Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

[Dr.Thrax]

Who do you think pays for this "Insurgency" ?
The day the Israelis stop pumping shekels into the rebellion, they'll fall apart within a year.

You seriously are retarded.
Rebels get most of their funding from Qatar and Turkey. Let me make this clear: If rebels got any military, logistical, or monetary support from Israel, Assad would've been gone in 2013. Just saying. We clearly haven't gotten any and we clearly won't get any.

yr not only world's most foolish people but most ignorant was well.

Remember that whose money is involved in a war, the results r only in its favor in long run.

In this war no matter who wins only Israel is in most beneficial position!

Wrong.
If you haven't noticed rebels are hostile to Israel, Assad pretended he was but he hadn't attacked them since 1982. Meanwhile Israel made incursions into rebel held territory with bulldozers and destroyed a refugee camp in the UNDOF. Rebels couldn't do crap about it or they would've been bombed to oblivion.

more important question is where did they got chemical weapons to fire at Syrian forces when they were using them against them?

While we are aware of the fact that Israel has one of most advanced stockpiles of chemical and nuke weapons in world and the fact hat it has western support to do what he likes.

The only CW Israel has to my knowledge is white phosphorus. Assad used Sarin, this has been proven so many damn times.

bellingcat - Updated Google Earth Imagery from August 24th 2013 Reveals More Details About The August 21st Sarin Attack

Turkey escorts scores of militants to join Daesh in Syria: Report

Turkey’s intelligence agency has delivered more than 60 foreign militants over the Turkish border into Syria to fight in the ranks of the Daesh terrorist group, a new report says.

The National Intelligence Organization (MİT) ensured a safe passage for the Daesh elements who had been arrested by Turkish police between April and September last year for suspected involvement in terrorism-related activities, Turkey's English-language newspaper Today's Zaman reported on Wednesday, citing a report by Turkish Nokta weekly news magazine.

MİT collected the militants directly from jail and handed them over to Daesh handlers in Syria through the Akcakale border gate, situated in Turkey’s southern Sanliurfa Province, the report said.

The prisoners should have been deported, but they were delivered instead to MİT agents with the knowledge and authorization of Sanliurfa police chief Eyup Pinarbasi, the report added.

The paper said CCTV cameras were turned off while border personnel were ushered away from the meeting spot on the day of delivery of the 60-strong group.

Militants from the US, Turkey, Russia, Sweden, Denmark, France, Germany, Macedonia, Turkmenistan, Chechnya, Ingushetia, East Turkestan and Australia were among the militants, the report said.
Back in June, Today's Zaman accused MİT of helping Daesh elements cross into Syria based on a footage obtained by the center-left Turkish daily, Cumhuriyet.

A screengrab of footage released by the daily, Cumhuriyet, on June 12, 2015, shows a Turkish driver pointing to the Daesh base where he dropped off militants.

The video showed bus drivers admitting that they had transferred “heavily bearded people, who looked scruffy” to the border at the order of MİT.

The militants were collected from the Atme camp in northwestern Syria, transported via Turkey's southeastern border and dropped off in Akcakale town, where they reentered Syria, according to footage.

Ankara has come under fire for not doing enough to halt the advance of Daesh as well as for its perceived reluctance to crack down on militants using its territory to travel into Syria, gripped by deadly unrest since March 2011.
The US and its regional allies - especially Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey - are supporting the militants operating inside the Arab country.

PressTV-‘Turkey delivers 60 militants to Daesh’

Source: PressTV


News: Rebels in combat in Dara'a during the southern storm:

Map of Dara'a now: Rebels are advancing from the Northwest

 

[Hussein]

Three terrorists captured, Afghani and Irani...

only Afghani. too bad for your hatred.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

only Afghani. too bad for your hatred.

The one in the middle is Iranian. What do you expect? Flowers to be thrown over his head as a reward for coming from Iran to kill Sunni Syrians? Yes, I want him to die.

 

[Hussein]

The one in the middle is Iranian. What do you expect? Flowers to be thrown over his head as a reward for coming from Iran to kill Sunni Syrians? Yes, I want him to die.

yeah sure shias want to kill sunnis... it is what your saudi masters teached you to say fanatic
he is not Iranian not even looking Iranian at all
but for your story it is convenient
since you have zero culture about Iran that's not possible for you to understand something like most guys in Iran prefer win money in Iran than fighting in Syria . you are very very very far to understand even the mentality inside the sepah.

keep support your masters you do it fine.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

yeah sure shias want to kill sunnis... it is what your saudi masters teached you to say fanatic
he is not Iranian not even looking Iranian at all
but for your story it is convenient
since you have zero culture about Iran that's not possible for you to understand something like most guys in Iran prefer win money in Iran than fighting in Syria . you are very very very far to understand even the mentality inside the sepah.

keep support your masters you do it fine.

He said he's Iranian and he looks Iranian.

 

[Hussein]

He said he's Iranian and he looks Iranian.

he said he is Iranian because he was forced to say so. and you don't even know how looks an Iranian idiot.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

he said he is Iranian because he was forced to say so. and you don't even know how looks an Iranian idiot.

 

[SALMAN F]

yeah sure shias want to kill sunnis... it is what your saudi masters teached you to say fanatic
he is not Iranian not even looking Iranian at all
but for your story it is convenient
since you have zero culture about Iran that's not possible for you to understand something like most guys in Iran prefer win money in Iran than fighting in Syria . you are very very very far to understand even the mentality inside the sepah.

keep support your masters you do it fine.

From which arab people you belong

 

[Solomon2]

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi Become a fan
Research fellow, Middle East Forum
Why America Should Aim To Contain -- Rather Than Destroy -- ISIS
Posted: 08/12/2015 9:21 am EDT Updated: 08/12/2015 9:59 am EDT

ASSOCIATED PRESS

TEL AVIV -- What to do about Syria? How to defeat the Islamic State? Think of all theop-eds and policy papers that aim to provide answers to these questions. But is there actually anything to them? What about the current U.S. approach?

To begin with, one can readily agree that the U.S. train-and-equip program for Syrian rebels to fight ISIS has been misguided from the beginning. The notion that such a force can only take on ISIS and not the Assad regime has no credibility among the overwhelming majority of Syrian rebels, regardless of ideological orientation, as the fight against the two is seen as inherently intertwined. Little wonder then that the initial batch recently inserted into Syria had only 60 recruits.

Further, U.S. policymakers' grasp of the ground situation appears to have been grossly out of touch with reality. They failed to anticipate a clash with Syria's al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front, which has also been targeted in American airstrikes. It is clear to any observer who has visited or tracks online the Azaz district into which the U.S.-trained rebels were inserted that the area had a notable Nusra Front presence that would suspect any American proxies.

Meanwhile, U.S.-led coalition airstrikes, bound as they are in part by political considerations, have produced mixed results. They have been most effective in the north, in support of the Syrian Kurdish units -- known as the People's Protection Units, or YPG -- that have deprived ISIS of significant control of north Raqqa province and Hasakah, such that the YPG has also taken over many parts previously held by the Assad regime. On the other hand, understandable reluctance to launch airstrikes that can be seen as directly supporting the regime means that ISIS advances through the Homs desert have largely been unimpeded. ISIS's control of the heartlands of its territories in central and southeastern Syria remains largely unchallenged, and revenue streams have not been seriously hurt. Furthermore, hundreds of civilians have been killed by U.S.-led airstrikes, according to a recent report.

The Islamic State is here to stay for the long term, if not indefinitely, and the coalition should accordingly give up on pretensions to 'degrade and destroy' it.


The YPG, for all its successes, will only go so far in attempting to take territory from ISIS. The same goes for the expected establishment of a Turkish "safe zone" in the north Aleppo countryside that may clear ISIS out of the remaining northern border areas and has prompted the withdrawal of Nusra Front fighters. This expected "safe zone" is a small, strictly local initiative driven more by Turkey's desire to stop the YPG from linking up with its third canton of Afrin.

