What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

From this video,(especially at 1:21) it seems the US or "coalition forces" actually performed attacks that supported cornered ISIS forces.
where is @500 ??? pls come and explain why US led forces at 1:21 would attack 3 SAA areas directly surrounding or close to ISIS in east Syria?
This seems like more evidence that at a minimum, the US selectively assists ISIS in certain convenient situations.
Nowadays in the Syrian war, most anti Assad countries seem to be supporting ISIS or directly attacking SAA now that their proxy groups have been vanquished.
You seriously consider video with baseless claims made by Assad fanboys as some kind of proof? I mean seriously? LOL.

ISIS is the best thing that ever happened to Assad. Prior ISIS in 2012 Assad was on verge of total collapse.

 
. .
Dar3a offensive is imminent and will start in less than 72 hrs till now.
deceive artillery raining will start soon then army land attack.
 
.
Dar3a offensive is imminent and will start in less than 72 hrs till now.
deceive artillery raining will start soon then army land attack.

Source? That would change dynamics of the war if it indeed occurs....
 
. .
You seriously consider video with baseless claims made by Assad fanboys as some kind of proof? I mean seriously? LOL.

ISIS is the best thing that ever happened to Assad. Prior ISIS in 2012 Assad was on verge of total collapse.

Can you prove those are baseless claims? You probably cant prove what they show and say in their videos are wrong, and thats why they got popular. You just used ad hominem to discredit those videos. IF ISIS was the best thing that happened to Assad then why did SAA destroy Yarmouk camp where ISIS was fighting from? Makes no sense. circular logic.On the other hand ISIS has been caught with Israeli weapons, exists on Syria-ISrael border. Wait a minute. Why hasnt US coalition forces struck all those ISIS locations on the SYria-Iraq border? why has it taken multiple strikes by Iraqi airforce to destyroy ISIS facilities on its syrian border? But US and coalition partners can hit these sites, so why didnt they do it?Turkey worked more with ISIS than Syria did, but you only point out Sytria working with ISIS. And i am willing to be money the US has also enabled ISIS, at best(hopefully) indirectly.
 
.
Can you prove those are baseless claims?
LOL. Because they are baseless. Just some anonymous woman reading text written by Assadist goons.

IF ISIS was the best thing that happened to Assad then why did SAA destroy Yarmouk camp where ISIS was fighting from? Makes no sense. circular logic.
Actually Yarmouk is a perfect proof of my point. There were dozens towns and villages in Damascus area controlled by rebels and only 1 area controlled by ISIS. And you know what? ISIS area was LAST to be attacked by Assadist out of dozens.

On the other hand ISIS has been caught with Israeli weapons
Total crap. There was never Israeli weapon in ISIS hands. But swarms Russian.

exists on Syria-ISrael border.
It exists all over Syria.

Why hasnt US coalition forces struck all those ISIS locations on the SYria-Iraq border?
It did uncounted times.
 
. .
Russia: Only Syrian forces should be stationed on Israel border
Moscow calls for exit of non-Syrian forces from 'de-escalation area' as rebels prepare for potential government push.

9 hours ago

53ba4c76dcdf4b20892a5c88b8e66f4d_18.jpg

The Syrian army is reportedly sending reinforcements to southern Syria in an apparent preparation for an offensive [File: Omar Sanadiki/Reuters]
MORE ON SYRIA'S WAR
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said that only Syrian forces should be present in areas alongside the country's border with Israel and Jordan, as rebels in southern Syria prepare for a possible offensive by government troops.

In recent days, Syrian government aircraft have dropped leaflets on rebel-held areas in Deraa, warning of an imminent push and urging the fighters to lay down their arms.

The southern province, which is mostly controlled by opposition groups, is close to the volatile Israeli-occupied Syrian Golan Heights, which has emerged as a flashpoint in a wider standoff between Israeland Iran.

The United States has recently warned it will take action to protect a ceasefire in the area, while Israel said it would not tolerate a permanent military presence in Syria by Iran - a major ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, along with Russia.

Israel has long been worried that any Syrian government advance would bring Iran-backed militias with it to the area near the occupied Golan Heights.

Fears as Syria military expected to target Deraa province next
Speaking to reporters on Monday, Lavrov said the withdrawal of non-Syrian forces from the "de-escalation area" should be done on a "mutual basis" as part of a "two-way street".

"The result of the ongoing work should be a situation in which troops of the Syrian armed forces will be stationed alongside the Syrian border with Israel," he said, without specifying which countries back these rebel groups.

'De-escalation zone'
The United States, Russia and Jordan agreed last year to create a "de-escalation zone" in southwest Syria, which included the regions of Deraa, Quneitra and Sweida.

The area has been held under a ceasefire, but has recently been tense following a series of recent Israeli strikes on Syrian and Iranian forces.

Al Jazeera's Zeina Khodr, reporting from Beirut, Lebanon, said Lavrov's comments come amid ongoing international negotiations aimed at avoiding a military escalation in this part of Syria that could involve regional powers.

"Jordan and Israel ... do not want to see Iranian troops or Iranian-allied troops on their borders, so if there's any arrangement or any deal, it will definitely not involve Iranian troops taking a part in any battle," Khodr said.

"What ... they're trying to do is reach some sort of an arrangement whereby the rebels decide to lay down their arms and surrender and those who want to leave to the rebel controlled province of Idlib in the northwest will be able to do so - but state authority will return to this area," Khodr added, noting that Jordan was keen to avoid an escalation on the border as it would create a refugee crisis.

'Imminent offensive'
While Syrian government forces dropped leaflets on Deraa's rebel-held areas, the Lebanon-based Al-Mayadeen TV, which has reporters embedded with Syrian troops, said the army is sending reinforcements to southern Syria in an apparent preparation for an offensive.

Middle East tensions at heart of Netanyahu's visit to Moscow
The reports of an imminent operation in the de-escalation zone have worried the US, which warned on Friday that it would take "firm and appropriate measures" in response to ceasefire violations.

Jordan said on Monday it was discussing developments in southern Syria with Washington and Moscow and that all three parties agreed on the need to preserve the "de-escalation" zone they brokered last year and which has reduced violence.

A senior official who requested anonymity told Reuters news agency the three countries that signed last year's deal "saw eye-to-eye" on the need to preserve the zone as a key step to "accelerate efforts to reach a political solution" in Syria.

'No place for Iranian presence'
Later on Monday, Israel called for Iran to be denied any military presence in Syria.

"Our position on Syria is clear," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his parliamentary faction in broadcast remarks. "We believe that there is no place for any Iranian military presence, anywhere in Syria."

Netanyahu said he would press German and French leaders to support his position during a European tour next week, with talks expected to focus on the US decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal - long-sought by Israel - and the Iranian presence in Syria.

"These things, of course, reflect not only our position. I can safely say that they also reflect the views of others in the Middle East and beyond the Middle East. This will be the main focus of my discussions," Netanyahu said.

Earlier this month, Israel launched a large-scale attack against what it said were Iranian targets in Syria, raising fears of a major confrontation.

This was one of the largest Israeli military operations in recent years and the biggest against Iranian targets.

Those strikes followed a barrage of rockets that Israel said was fired toward its forces in the occupied Golan Heights by Iran from Syria.

Even before that, Israel had been blamed for a series of strikes inside Syria that killed Iranians, though it has not acknowledged them.

THE LISTENING POST

How the media covered the Syria strikes


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/midd...-stationed-border-israel-180528145855321.html
 
.
logo.png

Assad’s property law to strip people of their rights

DIANA MOUKALLED

May 29, 201815:41

After all the killing and displacement, now is the time for the confiscation of properties in Syria. The Syrian Arab News Agency has published the text of Legislative Decree (Law) No. 10 of 2018, issued by President Bashar Assad. The law stipulates the formation of two organizational real estate zones in Damascus for model cities that will replace the ruins of destroyed areas on the outskirts of the Syrian capital.

This decree will first take effect in Damascus and its outskirts, but will later extend to other parts of Syria.

Let us forget for a minute that proposing reconstruction projects seems absurd when the country is still in a state of war, many political and military parties are playing a role in the war and, above all, there is no comprehensive political solution to end the war.

Amidst all of this, Law No. 10 was issued.

The law includes many details about the rights of former property owners who were banished and should return to get hold of their lands, but the wording of the law shows its intention to strip people of their properties — especially those who have fled Syria or those with no association with the regime.

The proposed decree is full of obvious traps, namely in its text about the right of residents to prove ownership of their properties through submitting applications within no more than 30 days. After that, decisions will be made by a committee that issues decisions not subject to appeal.

Can someone who fled Syria after being pursued or after having his house destroyed and his family displaced return to the regime that caused all this and provide documents proving his ownership of a destroyed house or a burned land within 30 days?

What does this mean in practice? It is known that it is impossible for a large number of Syrian individuals and families who have fled the country to submit applications, since they are wanted by the security authorities or because they worry their sons would be recruited into the regime’s army — and let’s not forget about the lack of security in Syria.

The law, which is supported by other laws and decrees, gives committees the power to strip people of their properties, and this practice will be repeated throughout the regime-controlled areas. This is a serious step that entails forced displacement. It also strips people of their property ownership rights and manipulates them through exploiting reconstruction plans and turning them into profitable projects that benefit pro-Assad businessmen.

" The new law is not innocent — it mainly targets displaced persons, the majority of whom are wanted by the security authorities in Syria."
Diana Moukalled

These laws reward parties that have supported the regime and prevented its fall and punishes its victims, who were forced to flee Syria because of the war the regime has waged against its people.

The new law is not innocent — it mainly targets displaced persons, the majority of whom are wanted by the security authorities in Syria. It is known that the families of nearly one million war victims (killed and wounded) cannot return to Syria under the current circumstances and will fail to provide the required documents. Therefore, the regime’s property confiscation decisions lack legal and social legitimacy. In fact, they are contrary to international human rights laws, specifically a person’s right to housing and private property.

In Lebanon, where 1.5 million Syrian refugees live and where the issue of refugees has caused a serious political division, some political parties, especially the Syrian regime’s allies, were overwhelmingly confused by the new law.

Lebanese Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, who has been inciting against refugees and urging the government to stifle them and return them quickly and forcibly to Syria, finds himself and his partners obliged to rethink his plans.

The first reason Syrian refugees have not returned home is the regime, which is supported by Bassil and his party. Now, this decision to confiscate properties seems to be a nightmare for Lebanese political parties, especially Christian ones that are worried about Syrian refugees staying in Lebanon.

Bassil rushed to send cables of protest and questions to the Syrian regime and the United Nations, but he forgot that a regime that has killed its people and destroyed its country won’t care about anything like that.

The regime claims these acquisitions and construction projects will transform destroyed areas into glamorous tourist attractions. It is worth reflecting on what has happened in recent years to realize that what will be built — if it actually goes ahead — would only be the foundation for more destruction.

  • Diana Moukalled is a veteran journalist with extensive experience in both traditional and new media. She is also a columnist and freelance documentary producer. Twitter: @dianamoukalled
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view
 
. . .
LOL. Because they are baseless. Just some anonymous woman reading text written by Assadist goons.


Actually Yarmouk is a perfect proof of my point. There were dozens towns and villages in Damascus area controlled by rebels and only 1 area controlled by ISIS. And you know what? ISIS area was LAST to be attacked by Assadist out of dozens.


Total crap. There was never Israeli weapon in ISIS hands. But swarms Russian.


It exists all over Syria.


It did uncounted times.
http://www.atimes.com/article/the-syria-connection-to-iran-afghanistan-and-china/
@500 pls read that article...a fatemeyoun fighter said he was foghting isis in syria,but of fatemeyoun brigage is am iranian proxy,which i agree with,why would they be foghtong isis of iran is really in bed with isis? you dpnt kill your ally right?
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom