What's new

South China Sea Forum

Wasted or not, 20,000 tons of TNT were dropped in Ha Noi and Haiphong by 200 B-52 bombers and 2000 fighters and that did not even shoke us. Your airforce don't even come anywhere close to the air power of America, rookie.

If it is the 20000 tons of TNT with high precision, your army would already be toasted.

The US has developed the GPS right after the Vietnam War because they thought that their previous war tactics weren't efficient enough.

Your type 99 will be shooting targets for our RPG-29. We produce those en masse. Good luck trying to move those tanks across the terrain of Lao Cai, Ha Giang, Cao Bang, and Lang Son

China doesn't need to send its tank troops to fight Vietnam, all China needs to do is to bomb you with missiles and drones, no casualty at all.
 
. .
If it is the 20000 tons of TNT with high precision, your army would already be toasted.

The US has developed the GPS right after the Vietnam War because they thought that their previous war tactics weren't efficient enough.
20,000 tons of TNT were dropped with resulted in 1300 civilians casualties; that's pretty accurate there bunny. 20k TONS of TNT were designed to hit both civilian and miitary targets; not a moving column of army personnels

If it is the 20000 tons of TNT with high precision, your army would already be toasted.

The US has developed the GPS right after the Vietnam War because they thought that their previous war tactics weren't efficient enough.



China doesn't need to send its tank troops to fight Vietnam, all China needs to do is to bomb you with missiles and drones, no casualty at all.
missiles and drones? So scary.....I guess this time your missiles and drones will delivered a combined more than 20,000 tons of TNT in just two cities of Ha Noi and Hai Phong...............I'm running now
 
.
20,000 tons of TNT were dropped with resulted in 1300 civilians casualties; that's pretty accurate there bunny. 20k TONS of TNT were designed to hit both civilian and miitary targets; not a moving column of army personnels

That's why you will return to the guerrilla warfare tactics when fighting against PLA.

PLA will first blow all your air force and navy away, then you would have no choice but to go back and hide in the tunnel.

But PLA has no interest to occupy your land, but best option is to bomb your land and to make you suffering.
 
.
Your type 99 will be shooting targets for our RPG-29. We produce those en masse. Good luck trying to move those tanks across the terrain of Lao Cai, Ha Giang, Cao Bang, and Lang Son
I am sorry to tell you that plz arrive north of Yangtze River first, then you maybe can see Type 99:rofl:

Ps :We destroy your Air Force and navy don't need Type 99:rofl::omghaha:
 
.
That's why you will return to the guerrilla warfare tactics when fighting against PLA.

PLA will first blow all your air force and navy away, then you would have no choice but to go back and hide in the tunnel.

But PLA has no interest to occupy your land, but best option is to bomb your land and to make you suffering.
You talk a lot of xhit but your airforce does not even come close anywhere to the U.S in 1972 (200 B-52 bombers and 2000 fighters). At best you can launch a few missiles and us. Any land war with us we will toast you with ease.
 
.
missiles and drones? So scary.....I guess this time your missiles and drones will delivered a combined more than 20,000 tons of TNT in just two cities of Ha Noi and Hai Phong...............I'm running now
Kid,destroy your airport and harbor don't need so much TNT.:omghaha:

You talk a lot of xhit but your airforce does not even come close anywhere to the U.S in 1972 (200 B-52 bombers and 2000 fighters). At best you can launch a few missiles and us. Any land war with us we will toast you with ease.
We just get back Islands of nansha why need land war?:rofl:
 
.
What a joke. In 11 days of air attack from America in 1972, they mustered 200 B-52 bombers and 2000 fixed wing fighters to drop 20,000 TNT on Ha Noi and Hai Phong and it did not even break us. Now you are talking about some ballistic missiles that can break our backs? Get out of here rookie

Your friend was jacking off to some fantasy of conquering Hainan with scud missles.

I think war between VN-China soon will break out again if China dont return our islands. As long as US commit Not to side with China to attack VN like in 1979, Im sure China will taste our steel punch soon

China citizen had better evacuate out of Hai Nan island from now :coffee:

U should ask urself why VN still control the largest part of Spratly when we just have "poor Mig-21 and Su-22" :whistle:

Your pathetic nation whines and complains every time Taiwan holds a live fire drill on Taiping island, the largest Spratly island and the only one with a freshwater supply. (Not the sh1tty brakish water on your island). You also control ZERO percent of the paracels

Taiwan to hold live-fire drill in Spratlys - InterAksyon.com
 
.
You talk a lot of xhit but your airforce does not even come close anywhere to the U.S in 1972 (200 B-52 bombers and 2000 fighters). At best you can launch a few missiles and us. Any land war with us we will toast you with ease.

China's modern multi-dimentional warfare is far more deadly than the US military capability in the 1970s.

Having more outdated bombers and fighters mean nothing, the US in the WWII had even larger number of air force, but does this mean they were more powerful?

Today's warfare is not just aircraft vs aircraft, warship vs warship.

China's global systems will provide an incredible high efficient command and accuracy. It is multi-dimensional; second artillery + air force + navy + army + information warfare to fight you simultaneously.

Against a highly modernized army such as PLA, your outcome won't be much better than Saddam Hussein's army in the first Gulf War.
 
.
China's modern multi-dimentional warfare is far more deadly than the US military capability in the 1970s.

Having more outdated bombers and fighters mean nothing, the US in the WWII had even larger number of air force, but does this mean they were more powerful?

Today's warfare is not just aircraft vs aircraft, warship vs warship.

China's global systems will provide an incredible high efficient command and accuracy. It is multi-dimensional; second artillery + air force + navy + army + information warfare to fight you simultaneously.

Against a highly modernized army such as PLA, your outcome won't be much better than Saddam Hussein's army in the first Gulf War.
So scary but we still do not consider you anywhere close to the U.S in 1972. Your airforce comes no where close to the U.S in delivering 20k TONS of TNT on us. Your missiles come no where close to delivering 20K tons of TNT on us either. If there is a war between you and us, the outcome won't be much better than the 1979 war

Your friend was jacking off to some fantasy of conquering Hainan with scud missles.





Your pathetic nation whines and complains every time Taiwan holds a live fire drill on Taiping island, the largest Spratly island and the only one with a freshwater supply. (Not the sh1tty brakish water on your island). You also control ZERO percent of the paracels

Taiwan to hold live-fire drill in Spratlys - InterAksyon.com
You retard, Viet Nam control the Truong Sa Lon island that also has fresh water
 
.
China's modern multi-dimentional warfare is far more deadly than the US military capability in the 1970s.

Having more outdated bombers and fighters mean nothing, the US in the WWII had even larger number of air force, but does this mean they were more powerful?

Today's warfare is not just aircraft vs aircraft, warship vs warship.

China's global systems will provide an incredible high efficient command and accuracy. It is multi-dimensional; second artillery + air force + navy + army + information warfare to fight you simultaneously.

Against a highly modernized army such as PLA, your outcome won't be much better than Saddam Hussein's army in the first Gulf War.

don't cry again, useless PLA.

th


Your friend was jacking off to some fantasy of conquering Hainan with scud missles.





Your pathetic nation whines and complains every time Taiwan holds a live fire drill on Taiping island, the largest Spratly island and the only one with a freshwater supply. (Not the sh1tty brakish water on your island). You also control ZERO percent of the paracels

Taiwan to hold live-fire drill in Spratlys - InterAksyon.com

we can take back in any time, kid.
 
.
So scary but we still do not consider you anywhere close to the U.S in 1972. Your airforce comes no where close to the U.S in delivering 20k TONS of TNT on us. Your missiles come no where close to delivering 20K tons of TNT on us either. If there is a war between you and us, the outcome won't be much better than the 1979 war
:rofl:Foolish boy .

Again,Clear your Air Force and navy don't need land war and drop TNT on your head.

If you like land war,attack yunnan and guangxi Plz.
There are hundred tanks can be shoot:rofl::omghaha:
 
.
So scary but we still do not consider you anywhere close to the U.S in 1972. Your airforce comes no where close to the U.S in delivering 20k TONS of TNT on us. Your missiles come no where close to delivering 20K tons of TNT on us either. If there is a war between you and us, the outcome won't be much better than the 1979 war


You retard, Viet Nam control the Truong Sa Lon island that also has fresh water

Again, this is the modern warfare, don't stick in the past.

The 1970s had no modern warfare.

The modern US army has smaller number of army and nukes compared to the 1970s, but do you think that you can face them again?
 
.
Again, this is the modern warfare, don't stick in the past.

The 1970s had no modern warfare.

The modern US army has smaller number of army and nukes compared to the 1970s, but do you think that you can face them again?
Modern warfare involves a lot of electronic countermeasure which your side has ZERO experience in while we had plenty of.

Your military does not come close to the U.S so don't compare them to you. We dealt with the U.S when our servicemen did not even have any experience of modern warfare back in the 60's so you think we'll fare worse than a mediocre average joe military like yours in 2014? Damn, we must be drinking and sleeping in the past 50 years.

We do not even consider your supa bowa air bowa to be anythiing close to being a threat. I've said this before, $5 billion USD we put into buying 6 submarines and building their infrastructures could have put into S-300, BukM2, TorM2 missile systems but we did not do that. Simply put, we don't consider your air bowa as a threat.

I've said this before and will say this again, if you try anything like the 1979 land incursion again we will make you look like a third-rated military bowa pretty quick.
 
.
Modern warfare involves a lot of electronic countermeasure which your side has ZERO experience in while we had plenty of.

Your military does not come close to the U.S so don't compare them to you. We dealt with the U.S when our servicemen did not even have any experience of modern warfare back in the 60's so you think we'll fare worse than a mediocre average joe military like yours in 2014? Damn, we must be drinking and sleeping in the past 50 years.

We do not even consider your supa bowa air bowa to be anythiing close to being a threat. I've said this before, $5 billion USD we put into buying 6 submarines and building their infrastructures could have put into S-300, BukM2, TorM2 missile systems but we did not do that. Simply put, we don't consider your air bowa as a threat.

I've said this before and will say this again, if you try anything like the 1979 land incursion again we will make you look like a third-rated military bowa pretty quick.

This is the biggest joke of the century.

BTW, US now comes right after China for its Asia-Pacific Pivot, because they even view you guys as a worthless opponent.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom