Messerschmitt
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,662
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Hmm
Suicide drones hit target 500km inside Iran
- Thread starter Beny Karachun
- Start date
RealNapster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,611
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Wow. That way almost every country should disagree with USA when it talk of human rights and preventing human lives. Because the world have seen instances where both parties of a conflict were using American provided equipments to kill.
Iran is not actively killing Ukrainians, Russians are. Same as USA isn't destroying Russian tanks and jets, Ukrainians are.. using American weapons
Muhammad Saftain Anjum
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2021
- Messages
- 2,080
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
I hope de escalates soon
Petrol here is already so expensive
Petrol here is already so expensive
Beny Karachun
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2016
- Messages
- 6,521
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
If I had to guess, Mossad began to smuggle suicide drones into Iran and arm the new revolutionaries.
I think this will become a more regular occurrence.
jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
RealNapster sahaab, although I reacted with "Loved It" for the OP and I dearly wanted these drones to land on Khamenei's palace and whoever are the latest commanders of the IRGC, Basij and Basij burqa brigade I know that Israel government will never do that. Israel government wants @SalarHaqq's mullahs to remain in power because that way Iran won't develop and will never pose a threat to Israel government. Israel government and Iran's mullahs collaborated during the Iran-Iraq war including for the Israeli military attack on Iraq's nuclear reactor.
There is the desi saying "Mullah ki daud masjid tak", yes ?
That was why the British colonial government of India established the Deoband mullah school and why the Britishers also gave love to the Hindutvadis but hanged Bhagat Singh and put Indian Communists like Shaukat Usmani on trial in the "Meerut Conspiracy Case".
Sineva
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 24, 2018
- Messages
- 4,657
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Benny...benny...benny..."Iranian UAV tactic" is actually copied from Israel, this is the Israeli Harpy, a drone in operation from 1994:
And this is the Iranian Shahed 136, blatant copy of the Harpy:
I don't know the details behind the attack. I just know that Iran laughed about Saudi patriot defense systems but they didn't have the last laugh.
This is what happens when you just look at purely superficial details and start jumping to all sorts of wild unsubstantiated conclusions.
For a start the shahed 136 is certainly not a "blatant copy of the harpy",unless of course you mean that they`re both piston engined powered delta wing type loitering/attack munitions?.
The shahed 136 is quite a bit bigger than the harpy,it also uses a 4 cylinder engine as opposed to a 2 cylinder.
The biggest difference tho is in the aerodynamic control set up.
On the harpy its pretty standard,you have 2 moving horizontal control surfaces at the rear for pitch control and possibly roll control,and 2 moving vertical control surfaces as rudders.
The shahed 136 uses a different set up,you have 4 moving horizontal control surfaces at the rear,these work as elevons to provide pitch,roll,and directional control,with the vertical surfaces being fixed to provide passive stability only.
One can also see that the profile of the two wings are different as is the type of nose cone.
Beny Karachun
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2016
- Messages
- 6,521
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Seems like a blatant copy to meBenny...benny...benny...
This is what happens when you just look at purely superficial details and start jumping to all sorts of wild unsubstantiated conclusions.
For a start the shahed 136 is certainly not a "blatant copy of the harpy",unless of course you mean that they`re both piston engined powered delta wing type loitering/attack munitions?.
The shahed 136 is quite a bit bigger than the harpy,it also uses a 4 cylinder engine as opposed to a 2 cylinder.
The biggest difference tho is in the aerodynamic control set up.
On the harpy its pretty standard,you have 2 moving horizontal control surfaces at the rear for pitch control and possibly roll control,and 2 moving vertical control surfaces as rudders.
The shahed 136 uses a different set up,you have 4 moving horizontal control surfaces at the rear,these work as elevons to provide pitch,roll,and directional control,with the vertical surfaces being fixed to provide passive stability only.
One can also see that the profile of the two wings are different as is the type of nose cone.
SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Naturally you'd like to see that, wouldn't you. After all such is the trademark of every avowed zionist and NATO collaborator, even if they're posing as revolutionaries. Sooner or later, they end up displaying their true colors and openly exposing themselves, like you just did in unequivocal terms.
Behold how this subject in their own words would "love" to see the zionist apartheid regime overthrow yet another government in the Islamic world. As if the methodical destructions of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Yemen at the hands of zionist-dominated NATO regimes weren't enough. The bloodthirst of zionist NATO cheerleaders cannot be satiated.
