A protest is not an attempt to control a third party, it's just a civilised atempt of making your case to a entity which claims to be natural ally. And as you are stating F16's sale is to develop conventional capabilities, you are contradicting the US's own version of intended application.
Two Flaws in the statement. First, You yourself are contradicting US's logic of Military aid as you confess this transfer is to bolster Pakistan military strength against India.
Second, development of conventional strength will increase nuclear threshold, then by applying the same logic, what kind of conventional strength would it take for Pakistan to completely denuclearize. There are no metrics measurable to a first use nuclear threshold, as your threshold is neither defined nor measurable.
India is just doing it's diligence by opposing military aid which will most likely will be used against India.
But preceding paragraphs, show the intent of building conventional capabilities and not dealing threats of terrorism, and I can't recall when Aim 120C5's were used against terrorists?
ABSOLUTELY disingenuous, If you are claiming 60,000 lives sacrificed, you are backing the 30000 odd terrorists who lost their lives. Are you now officially backing them as a loss of the Pakistani State? With this 60,000 number you are overstating the civilian lives by almost 100%.
Let us know when you make up your mind for intended prime use of these F16's provided as military aid, wether they are to build conventional capability against India, or to provide air support in WoT. and then base your justification. If you choose the middle ground of dual purpose, then we are just doing our due diligence. US arming Pakistan against India is not a new phenomenon, and we take due note of it.
Stability of any country is it's own interest. In is detrimental to India, to ensure protection of it's interests like stability, security and development in any sphere is not dependent on any third party.