Su-30 Coming to Iran? Elite Russian Fighters in Iranian Hands Set be a Game Changer for the ME

[Cthulhu]

If you can imagine the sun rising from the west then clearly you can imagine Su-30 coming to Iran.

 

[500]

But you also know that 40 years ago Iran's military couldnt function without foreign military officers who were embedded within the Iranian armed forces?

It perfectly could function. Much better than failed current army.

"Uproar"only happened after Russia had used the base a few times to smash ISIS at the initial part of the Syrian war. Iran went for practical interests then.

Russia virtually did not attack ISIS until 2017. They only bombed anti-ISIS rebels.

because Su-30s in Syria drop only dummy bombs it doesnt mean Su-30 in general cant drop PGM.

Syria is a test bed of Russian arms. Since Su-30 drops bombs it means it can't.

LIAR. Search Su-30 in wikipedia and under weapons it shows it can carry precision guided missiles.

LOL @ wikipedia.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Russia virtually did not attack ISIS until 2017. They only bombed anti-ISIS rebels.

Russia is a sovereign state. Russia does whatever it wants. It's no one else's business.

Listen you alawite parasite

@waz @The Eagle @Horus

sectarianism and ethnic slur are against forum rules

Yes, Russians killed millions of Nazis but only after they were invaded by the Nazis. Before that the Russians and Nazis were buddies

America and Nazis were buddies too. What's your point?

Syria is a test bed of Russian arms. Since Su-30 drops bombs it means it can't.

Incorrect. Su-30 never dropped bombs in Syria. Su-30 only used guns and rockets.

 

[500]

Incorrect. Su-30 never dropped bombs in Syria. Su-30 only used guns and rockets.

Right, they carry bombs for lulz

Anyhow u confirm my point that Su-30 is NOT a strike fighter like F-15E.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Anyhow u confirm my point that Su-30 is NOT a strike fighter like F-15E.

Su-30 and F-15E are multi role. They can do air to air and air to surface with equal ability.

T220 targeting pod tested on Su-35 prototype 902. BTW, the latest PGM are GPS guided, receive target GPS locations from drones, do not require targeting pods.

 

[500]

Su-30 and F-15E are multi role. They can do air to air and air to surface with equal ability.

F-15E is equipped with advanced target pods and carried tens of thousands precision strikes since 1991.

Su-30 does not have any pods at all and never carried any precision strikes.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

F-15E is equipped with advanced target pods and carried tens of thousands precision strikes since 1991.

Su-30 does not have any pods at all and never carried any precision strikes.

yes it does

BTW what's your obsession about targeting pods? Newest PGM don't need targeting pods.

 

[500]

yes it does

No it does not.

1) Su-30 does not carry any targeting pods.
2) Su-30 never carried as single precision strike.

BTW what's your obsession about targeting pods? Newest PGM don't need targeting pods.

Again your ignorance:

1) Pods are necessary to search and identify targets.
2) Pods are necessary to navigate at night.
3) Pods are necessary to deploy laser guided munition.

All 3 are critical.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

1) Su-30 does not carry any targeting pods.

Incorrect. Su-30MKI has Litening pod from Israel. Su-30MKM has Damocles pod from France. Su-30SM has T220 pod from Russia.

2) Su-30 never carried as single precision strike.

You don't know this for sure.

1) Pods are necessary to search and identify targets.

Incorrect. These days they use long loiter UAV for that and passing locations of targets to GPS guided ordnance carried on planes. This enables planes to stay out of danger zone and attack from safe stand off distance and altitude and in any weather condition and carry more ordnance.

2) Pods are necessary to navigate at night.

Incorrect. B-17 flew from Britain to Berlin and back at night in the 1940s and they didn't have targeting pods. These days there are GPS guided navigation and automated autopilot take off, flight, landing.

3) Pods are necessary to deploy laser guided munition.

Incorrect. F-117, Su-25 / 24 / 34 do not carry pods. They have fuselage mounted laser designators for guiding laser guided PGM.

 

[925boy]

How do you know what Su-30 drops in Syria?

I dont. I was going along with @500 's scenario that Su-30s drop dummy bombs in Syria.

It perfectly could function. Much better than failed current army.

Offcourse it could function, but only with foreigners assistance. do u still get the point?or u see no problem with that still?

Russia virtually did not attack ISIS until 2017. They only bombed anti-ISIS rebels.

Bullllshyyyyyttt. see the attached image. Wikipedia says Russia did first strikes in Syria against different rebels, including ISIL in 2015. why lie when you dont know better?

Syria is a test bed of Russian arms. Since Su-30 drops bombs it means it can't.

Syria being a testbed for Russian arms has nothing to do with Su-30 and whether it can drop PGMs. Your logic = since Su-30s in Syria drop only dummy bombs = Su-30s cant carry PGM. You definitely lack good logic.

LOL @ wikipedia.

No, LOL @ YOU! You VS Wikipeidia who does PDF Trust more? nuff said.

 

[500]

Incorrect. Su-30MKI has Litening pod from Israel. Su-30MKM has Damocles pod from France. Su-30SM has T220 pod from Russia.

Correct. T220 is experimental never used on Su-30 and no one will sell lightening or Damocles to Iran.

You don't know this for sure.

I know it for sure. You claimed urself that Su-30 never dropped even unguided bomb, means you are a troll.

Incorrect. These days they use long loiter UAV for that and passing locations of targets to GPS guided ordnance carried on planes. This enables planes to stay out of danger zone and attack from safe stand off distance and altitude and in any weather condition and carry more ordnance.

Correct. UAV's can't fly far behind enemy lights + there is a very big lag.

Incorrect. B-17 flew from Britain to Berlin and back at night in the 1940s and they didn't have targeting pods. These days there are GPS guided navigation and automated autopilot take off, flight, landing.

Correct. B-17 never made low altitude flights which are critical for non stealthy aicraft.

Incorrect. F-117, Su-25 / 24 / 34 do not carry pods. They have fuselage mounted laser designators for guiding laser guided PGM.

Correct. These called internal; pods and Su-30 does not have one. You are just an ignorant who does not know to lose.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Sukhois will be thrice as expensive under current currency devaluation.

 

[500]

Offcourse it could function, but only with foreigners assistance. do u still get the point?or u see no problem with that still?

No it function fine, for example in Oman.

Bullllshyyyyyttt. see the attached image. Wikipedia says Russia did first strikes in Syria against different rebels, including ISIL in 2015. why lie when you dont know better?

Russia lied.

Syria being a testbed for Russian arms has nothing to do with Su-30 and whether it can drop PGMs. Your logic = since Su-30s in Syria drop only dummy bombs = Su-30s cant carry PGM. You definitely lack good logic.

Su-30 never carried a pod and only dummy bombs. F-14 can carry dummy bombs as well.

No, LOL @ YOU! You VS Wikipeidia who does PDF Trust more? nuff said.

I go to work now. I'll show u later many examples of Russian lies about so called fight against ISIS.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Sukhois will be thrice as expensive under current currency devaluation.

Rial is strong against ruble.

I'll show u later many examples of Russian lies about so called fight against ISIS.

Who do you think you are? Just another crazy person on the internet.

Correct. T220 is experimental never used on Su-30 and no one will sell lightening or Damocles to Iran.

Iran has good relation with France. France can sell Damocles to Iran.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Correct. T220 is experimental never used on Su-30 and no one will sell lightening or Damocles to Iran.

Its strange you claim USSR can't produce a functioning targeting Pod.
by the way if Iran is really interested in Su-30(which I doubt) ,we ourselves produce several different model of targeting pods. for example our TLS-99 is at least comparable to french ATLIS-2