Stronger Pakistan means Stable India

[45'22']

dude we have Pashtoon Wizards , you don't want to take lonely mountain from us .. Smaug aka Talibragon are living that mountains ..

Abey party badal li...tu toh orc tha na
Anyways i am out b4 waz bans me from the thread

 

[halupridol]

Like your avatar says, I'll sedate future stupid posts of yours.

haha,,,i was hoping, someone frm the usual suspects will reply,,not u.
btw the post may sound stupid but not necessarily wrong altogether

 

[Laozi]

And no matter how many guns india buys it cant buys the needed pair of balls and will resort to just hot air flying from its ministers, as it wasn't Pakistan but india that threatened war both in 2002 and 2008 then chickened out.So tell me what good is your greater conventional strength if you cant use it?

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

 

[waz]

haha,,,i was hoping, someone frm the usual suspects will reply,,not u.
btw the post may sound stupid but not necessarily wrong altogether

It's stupid and it's wrong. You acknowledge this as well i.e. "hahahahah" .Post sensibly please.

 

[CHD]

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

@Chinese-Dragon @beijingwalker Isn't it ironic, indians consider everything chinese of inferior quality but never miss a chance to quote Sun Tzu, The Art of War

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

It is matter of great concern, that india is trying to control the foreign policy of independent states like US. At the same time it is dangerous for the stability of entire region. Indian lobbies continuously opposed sale of F-16s to Pakistan and they are worried that why US is selling F-16s to the country in a troubled relationship with india. However they failed to understand that how development of conventional capabilities of Pakistan is infact blessing for india as well?

Strong conventional war fighting capabilities of Pakistan and stable Pakistan is good for the stability of entire region. Peace is directly proportional with the stability and stability depends upon capacities and capabilities. Development of conventional war fighting capability and Nuclear threshold is interdependent on each other. Development of conventional strength of Pakistan will increse the nuclear threshold. Good for the india. I don't know why indian leaders can't understand that improvement in conventional capabilities of Pakistan is blessing for them.

Pakistan is facing multidimensional threats of terrorism from inside and outside its boundaries. In past few years 60,000 people sacrificed thier lives in Pakistan to build progressive and stable neighbour for India. To our surprise there are many confirm and unconfirmed reports about direct involvement of so called neighbour in this bloodshed. Now they are trying to resist capacity building of Pakistan against non state actors. Afterall no one wants to see dying thier assets with greater precision and it is thier last effort to save TTP from the precision strike capability of new F-16s

Indian establishment is suffering from Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) vis-a-vis Paks. They want Paks to be dead. So, a stable Pak is out of question for them. Every incremental development by Paks, no matter how miniscule it is, increases their OCD exponentially. Even after all these setbacks if Paks can transduce their celebrated 7X larger arch enemy to this level, it needs to be considered as a success in itself…

 

[45'22']

@Chinese-Dragon @beijingwalker Isn't it ironic, indians consider everything chinese of inferior quality but never miss a chance to quote Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Some Pakistanis call Shehzad as Chinese Kohli
It gives us an impression on how the world or for that matter even their allies see them

 

[halupridol]

It's stupid but not wrong. i acknowledge this as well i.e. "hehehe" .Post sensibly please.

aye aye sir!

 

[Laozi]

@Chinese-Dragon Isn't it ironic, indian consider everything chinese of inferior quality but never miss a chance to quote Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Indians are pragmatic people.

They are taught to gain knowledge from every region and religion.

Most Indians / Hindus are skeptical but they are generally willing to accept and adapt to anything good from any region or religion

 

[CHD]

Indians are pragmatic people.

They are taught to gain knowledge from every region and religion.

Most Indians / Hindus are skeptical but they are generally willing to accept and adapt to anything good from any region or religion

which hindus, upper or lower caste?

 

[Laozi]

which hindus, upper or lower caste?

Hindus were the people who inhabited the land mass of South Asia from Himalayas to Indian Ocean from Indus river to far east for last 8 to 10 thousand years, later on they got divided in other religions and castes

 

[CHD]

Hindus were the people who inhabited the land mass of South Asia from Himalayas to Indian Ocean from Indus river to far east for last 8 to 10 thousand years, later on they got divided in other religions and castes

If hinduism is so old and so many people followed, why didn't it spread like Islam and Christainity? how could it remain in one country for 10,000 years and dont spread?
Or was there some Vedic kind of wall around sub-continent due to which outside world coudn't see it?

 

[Laozi]

If hinduism is so old and so many people followed, why didn't it spread like Islam and Christainity? how could it remain in one country for 10,000 years and dont spread?
Or was there some Vedic kind of wall around sub-continent due to which outside world coudn't see it?

You are right. Brahmins who were proficient in Vedas built a wall around themselves. they never taught Sanskrit to others whom they considered inferior. They made rules to ban any non-Hindu to become Hindu. While other religions followed the policy of spreading their beliefs far and wide and having more and more followers.

 

[Paksanity]

I think we deliberately do this to keep them obsessed with f 16. Pretty soon these jets will belong to a museum. And they'll fight extremely hard to keep the museum pieces.


I think we deliberately do this to keep them obsessed with f 16. Pretty soon these jets will belong to a museum. And they'll fight extremely hard to keep the museum pieces.

You think? Hate comes naturally to you. OP is right. Conventional weapons restore balance and ensure stability in the region. You can't have it all nor can we. Better to come to terms with realities.

Hindus were the people who inhabited the land mass of South Asia from Himalayas to Indian Ocean from Indus river to far east for last 8 to 10 thousand years, later on they got divided in other religions and castes

What fantasy land are you living in? You mean to tell there were Hindus living in Pakistan as a majority? 8-10000 years ago? There were Hindus living in India 10000 years ago? How insecure one can really get.

Now get back to topic. You never were here as a majority part of society nor will ever be. Learn to respect your neighbours. We have every right to grow strong and buy weapons for our need. We aren't the ones who give up.

 

[Laozi]

What fantasy land are you living in? You mean to tell there were Hindus living in Pakistan as a majority? 8-10000 years ago? There were Hindus living in India 10000 years ago? How insecure one can really get.

Now get back to topic. You never were here as a majority part of society nor will ever be. Learn to respect your neighbours. We have every right to grow strong and buy weapons for our need. We aren't the ones who give up.

History books are written by scholars having different views therefore present days history books of our two nations may differ. That could be the reason of your terming our understanding of our history as our insecurity. BTW googling independent sources may come handy to clear some confusions.

On Topic : Pakistan is a sovereign Nation and has every right to arm itself with any weapons conventional or otherwise as it may desire according to its threat perception.