Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
So the poonch rebellion against the hindu tyrant never happened ?You didn't let them choose their destiny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the poonch rebellion against the hindu tyrant never happened ?You didn't let them choose their destiny.
Kashmir was a free princely state, your country invaded the land and now trying to mark it as your own territory.Actually it is India who did not let people of Jammu and Kashmir choose their destiny.
Muslims of Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir are happy being with Muslim Pakistan.
However the Muslims of Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh hate Indian occupation.
Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir want to be liberated from Indian rule.
Hold a plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir and lets see who get Kashmir.
Actually you are wrong.Kashmir was a free princely state, your country invaded the land and now trying to mark it as your own territory.
Lol, plebiscite was proposed in 1949, back then you didn't allowed it because it didn't suited your agenda. Now we won't allow it for the same reason.
First take back all the pakjabis and other people out from your administered Kashmir make the demography same as 1947, ask China to hand back Shakasgam valley which you gifted away, we will settle back the Kashmiri hindus back in the valley, pak army must pull out and only then UN will conduct the said plebiscite. Are you ready for it?
So the poonch rebellion against the hindu tyrant never happened ?
This has already been answered. These people come from a socialist party.Actually it did take place . . video is about a month old.
not sure for what they are asking azadi from Pakistan
You are absolutely spot on.History and Indian trolls don't go together. Let's also very casually forget the efforts of gilgit scouts and major brown and their efforts and the decision of the elders of gilgit baltistan who after attaining freedom from dogra rule, wilfully joined pakistan on the advice of major brown. Yep let's all blame evil invaders.
What is truly interesting is the mindset if Indians and Indian media. Indians and indian media and indian analysts openly call for the dismemberment of pakistan into several pieces whereas our analysts don't even know the word maoists. Our media does not highlight separatists in India apart fe disputed Kashmir but theirs is waiting for any loser to make a statement and be branded so and so leaders.
It showcases their obsession as well as their complete interference in our internal affairs when we don't do the same.
Tch. After all of that why shouldn't we perceive India as an enemy and the animosity an existential threat.
You should ask why this happened to Qayyum Khan, Muslim league and Muslim conference of Jammu. Why instigate communal violence in a peaceful state to join Pakistan.So the poonch rebellion against the hindu tyrant never happened ?
So rebelling against a tyrant is wrong, huh?You should ask why this happened to Qayyum Khan, Muslim league and Muslim conference of Jammu. Why instigate communal violence in a peaceful state to join Pakistan.
This has already been answered. These people come from a socialist party.
Actually you are wrong.
LOL, nice try with your lies. It is India which never held the referendum that Nehru promised.
Dont obfuscate us. You won't succeed.
Just because it is a forum, you think you can get away with your lies?
The referendum the Nehru promised is binding and still is.
Stop lying.
How can Nehru promised a referendum when the resolution was itself passed in the UN?Actually you are wrong.
LOL, nice try with your lies. It is India which never held the referendum that Nehru promised.
Dont obfuscate us. You won't succeed.
Just because it is a forum, you think you can get away with your lies?
The referendum the Nehru promised is binding and still is.
Stop lying.
That argument has already been debunkedAll Kahsmir was supposed to be handed over to India before the referendum.
I have answered this already.How can Nehru promised a referendum when the resolution was itself passed in the UN?
The first condition to referendum asked the pak army to vacate the occupied territory. We are still waiting for you to comply.
That argument has already been debunked
Pakistan's point of view is that the rebellion was against a tyrant.
Nice try though. Your arguments fall flat on the ground.
I hate it when Indians say "Pakistani tribesmen were supposed to evacuate Kashmir before a referendum could take place."
I have answered this already.
It was peaceful?Wtf it was hell for Muslims particularly for Muslims of our region they even skinned people as punishmentYou should ask why this happened to Qayyum Khan, Muslim league and Muslim conference of Jammu. Why instigate communal violence in a peaceful state to join Pakistan.
So says the Hindu dictatorAll Kahsmir was supposed to be handed over to India before the referendum.
Last time Indian media showed protests they turned out tp be protests against loadshedding and delayed pensions in KarachiSo ?
that doesnt mean that protest never happened.