However let me complete the above quoted statement: you want the Islamic Republic to fall so that Iran gets balkanized, as per the zionist regime's and NATO's clearly perceptible agenda for Iran, which is fully echoing their general modus operandi against nations of the region. And among said nations, Islamic Iran is considered the big prize by world-devouring imperialists. Likewise you want Syria, Russia, the DPRK and Venezuela to lose a key strategic partner / ally of theirs, so that NATO can have it easier destabilizing them too.
Of course we couldn't have expected any less from "leftist" patsies of the empire acting as agents for the capital - Freudo-"Marxists", Trotskyists, LGBT "progressists" and so on. From the fake 1968 student "revolutions" to this very day, they haven't ceased serving the powers to be under a fallacious pretense of rebellion.
The zionist entity is totally engaged, using every realistic means at its disposal, in trying to destroy the Islamic Republic and the Iranian nation. As evident from every single measure they've taken against Iran over the past 43 years.
I know you gratuitously formulated this claim of yours, since you have no clue about the subject matter. Therefore, I shall first refute the little absurdity by way of logic exclusively, omitting concrete references to the Iranian context. After which we may examine some of the details.
So, you'd seriously have us believe the Islamic Republic is "weakening" Iran while the Iranian opposition for its part would proceed to "developing" the country and also to pursuing an "anti-zionist" policy if it was in charge... and yet, Isra"el" won't seize the golden opportunity to wreck this supposedly "weak" Iran for good, dislocating her into multiple smaller entities, if alone in order to avert potential takeover by the Iranian opposition which according to you would spell disaster for the zionists?
Because in 2003, Saddam's Iraq after more than a decade of devastating sanctions was powerful to the point of posing a major threat to the zionists perhaps? That's why the neocon zionist cabal in Washington had Iraq invaded?
In short, the assertion quoted above makes zero sense from a purely rational viewpoint. It utterly contradicts actual zionist thinking as well as zionist strategy and policy making. It's dismissive of the Bernard Lewis doctrine, the Oded Yinon plan and the historic specifics of zionist mischief since 2001. If as you claim Iran were no match for the regime in Tel Aviv, the latter would've instantly ripped Iran apart, it wouldn't be hesitating one second.
Let's move on to the plain ridiculous nature of the suggestion that Iranian opposition groups are ambitioning to confront the zionist entity. Any person with the slightest knowledge on the Iranian opposition, will be perfectly aware of the latter's complete subservience to Tel Aviv. I mean, go ahead and name one significant Iranian opposition leader or organization with an anti-zionist outlook, so we can have a real good laugh. The reason you won't is because there are none.
@RealNapster
The Iranian opposition in exile can currently be subdivided into three main clusters. The first two are diverse groupings made of political organizations, associations and activists along a range of ideological leanings.
The larger of the two is mostly coalescing around the person of Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's last king Mohammad Reza shah Pahlavi, who was ousted in the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The same autocratic shah who ruled Iran in the manner of an archetypal western and zionist client. Not that his son would be any different in this regard. When it comes to the zionists in particular, here's a couple of reports illustrating Reza Pahlavi's relationship with them:
Breaking: Yoko Ono, Iranian Prince and Others to Be Honored for Promoting Peace
Contributions to peace and "universal Jewish values" to be awarded by pro-Israel group
By Parker Richards • 01/29/16 1:07pm
Breaking: Yoko Ono, Iranian Prince and Others to Be Honored for Promoting Peace
The World Values Network will honor a wide variety of respected figures in world peace for Holocaust Remembrance Day on March 5.
observer.com
Mind you, these are zionist organizations. When they award someone like Reza Pahlavi with the title of "Champion of Jewish Values", it's definitely no longer an apolitical gesture.
Pahlavi seated next to Sheldon Adelson - extremist Likudnik zionist, Las Vegas casino magnate and major fundraiser for the Trump campaign, who notoriously advocated that Isra"el" drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.
https://old.iranintl.com/en/world/irans-exiled-prince-appeals-american-jews-solidarity
Pahlavi appealing to the zionist lobby in the USA for support. All the proof we need.
The second block among the anti-IR opposition is publicly represented by the two figures below.