Given the failure of current U.S. policy, the main alternative proposed is broader support for rebel groups -- either bringing the downfall of the regime or forcing a political settlement that can then bring about more effective local forces to take on ISIS. In this context, arguably the largest single rebel group -- Ahrar al-Sham -- has taken to Western media, calling for more engagement with the group from the West and the international community, while professing commitment to a "moderate" vision of Syria, including protection of minorities.

While the Ahrar al-Sham op-ed seems superficially impressive, it overlooks the most important issue of the group's ties to al Qaeda. Linked to this point is the subsequent inability or lack of will to oppose some of the more unsavory sides of the al Qaeda presence. For example, rhetoric of commitment to minorities cannot conceal the fact that Ahrar al-Sham has done nothing about the forced conversion to Sunni Islam of the Druze in Idlib at the hands of Nusra Front. Indeed, Ahrar al-Sham, like many other rebel groups, appears to pretend as though this has not happened at all.

Instead, the coalition should focus on containment, providing humanitarian aid for refugees and civilians and establishing a no-fly zone to stop indiscriminate killing.


In reality, when one reads between the lines of the op-ed, it becomes clear that what Ahrar al-Sham is advocating is Sunni Arab majoritarianism with a sectarian model of politics that cannot be seen as conducive to stability in Syria, even post-Assad. Generally left out of the debate in this context is the problem of simultaneously empowering the rebels and the YPG, when the former tend to view the latter as working towards taqsim Souria (the "division of Syria").

One thinks of the headache of Kurdish-Arab territorial disputes in post-2003 Iraq: such qualms are and will be no less of a nightmare in a post-Assad Syria. Add to this intra-rebel rivalries with power, ideological disputes and likely continued fighting from pro-regime and ethnic minority militias, and it can be seen just how difficult forming any unified force to take on ISIS will be even with the regime gone. The chaos that has engulfed Libya in the post-Gaddafi era is instructive in this regard, as is thecivil war and anarchy in Somalia of nearly a quarter century since the downfall of its dictatorial regime in 1991.

Nor should one pretend that the way forward lies in broader engagement with the regime. The regime is seeing its own population increasingly fragmented among different militia factions and continues to lose peripheral territories to its rivals. It is unlikely to be able to unite the country under its rule again. Working with the regime and by extension its main ally Iran, can only be seen as a recipe for permanent warfare.

Sadly, we are only 'in the early stages of what will be a much longer war,' as Rania Abouzeid put it.


In other words, there are no viable solutions. There is generally little honesty about what it would actually take to rebuild Syria at this point. For many years if not decades, it would take a large international ground force in Syria, enforcing the disarmament of all militia actors and implementing a grand nation-building project embodied in a government seen as acceptable to all sides. Unsurprisingly, no willpower or consensus exists anywhere for such an initiative.

Sadly, we are only "in the early stages of what will be a much longer war," as Rania Abouzeid put it. The Islamic State is here to stay for the long term, if not indefinitely, and the coalition should accordingly give up on pretensions to "degrade and destroy"it. Instead, the coalition should focus on containment, providing humanitarian aid for refugees and civilians and establishing a no-fly zone to stop indiscriminate killing of civilians and destruction of what remains of infrastructure in Syria.

Any talk of restoring stability to Syria and defeating ISIS without realistic acknowledgment of what would be required is only an invitation to mission creep and unnecessary waste of lives and resources.
TEL AVIV -- What to do about Syria? How to defeat the Islamic State? Think of all theop-eds and policy papers that aim to provide answers to these questions. But is there actually anything to them? What about the current U.S. approach?

To begin with, one can readily agree that the U.S. train-and-equip program for Syrian rebels to fight ISIS has been misguided from the beginning. The notion that such a force can only take on ISIS and not the Assad regime has no credibility among the overwhelming majority of Syrian rebels, regardless of ideological orientation, as the fight against the two is seen as inherently intertwined. Little wonder then that the initial batch recently inserted into Syria had only 60 recruits.

Further, U.S. policymakers' grasp of the ground situation appears to have been grossly out of touch with reality. They failed to anticipate a clash with Syria's al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front, which has also been targeted in American airstrikes. It is clear to any observer who has visited or tracks online the Azaz district into which the U.S.-trained rebels were inserted that the area had a notable Nusra Front presence that would suspect any American proxies.

Meanwhile, U.S.-led coalition airstrikes, bound as they are in part by political considerations, have produced mixed results. They have been most effective in the north, in support of the Syrian Kurdish units -- known as the People's Protection Units, or YPG -- that have deprived ISIS of significant control of north Raqqa province and Hasakah, such that the YPG has also taken over many parts previously held by the Assad regime. On the other hand, understandable reluctance to launch airstrikes that can be seen as directly supporting the regime means that ISIS advances through the Homs desert have largely been unimpeded. ISIS's control of the heartlands of its territories in central and southeastern Syria remains largely unchallenged, and revenue streams have not been seriously hurt. Furthermore, hundreds of civilianshave been killed by U.S.-led airstrikes, according to a recent report.

The Islamic State is here to stay for the long term, if not indefinitely, and the coalition should accordingly give up on pretensions to 'degrade and destroy' it.​

The YPG, for all its successes, will only go so far in attempting to take territory from ISIS. The same goes for the expected establishment of a Turkish "safe zone" in the north Aleppo countryside that may clear ISIS out of the remaining northern border areas and has prompted the withdrawal of Nusra Front fighters. This expected "safe zone" is a small, strictly local initiative driven more by Turkey's desire to stop the YPG from linking up with its third canton of Afrin.

Given the failure of current U.S. policy, the main alternative proposed is broader support for rebel groups -- either bringing the downfall of the regime or forcing a political settlement that can then bring about more effective local forces to take on ISIS. In this context, arguably the largest single rebel group -- Ahrar al-Sham -- has taken to Western media, calling for more engagement with the group from the West and the international community, while professing commitment to a "moderate" vision of Syria, including protection of minorities.

While the Ahrar al-Sham op-ed seems superficially impressive, it overlooks the most important issue of the group's ties to al Qaeda. Linked to this point is the subsequent inability or lack of will to oppose some of the more unsavory sides of the al Qaeda presence. For example, rhetoric of commitment to minorities cannot conceal the fact that Ahrar al-Sham has done nothing about the forced conversion to Sunni Islam of the Druze in Idlib at the hands of Nusra Front. Indeed, Ahrar al-Sham, like many other rebel groups, appears to pretend as though this has not happened at all.

Instead, the coalition should focus on containment, providing humanitarian aid for refugees and civilians and establishing a no-fly zone to stop indiscriminate killing.​

In reality, when one reads between the lines of the op-ed, it becomes clear that what Ahrar al-Sham is advocating is Sunni Arab majoritarianism with a sectarian model of politics that cannot be seen as conducive to stability in Syria, even post-Assad. Generally left out of the debate in this context is the problem of simultaneously empowering the rebels and the YPG, when the former tend to view the latter asworking towards taqsim Souria (the "division of Syria").

One thinks of the headache of Kurdish-Arab territorial disputes in post-2003 Iraq: such qualms are and will be no less of a nightmare in a post-Assad Syria. Add to this intra-rebel rivalries with power, ideological disputes and likely continued fighting from pro-regime and ethnic minority militias, and it can be seen just how difficult forming any unified force to take on ISIS will be even with the regime gone. The chaos that has engulfed Libya in the post-Gaddafi era is instructive in this regard, as is thecivil war and anarchy in Somalia of nearly a quarter century since the downfall of its dictatorial regime in 1991.

Nor should one pretend that the way forward lies in broader engagement with the regime. The regime is seeing its own population increasingly fragmented amongdifferent militia factions and continues to lose peripheral territories to its rivals. It is unlikely to be able to unite the country under its rule again. Working with the regime and by extension its main ally Iran, can only be seen as a recipe for permanent warfare.

