What's new

Swat Operation II

Status
Not open for further replies.
70 killed as troops pound Taliban hideouts in Swat

* Fighting in Swat triggers civilian exodus
* Soldier killed, four wounded in roadside bomb in Wana

PESHAWAR: The military on Monday claimed it had killed 70 Taliban and injured several others during its assault on a village in Chaharbagh tehsil of Swat, a private TV channel reported.

According to the channel, officials said residents had already vacated the village on Sunday before troops launched the operation.

They said the security forces pounded Taliban hideouts in Alamganj and Waliabad areas of Chaharbagh that killed around 70 Taliban holed up in the tehsil.

Earlier on Monday, Swat police recovered eight bullet-ridden bodies from the restive region. “The bullet-ridden bodies of eight local residents were found on Monday morning in various areas of Swat,” said a police official, requesting anonymity.

The official blamed the killings on the Taliban loyal to rebel cleric Fazlullah, who have executed dozens of government employees and pro-government supporters in the past year.

Exodus: Trapped amidst clashes between the Taliban and security forces, residents in Swat have begun a mass exodus from the area.

Thousands of civilians were fleeing the fighting in the valley, Reuters reported.

“We have been punished for no fault of our own,” said a man, trudging along a mountain path with his family and about 100 other villagers, laden with children and bundles of belongings.

He said he was taking his family to stay with relatives in Mardan district of the NWFP.

Another man from Chaharbagh, Samiullah (36), said most people had left his village and no one was left to offer funeral prayers for those killed in the fighting. People were burying their relatives in the yards of their homes, he said.

The people leaving Swat are joining thousands of villagers who have fled fighting in other restive areas, particularly Bajaur Agency.

Soldier killed: Meanwhile, a soldier was killed and four injured when a roadside bomb exploded in South Waziristan Agency’s Khamrang village, the military said, AFP reported.

The remote-controlled device was planted along a road in the village near Wana, and was detonated soon after the lead vehicle in a paramilitary convoy was spotted, an official said, requesting anonymity. “One soldier died and four were wounded,” the official said. daily times monitor/staff report/agencies

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
.
to answer all your questions regarding how far the army is willing to go right now, YES.

Yes What? Yes can interpret in many different ways to many different people, such as, to an extent that the gap between civilian society and armed forces is so huge that army have to stop officers from identifying themselves and going out in public in Uniform? To that extent that to save the country, we kill all our people and left with the country only? Or to that extent that someone else decides its too much, and the country have beocme Saddam style government, so lets move on and 'liberate' the Pakistanis? And the more you can use your imagination...

So What was that yes in block letters pointing to?

  • a game-changing weapon that was supposed to be tested was stopped by the "supreme" parliament, obviously taking direct orders from the US.


  • E.g. what weapon that Zardari (the man without any power) can stop the military from?

    [*]Zardari made a deal with the US for airstrikes, the army has nothing to do with it.

    This is hypothetical theory. Zardari has no power to sign such agreements on his own, without having discussed in the parliament or the Military, and no such thing had been discussed in the parliament. (Unless you have some proves that confirms Military was not accomplice to that agreement).

    [*]the parliament disposed of the NSC national security council, army did not interfere

    And what good that council was for?

    [*]parliament shut down political wing of ISI, army did not interfere

    And you believed in this? My proof to my potent claim is, wait and watch.

    [*]govt. curtailed NAB's powers to bring politicians to account, army did not interfere.

    And what NAB had to do with Military? Except top brass too is being accused for stashing money away, if you haven't been listening to the accusations of controversial, billion or so dollar missing from what US gave away to General Musharraf, so no NAB, no accountability (like we ever had any case of accountability of Military officer anyway).

    [*]zardari cut off funding to our ballistic missile programs and other strategic organizations, taking orders from the US

Depends on how much funding did he cut. Can you point me to actual article, and that it has taken place or has he been deciding, or did he reduced the funding, or has he totally cut it off etc.?

And I do agree with you on all points regarding Zardari that he have to take orders for US, after all, almost half of his controversial money ($1.5bn) is stashed away in US. So why would he lose the money for the people, he took it from in the first place.

what the army could not tolerate was the ISI-interior ministry deal, Rehman Malik has ties with British agencies. even your extremist ally hamid gul bitterly opposed that and said it was a conspiracy.

So every person who talks about Islam is Extremist? I think you have no idea what General Hamid Gul is. You have no clue what he stands for. And you have no idea how best of the army brass he was. Generals like him make us all proud of our Army. And regardless of the matter, I never thought it was a good idea to put ISI under interior ministry, but thats not what I am arguing here, that whether it was right or wrong, the argument here is, whether Military is under Civilian control or not, and it's NOT. This being one of the example in the current time (and past results you already know) and the future have no surprises. My proof to that is, wait and watch.

seriously pashtun, think for a moment before you post. you haven't been making any sense for the last few pages of this thread. you say the army isn't doing anything to stop militants from slaughtering you and you go on to say that the army supports them. then you go on to say that the army is enslaved by the west and is fighting against muslims. we can see your support for these extremists when you tried to defend the foreigners marrying pashtun women. the same foreigners who you accused earlier, as spies.

For the umpteeth time, please stop your accusations of we hating the army. I mean for frickin two dozen posts, I had been saying I am questioning the certain actions and strategies of the top brass and yet you are at it again, chewing the rubber apple over and over again. I mean get over that complex you have man.

If you can't argue on the bases oo academic and logical ways, then don't humiliate yourself in constantly accusing people for hating the entire army to get some support from other people here who had not been reading the entire discussion.

It's below the belt. You seem like in your teens or early 20s who have no clue how to interact on sober bases. Let me repeat myself, I love Army, I just don't approve every action of the top military brass, that too not all of them, because I beleive their's a split among top brass on many issues as well (e.g. operations agains ttheir own people, on a honeymoon with WoT, taking pressure from United States, etc. etc.). There are still best of the best lot in the army, that oppose the top elite for doing all those things (we had seen many officers opposing Musharraf for getting in bed with US over WoT).

So you see, our criticism here, stop conquering your own people and country, while making excuses for the direct attacks on our soverignty that the ACCs are waiting outside and we have no capability to defend ourselves, hence the honourless life we have to live.

I stand by my words, I prefer dying on my feet than live on my knees with my head on someone's else feet. I would prefer to be killed by an enemy fire, than disappear or get shot by my own protectors.

I hope you DO understand my criticism this time. And if you think Army is beyond criticism, (as one of your friends think that who said we are Not Muslims for questioning army), than let me know, so I know criticism of the things we deem wrong in our opinion is not allowed here and that only praises are allowed.

I am not asking for much, a simple yes or no answer to this question, which you've dodged several times already.
 
.
If this has been democracy, then it has been a catestrophic failure, and my point of "people rise when governments fail" stands tall. And hence the people fight against such menace since we don't live in a utopia as you perfectly described.

The great Che says - Why does the guerrilla fighter fight? We must come to the inevitable conclusion that the guerrilla fighter is a social reformer, that he takes up arms responding to the angry protest of the people against their oppressors, and that he fights in order to change the social system that keeps all his unarmed brothers in ignominy and misery.

That's how the revolutions take place, when the rulers fail to produce results rather oppress masses with mass murders and injustices and inflicting great harm upon their own citizens.

Wow! this series between you, Pashtun, and AM has been a real eye-opener. All this time I thought you were posting from Pakistan and were recently from SWAT. Now we learn you are in Canada and the US? And, finally, we learn that you favor the dictatorship of the proletariat by the vanguard of the people. Instead of Che's communist vanguard, I guess it is a jihadi vanguard. I begin to understand the underpinnings of your hatreds and why you are such a relentless propagandist.
 
.
Now we learn you are in Canada and the US? And, finally, we learn that you favor the dictatorship of the proletariat by the vanguard of the people. Instead of Che's communist vanguard, I guess it is a jihadi vanguard. I begin to understand the underpinnings of your hatreds and why you are such a relentless propagandist.

Oh yeah, I am a teleporter, I live in Canada and the U.S. at the sametime, and post from both countries simultaneously by hopping from one end to another. No, genius, I don't live in the U.S.

And of course our American guest, the hatred for injustice, tyranny, oppression and imperialism, is one thing that you would not support, since your country is a number one source of producing Tyranny, injustices, oppression and imperialism by altering other people's leaderships and calling it democracy, killing millions of people and calling it collateral damage, drawind and re0drawing borders by supporting dictators and tyrannical regimes and calling it "New Middle East".

I know, you don't support that hatred against such elements I described, so save your golden words. You'd need it for those who can actually
 
.
Oh yeah, I am a teleporter, I live in Canada and the U.S. at the sametime, and post from both countries simultaneously by hopping from one end to another. No, genius, I don't live in the U.S.

Well, OK, you deflected my comment about your "being" in Canada and the US to the "teleporting" nonsense, just as you did to AM. So where are you living now? Can you give a straight answer?
 
.
Well, OK, you deflected my comment about your "being" in Canada and the US to the "teleporting" nonsense, just as you did to AM. So where are you living now? Can you give a straight answer?

Your question is absurd and personal and you have no right to ask me personal questions on public forums and neither does it matter where I live and where I don't. What really matter to you was whether I was in U.S. or not (so perhaps you can pick on me), but sorry to burst your bubble, as I said already, I don't live in your country.

And what matters is where I am from, and I am from NWFP (Swat & Khyber Agency), and am a living, breating, talking Pakhtun on the ground.

Now don't try to get out of your socks and stick to the discussion or get yourself a bike and take a hike.

I am already late for work. Good Day!
 
.
I didn't know we live in Utopia. Perhaps, I tend to live in the reality of the country I call my own. And let me tell you what is the reality, the reality is: in past three decades, there had been only one instance (the current one) where the awaam had voted someone out (tho its arguable as well), other than that, it had always been coup-de-etats to remove the government in service.

So the notion of, you vote the government out, looks flawless on the paper, but in practical, on ground, it has no factual tail wiggling behind it, as I pointed out what happened before, and since almost all of elections are rigged (some more than others), almost every democratic government (since I had been start breathing) had lost to military coups, every peaceful protest ended up in baton charging, mass arrests, dragging people from hair, people raising their voice disappearing or mysteriously dying etc. etc., not only in our country, but in most pf the third world.

And then at the end we elect people who have stolen billions of dollars from our country, who have charges of murders on them, who had been caught on video for dast-draazi'ng women, and who are easily bought and bowed down to pressure because they have to save their seats and as well necks and as well the money they stashed away in foreign banks (ever wondered why they would not bow to those countries where they have stashed away the money they stole from us?).

If this has been democracy, then it has been a catestrophic failure, and my point of "people rise when governments fail" stands tall. And hence the people fight against such menace since we don't live in a utopia as you perfectly described.

The great Che says - Why does the guerrilla fighter fight? We must come to the inevitable conclusion that the guerrilla fighter is a social reformer, that he takes up arms responding to the angry protest of the people against their oppressors, and that he fights in order to change the social system that keeps all his unarmed brothers in ignominy and misery.

That's how the revolutions take place, when the rulers fail to produce results rather oppress masses with mass murders and injustices and inflicting great harm upon their own citizens.

Good Day!

You sir indeed live in some twisted utopia, where you dream of revolutions by half crazed religious nutjobs brandishing a perverted form of Islam as a cure for all ills. The lack of democracy is no excuse to go seeking an even more crazed, destructive and despotic regime under the Mullahs, which is all your 'revolution' boils down to.

People like you and Anwar have no choice but to advance this criminal, immoral and medieval mindset under the garb of Islam, since it is only through the subjugation and coercion of people through violence (endorsed and justified by this perverted interpretation of Islam of course) that these thugs will ever come to power.

The mass injustices being committed now are not by the rulers, but by these very 'men of faith' - the injustice was committed when taliban were taught to not respect teh law, and take it into their own hands, when children were taught to wield AK-47's instead of pens, to behead soldiers and civilians - that sir is where 'mass injustice was committed'.

In contrast, the existence of a brothel or two, a corner store distributing pornography, and an illegal liquor store are but shining examples of virtue. It is only a twisted mind that can seek to justify sins of murder, coercion, suicide bombings and the overthrow of the state on the basis of the above.

That your revolution has failed, and the one I advocate succeeded, can be seen from the fact that it is those who chose the political, non violent form of protest to affect change are the ones leading the country now, and it is your rabid Mullah's who have shown their true colors of being cold blooded murderers of innocents, and the guardians of obscurantism and intolerance.

Yes WE elected people who have siphoned of billions, and as horrible as that choice may be WE made that choice - it was not imposed on us by some two bit suicidal Mullah dreaming of sex with a four year old. WE will live with the consequences of OUR decisions and WE will learn to choose wisely.

In the end that is the only way a society and system can survive, when its people learn to exercise their rights responsibly and wisely, and that cannot come about without trial and error and without continuity. What you propose is not a system, but merely the substitution of a tyranny of the Military (Musharraf and those before him) with the far worse tyranny of the Mullah. I seek neither, and will stand for and advocate the flawed political and democratic process that still remains the best choice out of several flawed choices.

The revolution that mattered took place already. It was peaceful and political (the violence marring it the frustrated lashing out of the alternate tyranny of the Mullah you propose), and a military dictator, benevolent though he was, was overthrown in favor of a democratically elected government. That revolution is the one that needs to continue, and attempting to prevent it from succeeding is the tyranny of the Mullah.
 
.
Your question is absurd and personal and you have no right to ask me personal questions on public forums and neither does it matter where I live and where I don't.

I realize that what I asked you was personal. And I apologize for that, I assumed that you could give me a very broad answer, like North America or the Western Hemisphere. I never would have if you hadn't been so high handed about other peoples location. I don't want to pick on you. You obviously are impervious to my comments anyway. But, I am sorry that I pushed you to making a personal revelation that you did not choose to make.
 
.
Your question is absurd and personal and you have no right to ask me personal questions on public forums and neither does it matter where I live and where I don't. What really matter to you was whether I was in U.S. or not (so perhaps you can pick on me), but sorry to burst your bubble, as I said already, I don't live in your country.

And what matters is where I am from, and I am from NWFP (Swat & Khyber Agency), and am a living, breating, talking Pakhtun on the ground.

Now don't try to get out of your socks and stick to the discussion or get yourself a bike and take a hike.

I am already late for work. Good Day!

OK, I shall revise Truth Seeker's question a bit.

Are you in Pakistan or outside Pakistan and kindly put flags which reflect your present location and not country of birth if different from present one.
 
.
The thing that you are accusing me for (that I am shooting down other's evidence), I can accuse you for the same as well or others. E.g. You did not take any proofs I provided in my rebuttal to your/others official claims about LM massacre (which you are still standing by), my post is still up there somewhere where I provided many reports and a video call of Ghazi, who reiterated he is ready for surrender/negotiations but all communications had been dropped and operation is imminent, and yet that was shot down as well, citing it was too late, in fact too late is better than never, and that was the case of never. But anywhichway, those proofs, plus reasoning with logic and evidence was all shot down in favour of defence of military operation.

So it's kind of two way traffic now isn't it? But I guess blaming eachother wont take us anywhere rather like women we will be having a catfight for ages, hence I said I agree to disagree with you.

Secondly, I must tell you something, not every thing have an evidence in a link form on internet. There are several things people read in books, magazines, Urdu Newspapers (that are impossible to search for references) and personal experiences, or memories of watching, reading, hearing it elsewhere etc., so either you simply can call other person lier, or take his reasoning and work out logically instead of plainly telling them your evidence is wrong and mine is right. In addition to that, what Waraich and Anwar had been saying is purely experienced based. Only experience can teach certain things, since there's no way any institution documents what it does (specially the wrong things) and give public access to it. So again, you can agree to disagree here, because asking for proofs for such stuff (as they were saying) is basically throwing a laugh, since you and I, know that what they were saying cannot be documented and easily available for public. It's pure experience.


I didn't know they have characters. Floor crossings for petty interests of money and power, then dumping their people for something else, than becoming a mouthspeaker for a dictator - and the list goes on... I don't think there's any character involved here. Probably in given time, Haq will be speaking against Musharraf, just as many have already. And about Edhi, I already answered that before.

I tend not to believe in the sources of those who carried the act. In academic way, the tendency of lying and fabricating stories is 99% on the part of the culprit, hence the goold old proverb "Chor bhi kabhi kehta hey kay mein nay chori ki hey?"

So my stand on this stays, when your own angry/agitated citizens are involved, you do not massacre them or shoot at angry protestors (tho it has always been the case), you talk to them, you listen to them, you find a mutual solution (when you are in power, you have more responsibilities than ordering mass massacres as a solution for everything). Patience is virtue, and immensly required to deal with your "not so bright" public, which clearly lacks at our official level, unfortunately.

It does not matter whether you believe that every single one of the negotiating party had 'character' or not. You are suggesting that everyone of them went through hours of negotiations, and then came out and addressed a press conference and lied to Pakistan and the world that Mullah Ghazi did not want to surrender.

As absurd as that sounds, your theory was blown apart by Maulana Abdul Sattar Edhi's own statements from multiple conversations with Ghazi, that validate the statements made by the negotiating team, so the question of not believing the statements of the 'perpetrators' does not arise in this case, since the 'perpetrators' position has been validated by a an extremely respected and neutral third party.

