Stealthy J-10C confirmed

[Edevelop]

just like Rafale and Super MKI, both belongs to same category dear.

@Topic.
It must be the Carrier based J-10X. V shaped tail, twin engine bird.

Have a look at the one that says FC-20.
Didn't we order like 36 of these?
If its the name 'FC-20' we keep saying we will purchase, then to me it looks like the one that is a derivative of J-10B with conformal fuel tanks and is dual seat version.

 

[S-A-B-E-R->]

Have a look at the one that says FC-20.
Didn't we order like 36 of these?
If its the name 'FC-20' we keep saying we will purchase, then to me it looks like the one that is a derivative of J-10B with conformal fuel tanks and is dual seat version.

actually that is frm the time when we wanted it with KLJ10 now i guss nothing less than AESA (look at the nose cone)

 

[Edevelop]

actually that is frm the time when we wanted it with KLJ10 now i guss nothing less than AESA (look at the nose cone)

So wait i don't get it. Are we in favour of AESA or not?
I think the plan would be to have AESA in JF-17 Blk 2 because it will be cheaper.
Since our order could go upto 150 for FC-20, 36 of the ones we ordered for the time being may not be AESA...

 

[Akasa]

lollz u should post the link not the website..

Right, because you clearly don't have enough logic to click on the link that said Fighter Jets.

But anyways, Chinese Military Aviation | China Air Force

---------- Post added at 10:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 AM ----------

That's a huge exaggeration don't you think? From what I've seen Huitong is simply a good speculator, he doesn't appear to have the scoop on any insider information. Besides, he doesn't actually quote a source, it's simply a speculation that it MIGHT be under development. Here is what he actually says...



Chinese Military Aviation | China Air Force

I wasn't referring to Huitong. I was talking about the various insiders. They have been correct so far as far as details are concerned.

 

[rcrmj]

At least we make our own planes whereas you guys beg, borrow, and steal technology and call it your's! Sheeesh! Nuff said!

That's why no one takes Indian seriously, btw where did you get the paint for LCA?

 

[Pak47]

You can't just make a stealth aircraft unless you start from scratch.. RCS will be reduced and its an upgrade from J10b to j10c kinda like jf-17 block 2 to block 3.

 

[yyetttt]

J-10C and J-20 and J-21! China has got it going!

 

[rcrmj]

Calm down friend, any photos leaked, until then just speculation

 

[AADHAAR]

That's why no one takes Indian seriously, btw where did you get the paint for LCA?

it is called hiding your inferiority under mocking. excessive torture under CPC is taking your senses away.

in fact what could you achieve even in 1962 .... you failed to takeover even an unmanned border enclave.

ran back picking up your tail

you can keep trying your series of junks ... junk-10, junk-20, junk-30, junk-40.

nothing but self delusion.... sorry.

 

[Zarvan]

Huitong is saying that a semi stealth J-10C is being built

Is it the same plane which Pakistan will built along with China as partner for as its future Stealth Plane

 

[帅的一匹]

At least we make our own planes whereas you guys beg, borrow, and steal technology and call it your's! Sheeesh! Nuff said!

The most stupid excuse i'd ever heard in my life.

 

[marshall]

I wasn't referring to Huitong. I was talking about the various insiders. They have been correct so far as far as details are concerned.

Considering the J-20 and J-16/21 (whatever it will be called) will be the frontline stealth fighters, what purpose would a stealth J-10C serve especially given that it would still not have internal weapons bays? Doesn't seem to make sense and sounds like vaporware to me. It's much more likely the J-10B will simply evolve to a lower RCS similar to the Eurofighter and Rafale.

 

[yyetttt]

How about something like this?

stealty J-10C has external weapons?

 

[Nishan_101]

How about something like this?

Is there any Chinese fighter for their next carrier program?

 

[Nishan_101]

It would be more like that.