Irfan Baloch
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,975
- Reaction score
- 214
- Country
- Location
I coud qoute the atrocities of FSA agaisnt the Syrian people but thats not the point here.FSA needs these weapons against Assad helicopters, otherwise Assad would continue barrelbombing children.
Secondly, ISIS already has FN-6. And they used and shot at least one Iraqi helicopter with it.
I am pointing at something extremely worrying
and I pray that you understand. you have your own in house insurgency going on for decades in the shape of PKK and we Pakistanis fully and unconditionally support you on this (without any ifs and buts as we do regarding Cyprus issue)
the issue I have is, the terrorists getting hands on these SAMs... whatever their name, FSA, Al Nusra, AQ, TTP, ISIS etc.. the weapons can change hands and then who knows one day these same SAMs bring down airliners?
my problem is .. I want to know who provided them with these weapons? these people are not regular soldiers, no oath , no loyalty , no control. they cannibalize each other and fight each other too and change sides.
say for instance me and you agree that the rebels fighting Asad regime must be helped and we provide them with SAMs. now the rebels within FSA have change of heart and they switch over to Al Qaeda, you know in FSA many TTP members from Pakistan are also fighting on behalf of FSA (those butchers have killed over 50K Pakistanis). what if they bring these SAMs back against Pakistan? for sure they will never turn against Qatar or Saudi Arabia because they are brothers in faith.
but I cant say the same about two countries, Turkey and Pakistan thats my issue.
people are frequently starting to equate Turkish actions with Pakistani actions in the 80s re Afghan jihad... the results have been extremely devastating for us in 3 decades. I shiver to think what will happen to you.
doing the same mistake and expecting a different result is a folly my dear.
this war must end. Asad regime is reduced in tatters. try peace now