Ghazi had indicated a desire to conditionally surrender before, conditions that were unacceptable. He wanted to be given straight out amnesty and be allowed to live in his village. There was no reason to believe that, after refusing to surrender unconditionally in negotiations with the negotiating party, or with Maulana Edhi, he had changed his mind on unconditional surrender.

If he had changed his mind, he should have come out with his hands in the air and surrendered when the operation was imminent, instead he and his fellow terrorists chose to fight it out, martyring 9 SSG members, and extending the operation into several hours - this was no behaviour of a man who had decided to surrender. And that is key here, unconditional surrender, not a pardon to go live in his village after threatening suicide bombings across Pakistan and killing innocent people.

Sorry, but the 'last phone call' of a terrorist who had just refused to surrender unconditionally does not carry any weight in terms of credibility, except for those who were sympathetic with this tyrannical/perverted system he was trying to impose through criminal behavior.
when your own angry/agitated citizens are involved, you do not massacre them or shoot at angry protestors

Not surprisingly, we never hear this nonsense when a gang of murderous criminals is gunned down when they choose to 'fight it out' instead of surrendering to the police. Those criminals are Pakistanis an fellow citizens too aren't they? And yet LEA's have an authority and responsibility to use deadly force to stop them.

The situation was the same at the LM. These were not 'protesters/agitated citizens', these were hardcore criminals (the leadership and the armed militants holed up). The GoP exercised great restraint for almost two weeks, engaged in dialog, obtained the release of thousands of students, and finally when the criminals refused to surrender unconditionally, used deadly force.
 
.
^^^ I must say, AM, I admire your energy in responding to Pashtun. After reading through reams of his posts, I do not have the stamina to attempt a point-by-point rebuttal of his anti-US conspiracy theories, as you have tried tonight for his anti-PA and GoP rants. I fear your effort will be lost on him, but, at least, your responses are informative to me. Thanks.
 
.
yeah AM. dude you are awsome. i really think that you should go to pakistan and start running for political office. i am not joking in this regard at all. poeple like you can change Pakistan for better while i fear for pakistan when it comes to people like pushtun
 
.
^^^ I must say, AM, I admire your energy in responding to Pashtun. After reading through reams of his posts, I do not have the stamina to attempt a point-by-point rebuttal of his anti-US conspiracy theories, as you have tried tonight for his anti-PA and GoP rants. I fear your effort will be lost on him, but, at least, your responses are informative to me. Thanks.


We have to analyse the whole available information in islamic frame and then we can conclude who is right and who is wrong.Otherwise lot of information,knowledge and experience could help us to see the picture correctly.


What ever is going on in SWAT has definately link with LAL Mosque operation,I heard from my sources that Col Haroon was against use of force ,he wanted solution of problem through dialogue.

Any how we can see after that action security satuation in Pakistan espacially in NWFP dont improve but deterioating furthur.These are after shocks of LAL mosque operation.It means there are invisible hands behind what ever is going on in NWFP.
 
Last edited:
.
You sir indeed live in some twisted utopia, where you dream of revolutions by half crazed religious nutjobs brandishing a perverted form of Islam as a cure for all ills. The lack of democracy is no excuse to go seeking an even more crazed, destructive and despotic regime under the Mullahs, which is all your 'revolution' boils down to.

People like you and Anwar have no choice but to advance this criminal, immoral and medieval mindset under the garb of Islam, since it is only through the subjugation and coercion of people through violence (endorsed and justified by this perverted interpretation of Islam of course) that these thugs will ever come to power.

The mass injustices being committed now are not by the rulers, but by these very 'men of faith' - the injustice was committed when taliban were taught to not respect teh law, and take it into their own hands, when children were taught to wield AK-47's instead of pens, to behead soldiers and civilians - that sir is where 'mass injustice was committed'.

In contrast, the existence of a brothel or two, a corner store distributing pornography, and an illegal liquor store are but shining examples of virtue. It is only a twisted mind that can seek to justify sins of murder, coercion, suicide bombings and the overthrow of the state on the basis of the above.

That your revolution has failed, and the one I advocate succeeded, can be seen from the fact that it is those who chose the political, non violent form of protest to affect change are the ones leading the country now, and it is your rabid Mullah's who have shown their true colors of being cold blooded murderers of innocents, and the guardians of obscurantism and intolerance.

Yes WE elected people who have siphoned of billions, and as horrible as that choice may be WE made that choice - it was not imposed on us by some two bit suicidal Mullah dreaming of sex with a four year old. WE will live with the consequences of OUR decisions and WE will learn to choose wisely.

In the end that is the only way a society and system can survive, when its people learn to exercise their rights responsibly and wisely, and that cannot come about without trial and error and without continuity. What you propose is not a system, but merely the substitution of a tyranny of the Military (Musharraf and those before him) with the far worse tyranny of the Mullah. I seek neither, and will stand for and advocate the flawed political and democratic process that still remains the best choice out of several flawed choices.

The revolution that mattered took place already. It was peaceful and political (the violence marring it the frustrated lashing out of the alternate tyranny of the Mullah you propose), and a military dictator, benevolent though he was, was overthrown in favor of a democratically elected government. That revolution is the one that needs to continue, and attempting to prevent it from succeeding is the tyranny of the Mullah.


We need to bring change in society if want to get ride of Mullah mafia and Currupt government.We need to develop a system (Khalafat) in which Mullah and Ruler both are account able by Kazi .These both groups are basically responsible for present distuction of our society.
 
.
Sunday, January 25, 2009
CIA-ISI Jihadi "Frankenstein" Sows Chaos, Reaps Death
With 180 girls' schools torched since 2008 in Pakistan's Swat Valley and some 900 indefinitely closed, the future for education for some 125,000 young women is under dire threat by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

The latest bombings took place Monday in the district capital, Mingora, "once considered the safest place in Swat," according to The Guardian. Five girls' schools were leveled by TTP militants who last week decreed a permanent ban on education for girls.


In recent weeks, residents who have crossed the TTP have been strung-up from trees, beaten, or had their shops destroyed while markets have been ruled "no go" areas for women.

First mobilized during the 1980s by the CIA and Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence agency (ISI) as "plausibly deniable" assets to wage "holy war" against Afghanistan's socialist government, organized crime and drug-linked jihadi groups now threaten Pakistan itself. Call it "blowback" on steroids.

As the Obama administration prepares to the double the size of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, attacks in Pakistan by the American-led NATO coalition will only accelerate the splintering of the nuclear-armed South Asian nation and fuel new attacks by international terrorist outfits such as "former" allies, the Afghan-Arab database of disposable intelligence assets known as al-Qaeda.Amply warned by South Asian and Middle Eastern experts in the 1970s who predicted a slow-moving but inevitable catastrophe for the region, short-term Cold War "gains" against the Soviet adversary trumped long-term strategic planning which, if America were a sane country, would have worked to strengthen, rather than undermine, progressive regional forces.

Despite the inescapable conclusion that the CIA's Islamist Frankenstein monster is running amok, one can only surmise that America's corporatist masters continue to view religiously-inspired neofascists as a reliable auxiliary force to advance geopolitical goals against their capitalist rivals.
As I documented in "Unconventional Warfare in the 21st Century: U.S. Surrogates, Terrorists and Narcotraffickers," (Antifascist Calling, December 19, 2008) despite the catastrophes wrought by American global gamesmanship, for United States Special Operations Command (USSOC) and the CIA, this disastrous paradigm is still fully operational.


Indeed a September 2008 USSOC planning document, first disclosed by Wikileaks, avers that unconventional warfare "must be conducted by, with, or through surrogates; and such surrogates must be irregular forces." For the people of Pakistan, the "irregular forces" ranged against them are driving the country headlong over the edge of a precipice. Unfortunately however, this is not by accident.

As Swiss investigative journalist Richard Labévière wrote, describing Pakistan's descent into chaos, "The Pakistani morass and its profound strategic implications for all of Central Asia have become one of the most alarming and chaotic scenes on the planet. As one of the most strategic areas of the next millennium slips into a criminal state, Uncle Sam looks on with cynicism (if not benevolence)."
Citing the confluence of interests amongst American corporate grifters and far-right Islamist terror networks, Labévière pointedly cites a top U.S. intelligence officials' approval of the reactionary forces set in motion by America's anti-Soviet Afghan gambit as a signpost for future destabilization campaigns:


"The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them against our adversaries worked marvelously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army," explains a former CIA analyst. "The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter Chinese influence in Central Asia." In a certain sense, the Cold War is still going on. For years Graham Fuller, former Deputy Director of the National Council on Intelligence at the CIA, has been talking up the "modernizing virtues" of the Islamists, insisting on their anti-Statist concept of the economy. Listening to him, you would almost take the Taleban and their Wahhabi allies for liberals. "Islam, in theory at least, is firmly anchored in the traditions of free trade and private enterprise," wrote Fuller. "The prophet was a trader, as was his first wife. Islam does not glorify the State's role in the economy." (Richard Labévière, Dollars for Terror: The United States and Islam, New York: Algora Publishing, 2000, p. 6)

But inevitably, facts on the ground put paid the mad schemes of imperialist architects such as Graham Fuller and his acolytes. Fast forward a decade and it becomes all-too-painfully clear it is the Afghan and Pakistani people who are paying the price in blood for America's bankrupt policies. Having armed, financed and provided an ample array of targets for "free trade liberals" such as the Taliban and al-Qaeda--subsisting on the illicit profits of the international narcotics trade and other dubious ventures--Yankee hubris, as historian Chalmers Johnson reminds us, has called forth the goddess of divine retribution, Nemesis, on all our heads.

Medievalism in Swat Valley: Pakistan, and America's, Future?

While moves to impose sharia law on the Pakistani people through violence is the alleged intent of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan and their al-Qaeda "brothers," more mundane, though far-more worldly concerns motivate the jihadists: state power and the loot such a position would afford enterprising charlatans.


What better means than control--through fear--of a terrorized population forced to look the other way as a gang of "holy warriors" steal their resources and process heroin on an industrial scale while turning a quick profit in the bargain!

Investigative journalist Amir Mir, writing in the Lahore-based newspaper The News International reports that


Around 10,000 TTP militants have been pitted against 15,000 Army troops since Oct 22, 2007, when the [Swat Valley military] operation was officially launched. Leading the charge against the Pakistan Army is Maulana Fazlullah, also known as Mullah Radio for the illegal FM radio channel he operates. Through his FM broadcasts, still operational despite being banned by the NWFP [North West Frontier Province] government, the firebrand keeps inspiring his followers to implement Shariah, fight the Army and establish his authority in the area.

Military authorities have repeatedly alleged that Fazlullah, who has thousands of armed supporters ready to challenge the security forces on his command, has close links with the Taliban and al-Qaeda operatives. The cleric has already become a household name in Swat, as his Shaheen Commando Force is destroying and occupying government buildings, blowing up police stations, bridges, basic health units and hotels and burning girls' schools. ("Amid Rising TTP Gains, Army Adopts New Strategy," The News International, January 21, 2009)

Since the military launched an offensive against the clericalist thugs, indiscriminate Army attacks against the civilian population have wrecked havoc. In addition to burning down nearly 200 girls' schools, the TTP have torched 80 video shops, 22 barber shops and have destroyed some 20 bridges in the mountainous region. Mir reports the TTP have carried out some 165 bomb attacks against security forces, including 17 suicide bombings and increasingly sophisticated remote-controlled IED attacks.

So serious has the situation grown in the Swat Valley, that 800 provincial police, half the stated total according to The News International, have either deserted or left the area under pretext of going on "extended leave." Other observers contend that the TTP and the Army are collaborating together.

Local politicians who have fled the valley claim that "elements of the military and the militants appear to be acting together." Bushra Gohara, the Vice-President of the Awami National Party told The Independent on Sunday, "Even if they are not, there needs to be a complete review of the military's strategy."

"The suspicion of collusion, said a local government official in the largest town, Mingora," according to the IoS, "is based on the proximity of army and Taliban checkposts, each 'a mile away from the other'."

Reports indicate that Fazlullah's militia now effectively controls the Swat Valley. "Under these circumstances," Mir writes, "the state writ has shrunk from Swat's 5,337 square kilometres to the limits of its regional Mingora headquarters, which is a city of just 36 square kilometres."
In Mingora itself, once a prosperous urban hub that thrived on the tourist trade, the nature of the crisis can be gauged by the number of bodies that appear each morning after a night of terror. According to Mir, shopkeepers are now finding "four or five dead bodies hung over the poles or trees."

Unsurprisingly, it is the civilian population who have suffered the worst depredations of the TTP and the Pakistani Army. Hemmed-in on all sides, a military spokesperson conceded that a third of the population has fled the area since the Army launched its offensive.

Creating a dual-power situation as the state's hold in the area shrinks, some "70 Taliban courts are now ruling on hundreds of cases of 'immoral activity' every week," The Sunday Times reported.

Fueled by the repressive Saudi-inspired Wahhabi doctrine that fired the Afghan mujahedin during America's anti-Soviet Cold War "jihad," the TTP have embarked on a rule-by-fear strategy that seeks to impose "Sharia law" on an unwilling--and unarmed--population, as part of its long-term strategy to seize state power.

As in Afghanistan under the Taliban however, it is women who face the harshest sanctions by the jihadi thugs. The refusal to wear a veil or dancing in public are "offenses" punishable by death. The Sunday Times averred,


The emergence of a parallel Taliban legal system has a sinister objective. "This is our first step towards the implementation of sharia in Swat," said Muslim Khan, a Taliban spokesman. In the next phase, Khan said, the courts would begin to carry out harsher punishments, such as execution or chopping off hands.

Villagers said the Taliban were already killing people who defied their orders. "They didn’t even spare barbers and women coming out of markets without wearing their veils," said a Mingora resident.

There have been 51 Taliban executions since the start of the year, he added. The victims include politicians, security men, dancers, prostitutes and shopkeepers selling alcohol. (Daud Khattak, "Taliban's deadly 'justice' cows Pakistan," The Sunday Times, January 18, 2009)

Ominously, Fazlullah's state within a state is not staffed primarily by madrassa-educated cannon-fodder, but draw on a surplus of former Army and intelligence officers to fill the ranks, raising suspicions that the TTP enjoys powerful backing from ruling elites.

According to Mir, the Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat-i-Mohammadi (TNSM) and TTP are composed of two Shuras, or councils. One is the Ulema Shura that advises the group on "religious polices," while the Executive Shura, "is the highest policy-making organ of the TNSM, which has a large number of ex-servicemen, including retired commissioned officers, as its members."

Since 9/11, under intense pressure by their American "allies" in the "war on terror," the Army and ISI have been partially purged by military and political elites who rule the roost. However, disaffected ISI cadre who never endorsed former President-General Pervez Musharraf's half-hearted--some would say, deceitful--"break" with the Army's own creation, the Taliban, continue to sponsor retrograde jihadist outfits.

Still allied with the Taliban, al-Qaeda and home-grown terror groups such as Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM), elements burrowed deep within the state, including prominent former generals closely associated with former dictator, General Zia ul-Haq and the CIA, are actively conspiring to destabilize the civilian government.

Indeed, last November's terrorist assault on Mumbai, a joint venture amongst disaffected elements of the security/intelligence apparatus, LET and organized crime-linked assets such as Dawood Ibrahim's D-Company, was a shot across the bow of President Asif Ali Zadari's administration meant to further polarize the country and sow doubt amongst ruling class elites as to the efficacy of civilian rule.

Staggering from crisis to crisis, under heavy pressure from imperialism to "show results" for the billions of dollars in "aid" showered on the military by Washington, time is running out as the jihadi Frankenstein flexes its muscles.

From the Lal Masjid Siege to the Bhutto Assassination

Fazlullah's rise, and the TTP's assault on the people of the Swat Valley, can be directly linked to the fall-out from the July 2007 Red Mosque siege.
When the Red Mosque (Lal Masjid) controversy exploded, the state was forced, though some would say dragged kicking and screaming, to act against brothers Abdul Aziz and Abdul Rashid Ghazi, the al-Qaeda-linked leaders of the Mosque.

It wasn't always that way. Since its founding in 1965 in Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, the Red Mosque enjoyed patronage from influential members of the government, primes ministers, army chiefs and presidents, according to BBC News.

During the anti-Soviet Afghan jihad, the Red Mosque played a prominent role in the recruitment and training of fighters and was supported handsomely by the ISI when the Taliban was launched in Afghanistan in the mid-1990s. During the 2001 invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, many Red Mosque fighters were captured or killed by U.S. forces and Northern Alliance militia fighters.

In other words, high state officials, including intelligence chieftains such as Hamid Gul and Mahmoud Ahmad were staunch backers of the Ghazi brothers, hard-line advocates of dictator General Zia ul-Haq's program to "Islamize" Pakistani society come hell or high water. In this bankrupt project to destroy what little remained of Pakistani democracy and civil society, Zia and his retinue of Islamist generals were generously supported by the United States.

Former ISI General Hamid Gul told Asia Times, "It is a pity that our army was preparing youths to seize Lal Qala [the Red Fort of Delhi] and they ended up seizing the Lal Masjid." According to a recent report in The News International, Gul is now wanted by the U.S. "charged ... with providing financial assistance to Kabul-based criminal groups and involvement in spotting, assessing, recruiting and training young men from seminaries," as well as accusations that the ex-general has been "assisting the Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters in developing high-tech weapons."

Gun battles erupted in 2007 after gangs of burqa-clad seminary students occupied a children's library, kidnapped a group of Chinese women accused of being "prostitutes," and after repeated forays into surrounding commercial districts trashed CD shops accused of selling "pornography." But when the "students" demanded strict enforcement of sharia law, the state's hand was forced.

When police failed to stamp-out the mini-rebellion in the nation's capital, the Army was brought in. By the time the smoke cleared, Abdul Ghazi had been killed and his brother Abdul Aziz was arrested after attempting to flee the scene dressed in a woman's burqa, sparking outrage amongst the fundamentalists and former high-ranking intelligence officials. Conflicting reports claim that anywhere between 200 and 1,000 people lost their lives during the siege. In the aftermath, according to multiple press reports, a huge arms' cache was recovered, including stocks of AK-47 rifles and grenade launchers.

After the raid, Fazlullah joined forces with TTP and Pakistani al-Qaeda "emir" Baitullah Mehsud, "in a bid to provide an umbrella to all insurgent movements operating in several tribal agencies and settled areas of the NWFP," according to journalist Amir Mir.

Scant months after the Lal Masjid affair and in the midst of tumultuous nation-wide demonstrations by tens of thousands of democracy activists, including lawyers and left-wing labor militants demanding the restoration of Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudry, sacked by the Musharraf regime after ordering the government to account for Pakistan's "disappeared," Benazir Bhutto was murdered in Rawalpindi.

In the aftermath of Bhutto's December 27, 2007 assassination, state officials alleged that Mehsud claimed responsibility for her murder, a claim he denied. The "targeted killing" of Pakistan's most popular political figure followed on the heels of the October 2007 Karachi bombing that killed 150 of Bhutto's supporters when she returned home from exile.

The official story has undergone several contradictory metamorphoses. Shortly after Bhutto's murder it was alleged that Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LEJ), another banned terror group linked to al-Qaeda, were the reputed authors. The story then changed and al-Qaeda commander Mustafa Abu al-Yazid claimed responsibility, telling Asia Times, "We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat the mujahideen." Many analysts believe these serial fabrications by the government were meant to muddy the waters and conceal the true architects of the attacks.

In a letter to Musharraf before her murder, published by the Karachi-based newspaper Dawn, Bhutto named four persons involved in an alleged plot to kill her: Intelligence Bureau (IB) Chief Ijaz Shah, former chief minister of Punjab Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, former chief minister of Sindh Arbab Ghulam Rahim, and the former ISI chief, Hamid Gul. All are prominent pro-Islamist figures within the intelligence and security establishment who favored a continuation of Pakistan's policy of fielding terrorist proxy armies.

While first claiming that Bhutto was killed when she struck her head on the latch of her SUV sunroof fracturing her skull as the result of a suicide bomb blast, video footage surfaced showing a gunman firing several shots at the popular politician prior to the bomb's detonation. This would increase the likelihood that the suicide bomber's actual target was the gunman and therefore, part of a clean-up operation meant to conceal the identities of those who ghostwrote the Bhutto assassination script.

However, conflicting claims of responsibility, the hasty manner in which the security services removed all traces of forensic evidence from the crime scene and threats by police and intelligence officials against physicians who examined Bhutto's body, fueled speculation that Islamist elements within ISI and the Army--or the state itself--either manipulated the militants or carried out the terrorist outrages in a move to bolster Musharraf's waning grip on power.

Though allegedly on the outs with the clericalists, Musharraf was a staunch supporter of the Army's policy of fielding "irregular forces" comprised of far-right thugs such as Lashkar or the virulently anti-Shia communalist group Sipah-e-Sahaba (SSP) to carry out "plausibly deniable" strikes against India or internal left-wing political opponents.


Originally founded in 1985 at the behest of dictator General Zia ul-Haq to liquidate secular and leftist forces opposed to his moves to "Islamize" Pakistani society with the blessings of the CIA, the SSP was "banned" in 2002 but quickly regrouped under the banner of Millat-e-Islamia. Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 was an SSP member as was his uncle, the al-Qaeda operative and alleged architect of the 9/11 attack, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Echoes of the Lal Masjid affair continue to reverberate. On September 21, 2008 a massive truck bomb was detonated outside the Marriot Hotel in downtown Islamabad, killing 60 and wounding some 260 people, virtually obliterating the five-star hotel. Some 700 Pakistanis had gathered to break the daily Ramadan fast. If the bomber had managed to drive the truck into the lobby, the toll would have been far higher.

The conclusion drawn was bleak: if the Marriot could be hit in one of the most secure and upscale neighborhoods in the heart of Pakistan's capital, then no one was safe. It was feared that the bombers' intent was to destabilize and possibly spark an Army coup against the first civilian government in nine years.

With little to hope for from the Army and ISI, President Asif Ali Zadari has expanded the civilian-led Special Investigations Group (SIG), a distinct antiterrorist branch of the Federal Investigations Agency (FIA), The Guardian reported earlier this month. The SIG had languished under Musharraf. According to investigative journalists Adrian Levy and Catherine Scott Clark,


On December 14, the British PM flew to Islamabad to announce a £6m "pact against terror", saying he wanted to "remove the chain" that led from the mountains of Pakistan to the streets of Britain. A significant part of the funding was intended for the SIG currently a tight-knit cell of 37 full-time specialists that was to be expanded into a 300-strong force with an investigation division, an armed wing, an intelligence department and a research section. In return, Britain asked for access to the SIG's raw data and captured extremists who might illuminate British plots. ("On the Trail of Pakistan's Taliban," The Guardian, 10 January 2009)

The need for security would indeed be high. On March 11, 2008, the anniversary of the Madrid transport attacks, a suicide bomber struck the SIG's provincial office in Lahore, killing 25 people, including 13 officers. Tariq Pervez, the SIG's head told The Guardian that since the end of 2007, "suicide strikes from this region had killed 597 security force personnel and 1,523 civilians, including Benazir Bhutto on December 27."

