What's new

Syrian Air Defense Intercepted 71 Cruise Missiles Launched by West - Russian MoD

So basically the Russians couldn't detect French missiles and aircrafts ? That's good then. :D
Good one..:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Now you see it:

DawU-BFVAAA7_td.jpg



an now you don't:

DawU-BBUwAE72M-.jpg



Here are the 3 large buildings targeted: Intercepted cruise missiles my ***

Davi58SXcAANPg-.jpg
Is that the soap factory? :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
. .
Intercepted should look in better condition. This looks like wreckage left after its successful hit.


Thank you Mr. self proclaiming ballistics eyball expert. Seems like every time there is wreckage of any sort you can quickly determine what happened. I wounder why NTSB investigators have thousands of employees that spend years and millions of dollars to determine what happens and you can do everything from a laptop within seconds :lol:


Intercepted missiles look like scrap metal. Most of the missile debris would also be burned....


BTW I didn’t know Assad had 107 facilities that studies and manufactured biology and chemical weapons. Amazing that only 3 people were wounded after many of these facilities were bombed in populated areas with no health effects. I can’t believe people are this stupid and gullible :rolleyes:

More before and after images:


DaxlPXoWsAIa9Jw.jpg



DaxmjY4XkAAdUlD.jpg



Daxl8JyXUAAe1sL.jpg




That is a lot of smoke and I see heavily populated areas. This begs the question...

Where is all the sick and dying people from the after effects of being exposed to supposed chemical and biological manufacturing facilities after they been hit? :lol:

You can chock this up with WMD, babies being thrown out of of incubators and so on.
 
.
DaxmjY4XkAAdUlD.jpg


most of the building looks untouched . this is not site where hit it by 76 missile ...
 
. .
Now you see it:

DawU-BFVAAA7_td.jpg



an now you don't:

DawU-BBUwAE72M-.jpg



Here are the 3 large buildings targeted: Intercepted cruise missiles my ***

Davi58SXcAANPg-.jpg

They never said they intercepted ALL OF THE MISSILES. Also, the U.S launched 76 missiles at 3 buildings!!! LOL. Clearly they launched 76 missiles at ONE site because they knew it was heavily defended and that many would be intercepted. If you really think that 76 missiles hit that one place, at the one site, then you must have mental problems
 
.
Expect lot of lies and nonsense from these losers! fooling the gullible/naive with amateurish footage(s) and tall claims.

According to insiders, NATO struck and destroyed multiple regions/targets throughout Syria. Unfortunately, many sites are off-limits to people.

They couldn't shoot down a single Jet but they want us to believe that they took care of so many cruise missiles. :rolleyes:

And the NATO insiders tell truths like a Holy Book! Quite fantastic your thoughts are about believing into make believe stories West imperialists churn out to fool people. Just like this chemical attack is a staged one to give reason this aggression.

Assad on the ground is winning. Re capture of Aleppo, Palmyra, East Ghouta and Douma are big achievements. This is not going down well in Washington and with its puppet European allies.


Please dont consider it anymore, do supply Syria with S300 and other potent weapons. They need it. This imperial impulse to change regimes in Middle East must end in Syria.
 
.
They never said they intercepted ALL OF THE MISSILES. Also, the U.S launched 76 missiles at 3 buildings!!! LOL. Clearly they launched 76 missiles at ONE site because they knew it was heavily defended and that many would be intercepted. If you really think that 76 missiles hit that one place, at the one site, then you must have mental problems

That's a huge complex, and 70+ missiles is an accurate number if you want to level those 3 facilities.

The Pentagon has already stated that NO missiles were intercepted. Syrian air defenses only fired AFTER targets had been struck. An there's NO evidence that any missile had been intercepted.
 
. . .
The same people who told us Iraq had WMDs are telling us Assad used a chemical weapon f9r what reason exactly?

Assad was winning the war...he had absolutely no motivation at this stage to launch a silly little chemical attack on a bunch of people now did he?
History repeats itself yet gullible people forgot about this incident that happened 20 or so years ago. I truly believe in eugenics.

Thank you Mr. self proclaiming ballistics eyball expert. Seems like every time there is wreckage of any sort you can quickly determine what happened. I wounder why NTSB investigators have thousands of employees that spend years and millions of dollars to determine what happens and you can do everything from a laptop within seconds :lol:


Intercepted missiles look like scrap metal. Most of the missile debris would also be burned....


BTW I didn’t know Assad had 107 facilities that studies and manufactured biology and chemical weapons. Amazing that only 3 people were wounded after many of these facilities were bombed in populated areas with no health effects. I can’t believe people are this stupid and gullible :rolleyes:






That is a lot of smoke and I see heavily populated areas. This begs the question...

Where is all the sick and dying people from the after effects of being exposed to supposed chemical and biological manufacturing facilities after they been hit? :lol:

You can chock this up with WMD, babies being thrown out of of incubators and so on.
I'm no expert on exploded bombs but after a bomb hits a target, would the target be still in flame? I'm seeing guys taking clear HD pics of do called rubles of building after being struck after 6 hours. Would the area still burning? The depleted uranium from the missiles would be hazardous to ones health I would imagine.
 
.
History repeats itself yet gullible people forgot about this incident that happened 20 or so years ago. I truly believe in eugenics.


I'm no expert on exploded bombs but after a bomb hits a target, would the target be still in flame? I'm seeing guys taking clear HD pics of do called rubles of building after being struck after 6 hours. Would the area still burning? The depleted uranium from the missiles would be hazardous to ones health I would imagine.

Most of the time, it will not be direct hit. (A direct hit will be better) The intercepting missile just got to blow itself close enough to the hostile flying object, damaging electronics or mechanical structure.
 
.
The Pentagon is holding a live briefing now.

Just confirmed that 105 cruise missiles were fired. NONE were shot down. Syrian air defenses fired over 40 SAM's, largely after the cruise missiles struck there targets.

They also released the before and after photos of the sites struck. Over 70 missiles were deployed against the research facility in Damascus. It was obliterated.

Yeah, Indian friend.

Pathetic liars out again.

Perhaps they actually fired 105 cruise missiles and Syrian defense failed to hit 200 of them.

This makes Rambo look more impressive.

We need third party independent evidence. Not doctored images from an organization that needs some sort of victory to prove its worth.

Use your Indian googling skills and find real evidence, please.
 
Last edited:
.

That's how Syrian celebrated the incoming missiles.

Syria will win against so called Sunni, Israeli and American forces but they already won whatever.
 
.
That's a huge complex, and 70+ missiles is an accurate number if you want to level those 3 facilities.

The Pentagon has already stated that NO missiles were intercepted. Syrian air defenses only fired AFTER targets had been struck. An there's NO evidence that any missile had been intercepted.

70+ is farrrr more than necessary for that facility size my friend. A dozen would be more than enough given a tomahawks large warhead. Surely you can admit 70+ is way overkill. Only justification for it would be to saturate any SAM systems in the area around Damascus.

I'm aware of what the pentagon has stated but the pentagon is not exactly a trust worthy source historically. Pentagon is straight from the U.S government which is a frequent lier. Frankly, I'm surprised any American trusts their government in 2018. Its basically like using the Russian Ministry of Defense as your source. Their has also been no evidence that every missile went towards its target. I find it hard to believe not even one was intercepted by Pantsirs which are designed specifically for subsonic cruise missiles.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom