What's new

'Sugar gel' helps premature babies

I am not interested in continuing this discussion
I believe you should at least provide a reasoning to what you call religious miracle which science can prove 1400 yrs later and also how 2 who call themselves Muslims can feed discomfort in this as well as how bringing in France of 1880s was more acceptable than Saudi Arabia of 600 AD?

check the posts above
What posts? Medicine back then was no miracle even during Roman and Greek time it was called medicine!
 
.
I believe you should at least provide a reasoning to what you call religious miracle which science can prove 1400 yrs later and also how 2 who call themselves Muslims can feed discomfort in this as well as how bringing in France of 1880s was more acceptable than Saudi Arabia of 600 AD?


What posts? Medicine back then was no miracle even during Roman and Greek time it was called medicine!
These mods will neither understand nor answer and when they have no answer they will simply use their authority and ban us
 
.
@Syed.Ali.Haider and @Akheilos can we keep those Miricle Hadiths out of the discussion? I dont like the way the discussion is moving so I deleted them

I am asking politely because I didnt want to ban you both from thread and issue infractions
no discussion I am too old to know the intent.


thanks for your support

Understood Sir. I have already made my point. Insistence will not make a difference. :D
 
. .
Here is the proper Abstract, not the news story, with this key result: "Dextrose gel reduced the frequency of treatment failure compared with placebo (16 [14%] vs 29 [24%]; relative risk 0·57, 95% CI 0·33-0·98; p=0·04)" and this interpretation: "Treatment with dextrose gel is inexpensive and simple to administer. Dextrose gel should be considered for first-line treatment to manage hypoglycaemia in late preterm and term babies in the first 48 h after birth."

That is all.


Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. - PubMed - NCBI
Lancet. 2013 Dec 21;382(9910):2077-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61645-1. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Harris DL1, Weston PJ2, Signal M3, Chase JG3, Harding JE4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Neonatal hypoglycaemia is common, and a preventable cause of brain damage. Dextrose gel is used to reverse hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes; however, little evidence exists for its use in babies. We aimed to assess whether treatment with dextrose gel was more effective than feeding alone for reversal of neonatal hypoglycaemia in at-risk babies.

METHODS:
We undertook a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a tertiary centre in New Zealand between Dec 1, 2008, and Nov 31, 2010. Babies aged 35-42 weeks' gestation, younger than 48-h-old, and at risk of hypoglycaemia were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated blocked randomisation, to 40% dextrose gel 200 mg/kg or placebo gel. Randomisation was stratified by maternal diabetes and birthweight. Group allocation was concealed from clinicians, families, and all study investigators. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a blood glucose concentration of less than 2·6 mmol/L after two treatment attempts. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000623392.

FINDINGS:
Of 514 enrolled babies, 242 (47%) became hypoglycaemic and were randomised. Five babies were randomised in error, leaving 237 for analysis: 118 (50%) in the dextrose group and 119 (50%) in the placebo group. Dextrose gel reduced the frequency of treatment failure compared with placebo (16 [14%] vs 29 [24%]; relative risk 0·57, 95% CI 0·33-0·98; p=0·04). We noted no serious adverse events. Three (3%) babies in the placebo group each had one blood glucose concentration of 0·9 mmol/L. No other adverse events took place.

INTERPRETATION:
Treatment with dextrose gel is inexpensive and simple to administer. Dextrose gel should be considered for first-line treatment to manage hypoglycaemia in late preterm and term babies in the first 48 h after birth.

FUNDING:
Waikato Medical Research Foundation, the Auckland Medical Research Foundation, the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust, the Health Research Council of New Zealand, and the Rebecca Roberts Scholarship.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
 
.
Here is the proper Abstract, not the news story, with this key result: "Dextrose gel reduced the frequency of treatment failure compared with placebo (16 [14%] vs 29 [24%]; relative risk 0·57, 95% CI 0·33-0·98; p=0·04)" and this interpretation: "Treatment with dextrose gel is inexpensive and simple to administer. Dextrose gel should be considered for first-line treatment to manage hypoglycaemia in late preterm and term babies in the first 48 h after birth."

That is all.


Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. - PubMed - NCBI
Lancet. 2013 Dec 21;382(9910):2077-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61645-1. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Harris DL1, Weston PJ2, Signal M3, Chase JG3, Harding JE4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Neonatal hypoglycaemia is common, and a preventable cause of brain damage. Dextrose gel is used to reverse hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes; however, little evidence exists for its use in babies. We aimed to assess whether treatment with dextrose gel was more effective than feeding alone for reversal of neonatal hypoglycaemia in at-risk babies.

METHODS:
We undertook a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a tertiary centre in New Zealand between Dec 1, 2008, and Nov 31, 2010. Babies aged 35-42 weeks' gestation, younger than 48-h-old, and at risk of hypoglycaemia were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated blocked randomisation, to 40% dextrose gel 200 mg/kg or placebo gel. Randomisation was stratified by maternal diabetes and birthweight. Group allocation was concealed from clinicians, families, and all study investigators. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a blood glucose concentration of less than 2·6 mmol/L after two treatment attempts. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000623392.

FINDINGS:
Of 514 enrolled babies, 242 (47%) became hypoglycaemic and were randomised. Five babies were randomised in error, leaving 237 for analysis: 118 (50%) in the dextrose group and 119 (50%) in the placebo group. Dextrose gel reduced the frequency of treatment failure compared with placebo (16 [14%] vs 29 [24%]; relative risk 0·57, 95% CI 0·33-0·98; p=0·04). We noted no serious adverse events. Three (3%) babies in the placebo group each had one blood glucose concentration of 0·9 mmol/L. No other adverse events took place.

INTERPRETATION:
Treatment with dextrose gel is inexpensive and simple to administer. Dextrose gel should be considered for first-line treatment to manage hypoglycaemia in late preterm and term babies in the first 48 h after birth.

FUNDING:
Waikato Medical Research Foundation, the Auckland Medical Research Foundation, the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust, the Health Research Council of New Zealand, and the Rebecca Roberts Scholarship.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Apparently you ONLY understand things if YOU post them hence I see why it annoys you that something was already practiced before some gori chamri found it

Sugar Gel Prevents Brain Damage In Premature Babies: The Success Of The ‘Sugar Babies’ Study

Poster Presentations: Neonatology - Other
Pediatric Research (2011) 70, 652–652; doi:10.1038/pr.2011.877

Randomised Trial of Dextrose Gel for Treating Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: The Sugar Babies Study
D L Harris1,2, P J Weston1, M R Battin2,3 and J E Harding2

  1. 1Newborn Intensive Care, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton
  2. 2Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  3. 3Newborn Services, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
Background and Aims:Neonatal hypoglycaemia is common and linked to poor neurodevelopmental outcome. There is a paucity of data to guide treatment. We sought to determine whether treatment with 40% dextrose gel is more effective than feeding alone in reversing hypoglycaemia in the first 48 hours after birth.

Methods: Randomised, placebo controlled, double-blinded trial comparing the incidence of treatment failure in babies randomised to receive 40%dextrose gel or placebo gel. Eligible babies were ≥35 weeks gestation and at risk for hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic babies (blood glucose < 2.6mM, glucose oxidase method) were randomised, received gel 0.5ml (200mg) /kg massaged into the buccal membrane, and were encouraged to feed. Blood glucose was measured 30 minutes after treatment, and gel was repeated if hypoglycaemia persisted. Primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as blood glucose concentration < 2.6mM after two doses of gel 30 minutes apart.

Results: 514 babies were enrolled, of whom 242 (47%) were randomised, 122 to dextrose and 120 to placebo gel. The median (range) birth weight was 2870 (1590-5550) g and gestation 37 (35-42) weeks. Babies randomised to dextrose gel were half as likely to meet criteria for treatment failure (14 (11%) vs 28 (23%), p =0.01), and were also less likely to be admitted to Newborn Intensive Care for treatment of hypoglycaemia (15 (12%) vs 26 (22%), p =0.05).

Conclusion: Dextrose gel 200mg/kg is more effective than feeding alone, and should be considered for first line therapy of hypoglycaemia in late-preterm and term infants.


Pediatric Research - Abstract of article: Randomised Trial of Dextrose Gel for Treating Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: The Sugar Babies Study
 
.
Failure of treatment in 16 babies instead of 24. This is just a preliminary step in evaluating this technique. May be the addition of other "ingredients" will increase the efficacy?

Edit: Ingredients, such as other medications, of course.
 
Last edited:
.
Failure of treatment in 16 babies instead of 24. This is just a preliminary step in evaluating this technique. May be the addition of other "ingredients" will increase the efficacy?
reported for derailing with a certain mindset...You cant always be bailed out by mods ...it is saiddoing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity....You should have realized that when you did it 2nd time!
 
. .
Apparently, the dextrose gel product is covered by a patent:

Patent US2926121 - Therapeutic candy-like product and its preparation - Google Patents

Therapeutic candy-like product and its preparation
US 2926121
damn some people are just dying to make it unrealistic...didnt know you could get as butthurt as that!

Where does it say it cant be equated to SUGAR or NORMAL sugar cant be used? Maybe you should research on dates and find out if instead of needing a patent, NATURE ALREADY PATENTED IT!
 
.
Simple sugar is absorbed too quickly and causes spikes in the BGL. That is why "A dose of sugar given as a gel rubbed into the inside of the cheek is a cheap and effective way to protect premature babies against brain damage". That gel has to be prepared by exacting methods, not by any "other method".
 
.
"A dose of sugar given as a gel rubbed into the inside of the cheek is a cheap and effective way to protect premature babies against brain damage". That gel has to be prepared by exacting methods, not by any "other method".
No science proofs that...Plus natural sugar of fruits is not the same as ANY OTHER SUGAR

Sad to see a day a scientist is dying to look like a fool just coz he has problem digesting a non white already practiced it before the white introduced it to him :tsk:
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom