Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

[ultron]

Russia kill rebels using Tu long range strategic bombers

 

[500]

Why do you support Isis?

Cruise missiles are 1000 times more expensive than free fall bombs = ISIS support for u?

I hate Baath and think it must be eradicated: both Iraqi Baath aka ISIS and Syrian Baath aka Assad.

You are directly supporting Syrian Baath and indirectly support Iraqi Baath aka ISIS by bombing anti ISIS rebels.

Yesterday KHAPUASS air raid destroyed one of the largest textile yarn plants in the Middle East, which provided job to 600 people.

120.000 people without bread after Russia/Assad airstrike destroys bread factory in Atarib (Aleppo):

 

[Rukarl]

120.000 people without bread after Russia/Assad airstrike destroys bread factory in Atarib (Aleppo):

Good news !!! People who support Islamofascists don't deserve to eat anything.

I'm beginning to suspect @500 needs his head checked since he says most cruise missiles fail to reach target

The dude is a propagandist without a doubt and his trollings are in favour of Israeli propaganda machine.

 

[Barmaley]

bombs hit the target

The types of space sattelites which is being used in the war against terrorists.

from the left to right: Optoelectronic satellites, radio-electronic satellites to intercept AWACS, Air-defence and others signals , Optoelectronic satellites for detail observing, communication satellites, remote sensing satellites.

 

[ultron]

Russia air force four engine bombers hitting ISIS allies in Aleppo and Idlib provinces HARD. Thousands killed.

Russia deploys Msta-B artillery unit to fight rebels

https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5903/94845085.134/0_1418a1_896ffeea_orig


Tu-22M3 bombers. Terror of rebels.

 

[ultron]

Russia Iran captured Halash in southern Aleppo province

Syrian Army and Hezbollah Capture Halash in Southern Aleppo


Terror of rebels. Tu-95 four engine bombers.

Russia Iran take on rebels near Palmyra

 

[IR1907]

bombs hit the target

The types of space sattelites which is being used in the war against terrorists.

from the left to right: Optoelectronic satellites, radio-electronic satellites to intercept AWACS, Air-defence and others signals , Optoelectronic satellites for detail observing, communication satellites, remote sensing satellites.

lol @500's monkeys have nothing to defend themselves from superior technology.

 

[ultron]

Russia Iran take on rebels in Jobar

Russia Iran bombers kill thousands of people

 

[500]

lol @500's monkeys have nothing to defend themselves from superior technology.

This is superior technology. Assad's central airport before and after:

This is not really:

Good news !!! People who support Islamofascists don't deserve to eat anything.

Islamofascists are fighting for Assad.

Plus what u just said is example of fascism.

 

[ultron]

Islamofascists are fighting for Assad.

Shia and Salafists have been sworn enemies since the beginning of time. Even if there is no Assad, Shia would still come to Syria to kill Salafists.

Russia Iran Mi-24 helicopter gunships. Terror of rebels.

 

[notorious_eagle]

It does not change anything. Cruise missiles have same warhead as free fall bombs but 1000 times more expensive. So its basically just propaganda for show, especially since most (if not all) of these cruise missiles have failed.

Off course it is, the amount of firepower a strategic bomber can carry far outweighs what a tactical bomber can carry. A good example would be, the B52's or B1's can carry 5 to 10 times more ordnances than a F15 or F16 can. Same is the case here, a TU95 or TU160 can carry far more firepower when compared with SU34. I doubt it the Russians will use these Strategic Bombers to fire cruise missiles and will be using these free fall bombs in vast amounts of numbers to carpet bomb the enemy.

 

[ultron]

Russia bombed rebel bakeries in Saraqeb and Atareb

https://twitter.com/x/status/666728549550723072

 

[Daneshmand]

Off course it is, the amount of firepower a strategic bomber can carry far outweighs what a tactical bomber can carry. A good example would be, the B52's or B1's can carry 5 to 10 times more ordnances than a F15 or F16 can. Same is the case here, a TU95 or TU160 can carry far more firepower when compared with SU34. I doubt it the Russians will use these Strategic Bombers to fire cruise missiles and will be using these free fall bombs in vast amounts of numbers to carpet bomb the enemy.

Tu-160 is the world's largest combat aircraft. It can carry over 40 tonnes of ordinance. That is more than twice the maximum take off weight of F-16. It has a range of 12,000+ km and can carry six Kh-101 cruise missiles each with a range of 3,000+ km. It can fly from anywhere in Russia and hit targets anywhere on planet earth. Without refueling.

 

[ultron]

Tu-160 is the world's largest combat aircraft. It can carry over 40 tonnes of ordinance. That is more than twice the maximum take off weight of F-16. It has a range of 12,000+ km and can carry six Kh-101 cruise missiles each with a range of 3,000+ km. It can fly from anywhere in Russia and hit targets anywhere on planet earth. Without refueling.

the deadliest war plane mankind has ever built

 

[500]

Off course it is, the amount of firepower a strategic bomber can carry far outweighs what a tactical bomber can carry. A good example would be, the B52's or B1's can carry 5 to 10 times more ordnances than a F15 or F16 can. Same is the case here, a TU95 or TU160 can carry far more firepower when compared with SU34. I doubt it the Russians will use these Strategic Bombers to fire cruise missiles and will be using these free fall bombs in vast amounts of numbers to carpet bomb the enemy.

Unlike B-52 and B-1, Tu-160 and Tu-95 can only carry cruise missiles, thats why they are useless in conflicts like Syria.