What's new

Stray S-200 lands in Cyprus

Pathetic desperate troll.
No need to introduce urself. Everyone knows who u are.

I skipped ur previous debunked lies. Lets concentrate on ur latest lie.

The area used by Israeli planes defined by Russian MOD is 100km wide.
Exact locations of planes are well seen on radar picture:

morf7.1562077161.jpg


Its actually even closer than I showed.

The exact location of active S-200 launchers at that time is unknown.
S-200 locations are well known: Latakia and Homs. Both are well inside the range.

240 km is a theoretical maximum range against low speed targets. Reliable range of S-200 against supersonic manoeuvrable targets is 100-150 km max. Israeli planes were circling at safe distance almost whole time.
No. Thats effective range vs. targets with speed up to 4300 km/h.
Circling plane - thats simplest target possible.
Range was less than 80 km.

Stop making a joke of urself.
 
.
No need to introduce urself. Everyone knows who u are.

I skipped ur previous debunked lies. Lets concentrate on ur latest lie.


Exact locations of planes are well seen on radar picture:

morf7.1562077161.jpg


Its actually even closer than I showed.


S-200 locations are well known: Latakia and Homs. Both are well inside the range.


No. Thats effective range vs. targets with speed up to 4300 km/h.
Circling plane - thats simplest target possible.
Range was less than 80 km.

Stop making a joke of urself.

Pathetic troll, thanks for skipping your previously debunked lies. Moving next.
Radar image shows the planes at specific moment. But planes were moving during one hour over the area 100km wide defined by MOD shown at your own previously posted pic.
Exact location of active and on duty S-200 launchers at that day can be revealed only by Syrian air defence not some photoshop map you found on some trash site.
Effective range of S-200 against supersonic fighters is much lower than maximum range and not much higher than 100km. 240km is the maximum distance S-200 missile can cover and the only way it can hit anything at that range if it follows the perfect ballistic trajectory and will not perform any single manoeuvre. The probability of S-200 hitting F-16 at 240km range or even 200km is near zero. Educate yourself, troll.
 
.
Pathetic troll
Stop introducing urself.

Radar image shows the planes at specific moment.
Yep and according to this image all 4 are located at range less than 80 km from Latakia S-200 (actually less than 70 km). Some are moving towards the S-200 making them super easy target.

Exact location of active and on duty S-200 launchers at that day can be revealed only by Syrian air defence not some photoshop map you found on some trash site.
There are only 3 S-200 locations in Syria: Latakia, Homs and Dumeir. U are unbelievably dumb. Both Latakia and Homs are well within range of F-16s on that radar pic.

Effective range of S-200 against supersonic fighters is much lower than maximum range and not much higher than 100km. 240km is the maximum distance S-200 missile can cover and the only way it can hit anything at that range if it follows the perfect ballistic trajectory and will not perform any single manoeuvre. The probability of S-200 hitting F-16 at 240km range or even 200km is near zero. Educate yourself, troll.
Again you show ur very poor knowledge. Range depends on whether plane moving towards or away from the missile system. Circling indicates low speed. All 4 were well well within the S-200 range. And they circled there for 1 hour according to ur MoD.
 
. .
Did the Syrian air defense systems shoot down any of the missiles? They used to in the past, but checking this time if they did.
 
.
Syria has one of the most capable air defences in the world - much stronger than Pakistani.
Their air force is not weak at all. They have MiG-29 equipped with R-77 missiles.
In addition they get data from Russian forces which includes AWACS too.

With due respect, where was the data from the Russian forces this time? It seems to me Russia is allowing the Israelis to have a free pass
 
.
Tell that joke to those idiots who believe this only to get hyped about Israeli strength.
They have a full spectrum of most modern Russian SAMs:

S-300PMU2
Buk-2M
Pantsir S1/2
Pechora-2M
Igla

Uncounted number of older but still quite capable systems like S-200V, Kvadrat, S-125.
Most modern Russian jamming sistems

In addition they get data and guidance from Russian SAMs and AWACS.

Did the Syrian air defense systems shoot down any of the missiles? They used to in the past, but checking this time if they did.
No.

With due respect, where was the data from the Russian forces this time? It seems to me Russia is allowing the Israelis to have a free pass
Nowhere, Russians did not see anything either.
 
.
They have a full spectrum of most modern Russian SAMs:

S-300PMU2
Buk-2M
Pantsir S1/2
Pechora-2M
Igla

Uncounted number of older but still quite capable systems like S-200V, Kvadrat, S-125.
Most modern Russian jamming sistems

In addition they get data and guidance from Russian SAMs and AWACS.


No.


Nowhere, Russians did not see anything either.

Sorry to disappoint you. They dont have any single most modern Russian SAM. All their SAMs are already outdated 20 years old or older. No jamming systems. Their radars dont see any low flying objects 30 km away. The number of radars and short-range missile systems is extremely low. Almost zero defence against multiple cruise missile attacks. Flying around and firing missiles into empty buildings while being out of range of Syrian SAM doesnt require any effort. Of course if you are at least competent enough to avoid 50 year old S-200 with most modern US jets.
 
.
They have a full spectrum of most modern Russian SAMs:

No.

I wasn't expecting you to say yes and wouldn't take your word for it. I'm trying to get a response from others who are very familiar with the situation and who are not Israeli supporters.
 
.
Sorry to disappoint you. They dont have any single most modern Russian SAM. All their SAMs are already outdated 20 years old or older.
You are such a pathetic liar. All systems I listed are new. Pantsir S2 appeared just recently and is a minor modification of S1.

No jamming systems.
SHoigu claimed that they will supply jamming systems.

Their radars dont see any low flying objects 30 km away.
If you put radar at mountain it can see low flying objects at hundreds kms.

The number of radars and short-range missile systems is extremely low.
They have 36 Pantsirs and 18 Buk M2. Its enough top cover Damascus and Latakia area several times.

Almost zero defence against multiple cruise missile attacks.
See above. And good that u admitted that Russian MoD lied about 70 shot down cruise missiles.

Its amazing that every time u open ur mouth u lie.
 
.
Sorry to disappoint you. They dont have any single most modern Russian SAM. All their SAMs are already outdated 20 years old or older. No jamming systems. Their radars dont see any low flying objects 30 km away. The number of radars and short-range missile systems is extremely low. Almost zero defence against multiple cruise missile attacks. Flying around and firing missiles into empty buildings while being out of range of Syrian SAM doesnt require any effort. Of course if you are at least competent enough to avoid 50 year old S-200 with most modern US jets.

Russia should be doing more for Syria when it comes to Israeli provocations. As I understand it, Russia helped Syria to rebel the rebel groups and ISIS from overrunning the govt positions; however, when it comes to Israel, Russia looks at the other way. So with constant Israeli bombings against Syria, Russia doesn't fully equip nor fully train the Syrian air defense personnel.
 
.
Syria should purchase an updated defence system from China because Russia is not willing to upset the current status quo.

Lease China a port for 5years and watch the goodies come.
 
.
18 Buk M2
well , do you consider BUK-M2 a system designed to engage low flying threat like SDB or small missile like Delilah ?
the only thing they have is Pantsir and 30 or so of it is nowhere enough to cover Syria.
also does Syria have a modern RADAR system cover the country and can be networked with all the system you mentioned ?
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom