Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

[ultron]

Assad al Haiwan

What's al Haiwan?

 

[500]

Are you high? Drunk? Or just a blatant troll? It does not matter how many air defenses Russia had in Syria, they did not shoot or even attempt to shoot any of those Tomahawks.

But please if you have evidence they did, post it otherwise shut up with your conspiracies. Everyone is tired of your BS, im waiting for you to post hard facts and sources.


Amazing how even a Pantsir can shoot down cruise missiles yet Israeli boy here claim otherwise.

View attachment 389927 View attachment 389928

So u are saying that Russia could shot down Tomahawks, yet it allowed Assadists to be bombed and killed? Who is conspiracy troll?

What's al Haiwan?

Animal. By the way, real name of Assad family is al Wahish - الوحش (the beast) then he changed it to Assad.

 

[ptldM3]

Again butthurt kid with no brain. The only way to protect against "coke cans" rockets is to set C-RAM in every village:

And most probably their shells will do much more damage than rockets themselves. I never said that ur air defence is bad because u dont shot down hell cannon shells fired by rebels. But when you boasted u can shoot down all missiles and then could not shot down a single out of 59 that's indeed funny.


Russia says.


Yes only good Hezbie and IRGC is dead one.

Sober up to reality. Even the US acknowledged that Russia never attempted to shoot anything down. Conspiracy land and reality are two different things. The funny thing that you are claiming is that Israel had no air defenses on its southern border, that's just rediculus. There is not much land to cover over Israel so even medium range SAMs can protect large swaths of Israel.


Israel could not shoot those rockets down just like they had to launch a fighter jet to go after a toy drone because the Patriot missile failed twice to knock the drone out but so did the Israeli jet.

"Fails"?
How come we fail? Israel's rocket casualties in the last Gaza war fell to 3, and all three of them were killed by mortars, which the Iron Dome has limited capability against. But that would be solved when the Iron Beam will be deployed

Its pretty hard to hit a UAV flying low and slow with Patriot, but I assure you, with the David's Sling this will never happen

On the other hand, the S-300 and S-400 were absolutely USELESS against Israeli, coalition, Turkish and US aircraft, let alone those gigantic flying targets called Tomahawks, you couldn't even shoot down one of them.

There was no S-400 or S-300 when the SU-24 was shot down, Russia only brought that to Syria after the SU-24 incident and Russia never attempted to target any Israeli aircraft or those tomahawks over Syria. You Israeli boys just can't seem to get that through your heads.

Russsian SAM batteries have shot down hundreds of aircraft including Israeli and American.

 

[500]

What is this light?
White phosphorus?

Thermite incendiary cluster bomb.

Sober up to reality. Even the US acknowledged that Russia never attempted to shoot anything down.

That means they could not even lock on Tomahawks.

Conspiracy land and reality are two different things.

Failure is not a conspiracy. Conspiracy is to say that Russia could shot down Tomahawks, but allowed Assadists to be bombed and killed because of some conspiracy.

 

[ptldM3]

So u are saying that Russia could shot down Tomahawks, yet it allowed Assadists to be bombed and killed? Who is conspiracy troll?


Animal. By the way, real name of Assad family is al Hawish (beast) then he changed it to Assad.

Are you high? What part of Russia did not attemp to shoot down those tomahawks do you not understand? Both sides have confirmed it.

Why would Russia launch dozens of expensive missiles to protect at a mostly empty airport? Why would Russia risk war over that shity air base? Thank god Russia does not have people like you or Netan-yahoo in charge otherwise there would have been ww2.

 

[500]

Are you high? What part of Russia did not attemp to shoot down those tomahawks do you not understand? Both sides have confirmed it.

Why would Russia launch dozens of expensive missiles to protect at a mostly empty airport? Why would Russia risk war over that shity air base? Thank god Russia does not have people like you or Netan-yahoo in charge otherwise there would have been ww2.

Assad lost 9 aircraft + 7 officers, including brigadier general + other equipment. Yet you claim that Russia could shot down them but did not. Thats major conspiracy.

 

[Major 13625]

Assad lost 9 aircraft + 7 officers, including brigadier general + other equipment. Yet you claim that Russia could shot down them but did not. Thats major conspiracy.

U Israelis and Americans, always provoke others to war. Russians were wise enough not to shoot down those tomahawks.

 

[Beny Karachun]

U Israelis and Americans, always provoke others to war. Russians were wise enough not to shoot down those tomahawks.

Russia wasn't smart, it just couldn't shoot them down, as if shooting down cruise missiles is a declaration of war.

 

[Major 13625]

Russia wasn't smart, it just couldn't shoot them down, as if shooting down cruise missiles is a declaration of war.

was not smart? u have already agreed with me it was an act of provoking made by US which could escalate war with US! and smart people do there job with brain not with bullets! see how Russia annexed Crimea!

 

[Beny Karachun]

was not smart? u have already agreed with me it was an act of provoking made by US which could escalate war with US! and smart people do there job with brain not with bullets! see how Russia annexed Crimea!

Lol I don't see it as provocation, but I don't see Russia shooting down those cruise missiles a declaration of war.
That would only prove that Russia's air defenses are working, they didn't do it. Because they cant
You think Russia annexed Crimea without any bullets? You are very wrong if you think so.

By the way, I am pretty sure the Arab spring is, as many Muslims and Russians say, the result of the Mossad and the CIA. Funny how we crippled all of our enemies without firing a single bullet

 

[Major 13625]

Lol I don't see it as provocation, but I don't see Russia shooting down those cruise missiles a declaration of war.
That would only prove that Russia's air defenses are working, they didn't do it. Because they cant
You think Russia annexed Crimea without any bullets? You are very wrong if you think so.

By the way, I am pretty sure the Arab spring is, as many Muslims and Russians say, the result of the Mossad and the CIA. Funny how we crippled all of our enemies without firing a single bullet

Lol if arab spring was the result by Mossad and CIA than you are those people behind ISIS creation? who bombs Europe
59 tomahawks 110 million! for 6 old mig 23 overall damage 6 million from Syrian side? and that base resume operation within days! which full will stop them? Now those Russians and Chinese have hands on some intact tomahawks as well.

 

[500]

Putin terrorists drop cluster bomb in Jisr sh Shughur:

 

[Beny Karachun]

Lol if arab spring was the result by Mossad and CIA than you are those people behind ISIS creation? who bombs Europe

ISIS was an organization way before the Arab spring, it was made in 1999 while the Arab spring started in 2010

 

[yavar]

Tillerson: Russia Must Choose Alliance With Either US Or Iran تیلرسون: روسیه انتخاب کند

تیلرسون: روسیه بین ایران و آمریکا، یکی را انتخاب کند
وزیر خارجه آمریکا در نشست گروه 7 گفته که روسیه باید از بین ائتلاف با آمریکا و متحدانش یا ائتلاف با بشار اسد، ایران و حزب‌الله، یکی را انتخاب کند.
http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13960122000497

U.S Secretary Of State Rex Tillerson: Russia Must Choose Alliance With Either U.S. Or Iran

Tillerson: Russia Must Choose Between Allying With Us or Iran in Syria
Russia must choose between partnering with the United States or the Iranian axis, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said at a meeting of the G7 nations in Italy on Tuesday. “We want to relieve the suffering of the Syrian people. Russia can be a part of that future and play an important role,” Tillerson explained. “Or Russia can maintain its alliance with this group [Iran, Assad, and Hezbollah], which we believe is not going to serve Russia’s interests longer term.”
http://www.thetower.org/4847oc-till...ose-between-allying-with-us-or-iran-in-syria/

 

[Falcon29]

Tillerson: Russia Must Choose Alliance With Either US Or Iran تیلرسون: روسیه انتخاب کند

تیلرسون: روسیه بین ایران و آمریکا، یکی را انتخاب کند
وزیر خارجه آمریکا در نشست گروه 7 گفته که روسیه باید از بین ائتلاف با آمریکا و متحدانش یا ائتلاف با بشار اسد، ایران و حزب‌الله، یکی را انتخاب کند.
http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13960122000497

U.S Secretary Of State Rex Tillerson: Russia Must Choose Alliance With Either U.S. Or Iran

Tillerson: Russia Must Choose Between Allying With Us or Iran in Syria
Russia must choose between partnering with the United States or the Iranian axis, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said at a meeting of the G7 nations in Italy on Tuesday. “We want to relieve the suffering of the Syrian people. Russia can be a part of that future and play an important role,” Tillerson explained. “Or Russia can maintain its alliance with this group [Iran, Assad, and Hezbollah], which we believe is not going to serve Russia’s interests longer term.”
http://www.thetower.org/4847oc-till...ose-between-allying-with-us-or-iran-in-syria/

Tillerson is just in it for the money, he is not on the same page with the President. Just like during the republican debates, Trump and his VP were issuing polar opposite statements on policy towards Syria. Tillerson is just doing what the American elite requests of him. Keep talking about Assad just so people remember that Syria has to be on US agenda. But, they do not want him toppled, this is precisely what they want:

Despite all this, it was right not to intervene because Iranian- and Russian-backed Shi'ite pro-government jihadis are best kept busy fighting Saudi-, Qatar-, and Turkish-backed anti-government Sunni jihadis; because Kurds, however appealing, are not contenders for control of the whole of Syria; and because Americans have no stomach for another Middle Eastern war.

The direct American involvement that a few hours ago with nearly 60 cruise missiles in an hour attacking Shayrat Air Base implies siding with one side against the other, even though both of them are hideously repugnant. (While the regime has done the great preponderance of the killing, estimated at 94 percent, that's due only to its greater destructive power, not the humanitarianism of ISIS and its other enemies.

I see this military action as an error. Nothing in the U.S. Constitution requires that American forces fight in every war around the world; this one should be sat out, letting enemies of the United States fight each other to exhaustion.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/227904