What's new

Sri Lanka government orders removal of Dambulla mosque

Indians caught red handed trying to create friction between Buddhists and Muslims. Again divide and rule. Muslims and Buddhists of the world should unite against Hindu Nationalist and Brahmin supremacists.

You seriously seem to have lost it. I can understand since most of our kind were exterminated from your country post partition so you don't know our history. Don't you try talking on behalf of my community. A little hint: You and we were never friends and can never be. We share our kinship with the Hindus which you can never understand. Don't try to make it something you don't understand.

Post reported for needless trolling and digressing the thread.

temples like tripathi sabrimala puri jagnath temple palani temple were once buddhist temple.they were taken by hindus .

Are you used to talking trash out of ignorance or is it because you're like that? :what:
 
Buddhism being probably the only fashionable religion in the west this show of intolerance comes as unexpected.

The mosque should be relocated...Have visited the temple..Mosque seems a bit out of place there...
A cricket stadium is no less out of place.
 
Lord buddha is 9th incarnation of lord Vishnu
. All incarnation is equally respected in hinduism.

Unlike Islam which belief to follow only last prophet, hindus are free to follow any incarnation of vishnu, be is lord ram, krishna or buddha.

This respect was never enough to stop wholesale persecution and forced conversion.
 
This respect was never enough to stop wholesale persecution and forced conversion.

Is that what your madrassas teach you? I know you can't question the local mulla in your place but you and communists have a lot in common; both eradicate history and fabricate their own to forward their "cause". You lot are the reason why we Buddhists were wiped out.

We were always the safest among Hindus and Sikhs and will continue to be with our spiritual brothers rather than your types that have no place in this part of the world and still came in through brute force and disregard for local way of life.

read this ambedkar.org/Tirupati/

Dude, Ambedkar was a joker. He was a fake Buddhist who screwed up our entire community's image with his drivel. He wrote the constitution of India but unfortunately tried to be anti-Hindu with his nonsense. He conveniently forgot to add all those battles in which Buddhist protectorates were preserved by mainstream Hindu kings. Buddhism was a form of sainthood for mainstream Hindus. Visit Southeast today and you will see that it is prevalent even now.

Don't compare that liberal/secular/anti-dharmic wannabe clown with rest of us Buddhists.
 
dont you can the real father of nation a joker.what do you know about ambedkar you are stupid.do you know who the real buddhist are? do you know how many buddhist were massacred by hindu kings?what do you know about history?.the term hindu was coined only in 17 th century by britishers.before that saivam and vaishnavam were two sects in hinduism
you are idiot dont you know basic of hinduism and buddhism
hinduism is based on brahminism which is based on caste.but buddhisim was against caste system.if caste is destroyed hinduism will be destroyed.
sakyans are orginal buddhist ashoka and buddha belonged to sakya clan.that is why buddha is called as SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.

he does not belong to kshtriya jathi as said by hindus.sakyans
were republic.

Lord buddha is 9th incarnation of lord Vishnu is idiotic.the vishnavities follow vaishnavam.this said by swami viveknanda

Buddhism and Vaishnavism are not two
different things. During the decline of Buddhism in India,
Hinduism took from her a few cardinal tenets of conduct and
made them her own, and these have now come to be known as
Vaishnavism." SWAMY VIVEKANANDA
 
.do you know who the real buddhist are? do you know how many buddhist were massacred by hindu kings?what do you know about history?.

Same old Pushyamitra Sunga BS.

Do you know history ? Do you know why Buddhism and Jainism lost out to Hinduism in India ?

Atleast do you know why they lost to Shaivism in Tamil Nadu ?

Let me tell you the answer - Buddhism which set to out to cure Hinduism of a certain malaise called Brahmanism became afflicted with the same thing. The viharas became centers of political power and the monks started venturing out of the spiritual realm and concentrated on political issues. Corruption became rampant and at the time the Shaivite saints started a renaissance and people left the fold of Buddhism and went back to Hinduism. Even the Kings started patronising Shaivism (it was at that time the Pallava period was declining and the Cholas were in a resurgence). The real Buddhists in India are the ones in the North East. Not the ambedkarite neo-buddhists who are just wannabes and there for political power.

Stop your distorted marxist propaganda BS packaged as history.
 
hahaha whar are you saying? corruption political powers are you in todays world.it was in 7th century.it was kings world the masses follows kings order wthere buddhisim or hinduism people followed their kings faith.untill 7th century buddhisim and jainism were predominant religion in south india.it was after adhi shankarachary that hinduism gained momemtum.
do you know bodhidharma was a pallava king.
the raise of hinduism was because of sankaracharya and fox mind brahminsm nothing above than that.
the brahmins influnced the kings after the fall of buddhist kalaparayar dynasty.
 
The real Buddhists in India are the sakyans not the mongoloids nort east indians.sakyans are mauryans who ruled whole of india
satyawana kalaparar are dynasty in south india which was of sakya clan
 
Do you feel the last pic is a 50 yrs old "mosques" ? or it's just a newly build hut?
Anyway if this is a legal building in that area then they can go to court.

Skyline is correct. kobiraaz bhai, just look at that mosque, it looks like a new structure. It has no historical value whatsoever and can easily be moved if needed.
 
The real Buddhists in India are the sakyans not the mongoloids nort east indians.sakyans are mauryans who ruled whole of india
satyawana kalaparar are dynasty in south india which was of sakya clan

Real buddhists can be anyone but the dalit political groups which use Buddhism for politics. There are much more pressing issues for the dalit leaders to deal with than involving in religious politics.
 
The Raw and Tamil umma created, armed and trained the LTTE with revolutionary technique such as suicide bombing. See your fellow Hindu brothers in arms cried a river when LTTE was removed for good. Your TN politicians are threatening SL with dire consequences over its internal affairs.

Now what was that you were saying about the internal thingy ?

There is nothing called a Ummaa like urs...
Tamil race is strictly secular...
Even the Ltte were secular, not like u guys...

Skyline is correct. kobiraaz bhai, just look at that mosque, it looks like a new structure. It has no historical value whatsoever and can easily be moved if needed.

If its the saame happened in india, the posts will be in reverse..
 
hahaha whar are you saying? corruption political powers are you in todays world.it was in 7th century.it was kings world the masses follows kings order wthere buddhisim or hinduism people followed their kings faith.untill 7th century buddhisim and jainism were predominant religion in south india.it was after adhi shankarachary that hinduism gained momemtum.
do you know bodhidharma was a pallava king.
the raise of hinduism was because of sankaracharya and fox mind brahminsm nothing above than that.
the brahmins influnced the kings after the fall of buddhist kalaparayar dynasty.

Thank you for your posts. I have always wondered about this part of Indian history. Do you want to open a thread about this or is it ok if I open one. The topic will be: Decline of Buddhism in India.

In Southeastern part of Bangladesh, Chittagong, we have two groups of Buddhist, one is Tibeto Burman looking Chakma-Tanchangya and then there is Bengali Barua's, many of whom I have worked with and were good friends of mine. Do you know anything about Barua's and their origin?
 
temples like tripathi sabrimala puri jagnath temple palani temple were once buddhist temple.they were taken by hindus .

I think u r dumb....
In TN, tripathi was considered as a temple for lord murugan first..
Then history states, that king might have modified it, after becoming a devotee of Lord vishnu....
Sabarimala, palani are buddhist?
Are u nuts or what?
Palani has its world famous idol made by boghar, a chinese monk who had converted to hinduism....

hahaha whar are you saying? corruption political powers are you in todays world.it was in 7th century.it was kings world the masses follows kings order wthere buddhisim or hinduism people followed their kings faith.untill 7th century buddhisim and jainism were predominant religion in south india.it was after adhi shankarachary that hinduism gained momemtum.
do you know bodhidharma was a pallava king.
the raise of hinduism was because of sankaracharya and fox mind brahminsm nothing above than that.
the brahmins influnced the kings after the fall of buddhist kalaparayar dynasty.

Adi sankararcharya along with many saints saiver, upper, bought about the change....
Heard about the famous story of pallava king who had converted to jainism, suffered with stomach pain?
Saiver asked to pray to shiva, on which immediately the pains stopped...
They bought about the change in hinduism, and these saints didnt believe in caste systems...
Adi sankararcharya travelled all over india, and won various debates with buddhist and jainist scholars, which eventually nailed the end of buddhism...
And when cholas came to power, buddhism was complete...


And in no meaning, buddhist never followed strict religious procedures in india...
They followed it, along with local hindu cultures and festivals... So when Bhakti movement started, buddhism was complete, and suring the cholas buddhism was over...
Even sufi islam growed that way in the sub continent...
 
Back
Top Bottom