Pardon me for asking - but are you illiterate ??
I have already clarified that Herons were not even in Israeli Defence Forces in 1999 let alone IAF and that the Searcher deal was concluded before the even the first infiltrator was detected in Kargil. Not during the war.
As for the Imageries they were transferred by Ofeq Satellites during the war.
Yet you keep posting the same crap link with same bolded lines. Posting it 100 times doesnt make it true.
Or are you pretending to be Goebbels repeating the lie again and again till it becomes the truth.?
Either way you just FAIL !.
I am entirely literate. I posted an actual quote by an IAF air marshall who said, "The Israeli Heron and Searcher UAVs were critically useful for target information, as most of India's aerial surveillance aircraft were either too quick, or vulnerable to enemy missile fire."
You, on the other hand, keep blabbering on and contradicting the air marshall.
I think I will trust the military man over an internat fanboi, especially one without supporting links. Even if we accept your assertion that Israeli satellites were used, it still does not invalidate what the air marshall is saying, and only strengthens my claim that Israel saved your as$ during Kargil.
Just clarify is it anti-Islam or anti-Pakistan.They both are not same. But even then both of these are inconsequential in Indian scheme of thinigs. We have bigger fish to fry.
Israel's agenda is anti-Islam, i.e. anti-Muslim countries. Pakistan is a Muslim country (a subset of Islam) and India-Israel find common ground against Pakistan.
Although seems vinod and you are having a ball out here... there is no anger about pakistans existence... no disrespect to pakistanis, foreign policy of pakistan has always been anti India. what little knowledge I have of history; Idea of pakistan was to create a state for political and administrative representation of muslims which might have been threatened in hindu dominated india. We were fine with that, but you dictators turned pakistan into a non-secular islamic state. You weaponised your self to the teeth since 60's when India was struggling and launched assaults into our country to forcibly take kashmir. That sowed the seed for animosity and not ISLAM.
If pakistan did behave like the younger brother and maintained family relations we would have shed our blood to route out the predator drones from your soil, but you tried to bleed us through thousand cuts so we will remain indifferent to you and your aspirations.
We have decided to go our own way towards social justice and harmony in diversity... the world said 65 years ago india is term like equator not a country. We strived to prove them wrong. We will continue to struggle and strive to bring equality and prosperity among our people.
Pakistani establishment has chosen to be next messiah of ISLAM... you want to take up causes of kashmir..palestine.. indian muslims iraq afghan etc etc thats your own choice...
Oh, I think the cat's out of the bag now. We have gotten a look at the heart of the anti-Pakistan harted ingrained in so many Indians. Many of you are still obsessed with the ancient Islamic conquest, and the more recent partition. It's still an "open wound", meaning it's an open-ended
carte blanche to indulge in anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan hatred. Posts in this thread confirm the mindset, no matter how people try to backtrack and sugar coat it.
Another attempt at back-tracking from you previous post some pages back
you are just amazing.
No backtracking. Just educating you guys about basic logic and English.
Just because the same word "degree" is used in two unrelated sentences doesn't mean it has the same connotation. I use the word "it" in many sentences but it doesn't mean the same thing everywhere. Words are used in context and simply matching up two words in different contexts to try and make something out of it only exposes your desperation to clutch at straws.
Typical Pakistani attempt to grovel before the Chinese. Nothing much to say as this is on full display throughout the forum in all threads.
No grovelling; we have excellent relations with China, much to India's chagrin. Burn baby!
I brought in with the disclaimer "SOME" not all. But you immedaitely generalized those religious nutjobs to be the microcosm of the average Indian Muslim.
The article says "some" and it is reelvant to delve into that question to see how big that "some" could be. It is your assertion that only religious nutjobs would oppose the India-Israel relationship. An unproven assertion.
The average Indian muslim is what you see in this thread placing his national interest above religion.
And yet we are told continually by you guys that we shouldn't generalize a billion people based on posts in the forum. Convenient double talk. But expected from the likes of you.
But I bet this must difficult for a man in whose country most people identify themselves as Muslims rather than Pakistanis and are more Arab than Arabs, more Turk than Turks and more Palestinian than Palestinian themselves.
Yawn. Give it a rest. It was old even before Vinod tried it.
There is much you don't understand, that much is clear.