Sadly, we are only 'in the early stages of what will be a much longer war,' as Rania Abouzeid put it.​

In other words, there are no viable solutions. There is generally little honesty about what it would actually take to rebuild Syria at this point. For many years if not decades, it would take a large international ground force in Syria, enforcing the disarmament of all militia actors and implementing a grand nation-building project embodied in a government seen as acceptable to all sides. Unsurprisingly, no willpower or consensus exists anywhere for such an initiative.

Sadly, we are only "in the early stages of what will be a much longer war," as Rania Abouzeid put it. The Islamic State is here to stay for the long term, if not indefinitely, and the coalition should accordingly give up on pretensions to "degrade and destroy"it. Instead, the coalition should focus on containment, providing humanitarian aid for refugees and civilians and establishing a no-fly zone to stop indiscriminate killing of civilians and destruction of what remains of infrastructure in Syria.

Any talk of restoring stability to Syria and defeating ISIS without realistic acknowledgment of what would be required is only an invitation to mission creep and unnecessary waste of lives and resources.

 

[bsruzm]

PressTV-‘Turkey delivers 60 militants to Daesh’

Did you notice that nobody gives a f*ck about you?

The one in the middle is Iranian.

Somehow fits

 

[elszADaQ]

An Arab army or coalition from Sunni majority countries deploying its troops to destroy extremists, disarm destabilizing groups and help an acceptable national Syrian force to destroy all mulla-puppets in the Levant is all it takes to effectively destroy the cunning global-wide manipulation strategy Iranians concocted to protect their interests.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

You seriously are retarded.
Rebels get most of their funding from Qatar and Turkey. Let me make this clear: If rebels got any military, logistical, or monetary support from Israel, Assad would've been gone in 2013. Just saying. We clearly haven't gotten any and we clearly won't get any.

Wrong.
If you haven't noticed rebels are hostile to Israel, Assad pretended he was but he hadn't attacked them since 1982. Meanwhile Israel made incursions into rebel held territory with bulldozers and destroyed a refugee camp in the UNDOF. Rebels couldn't do crap about it or they would've been bombed to oblivion.

The only CW Israel has to my knowledge is white phosphorus. Assad used Sarin, this has been proven so many damn times.

bellingcat - Updated Google Earth Imagery from August 24th 2013 Reveals More Details About The August 21st Sarin Attack

dude common! Majid Al Baghdadi has already said that himself that attacking israel is against islam or something!

And dude dont buy too much of their empty claims of hating israel or america, none of them is fighting against them in the first place but r only fighting against those who r anti israel governments in Middle east.

ISIS hate america and israel as much as Afghan taliban hate Pakistan

That hate only exists in words!!!

Look to work for me or anyone to accomplish its results u dont need to be ''in love'' with them. As long as u do its job u get the support but as the job finishes and they no longer need u they will eliminate u. Just like today we r eliminating these taliban from our soil.

In future after Mr. Asad is gone and ideally for israeli and american sake hizbullah is gone so is Hamas through ISIS they will eliminate them as well. Just like to remove Qaddafi they used the same terrorists of Al Queda etc etc that they were trying to crush in Afghanistan on one hand!

This all game is called the super power game! In military terms its called the 4th generation warfare. In political terms called Proxy wars.

We Pakistanis are expert in this since we r doing that since 30-40 years, we here have the experience and insight to look b/w black and white when it comes to this.. Because when british left our South Asia they transferred this ''divide n rule'' strategy to us and from that we improvised this 4th gen warfare against soviats and successfully beaten them.

remember one thing if u have ever met any terrorist no matter of ISIS or taliban or anyother and have politely discussed him abt warfare, global scenarios, International relations and islam then u will come to only one common factor in everyone. That is they r ultra jahil people, they come from uneducated class,they are poor background wise and are extremely ignorant.

So people like them are easy to manipulate, brainwashed and u can get them emotional and on top of that they believe in everything they hear especially abrt islam because of their ignorance. Allah talks abt such people in Quran as well and classify them as Summun Bookmun, Umyun la yarfiqoon! These r the type of people who dont research, who dont use their brains, only believe in conspiracies and theories no matter how impracticle they are with changing global trends of time. Such people become ''reactionary'' in their life ie if something goes against them and their will or their believes they may even kill u.

So the global intel agencies especially of the non muslim world use them for their own gains by exploiting their brainwashed minds, ignorance as well as their emotional reactionary characteristics, hence the Al Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS etc etc come into existence. And dont even think that Terrorist or people like such characteristics dont exist in Non muslim world, they do exist there too the examples are of Crusades.Those armies of theirs in Crusades were also of people exploited by their Popes sitting comfortably in Rome and today's Istanbul.

If u had not conspired against Ottoman Empire with British and have let it remain as it is regardless of its weaknesses this day would have never arrived nor did Israel existed to ensure this day comes! Ottoman Empire would have always played its role as a Big brother for us in global scenarios against these non muslims powers and we would have been jointly ruling the World and Islam's Political, economic systems etc etc would have been flourishing in the world eventually making all under the umbrella of Islam. This is what i meant by yr mistake committed 100 years ago. No matter if they were Ajmi or any XYZ they were still ours! The non Muslims couldnt be for us what they would have been for us as Islam doesnt recognize divide on any basis b/w human beings or specially b/w fellow Muslims.

Try to understand Quran and Prophet's life, his companions and their strategies and tactics my friend! EVERYTHING IS THERE TO SEE AND LEARN FROM! If u do that u will never be misguided ever. And u will never be ignorant.

Remember All Mighty has made us to rule not do this!

 

[Dr.Thrax]

dude common! Majid Al Baghdadi has already said that himself that attacking israel is against islam or something!

And dude dont buy too much of their empty claims of hating israel or america, none of them is fighting against them in the first place but r only fighting against those who r anti israel governments in Middle east.

ISIS hate america and israel as much as Afghan taliban hate Pakistan

That hate only exists in words!!!

Look to work for me or anyone to accomplish its results u dont need to be ''in love'' with them. As long as u do its job u get the support but as the job finishes and they no longer need u they will eliminate u. Just like today we r eliminating these taliban from our soil.

In future after Mr. Asad is gone and ideally for israeli and american sake hizbullah is gone so is Hamas through ISIS they will eliminate them as well. Just like to remove Qaddafi they used the same terrorists of Al Queda etc etc that they were trying to crush in Afghanistan on one hand!

This all game is called the super power game! In military terms its called the 4th generation warfare. In political terms called Proxy wars.

We Pakistanis are expert in this since we r doing that since 30-40 years, we here have the experience and insight to look b/w black and white when it comes to this.. Because when british left our South Asia they transferred this ''divide n rule'' strategy to us and from that we improvised this 4th gen warfare against soviats and successfully beaten them.

remember one thing if u have ever met any terrorist no matter of ISIS or taliban or anyother and have politely discussed him abt warfare, global scenarios, International relations and islam then u will come to only one common factor in everyone. That is they r ultra jahil people, they come from uneducated class,they are poor background wise and are extremely ignorant.

So people like them are easy to manipulate, brainwashed and u can get them emotional and on top of that they believe in everything they hear especially abrt islam because of their ignorance. Allah talks abt such people in Quran as well and classify them as Summun Bookmun, Umyun la yarfiqoon! These r the type of people who dont research, who dont use their brains, only believe in conspiracies and theories no matter how impracticle they are with changing global trends of time. Such people become ''reactionary'' in their life ie if something goes against them and their will or their believes they may even kill u.

So the global intel agencies especially of the non muslim world use them for their own gains by exploiting their brainwashed minds, ignorance as well as their emotional reactionary characteristics, hence the Al Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS etc etc come into existence. And dont even think that Terrorist or people like such characteristics dont exist in Non muslim world, they do exist there too the examples are of Crusades.Those armies of theirs in Crusades were also of people exploited by their Popes sitting comfortably in Rome and today's Istanbul.

If u had not conspired against Ottoman Empire with British and have let it remain as it is regardless of its weaknesses this day would have never arrived nor did Israel existed to ensure this day comes! Ottoman Empire would have always played its role as a Big brother for us in global scenarios against these non muslims powers and we would have been jointly ruling the World and Islam's Political, economic systems etc etc would have been flourishing in the world eventually making all under the umbrella of Islam. This is what i meant by yr mistake committed 100 years ago. No matter if they were Ajmi or any XYZ they were still ours! The non Muslims couldnt be for us what they would have been for us as Islam doesnt recognize divide on any basis b/w human beings or specially b/w fellow Muslims.

Try to understand Quran and Prophet's life, his companions and their strategies and tactics my friend! EVERYTHING IS THERE TO SEE AND LEARN FROM! If u do that u will never be misguided ever. And u will never be ignorant.

Remember All Mighty has made us to rule not do this!

Firstly, ISIS technically did attack Israel, although they were using rockets weaker than Hamas' and they landed in the Middle of the Desert.
Second, stop bringing Israel into this. Yes, the Syrian revolution did evolve into a proxy war, thanks to Assad. That still doesn't make it any less of a revolution. If Israel wanted to do anything they would have done it long ago.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Firstly, ISIS technically did attack Israel, although they were using rockets weaker than Hamas' and they landed in the Middle of the Desert.
Second, stop bringing Israel into this. Yes, the Syrian revolution did evolve into a proxy war, thanks to Assad. That still doesn't make it any less of a revolution. If Israel wanted to do anything they would have done it long ago.

Haha like i said whose money is involved results r in their favor. Launching a few missiles is not convensing which even lie in the middle of barren desert and r also fired from isolated ghaza strip. If they were sincere enough they would have created a havoc in israel like they did in syria and iraq. BTW israel isnt that powerful as its believed to be. Its the most coward nation on the face of the earth and this is their biggest weakness too.

Israel does wants to do everything! but like its leaders often say ''better late then never''. They use these tactics to weaken the Muslim world like that of ISIS because as these nations get more weaker, no rule of law exists economy is in shambles as well as people waste their own man power by fighting and killing eachother and utilize precious resources to do that the more less numbers israel has to face in future.

Even if i let go this tell me what positive has israel done for the region or for Asia since these 67 years of its existance? It even plays football in Europe which is just a sport. Tell me even one positive thing that they have done for their neighbors in order to integrate their society into middle East ? They have even imported their culture with them instead of settling down in middle east and its unique culture and ethics?

Those people are NOT one of us nor one of u.

U it seems still are not understanding the dynamics of 4th gen warfare that i tried to explain to u. U are severely wrong my friend.

 

[Ahmed Jo]

Haha like i said whose money is involved results r in their favor. Launching a few missiles is not convensing which even lie in the middle of barren desert and r also fired from isolated ghaza strip. If they were sincere enough they would have created a havoc in israel like they did in syria and iraq. BTW israel isnt that powerful as its believed to be. Its the most coward nation on the face of the earth and this is their biggest weakness too.

Israel does wants to do everything! but like its leaders often say ''better late then never''. They use these tactics to weaken the Muslim world like that of ISIS because as these nations get more weaker, no rule of law exists economy is in shambles as well as people waste their own man power by fighting and killing eachother and utilize precious resources to do that the more less numbers israel has to face in future.

Even if i let go this tell me what positive has israel done for the region or for Asia since these 67 years of its existance? It even plays football in Europe which is just a sport. Tell me even one positive thing that they have done for their neighbors in order to integrate their society into middle East ? They have even imported their culture with them instead of settling down in middle east and its unique culture and ethics?

Those people are NOT one of us nor one of u.

U it seems still are not understanding the dynamics of 4th gen warfare that i tried to explain to u. U are severely wrong my friend.

This was a very idiotic post. I wouldn't know where to begin if I wanted to explain to you why that is but I don't, because you are a lost cause.