One, a feminist anti-hejab agitator backed by NATO, named Masume Qomi-Kolah aka Masih Alinejad:
She's on the record for declaring that Iranians supposedly wish to inflict "the same" fate as "Saddam and Qaddafi" upon Iran's Supreme Leader - in other terms she's endorsing NATO wars of aggression against Iraq and Libya all the same. The statement is included in this short documentary, which retraces the parallels between the west's campaign against Libya and their recent hybrid war on Islamic Iran (the exact same methods are at play):
Moreover Alinejad is particularly active in lobbying for never ending sanctions against Iran, including measures such as banning Iranian athletes from international competitions etc.
Two, Hamed Esmailiun. A resident of Canada, whose wife and daughter were on board the Ukrainian airliner mistakenly downed on the day ballistic missiles were fired at America's Ayn al-Assad air base in retaliation for the murder of shahid Qasem Soleimani. Esmailiun is close to "ethno"-separatist movements, and some say to the MKO (more on the latter below).
That the "ethno"-linguistic balkanization of Iran ranks high in Tel Aviv's list of priorities is a given, as shown by this paper from an influential Isra"el"i "think tank":
Dismantle Iran Now
In Iran, more and more non-Persian minorities— who make up about half the country’s population—are demanding independence, suggesting that Iran could disintegrate into ethnic/national states. Th
besacenter.org
The second current of Iranian oppositionists would warmly welcome a repeat of the Iraqi or Syrian scenario in Iran at the hands of NATO. So would the first current (although it may at times be trying to appear somewhat less vocal about it).
The third element constitutive of the Iranian opposition landscape is made of a single organization, the MKO (so-called People's Modjahedin Organization), a treasonous terrorist cult originally adhering to a "Marxist" reading of Islam, which sided with the foreign aggressors of their motherland during the 1980-1988 Sacred Defence, in addition to murdering over 10.000 Iranians in armed attacks especially during the early years of the Islamic Revolution. Their level of brutality has been on par with "I"SIS-style atrocities. Speaking of which, the MKO's cheering for "I"SIS in the summer of 2014 was thinly veiled:
Upon its illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, the USA granted the MKO protected status.
Given that they allied with Saddam and have committed countless acts of terrorism, they have no popular support base whatsoever in Iran. However they are a quite tightly organized lot, their ageing members brainwashed beyond usual norms, and they're deeply connected to zionist and NATO intelligence services including at the operational level. Some decades ago, their former leader Masud Rajavi ordered all married members of the cult to divorce their spouses, under the pretext that this would cement their commitment to the cause. They labeled this "the divorce revolution". He then took as a bride the current head of the grouplet, Maryam Rajavi, who was among those forced divorcees.
Note the kind of people who're lending support to the MKO:
Once again, hardcore zionists. Rudy Giuliani, a supporter of Bush and Trump. John Bolton, who other than being political tied to Tel Aviv has made significant financial investments in Occupied Palestine.
A wise man once said, "tell me from where you're speaking and I'll tell you who you are." Another said, "follow the money". Apply these maxims to the Iranian opposition and you'll understand whom they are working and what they're standing for.
Anyone willing to delude themselves into the satirical notion that the opposition to the Islamic Republic would set out to challenge Isra"el" in the unlikely event that they'd manage to grab power in Tehran, is free to do so. That wouldn't make their bizarre opinion any less outlandish nor any less removed from the real world though.
And more importantly, when one is oblivious to a given topic it's preferable to refrain from issuing baseless conjectures.
If the IR were to go, Iran would cease to exist as a unified nation-state. Like virtually every other nation-state targeted by the zio-American empire in West Asia and North Africa since 9/11, 2001.
Repeating a lie won't make it accurate, I'm afraid.
There is the desi saying "Mullah ki daud masjid tak", yes ?
Irrelevant to Iran's history and politics, of which you happen not to know the first thing.
Last time you proved to be unacquainted with very basic facts surrounding recent zionist- and NATO sponsored riots in Iran, falsely assuming things such as that western leaders hadn't expressed support for so-called "regime change", or that show business figures in the west (actors, musicians and so on) hadn't mobilized in unison against the Iranian government.
I was there to set facts straight but you're refusing to show humility and draw the necessary conclusions from that brief schooling. What you've been "following" on western and zionist controlled propaganda platforms in essence boils down to fake news for the gullible - as explained in the following outlet edited by smart, honorable left wing journalists:
Iran’s unrest triggers explosion of fake news - The Grayzone
Some of the most incendiary accusations made against Iran’s government by corporate media, celebrity influencers and Western leaders in the past months are little more than fabrications. And most remain uncorrected. Protests in Iran that ostensibly began as a reaction to the death of a woman in...
thegrayzone.com
If you so choose, be my guest and keep dwelling in the ill-informed shallowness characterizing the conformist take on Iranian affairs. However stop trolling the local forum section, will you. Not least because all you're achieving is to waste precious time: no Iranian user's going to take your ranting seriously over here, believe me. To the point that none so far has deemed the stuff worthy of being replied to in depth, did they. Rather, they're laughing it off.
This said I had put a courteous request to you before, asking if you would stop tagging and quoting me. It's a form of harassment which shall be reported if it goes on unabated. Kindly try your luck with someone else, although I predict no Iranian will be willing to discuss such comical attempts at anti-Iran propaganda - whose long debunked talking points you're in fact borrowing directly from classical zionist- / western- / Saudi-authored disinformation pamphlets. Do enjoy the company of your American, zionist, Saudi brothers in arms. Must applaud you for shedding the mask, that was a noble gesture I'll admit, but still, I'm fundamentally not interested in interacting with you.
Do not tag nor quote me again (unless you came to wake up to reality, and decided to stop mimicking western mainstream media discourse).
Last edited:
Iran has been yelling "marg bar america marg bar israel" translation death to america death to israel both america and israel are still there you iran havent fought a war with both america and israel but have wrecked havoc in neighbouring countries through your proxies on the other hand america helped iran with weapons in iran contra affair against iraq in iran iraq war america removed Afghan taliban from power which were a counterweight to iran and its sectarian projects and toppling of regional countries by iran through its sectarian and regional proxies why dont iran fire its thousands of missiles directly at israel or america or american bases in the region instead of becoming a fake champion of sectarian islam which iran promotes and prophisicesNaturally you would like to see that. After all such is the trademark of every avowed zionist and NATO collaborator, even if they're posing as revolutionaries. Sooner or later, they end up displaying their true colors and openly exposing themselves, like you just did in unequivocal terms.
Behold how this subject in their own words would "love" to see the zionist apartheid regime overthrow yet another government in the Islamic world. As if the methodical destruction of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Yemen at the hands of zionist-dominated NATO regimes weren't enough. The bloodthirst of zionist NATO cheerleaders cannot be satiated.
However let me complete the above quoted statement: you want the Islamic Republic to fall so that Iran gets balkanized, as per the zionist regime's and NATO's clearly perceptible agenda for Iran, which is fully echoing their general modus operandi against nations of the region. And among said nations, Islamic Iran is considered the big prize by world-devouring imperialists. Likewise you want Syria, Russia, the DPRK and Venezuela to lose a key strategic partner / ally of theirs, so that NATO can have it easier destabilizing them too.
Of course we couldn't have expected less from "leftist" patsies of the empire acting as agents for the capital - Freudo-"Marxists", Trotskyists, LGBT "progressists" and so on. From the fake 1968 student "revolutions" to this very day, they haven't ceased serving the powers to be under a fallacious pretense of rebellion.
The zionist entity is totally engaged, using every realistic means at its disposal, in trying to destroy the Islamic Republic and the Iranian nation. As evident from every single measure they've taken against Iran over the past 43 years.
If the IR were to go, Iran would cease to exist. Like virtually every other nation-state targeted by the zio-American empire in West Asia and North Africa since 9/11, 2001.
Repeating a lie won't make it accurate in any shape or form, I'm afraid.
Irrelevant to Iran's history and politics, of which you happen not to know the first thing.
Last time you proved not be acquainted with most basic facts surrounding recent zionist- and NATO sponsored riots in Iran, falsely assuming things such as that western leaders hadn't expressed support for so-called "regime change", or that show business figures in the west hadn't mobilized in unison against the Iranian government.
I was there to set facts straight but you refused to show some humility and draw the necessary conclusions from that brief schooling. What you've been "following" on western and zionist controlled propaganda platforms, in essence is fake news for the gullible - as explained in the following outlet edited by smart, honorable left wing journalists:
Iran’s unrest triggers explosion of fake news - The Grayzone
Some of the most incendiary accusations made against Iran’s government by corporate media, celebrity influencers and Western leaders in the past months are little more than fabrications. And most remain uncorrected. Protests in Iran that ostensibly began as a reaction to the death of a woman in...
If you so choose, be my guest and dwell in the shallow ignorance which keeps characterizing the conformist, zionist- and NATO-compatible take on Iranian affairs you've been voicing. However stop trolling the local forum section. Not least because you're downright wasting time: no Iranian user's going to take your ranting seriously over here, believe me. To the point that none has deemed this stuff worthy of being addressed in depth, isn't it.
This being said I had put a rather courteous request to you before, asking that you stop tagging or quoting me. It's a form of harassment which shall get reported if it does not cease. Kindly try your luck with someone else, although I can predict no pro-Iran user will be willing to discuss such comical, sub-par attempts at anti-Iran propaganda - whose long debunked talking points you're in fact borrowing directly from tired old, classical zionist- / western- / Saudi-authored disinformation pamphlets. You believe people will be fooled by the drivel? Do enjoy the company of your American, zionist, Saudi brothers in arms. Must applaud you for dropping the mask, that was a noble gesture I'll admit, but still I'm not interested in interacting with you.
Just bug off, and never tag nor quote me (unless you came to wake up to reality and decided to stop mimicking western mainstream media discourse so blatantly).
SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
False. Iran has been in a proxy war against Washington and Tel Aviv since 1979.
Against the USA, Iran fought a hot war too, in the Persian Gulf, 1988. Resulting in an Iranian civilian airliner getting shot down in a criminal attack by the USA Navy. Get your facts straight.
Fighting terrorists and aggressors that the zionists and NATO unleashed upon the neighborhood.
No, Iran coerced the Americans to release a token number of lighter arms in exchange for mediating the liberation of western hostages in Lebanon. And after pro-Iranian fighters escalated by having the Marine barracks blown to smithereens in Beirut.
The Taleban have a neutral working relationship with Iran today. Iran backed them with weapons against American occupiers.
Moreover the US-installed Afghan government was no friend of Iran. They dispatched to Iran NATO-spies disguised as immigrants, allowed the Americans to use their territory for military operations against Iran like those spy drone overflights. Eventually Iran captured an example of the USA's top secret RQ-170 UAV, which had taken off from Bagram airbase, Afghanistan.
There's no such project on Iran's part.
From day one of the Islamic Revolution, Iran adhered to a pan-Islamic ideology and firmly rejected any notion of sectarianism. Organizing conferences where Sunni Islamic movements where invited, and then assisting Sunni Moslems in places such as Palestine - where Iran is the only state actor to extend military support to local Resistance groups, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kurdish-speaking and Arab Sunnis of Iraq against "I"SIS, as well as Afghan mojahedin fighting the Soviets.
It's Iran's enemies who are promoting sectarianist movements in hopes of isolating Shia Moslem Iran within the Moslem world.
Because the Iranian leadership is not short-sighted like Saddam, to provide the enemy with a blatant casus belli in an offensive first strike like Iraq did in Kuwait.
Here's the real question: why don't US-allied regimes of the region proceed to emulating Iran and supporting Resistance groups against zionist and western occupation forces?
There's no such thing except in the minds of those who fall for the western- and zionist-sponsored anti-Iran propaganda.
Last edited:
Cut the crap, the only sectarian cretin here is you. The reason Iran triggers you into oblivion is because they're not Sunni like yourself, otherwise all your accusations against Iran is also applicable to e.g. Saudi Arabia and Turkey in the region, and several other nations around the globe.
Reality is that you and your ilk cant cope with the fact that Iran is the only Muslim country that's actively and successfully fighting US and Israeli interests in the region; moreover Iran is the only fully sovereign Muslim country despite 40 years of brutal sanctions. Iran is actually getting stronger and it makes you and people like you very nervous.
Cope.
Iran has been creating unrest in turkey through its kurdish proxies in Pakistan with its balochistan proxies with the likes of bla blf leb ubla iran creating northern alliance in Afghanistan against the Afghan taliban and ultimately helping america to topple Afghan taliban government with america and even partcipating with american forces in Afghanistan to topple Afghan taliban government plus the biggest gem america removing saddam hussein who fired scuds and missiles at israel and was the biggest roadblock in iranian expansion was removed by america through war and with the help of iranian proxies in iraq ontop of that iran creating terrorism in Pakistan through iran created northern alliance and india in Pakistan through Afghanistan plus iran giving its territory to india and Pakistan's enemies to create terrorism in Pakistan through sistan balochistan etc heck Pakistan captured indian spy comming from iran from iranian city of chahbahar
What a joke iam first a Muslim then my fiqah and lineage comes and iam not a sunni your rant here exposes the fact that how much iran is sectarian and its directed policies are of sectarianism separatism thats why the whole world hates iran and have sanctioned this pariah state such as iran
Your sectarianism makes you assume that I'm Iranian, lil bro.
SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Iran has no Kurdish proxies in Turkey. The PKK are at war with Iran via their PJAK offshoot.
Nothing to do with Iran. Pakistan's Baluchestan province has seen unrest since shortly after independence.
Iran did not create the Northern Alliance. Much like Pakistan, Iran was backing Resistance groups against the Soviets. Then when the USSR left Afghanistan, mojahedin factions got caught up in civil strife. Iran remained loyal to her local allies.
Iran intervened to prevent needless civilian casualties in Herat once NATO invasion had become certain. Also prior to the USA invasion, associates of the Taleban had savagely murdered Iranian diplomats in Mazare Sharif, the Taleban in person had massacred civilians in areas known to be strongholds of Iran-allied parties, and the Taleban spent the 1990's kidnapping Iranian citizens in border regions for ransom.
Now could you remind us the name of the country which allowed NATO to establish supply lines on its territory for the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan? Hint: it wasn't Iran. I'll give you another hint: that country's name starts with the letter P.
Washington removed the Taleban and Saddam with the goal of encircling Iran, bringing to power anti-Iran forces in those two countries and ultimately destabilizing and invading Iran herself.
Wikileaks documents illustrate what the neocon plan was about, and how they had their sights firmly set on Iran as their next target. Bush placed Iran on his so-called "axis of evil". Yankee G.I.'s were chanting slogans like this one:
Had Iran not supported Resistance forces in Iraq and Afghanistan against USA occupiers, turning those theaters into quagmires for Washington and resulting in many hundreds of USA military casualties, had Iran not developed her defence industries as well as her regional network of allies, she would have been attacked as well.
Only once Iraq was at full fledged war against the USA. Not before. If Iran was to find herself in a similar situation, such an amount of missiles would start raining on Isra"el" nobody would be able to count them.
This is without mentioning the Iranian-supplied weapons, training and funds which have caused hundreds of casualties to zionist occupiers in Lebanon and Palestine.
The opposite is the case: Saddam was the aggressor looking for expansion, he ordered his massive army to march onto Iranian soil in an attempt to annex Iranian territory. A move he repeated afterwards in Kuwait.
After being naive enough to provide Washington with a casus belli in 1990. Naive enough to fall for the American ambassador to Kuwait's deceitful "green light".
Naive enough not to understand the true reason behind NATO's and the Warsaw Pact's simultaneous support for his aggression of Iran in the 1980's.
Saddam received entire divisions worth of weaponry, was literally flooded by arms from France, the USSR, Brazil and countless other states during his war of aggression on Islamic Iran. His effort was wholly funded by Arab monarchies of the Persian Gulf. Whilst Iran was under heavy sanctions and arms embargo.
European regimes even helped Iraq manufacture banned chemical weapons, the USA regime offered live satellite imagery to Baghdad with which to target Iranian troops. At the UN Security Council, the USA vetoed a draft resolution intended to condemn Iraq's proven use of WMD against Iran.
In the Persian Gulf tanker war, America directly sided with Iraq by attacking the Iranian Navy, and downed an Iranian civilian airliner, martyring all on board. An Iranian PoW from the IRGC Navy was tortured to death in USA custody, his body pierced with large nails.
I suggest to take a more in depth view at the history of the region.
Nope, Iranian allies did not help the Americans invade Iraq.
USA ground troops entered Iraq from the kingdom of Kuwait. Their aircraft took off from bases in Bahrein and Qatar to conduct their bombing raids against Iraq.
Cannot make sense of the above.
Pakistani authorities stated Iran wasn't involved. Meanwhile Baluch "ethno"-nationalist leaders have been living in the UAE but we're yet to hear you complain about those.
Enjoy the company of this so-called "whole world", i.e. the zio-American empire and its regional clients and vassals, if it suits your preferences.
Last edited:
What a joke usa removed anti iranian regimes like saddam and Afghan taliban to create anti iranian regimes what a joke and where did indian raw operative khulbushan yadev aka mubarak hussain patel came from not from iran but from france ontop of that the whole world knows and our intelligence appratus also called on iran not to let its territory to be used by terrorists which iran itself created if iran didnt created baloch proxies in Pakistan then why doesnt iran takes action against them our recently 4 fc soldiers got killed by iranian proxies operating from iran ontop of that iran created drug smugglers known as northern alliance in Afghanistan to create terrorism sabotage subversion propoganda against Pakistan plus to send drugs to Pakistan all drugs that comes from Pakistan comes from iranIran has no Kurdish proxies in Turkey. The PKK are at war with Iran via their PJAK offshoot.
Nothing to do with Iran. Pakistan's Baluchestan province has seen unrest since shortly after independence.
Iran did not create the Northern Alliance. Much like Pakistan, Iran was backing Resistance groups against the Soviets. Then when the USSR left Afghanistan, mojahedin factions got caught up in civil strife. Iran remained loyal to her local allies.
It was all about preventing needless civilian casualties in Herat once NATO invasion had become certain. Also prior to the USA invasion, associates of the Taleban had savagely murdered Iranian diplomats in Mazare Sharif, the Taleban in person had massacred civilians in areas known to be strongholds of Iran-allied parties, and the Taleban spent the 1990's kidnapping Iranian citizens in border regions for ransom.
Now could you remind us the name of the country which allowed NATO to establish supply lines on its territory for the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan? Hint: it wasn't Iran. I'll give you another hint: that country's name starts with the letter P.
Washington removed the Taleban and Saddam with the goal of encircling Iran, bringing to power anti-Iran forces in those two countries and ultimately destabilizing and invading Iran herself.
Wikileaks documents illustrate what the neocon plan was about, and how they had their sights firmly set on Iran as their next target. Bush placed Iran on his so-called "axis of evil". Yankee G.I.'s were chanting slogans like this one:
Had Iran not supported Resistance forces in Iraq and Afghanistan against USA occupiers, turning those theaters into quagmires for Washington and resulting in many hundreds of USA military casualties, had Iran not developed her defence industries as well as her regional network of allies, she would have been attacked as well.
Only once Iraq was at full fledged war against the USA. Not before. If Iran was to find herself in a similar situation, such a tremendous amount of Iranian missiles would start raining on Isra"el" nobody would be able to count them.
This is without mentioning the Iranian-supplied weapons, training and funds which have caused hundreds of casualties to zionist occupiers in Lebanon and Palestine.
The opposite is the case: Saddam was the aggressor looking for expansion, he ordered his massive army to enter Iran in an attempt to annex Iranian territory. A move he repeated afterwards against Kuwait.
After being naive enough to provide Washington with a casus belli in 1990. Naive enough to fall for the American ambassador to Kuwait's deceitful "green light".
Naive enough not to understand the true reason behind NATO's and the Warsaw Pact's simultaneous support for his aggression of Iran in the 1980's.
Saddam received several entire armies worth of weaponry, was literally flooded by arms from France, the USSR, Brazil and countless other states during his war of aggression on Islamic Iran. His effort was entirely funded by Arab monarchies of the Persian Gulf. Whilst Iran was under heavy sanctions and arms embargo.
European regimes even helped Iraq manufacture banned chemical weapons, the USA regime offered live satellite imagery to Baghdad with which to target Iranian troops. At the UN Security Council, the USA vetoed a draft resolution intended to condemn Iraq's proven use of WMD against Iran.
In the Persian Gulf tanker war, America directly sided with Saddam and attacked the Iranian Navy, downed an Iranian civilian airliner, martyring all on board. An Iranian PoW from the IRGC Navy was tortured to death in USA custody, his body pierced with large nails.
I suggest to take a more in depth view at the history of the region.
Nope, Iranian allies did not help the Americans invade Iraq.
USA ground troops entered Iraq from the kingdom of Kuwait. Their aircraft took off from bases in Bahrein and Qatar to conduct their bombing raids against Iraq.
Cannot make sense of the above.
Pakistani authorities stated Iran wasn't involved. Meanwhile Baluch "ethno"-nationalist leaders have been living in the UAE but we're yet to hear you complain about those.
Enjoy the company of this so-called "whole world", i.e. the zio-American empire and its regional clients and vassals, if it suits your preferences.
Similar threads