Despite attempts to recruit--or co-opt--poverty-stricken, often unwilling young members of TNSM/TTP head-honcho Baitullah Mehsud's extended clan in Waziristan for use as cannon-fodder, Pervez told The Guardian its a hard sell given Mehsud's brutal methods of dealing with those who oppose him.


Indeed, according to Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid, when 600 tribal elders spoke out against the TNSM/TTP in 2005, Mehsud had each of them sent a needle, black thread and 1,000 rupees with which to buy some cloth to stitch their own funeral shrouds: all of them were subsequently murdered.

The situation has deteriorated to such a degree for U.S./NATO "coalition" forces that America's main supply route into Afghanistan from western Pakistan's tribal belt, that the military "has obtained permission to move troop supplies through Russia and Central Asia, Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top American commander in the Middle East, said on Tuesday," according to The New York Times.

In December, hundreds of NATO supply trucks were torched in Peshawar by Taliban, TTP and al-Qaeda fighters and Pakistani truck drivers are now refusing to drive along the supply route.

Frankenstein Turns on its Master: "Round Up the Usual Suspects!"

The alliance forged in the wake of the Lal Masjid siege and the Bhutto assassination amongst forces loyal to Maulana Fazlullah and Baitullah Mehsud's TTP, Mullah Mohammed Omar's Afghan Taliban and Osama bin Laden's Afghan-Arab database, al-Qaeda, are chickens that have come home to roost for U.S. imperialism. But it is the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan who are paying the price.

Despite the grave threats to the people of Central, South Asia and the Middle East posed by a resurgence of far-right fundamentalism sponsored by the United States, Washington still continues to view Islamist terror and organized crime-linked networks such as al-Qaeda and their related complex of jihadi groups as "off-the-shelf," plausibly deniable intelligence assets.

Notwithstanding the severe global capitalist economic meltdown, geopolitical expansion into regions of strategic and economic interest to the United States is a top priority of the Obama administration. A central pillar of the American policy despite "regime change" in Washington, is the destabilization of Iran. As Seymour Hersh reported, the U.S. via their ISI and Saudi "allies" are arming and financing Pakistani-based jihadi groups such as Jundullah to target Iran.


The Administration may have been willing to rely on dissident organizations in Iran even when there was reason to believe that the groups had operated against American interests in the past. The use of Baluchi elements, for example, is problematic, Robert Baer, a former C.I.A. clandestine officer who worked for nearly two decades in South Asia and the Middle East, told me. "The Baluchis are Sunni fundamentalists who hate the regime in Tehran, but you can also describe them as Al Qaeda," Baer told me. "These are guys who cut off the heads of nonbelievers--in this case, it’s Shiite Iranians. The irony is that we're once again working with Sunni fundamentalists, just as we did in Afghanistan in the nineteen-eighties." Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is considered one of the leading planners of the September 11th attacks, are Baluchi Sunni fundamentalists.


One of the most active and violent anti-regime groups in Iran today is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People's Resistance Movement, which describes itself as a resistance force fighting for the rights of Sunnis in Iran. "This is a vicious Salafi organization whose followers attended the same madrassas as the Taliban and Pakistani extremists," [Vali] Nasr told me. "They are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda and they are also thought to be tied to the drug culture." The Jundallah took responsibility for the bombing of a busload of Revolutionary Guard soldiers in February, 2007. At least eleven Guard members were killed. According to Baer and to press reports, the Jundallah is among the groups in Iran that are benefitting from U.S. support. ("Preparing the Battlefield," The New Yorker, July 7, 2008)

While North American and European Muslim communities remain a target of repressive "counterterrorist" policies that demonize Muslims and Arabs as dangerous "others," internal "enemies" and "usual suspects" to be preyed upon by police and intelligence agencies, real, not fictional, terrorist networks continue to operate, indeed thrive, with impunity. Here, as elsewhere, short-term tactical advantage over capitalist rivals trump democratic processes and economic well-being based on social justice.

As security analyst and historian, Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed documented in a Briefing Paper prepared for the British Parliament in the wake of al-Qaeda's 2005 London transport attacks,


The government appears unable to fully extract itself from these strategic interests, continuing to tolerate Islamist extremist networks in the UK, including successor organizations to al-Muhajiroun, and showing an inexplicable unwillingness to investigate them; displaying ongoing reluctance to arrest and prosecute leading extremists despite abundant evidence of their incitement to terrorism, murder, violence and racial hatred (with serious action delayed until public pressure is brought to bear); and refusing to investigate key al-Qaeda affiliated terrorist suspects based or formerly based in the UK connected to 7/7 and other terrorist attacks. In this dire situation, proposing the extension of state power through yet further anti-terror legislation, as the Brown government is now doing, can never hope to contribute to real security. For in this context, such legislation not only fails to rectify the multiple failures of domestic and international security policy behind the paralysis of the British national security system; it simply lends unprecedented powers of social control to a paralysed system operating according to a defunct and dangerous intelligence paradigm. (Inside the Crevice: Islamist terror networks and the 7/7 intelligence failure, London: Institute for Policy Research and Development, August 2007)

Much the same can be said for the United States and its myopic "counterterrorist" policies that rely on the demonization of entire communities, driftnet surveillance of the population, the infiltration of provocateurs into antiwar, socialist and left-wing organizations with no demonstrable ties to international terrorism, and the induced climate of suspicion and fear that breed social paralysis in the face of grave, contemporaneous ruling class threats to democracy.

As a tsunami of Predator drones rain remote-controlled death on the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and as the Obama administration prepares a major military escalation in Central- and South Asia, girls' schools continue to burn in the Swat Valley with matchbooks labeled "Made in the USA."Antifascist Calling...: CIA-ISI Jihadi "Frankenstein" Sows Chaos, Reaps Death
 
Last edited:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom