What's new

Syrian Air Defense Intercepted 71 Cruise Missiles Launched by West - Russian MoD

intercepted storm shadow missile

30709466_1685785901502785_7079436126330552320_n.jpg
30707199_1685787498169292_5978794733177143296_n.jpg
Intercepted should look in better condition. This looks like wreckage left after its successful hit.
 
I repeat, drone just briefly entered airspace.



I repeat Israeli attempted and failed to shoot it down 3 different times. Continue to tap dance around it all you want.



Mortar fire claim was another lie, because there are no rebels closer than 40 km to hat base. According to Russian reporter Saponkov 5 planes were destroyed. 2 were killed. Thats major fail and humiliation for heavily defended airbase.



None of those claims can be proven. Russia denied the claim. At the end Russia destroyed 13 drones and provided proof while Israel couldn’t shoot down a single Russian drone or even an ancient s-200 that entered its airspace.


As for “rebels” not being closer then 40km. Really you think they can’t disguise themselves and get closer to the base. Thousands of US, British and Saudi soldiers have been killed because “rebels” infiltrated areas.

Remember that American airbase in Afghanistan that was attacked? Remember how many aircraft were destroyed?



Israel intercepted many drones, including Iranian super duper stealth.





1) 163 is total killed in the war.
2) Starting a war against own territory is pretty much a nonsense claim.

Russia blatantly lied about 2000 killed to justify its aggression.



The EU investigation found Georgia was the one that was the aggressor. Can’t read my post from earlier or just playing stupid?

Russia estimated 2000 killed, it was not accurate but it also wasn’t some rediculous number either and considering Georgian bombarded civilians with grad rockets and injured hundred it was not misleading either. Many of the injured survived.

I would take that over shooting innocent civilians across a fence.
 
This attack went after Syria's capability to produce chemical weapons.
I think they should have gone after the helicopters who dropped them too if you really wanted to prevent future gas attacks, there are apparantly already reports coming in that Assad has capacity remaining:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-15/syrias-chemical-weapons-capacity-remains/9660216
These strikes seem to be rather symbolic.

They couldn't shoot down a single Jet but they want us to believe that they took care of so many cruise missiles. :rolleyes:
I saw those videos of interception too, it is possible they intercepted a small number, but it is quite clear that Syrian SAM got completely overwhelmed. No way in hell they ever intercepted 71 ( even 13 is not very believable).

Intercepted should look in better condition. This looks like wreckage left after its successful hit.
We can only guess, but I think Syrian air defences aren't hit to kill; they explode on impact. The text is still readable too, I would think that only a smoldering heap of a little metal would be left of a cruise missile succesfully impacting.

For example, Damascus airport is reportedly in ruins [insider info.] but they are mum over this. They are trying to conceal facts from the public because their over-inflated ego will be hurt.
No airport was targeted by the strikes, so if it somehow completely on fire, then something else happened.
 
Expect lot of lies and nonsense from these losers! fooling the gullible/naive with amateurish footage(s) and tall claims.

According to insiders, NATO struck and destroyed multiple regions/targets throughout Syria. Unfortunately, many sites are off-limits to people.

They couldn't shoot down a single Jet but they want us to believe that they took care of so many cruise missiles. :rolleyes:

You are an idoit. The reason no jets were shot down is because all the munitions used were cruise missiles launched far away from Syrian airspace.
 
You are an idoit. The reason no jets were shot down is because all the munitions used were cruise missiles launched far away from Syrian airspace.
Let me guess - you 'monitored' the flight path of each Jet during the course of strikes with your magical instruments.
 
Point is about honesty which you cannot expect from Syrians (and Russians); they are concealing lot of damage on the ground per insider voices/sources.

For example, Damascus airport is reportedly in ruins [insider info.] but they are mum over this. They are trying to conceal facts from the public because their over-inflated ego will be hurt.

It is virtually impossible for even Russian defenses to intercept so many cruise missiles across the board; complete and utter bull crap.

I am simply curious about what has transpired.
Honesty eh? and the US is honest??
 
Let me guess - you 'monitored' the flight path of each Jet during the course of strikes with your magical instruments.
No, it's because I can read English. The U.S Pentagon said The Coalition launched a little more than double the previous amount of cruise missiles last year. Both Naval and Air launched if you even bother to read a bit before opening your mouth.
 
No, it's because I can read English. The U.S Pentagon said The Coalition launched a little more than double the previous amount of cruise missiles last year. Both Naval and Air launched if you even bother to read a bit before opening your mouth.
NATO Jets patrol Syrian airspace on a regular basis, you dimwit. How about you do your homework before you spam more BS.

Bloody armchair experts/propaganda bots.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom