to raise a voice against ur own gov. I say bravo what ever nai sits at the head of gov. Keep it tight.

 

[Madali]

U are an ignorant of special kind by repeating the same bs of ur masters about Chechen and outsiders bs. WhIle the whole world saw the Syrian masses protesting on the streets peacefully while getting shot at by the regime thugs. We saw huge defections from the SAA of those who couldnt kill their own. And yet u claim it otherwise. Have u seen the latest videos of sctarian shia malitias the Iraqis the afghans the pakistanis the lebanese and what else the hell not, driving through Aleppo shouting labaik this that khonenis and what ever dead or alive they could call on.

And u are whining about a handful of Chechens. U deserve the kind of repressive gov that sits in tehran. And really u deserved what the basigi did to u guys the last time u tried to raise a voice against ur own gov. I say bravo what ever nai sits at the head of gov. Keep it tight.

Wow, calm down. Anytime soon you will strap a bomb to your chest and blow up a mosque.

There are significant data regarding, both foreign fighters and foreign arms into Syria since early days of the revolution. Back in 2011, countries like Qatar were bragging about financing the opposition. Back then they didn't think it would drag on for 5 years with a lot of backlash so they didn't hide it. Now, everyone hides their support.

 

[500]

So lets say Khomeini was a french agent, how about the actual day to day Revolutionary battles by the people? What percentage of them were French? Would you say 50,000 to be an accurate number, with French weapons smuggled in to help them fight the Shah?

In 1917 Communist were small portion of revolutionary forces in Russia, yet they managed to capture power and held it for 70 years.

Similar hing happened in Iran. There were many people unhappy with Shah, but then Ayatulas hijacked revolution and keep it through terror and intimidation. How many free elections were held by Ayatulas? - None.

Do u think these people wanted Ayatulas?

 

[Salman_Farsi]

Comparing the Syrian rebellion and the Iranien revolution is totally ridiculous. They're two completely different things.
1-The Iranien regime was a total monarchy, without any democratic control on the 'Shah'.
The Syrian regime is a Republic with a parliament and the president has been chosen by the people by election.
2-The Iranian revolutionaries were against the principe of the 'Pahlavi' reign and wanted a democratic system.
The Syrian protestors (the real Syrian civilians who participated in the first peaceful protests) were mainly criticising a part of the governmental policies.
3-The Iranian revolution wasn't supported by any foreign government as it was against the both of West and East influence on Iran.
The Syrian rebellion was supported by the West, the Zionist regime and the Arab dictatorships since its very first days.
4-The Iranian government was fully supported by the US, and the US government intervened against the revolution, without even a request from the 'Shah'.
The Syrian government had no ally like the US for Iran; Iran and Russia intervened after several official request by the Syrian government.
5-The Iranian revolutionaries were under high pressure for many years and any act against the regime was answered by terror and torture, and even after the deployment of the Army in the street, people acted peacefully cause of the order of Imam Khomeini. Iranian official protests started after several years of hidden action and peaceful critics against the regime.
The Syrian official protests started from the first day of actions against the gov't and the first actions of the police has led to armed attacks against the government.
6-The Iranian government was Iranian.
The Syrian rebellion was officially backed by foreign states and now there's thousands of foreign terrorists fighting against the government.
7-The majority of the Iranian people asked one thing: an "Islamic Republic".
In Syria there isn't any consensus; one group want a Caliphate, another want separation, another want a secular Arab state.

 

[500]

Comparing the Syrian rebellion and the Iranien revolution is totally ridiculous. They're two completely different things.
1-The Iranien regime was a total monarchy, without any democratic control on the 'Shah'.
The Syrian regime is a Republic with a parliament and the president has been chosen by the people by election.

North Korea is also Democratic Republic then.

Assads' election win margins:

1971: 99.2%
1978: 99.9%
1985: 100%
1991: 99.9%
1999: 100%
2000: 99.7%
2007: 97.6%
2014: 88.7%