Alienoz_TR
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 4,170
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yesterday, I saw some reports which were telling that SyAF hit Kanaker. Which means rebels might have taken Kanaker as well.
What odds are you talking about? All the odds are in favour of the SAA; they outgun, outman and can outspend their adversaries by a long shot. SAA performance in this war can simply be summed up in one word "Pathetic".
They dominate the air and are in possession of massive heavy weapons. In theory, they should have clobbered the IS and FSA. But their tactics are weak, i have seen some of their tank crews in action, they failed to perform even the basic manoeuvres against ATGM. Only recently the SAA has started arming their tanks with caged armour, this should have been done long time ago. There certainly seems to be a morale problem in the SAA. Instead of surrendering to the IS, they should have fought to the last man knowing full well that IS would chop their heads off if they surrendered. SAA needs to revamp and overhaul their Officers Corp, their performance has been below satisfactory level.
Your forgot to mention, USA, NATO,Israel raids and the GCC's deep pocket . For the SAA performance, it is always hard for a regular army to adapt to an unconventional warfare, but they have adapted, and survived the wabism onslaught.
True, but they adopted and reversed the tide.
Pakistan who is a lot stronger had problem to stamie her own Taliban, and she have an ongoing problem still. Good armies adapt, and SAA has.
Heard from someone who once served in Waziristan,according to him we never surrender,fight to the last bullet,and if everything goes wrong,we have something left to finish off ourselves before getting into their hands...That's why they had been able to repel with only up to 50 people in a post an attack from hundred's of terrorists with heavy weapons...Syrian army needs that spirit to fight ISIS...
Does not matter in regards to the deep pockets of foreign nations, they still haven't supplied FSA with heavy weapons or any aviation platforms. On the other hand, SAA is awash with heavy weapons and a decent Air Force. If used properly, they would have clobbered the ISIS and FSA.
It is indeed hard for a conventional army to change its formations, but than again it shouldn't be loosing territory like the way SAA did at the start of the war. Also another point, FSA and ISIS are not fighting unconventional battles anymore. They are fighting pitched battles and taking the SAA head on and defeating them.
They are indeed making slow progress, but its a very slow progress.
There have been very few instances of Pakistan Army(PA) fighting pitched battles with the Taliban, and whenever it happened, PA clobbered the Taliban. Pakistan at no point lost major territory to the Taliban, and the Taliban were never in a position to challenge PA head on in a conventional format. No major Air Bases or Army Cantonments have fallen to the Taliban. Even when North Waziristan was under complete control of the Taliban, at no point did they dare attack PA's base situated inside North Waziristan. I am sorry to say but SAA has not proved to be a Good Army.
If you are talking about PA Regulars, than yes its true they have never surrendered or ever loose a battle. You have to keep in mind, PA is a well oiled organization. If there is a chance of TTP overrun, they immediately have Gunships, PAF strikes and a QAF on standby.
Alas, the fierce SAA attack on Mourik was foiled with huge losses. Humiliating defeat.. indeed