Persian Gulf 1906
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2018
- Messages
- 1,428
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
two iranians have told you otherwise but you know better of course.BS. Russia and Iran have good relation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
two iranians have told you otherwise but you know better of course.BS. Russia and Iran have good relation.
two iranians have told you otherwise but you know better of course.
T220 and Kh59MK2 exist only in cartoon movies. Su-30 is flying in Syria for 2.5 years and only drops dumb bombs there on villages without any air defence.Su-30 has T220 EO and laser targeting pod developed from Su-34's Platan fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system sort of like F-117's fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-30 is armed with all kinds of PGM including laser, TV, GPS, as well as Kh-59MK2 air launched land attack cruise missiles range more than 300 km.
even if we have best relation , our constitution won't allow itBS. Russia and Iran have good relation.
Su-30 is flying in Syria for 2.5 years and only drops dumb bombs there on villages without any air defence.
even if we have best relation , our constitution won't allow it
i speak for one more iranian than you doAnd who do you speak for? All Iranians?
i speak for one more iranian than you do
Su-30 carries dumb bombs in Syria. 99% of Russian strikes in Syria are dumb bombs. Only Su-34 uses guided bombs in very rare occasions.Su-30 is not used for ground attack in Syria. Only Su-24M / 34 / 25SM are. Su-24M has Kaira-24 fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-34 has Platan fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-25SM has SOLT-25 fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-30 can drop GPS guided bombs without targeting pod.
Su-30 carries dumb bombs in Syria. 99% of Russian strikes in Syria are dumb bombs. Only Su-34 uses guided bombs in very rare occasions.
Anyhow u confirm my point that Su-30 is a fighter and not bomber.
F-14 is much better fighter though.
I agree. Iran needs to move away from Russia because it has proven time and time again over the last 40 years that it is totally controlled by Israel/US and cannot be trusted to adhere to signed contracts.
Pakistan has good experience in the development of JF-17 and China is starting to overtake Russia in terms of jet technology (finally resolving their engine problems and moving forward with stealth tech very nicely).
Of course Russia has its own interests but that's not mutually exclusive with saying that it has consistently been a very bad and unreliable ally to Iran (from reneging on a signed s-300 defensive contract to voting for UNSC sanctions against Iran).Beggars cant be choosers
You should count yourself lucky that anyone was going to sell defence weapons to Iran. Do you really blame the Russians for Iran being in the situation it is. Russia has its own interests just like any country should have and its own problems, its not up to Russia to pick up Iran's problems.
Tell me which country is going to sell Iran weapons and risk pressure and sanctions? China is going for a a business orientated strategy, they are not going to risk their economy for Iran. Look at what happened to China's ZTE phone manufacture when they got caught selling to Iran. They got banned from importing chips and nearly 50,000 Chinese were about to lose their jobs.
Pakistan cant even finish the I.P Pipeline because of outside pressures and you now expect to jointly produce advanced weapons?
You need to be realistic, Iran does not have much of a choice.
But you also know that 40 years ago Iran's military couldnt function without foreign military officers who were embedded within the Iranian armed forces?F-14 is much better than Su-30. Ironic that Irans air force 40 years ago was way stronger than today.
"Uproar"only happened after Russia had used the base a few times to smash ISIS at the initial part of the Syrian war. Iran went for practical interests then.This is a very sensitive issue in Iran. They tried to let Russia use Hamedan air base but there was a lot of uproar so they had to kick them out.
because Su-30s in Syria drop only dummy bombs it doesnt mean Su-30 in general cant drop PGM.Su-30 carries dumb bombs in Syria. 99% of Russian strikes in Syria are dumb bombs. Only Su-34 uses guided bombs in very rare occasions.
Anyhow u confirm my point that Su-30 is a fighter and not bomber. F-14 is much better fighter though.
LIAR. Search Su-30 in wikipedia and under weapons it shows it can carry precision guided missiles.Su-30 can drop only dumb bombs..
because Su-30s in Syria drop only dummy bombs it doesnt mean Su-30 in general cant drop PGM.
Of course Russia has its own interests but that's not mutually exclusive with saying that it has consistently been a very bad and unreliable ally to Iran (from reneging on a signed s-300 defensive contract to voting for UNSC sanctions against Iran).
It's in everyone's interests to resist the US's unilateral attempts to bully the rest of the world into submission.
I never said I expect to jointly produce weapons with Pakistan, someone else said that and I simply said Pakistan has decent experience in that area.
You said you wanted to distance Iran from Russia because of the s-300 and voting UNSC sanctions against Iran and then mentioned Pakistan's experience. That implied to me you wanted to jointly produce weapons with them. If thats not what you meant then I dont know what was the point of you making that statement. Yes Pakistan has experience your talking about but so does many other countries.I never said I expect to jointly produce weapons with Pakistan, someone else said that and I simply said Pakistan has decent experience in that area.
Su-30 is not used for ground attack in Syria. Only Su-24M / 34 / 25SM are. Su-24M has Kaira-24 fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-34 has Platan fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-25SM has SOLT-25 fuselage mounted EO and laser targeting system. Su-30 can drop GPS guided bombs without targeting pod.
Hamadan is not a Russia base. Nothing goes against Iran constitution Russia planes use it.
using it means giving part of it to Russia and that's forbidden even if its for peaceful purposes .اصل یکصد و چهل و ششم
استقرار هر گونه پایگاه نظامی خارجی در کشور هر چند به عنوان استفادههای صلحآمیز باشد ممنوع است.
in trade both side must want something , the question is that Iran want any weapon that is on the market?Beggars cant be choosers
You should count yourself lucky that anyone was going to sell defence weapons to Iran. Do you really blame the Russians for Iran being in the situation it is. Russia has its own interests just like any country should have and its own problems, its not up to Russia to pick up Iran's problems.
Tell me which country is going to sell Iran weapons and risk pressure and sanctions? China is going for a a business orientated strategy, they are not going to risk their economy for Iran. Look at what happened to China's ZTE phone manufacture when they got caught selling to Iran. They got banned from importing chips and nearly 50,000 Chinese were about to lose their jobs.
Pakistan cant even finish the I.P Pipeline because of outside pressures and you now expect to jointly produce advanced weapons?
You need to be realistic, Iran does not have much of a choice.
Uproar happened as soon as the photo of Russia airplane there get published on the net."Uproar"only happened after Russia had used the base a few times to smash ISIS at the initial part of the Syrian war. Iran went for practical interests then.